Rektumperforation als Spätkomplikation einer ProACT-Implantation

The treatment of stress incontinence in men: part 2 of a series of articles on incontinence

BACKGROUND

Stress incontinence in men is a rare, usually iatrogenic condition. Its prevalence can be expected to rise in the future because of the increasingly common performance of radical prostatectomy. Most men who have undergone prostatectomy experience a transient disturbance of urinary continence. Such disturbances are only rarely due to structural damage to the sphincter apparatus and therefore have a good prognosis for spontaneous recovery.

METHOD

Selective literature review.

RESULTS

Pelvic floor training and/or pharmacotherapy can be used for more rapid restoration of subjectively satisfactory urinary continence. If the sphincter is intact, continence can also be regained in the early postoperative period through the submucosal injection of bulking agents. Incontinent patients whose urinary sphincter is dysfunctional because of denervation or direct injury to striated muscle can now be treated with a variety of surgical techniques. The implantation of an artificial sphincter is the gold standard of therapy. Properly selected and informed patients can also be treated with minimally invasive procedures, such as the creation of a male suburethral sling, although the experience with such procedures to date has not been extensive.

CONCLUSION

Post-prostatectomy incontinence has a good prognosis and should thus be treated conservatively at first. If it nonetheless persists, surgical treatment is indicated for patients who choose it after being fully informed about their options.

Neue Verfahren zur operativen Therapie der postoperativen Belastungsinkontinenz beim Mann

The impact of minimally invasive techniques for the treatment of postoperative male incontinence has significantly improved in recent years. These techniques are based on the continuous increase in urethral resistance. This resistance can be readjusted with balloons placed paraurethrally or with readjustable suburethral slings. The success rates depend on the preoperative degree of incontinence. With bulking agents that are transurethrally injected into the submucosa of the sphincter, continence rates between 12 and 90% can be seen. Severe complications are rare. The impact of the studies is often limited due to a short follow-up. After implantation of adjustable balloons that are placed paraurethrally close to the bladder neck, continence rates up to 70% can be seen. The overall improvement of incontinence is observed in up to 90% of the treated patients. Complications such as balloon migration or mechanical disorders can cause operative revision. Suburethral sling systems are available as bone-anchored slings or as readjustable slings. Continence can be seen in up to 90% of the patients postoperatively. Severe complications such as sling erosion or sling infection are rare. In cases of mild and moderate incontinence, these minimally invasive techniques are good alternatives to the fascial sling or alloplastic sphincter implantation. To improve the evaluation and to compare these techniques with the conventional methods, further investigations with a longer follow-up are necessary.