[Radiologic diagnosis of pathologic fractures]

Pathological Fractures in Benign Bone Lesions - Diagnosis and Therapy

INTRODUCTION

Most tumour-related pathological fractures occur in patients with bone metastases. However, in mostly younger patients, a pathological fracture can be due to both a benign or a malignant bone tumour. Making the correct diagnosis from among these two differential diagnoses is enormously important. If the tumour is malignant, treating the fracture inevitably leads to tumour cell contamination and can significantly worsen the oncological situation. The aim of this review article is firstly to provide the reader with diagnostic assistance in the case of suspected pathological fractures, and secondly to focus on the treatment of pathological fractures occurring with benign bone tumours.

METHODS

This is a non-systematic review of the diagnosis and treatment of pathological fractures in benign bone tumours or tumour-like lesions, based on an electronic PubMed database search. We also present our own procedures, in particular for ruling out a malignant bone tumour.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Whenever a fracture occurs in the absence of sufficient traumatic force, the possibility of a pathological fracture should always be considered. As well as taking a general history for a possible primary tumour, it is particularly important to ask the patient whether they had any pain before the fracture occurred. If the findings from clinical examination or conventional radiological imaging give rise to suspicion of a pathological fracture, an MRI of the affected skeletal section with contrast medium should be carried out before commencing any fracture treatment. A CT scan is also helpful for accurately assessing bone destruction. If a malignant or locally aggressive benign bone tumour such as giant cell tumour (GCT) or aneurysmal bone cyst (ABC) cannot be definitively ruled out through imaging, a biopsy is essential. The bone biopsy must always be carried out on the assumption that the histological work-up will reveal a malignant bone tumour; it must therefore be performed according to strict oncological criteria. If the radiological diagnosis is unambiguous, e. g., a juvenile bone cyst (JBC) or a non-ossifying fibroma (NOF), conservative treatment of the fracture can be considered, depending on the location. In the presence of a locally aggressive benign bone tumour such as a GCT or ABC, curettage of the tumour must be carried out as well as treating the fracture. With GCT in particular, neoadjuvant therapy with denosumab prior to curettage and osteosynthesis or en bloc resection of the tumour should be considered, depending on the extent of the tumour.

CONCLUSION

Pathological fractures, especially in younger patients, should not be overlooked. Only after a malignant or benign locally aggressive bone tumour has been definitively ruled out should fracture treatment be performed. In the presence of a locally aggressive bone tumour, as well as treating the fracture, it is usually necessary to perform curettage of the tumour - also en bloc resection, where applicable, in the case of a GCT. Depending on the location, benign, non-aggressive tumours can be treated conservatively if necessary.

Undiagnosed Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures in an Octogenarian During the Coronavirus Disease Pandemic

Osteoporotic vertebral fractures are frequently misdiagnosed or under-recognized in the older population, leading to disease progression and reduced quality of life. This case of an 87-year-old woman with acute back pain highlights the importance of early diagnosis and management of fragility fractures. During the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, patients with a history of well-managed osteoporosis experienced worsening symptoms of vertebral collapse due to activity limitations and prolonged immobilization. The initial diagnosis of spinal stenosis delayed appropriate treatment for four months. Serial magnetic resonance imaging revealed compression fractures at L1 and L3, and a dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry scan showed osteoporosis with a T-score of -3.2. Pharmacological therapy, including bisphosphonates, was initiated. A comprehensive rehabilitation program with a multidisciplinary approach, with bracing, and lifestyle changes helped stabilize the spine, reduce pain, and maximized function. Her condition improved with close monitoring and guidance during home exercises. This case exemplifies the necessity of a precise and timely diagnosis of osteoporotic vertebral fractures to initiate management and mitigate disease progression.

[Radiological aspects in the diagnostics of pathological fractures]

Radiological diagnostics play a key role in the identification and assessment of pathological fractures. Conventional projection radiography is still the mainstay of imaging investigations. With knowledge of the patient history, the morphology and location of a fracture as well as concomitant findings, such as osteolysis or periosteal reactions can add valuable information on the origin of the fracture. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the imaging modality of choice for the local diagnostic work-up as it provides insights into the medullary cavity and visualizes potential extraosseous tumor tissue in the fracture zone. Computed tomography (CT) imaging provides valuable information on the morphological features of fractures and is useful for the planning of the surgical approach. Furthermore, it is the modality of choice for whole-body staging. In most cases of pathological fractures without a history of malignancy, a biopsy and histological work-up is recommended.