Bildgebung des Nierenzellkarzinoms

MRI and contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) image fusion of renal lesions

Ultrasound is a common and established imaging method for the initial characterization of renal lesions. The widespread used Bosniak classification (I-IV) classifies renal lesions in five individual groups using contrast-enhanced computer tomography (CE-CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and/or contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) imaging criteria. For complex pathologies, CEUS/MRI image fusion is a novel imaging technique for the differentiation of benign and malignant renal lesions. Compared to CE-CT and MRI alone, ultrasound image fusion offers the additional possibility of being a real-time imaging technique that can be used together with other cross-sectional imaging techniques.This article describes the newest possibilities of image fusion with CEUS and MRI in detection and characterization of unclear renal lesions.

[Possibilities of sonographic image fusion: Current developments]

CLINICAL/METHODICAL ISSUE

For diagnostic and interventional procedures ultrasound (US) image fusion can be used as a complementary imaging technique.

METHODICAL INNOVATIONS

Image fusion has the advantage of real time imaging and can be combined with other cross-sectional imaging techniques.

PERFORMANCE

With the introduction of US contrast agents sonography and image fusion have gained more importance in the detection and characterization of liver lesions.

ACHIEVEMENTS

Fusion of US images with computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) facilitates the diagnostics and postinterventional therapy control.

PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS

In addition to the primary application of image fusion in the diagnosis and treatment of liver lesions, there are more useful indications for contrast-enhanced US (CEUS) in routine clinical diagnostic procedures, such as intraoperative US (IOUS), vascular imaging and diagnostics of other organs, such as the kidneys and prostate gland.

[Modern imaging of kidney tumors]

If a renal mass is suspected on clinical examination or ultrasound the finding has to be confirmed by cross-sectional imaging. Methods that are used include multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Also contrast-enhanced ultrasound has been successfully implemented in renal imaging and now plays a major role in the differentiation of benign from malignant renal masses. In expert hands it can be used to show very faint vascularization and subtle enhancement. The MDCT technique benefits from the recently introduced dual energy technology that allows superior characterization of renal masses in a single-phase examination, thereby greatly reducing radiation exposure. For young patients and persons allergic to iodine MRI should be used and it provides excellent soft tissue contrast and visualizes contrast enhancement kinetics in multiphase examinations.This article aims at giving a comprehensive overview of these different imaging modalities, their clinical indications and contraindications, as well as a description of imaging findings of various renal masses.

Nephrectomy or nephron-sparing surgery - how to decide?

Aim of the study

Radical nephrectomy in the treatment of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) remains the gold standard, but nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) is still increasing in importance. The main goal of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound and multi-detector computed tomography in RCC staging and its influence on deciding about further patient treatment.

Material and methods

87 patients (age range 27–90 years; median 61.5) underwent ultrasound (US) scan and contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT) of the abdomen and pelvis. 28 patients were qualified for NSS. The remaining group of patients underwent nephrectomy.

Results

NSS was performed more frequently among patients with lesions in the lower pole of the kidney and there was no infiltration to the calyx and renal pelvis. Radical nephrectomy (RN) was pursued in cases with lesions in the central or upper pole. Lesion diameter in patients qualified for NSS was smaller than in patients qualified for radical nephrectomy.

Conclusions

Determining the relationship between tumour and adjacent structures is not a simple matter. According to our study, 50% of CT results differ from histopathology assessment. Tumour diameter determined in CT examination is larger than in ultrasound and histopathological measurements while US scanning tends to underestimate tumour size in relation to histopathological assessment.

[Imaging for diagnostics of urolithiasis including dual-energy CT]

Patients with stone disease usually present to the urologist with acute colic pain. For the right choice of therapy the diagnosis needs to be confirmed using one of many imaging methods, including ultrasonography, abdominal radiography, intravenous urography, non-contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT), CT and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) urography and dual-energy CT. The techniques differ in the availability, diagnostic sensitivity and specificity and level of radiation exposure. Compared to the others dual-energy CT allows distinction between different stone compositions with high accuracy and can affect the choice of therapy. This article on imaging and diagnosis of urolithiasis discusses the different imaging methods and highlights dual-energy CT and its distinctive features.

Imaging of advanced renal cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

To describe current radiological cross-sectional imaging in the detection and staging of advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC), defined here as RCC reaching beyond the renal capsule, whether by immediate extension or by metastasis.

METHODS

Review and summary of current radiological and urological literature, including original articles and reviews, retrieved from the medical data base "PubMed".

RESULTS

Multi-detector-row computed tomography (MDCT) shows a sensitivity of up to 100% and specificity of about 90% for retroperitoneal disease, venous tumour thrombus, and metastasis, but limited accuracy for lymphadenopathy in RCC. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is applied as a problem-solving modality, with particular strength in imaging metastasis to brain and bone. However, dynamic, contrast-enhanced- (DCE-) and arterial-spin-labelling (ASL-) MRI may help to monitor early response to angiogenesis inhibitor drugs. Ultrasonography (US) shows limited capability of identifying retroperitoneal disease, venous tumour thrombus extension, and metastasis. Positron Emission Tomography with 18-fluoro-desoxy-glucose (FDG-PET) demonstrates modest accuracy for metastasis of RCC, with positive studies being suspicious, while negative studies cannot reliably exclude disease.

CONCLUSIONS

MDCT represents the diagnostic mainstay for the detection and staging of RCC. In the wake of new systemic therapies for advanced RCC, including angiogenesis inhibitor drugs, monitoring treatment response may become a new task for cross-sectional imaging.