CT und MRT der Leber: wann, was, warum?

Imaging Features of Main Hepatic Resections: The Radiologist Challenging

Liver resection is still the most effective treatment of primary liver malignancies, including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), and of metastatic disease, such as colorectal liver metastases. The type of liver resection (anatomic versus non anatomic resection) depends on different features, mainly on the type of malignancy (primary liver neoplasm versus metastatic lesion), size of tumor, its relation with blood and biliary vessels, and the volume of future liver remnant (FLT). Imaging plays a critical role in postoperative assessment, offering the possibility to recognize normal postoperative findings and potential complications. Ultrasonography (US) is the first-line diagnostic tool to use in post-surgical phase. However, computed tomography (CT), due to its comprehensive assessment, allows for a more accurate evaluation and more normal findings than the possible postoperative complications. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and/or hepatospecific contrast agents remains the best tool for bile duct injuries diagnosis and for ischemic cholangitis evaluation. Consequently, radiologists should be familiar with the surgical approaches for a better comprehension of normal postoperative findings and of postoperative complications.

Combined Hepatocellular-Cholangiocarcinoma: What the Multidisciplinary Team Should Know

Combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA) is a rare type of primary liver malignancy. Among the risk factors, hepatitis B and hepatitis C virus infections, cirrhosis, and male gender are widely reported. The clinical appearance of cHCC-CCA is similar to that of HCC and iCCA and it is usually silent until advanced states, causing a delay of diagnosis. Diagnosis is mainly based on histology from biopsies or surgical specimens. Correct pre-surgical diagnosis during imaging studies is very problematic and is due to the heterogeneous characteristics of the lesion in imaging, with overlapping features of HCC and CCA. The predominant histological subtype within the lesion establishes the predominant imaging findings. Therefore, in this scenario, the radiological findings characteristic of HCC show an overlap with those of CCA. Since cHCC-CCAs are prevalent in patients at high risk of HCC and there is a risk that these may mimic HCC, it is currently difficult to see a non-invasive diagnosis of HCC. Surgery is the only curative treatment of HCC-CCA. The role of liver transplantation (LT) in the treatment of cHCC-CCA remains controversial, as is the role of ablative or systemic therapies in the treatment of this tumour. These lesions still remain challenging, both in diagnosis and in the treatment phase. Therefore, a pre-treatment imaging diagnosis is essential, as well as the identification of prognostic factors that could stratify the risk of recurrence and the most adequate therapy according to patient characteristics.

Speeding up the clinical routine: Compressed sensing for 2D imaging of lumbar spine disc herniation

PURPOSE

Increasing economic pressure and patient demands for comfort require an ever-increasing acceleration of scan times without compromising diagnostic certainty. This study tested the new acceleration technique Compressed SENSE (CS-SENSE) as well as different reconstruction methods for the lumbar spine.

METHODS

In this prospective study, 10 volunteers and 14 patients with lumbar disc herniation were scanned using a sagittal 2D T2 turbo spin echo (TSE) sequence applying different acceleration factors of SENSE and CS-SENSE. Gradient echo (GRE), autocalibration (CS-Auto) and TSE prescans were tested for reconstruction. Images were analysed by two readers regarding anatomical delineation, diagnostic certainty (for patients only) and image quality as well as objectively calculating the root mean square error (RMSE), structural similarity index (SSIM), SNR and CNR. The Friedman test and Chi-squared were used for ordinal, ANOVA for repeated measurements and Tukey Kramer test for continuous data. Cohen's kappawas calculated for interreader reliability.

RESULTS

CS-SENSE outperformed SENSE and CS-Auto regarding RMSE (e.g. CS-SENSE 1.5: 43.03 ± 11.64 versus SENSE 1.5: 80.41 ± 17.66; p = 0.0038) and SSIM as well as in the subjective rating for CS-SENSE 3 TSE. In the patient setting image quality was unchanged in all subjective criteria up to CS-SENSE 3 TSE (all p > 0.05) compared to standard T2 with 43 % less scan time while the GRE prescan only allowed a reduction of 32 %.

CONCLUSION

Combining a TSE prescan with CS-SENSE enables significant scan time reductions with unchanged ratings for lumbar spine disc herniation making this superior to the currently used SENSE acceleration or GRE reconstructions.