[Imaging of the lung using low-field magnetic resonance imaging]

Initial experience with a next-generation low-field MRI scanner: Potential for breast imaging?

PURPOSE

Broader clinical adoption of breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) faces challenges such as limited availability and high procedural costs. Low-field technology has shown promise in addressing these challenges. We report our initial experience using a next-generation scanner for low-field breast MRI at 0.55T.

METHODS

This initial cases series was part of an institutional review board-approved prospective study using a 0.55T scanner (MAGNETOM Free.Max, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen/Germany: height < 2 m, weight < 3.2 tons, no quench pipe) equipped with a seven-channel breast coil (Noras, Höchberg/Germany). A multiparametric breast MRI protocol consisting of dynamic T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and diffusion-weighted sequences was optimized for 0.55T. Two radiologists with 12 and 20 years of experience in breast MRI evaluated the examinations.

RESULTS

Twelve participants (mean age: 55.3 years, range: 36-78 years) were examined. The image quality was diagnostic in all examinations and not impaired by relevant artifacts. Typical imaging phenotypes were visualized. The scan time for a complete, non-abbreviated breast MRI protocol ranged from 10:30 to 18:40 min.

CONCLUSION

This initial case series suggests that low-field breast MRI is feasible at diagnostic image quality within an acceptable examination time.

Comparison of vestibular schwannoma visualization between 0.55 T and 1.5 T MRI

OBJECTIVES

Vestibular schwannoma (VS) is the most common mass of the internal auditory canal (IAC) and is responsible for unilateral sensorineural hearing loss. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 1.5 T and 3 T is the standard of care for the evaluation of VS, and the feasibility of using modern low-field MRI for imaging of the IAC has not yet been elucidated. Hence, the purpose of this prospective study was to assess image quality and diagnostic performance of a modern 0.55 T MRI.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty-six patients with known unilateral VS underwent routine MRI of the IAC at 1.5 T, followed immediately by 0.55 T MRI. Two radiologists independently evaluated the image quality, conspicuity of VS, diagnostic confidence, and image artifacts separately for isotropic T2-weighted SPACE images and for transversal and coronal T1-weighted fat-saturated contrast-enhanced images at 1.5 T and 0.55 T using 5-point Likert scales. In a second independent reading, both readers assessed lesion conspicuity and subjective diagnostic confidence in a direct comparison of 1.5 T and 0.55 T images.

RESULTS

Image quality of transversal T1-weighted images (p = 0.13 and p = 0.16 for Reader 1 and Reader 2, respectively) and T2-weighted SPACE images (p = 0.39 and p = 0.58) were rated equally at 1.5 T and 0.55 T by both readers, whereas image quality of coronal T1-weighted images was superior at 1.5 T (p = 0.009 and p = 0.001). Analysis of the conspicuity of VS, diagnostic confidence, and image artifacts of all sequences revealed no significant differences between 1.5 T and 0.55 T. In the direct comparison of 1.5 T with 0.55 T images, there were no significant differences in lesion conspicuity or diagnostic confidence for any sequence (p = 0.60-0.73).

CONCLUSIONS

Modern low-field MRI at 0.55 T provided a sufficient diagnostic image quality and seems feasible for the evaluation of VS of the IAC.

Ventilation and perfusion MRI at a 0.35 T MR-Linac: feasibility and reproducibility study

BACKGROUND

Hybrid devices that combine radiation therapy and MR-imaging have been introduced in the clinical routine for the treatment of lung cancer. This opened up not only possibilities in terms of accurate tumor tracking, dose delivery and adapted treatment planning, but also functional lung imaging. The aim of this study was to show the feasibility of Non-uniform Fourier Decomposition (NuFD) MRI at a 0.35 T MR-Linac as a potential treatment response assessment tool, and propose two signal normalization strategies for enhancing the reproducibility of the results.

METHODS

Ten healthy volunteers (median age 28 ± 8 years, five female, five male) were repeatedly scanned at a 0.35 T MR-Linac using an optimized 2D+t balanced steady-state free precession (bSSFP) sequence for two coronal slice positions. Image series were acquired in normal free breathing with breaks inside and outside the scanner as well as deep and shallow breathing. Ventilation- and perfusion-weighted maps were generated for each image series using NuFD. For intra-volunteer ventilation map reproducibility, a normalization factor was defined based on the linear correlation of the ventilation signal and diaphragm position of each scan as well as the diaphragm motion amplitude of a reference scan. This allowed for the correction of signal dependency on the diaphragm motion amplitude, which varies with breathing patterns. The second strategy, which can be used for ventilation and perfusion, eliminates the dependency on the signal amplitude by normalizing the ventilation/perfusion maps with the average ventilation/perfusion signal within a selected region-of-interest (ROI). The position and size dependency of this ROI was analyzed. To evaluate the performance of both approaches, the normalized ventilation/perfusion-weighted maps were compared and the deviation of the mean ventilation/perfusion signal from the reference was calculated for each scan. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were performed to test whether the normalization methods can significantly improve the reproducibility of the ventilation/perfusion maps.

RESULTS

The ventilation- and perfusion-weighted maps generated with the NuFD algorithm demonstrated a mostly homogenous distribution of signal intensity as expected for healthy volunteers regardless of the breathing maneuver and slice position. Evaluation of the ROI's size and position dependency showed small differences in the performance. Applying both normalization strategies improved the reproducibility of the ventilation by reducing the median deviation of all scans to 9.1%, 5.7% and 8.6% for the diaphragm-based, the best and worst performing ROI-based normalization, respectively, compared to 29.5% for the non-normalized scans. The significance of this improvement was confirmed by the Wilcoxon signed rank test with [Formula: see text] at [Formula: see text]. A comparison of the techniques against each other revealed a significant difference in the performance between best ROI-based normalization and worst ROI ([Formula: see text]) and between best ROI-based normalization and scaling factor ([Formula: see text]), but not between scaling factor and worst ROI ([Formula: see text]). Using the ROI-based approach for the perfusion-maps, the uncorrected deviation of 10.2% was reduced to 5.3%, which was shown to be significant ([Formula: see text]).

CONCLUSIONS

Using NuFD for non-contrast enhanced functional lung MRI at a 0.35 T MR-Linac is feasible and produces plausible ventilation- and perfusion-weighted maps for volunteers without history of chronic pulmonary diseases utilizing different breathing patterns. The reproducibility of the results in repeated scans significantly benefits from the introduction of the two normalization strategies, making NuFD a potential candidate for fast and robust early treatment response assessment of lung cancer patients during MR-guided radiotherapy.