[Is the prostate cancer screening behaviour of men with familial predisposition predictable?]

[Familial prostate cancer and genetic predisposition]

BACKGROUND

Twenty percent of all prostate cancer patients have a positive family history (at least 1 first-degree relative with prostate cancer) and a part of these patients have a genetic predisposition.

OBJECTIVES

A literature search and analysis of studies investigating incidence, diagnosis, and clinical course of familial compared to sporadic prostate cancer as well as genetic predisposition was performed using PubMed and Embase.

RESULTS

Risk of prostate cancer depends on number, degree of relationship, and age of onset of affected men in the family. The incidence of familial prostate cancer is higher and the age of diagnosis lower compared to sporadic cases. The clinical course of the disease is comparable, but in individuals with a germline mutation, more intensive therapy is needed due to a more aggressive disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Crucial for risk assessment is a detailed family history, including creation of a pedigree with cancer family history if necessary. In high-risk families, genetic counselling and annual prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening beginning at the age of 40 should be performed. Verification of a germline mutation requires more intensive therapy due to more aggressive disease.

[Prospective evaluation of prostate cancer screening in men with a family history of the disease]

BACKGROUND

Family history is one of the strongest risk factors for prostate cancer. In this prospective study we evaluated the results of prostate cancer screening performed in healthy brothers of prostate cancer patients. The detection rate of prostate cancer and the positive predictive value of the examinations were determined.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study population comprised 513 healthy men who were 38-75 years of age (median 62.0 years). Of these men, 268 having only one affected brother with prostate cancer were assigned to the sporadic group, and 245 probands having 2-10 affected relatives were assigned to the familial group. An abnormal PSA and/or a pathological digital rectal examination (DRE) was noted in 17.5% of familial (43/245) and 15.8% of sporadic probands (35/268). A biopsy of the prostate was performed in 60.5% of familial (26/43) and 71.4% of sporadic (25/35) men with pathological findings.

RESULTS

Prostate cancer was found in 15 of 26 familial (57.7%) and 16 of 25 sporadic (64.0%) probands by prostate biopsy. The overall detection rate was 6.0% (31/513).

CONCLUSION

Due to an increased prevalence the detection rate of prostate cancer and the positive predictive value of PSA and/or DRE are higher in men with a family history as expected in an unselected population. Our data suggest that in predisposed men prostate cancer screening should be recommended early. Furthermore an early indication for prostate biopsy is necessary. This recommendation should also be applied if only one first-degree relative has prostate cancer.