Sexualität nach Nierentransplantation

Effect of kidney transplantation on sexual dysfunction in patients with end stage renal disease: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

End-stage renal disease (ESRD) is associated with a multitude of physical, psychological, and social health challenges, including a profound impact on sexual and reproductive health. Among males with ESRD, erectile dysfunction (ED) is highly prevalent due to factors such as underlying comorbidities, including diabetes and hypertension, and the physiological effects of long-term dialysis. Kidney transplantation (KTx) has been proposed as a potential intervention to mitigate the effects of ED by restoring renal function and improving hormonal balance. However, the evidence surrounding the effectiveness of KTx in improving sexual function, specifically erectile function (EF), remains inconclusive. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to evaluate the effects of KTx on sexual dysfunction (SexDys), particularly ED, in male ESRD patients.

AIM

To evaluate the benefits and potential harms of KTx compared to other forms of renal replacement therapy in improving EF in adult males with ESRD, assessed using the international index of EF (IIEF), to survey the prevalence of SexDys in this population, and to assess the correlation between various factors and SexDys through regression analysis.

METHODS

A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Google Scholar was conducted, following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Prospective and retrospective cohort studies, as well as cross-sectional studies assessing EF pre- and post-transplantation, were included. These studies used validated tools such as the IIEF to measure EF. Meta-analyses were performed using a random-effects model to estimate standardized mean differences (SMD) and hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Heterogeneity was assessed using the I² statistic, and publication bias was evaluated with a funnel plot and the Egger’s test.

RESULTS

A total of 2419 studies were identified, with 362 abstracts screened and 193 full-text articles reviewed. Ultimately, 11 studies were included for qualitative analysis and 7 for quantitative synthesis. The random effects model for SMD yielded a combined estimate of 0.43 (95%CI: -0.20-1.07), indicating a small but non-significant improvement in EF post-transplantation. The heterogeneity across studies was substantial (I² = 90%), reflecting significant variability in outcomes. Subgroup analysis showed greater improvements in EF among living-donor transplant recipients compared to those receiving organs from deceased donors. Despite this trend, the overall result for changes in EF was not statistically significant (P = 0.15). Additionally, the combined HR from the meta-analysis was 2.87 (95%CI: 1.76-4.69), suggesting that KTx significantly increases the likelihood of improved EF, though variability between studies persisted (I² = 63%).

CONCLUSION

While KTx offers some promise for improving EF in male ESRD patients, the overall evidence remains inconclusive due to high heterogeneity between studies and a lack of statistical significance in the combined results. Despite this, individual studies suggest that KTx may lead to significant improvements in EF for certain subgroups, particularly living-donor recipients. Future research should focus on larger, well-designed cohort studies with standardized outcome measures to provide more definitive conclusions. Addressing SexDys as part of routine care for ESRD patients undergoing KTx is crucial to improving their overall quality of life. However, adjunct therapies such as phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors may be necessary for those who do not experience adequate improvements post-transplantation.

The Quality of Sex Life Among Patients Before and After Lung Transplantation: A Single-Center Study

BACKGROUND

Lung transplantation (LTx) is the only effective method of treatment for patients with end-stage lung diseases; LTx prolongs and increases the quality of life (QoL). An important aspect of QoL that changes in the course of severe diseases is the quality of sex life. This aspect is yet to be discussed in relationship to LTx. We aim to compare patients' quality of sex life at the qualification process with patients' who underwent LTx.

METHODS

The studied group consisted of 100 patients (24 women before and 16 after LTx, 39 men before and 21 after LTX) who were admitted to the lung transplantology department for qualification or to control the function after LTx. To assess the patients' quality of sex life, we used The Changes in Sexual Functioning Questionnaire (CSFQ) and World Health Organization (WHO) QoL-BREF. To assess lung function, patients underwent a 6-Minute-Walk-Test (6MWT).

RESULTS

Patients after LTx obtained higher results-compared to patients qualified for LTx-in the WHO QoL-BREF in every domain (somatic, psychological, social, and environment). Men after LTx got more points in every domain and better total score (53 ± 5.62 vs 44.23 ± 10.28 point; P < .05) in CSFQ. Women before and after LTx obtained comparable results in CSFQ. Results of 6-Minute-Walk-Test were better among patients after LTx than in qualified patients (523.62 ± 95.71 vs 333.14 ± 145.38 and 524.12 ± 56.17 vs 317.20 ± 141.6, respectively for men and women).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients after LTx show better pulmonary function and quality of sex life than qualified. Preliminary results encourage us to conduct research on a larger group.

Erectile Dysfunction after Kidney Transplantation

Patients with kidney transplantation often have a worse quality of life than the general population. One of the reasons for this, in male patients, is the high prevalence of erectile dysfunction. This is mainly due to the presence of comorbidities, surgery for kidney transplantation, adverse drug effects, psychological changes related to chronic disease, as well as hyperprolactinemia and hypogonadism. Whenever these endocrine dysfunctions occur after kidney transplantation, they must be corrected with appropriate treatment, i.e., testosterone replacement therapy. Administration of the phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor (PDE5i) sildenafil at the recommended posology does not significantly alter the pharmacokinetics of the calcineurin inhibitors cyclosporin A or tacrolimus and does not impair kidney allograft function. Tacrolimus increases the peak concentration and prolongs the half-life of PDE5i in kidney transplant patients and, therefore, daily administration cannot be recommended due to the significant drop in blood pressure. Intracavernous injection or topical application of alprostadil can be a second-line option for the treatment of erectile dysfunction after kidney transplantation, which does not alter cyclosporine concentrations and does not deteriorate kidney function. Finally, penile prostheses can be successfully implanted following pelvic organ transplantation after eliminating the risk of infection associated with surgery.

Sexual Dysfunction and Satisfaction in Kidney Transplant Patients

INTRODUCTION

10% of the world's population suffers from chronic kidney disease. Kidney transplants provide an improvement in the quality of life of those patients. Sexual dysfunction is common after kidney transplantation, and its etiology is presumed to be multifactorial. It has a negative impact on sexual satisfaction and health-related quality-of-life. The integration of a new organ into the body can imply an adjustment of body image, which may eventually have a negative influence on intimacy and sexual behaviors.

AIM

To evaluate male sexual function, sexual satisfaction, and body image satisfaction among a convenience sample of patients who have had a kidney transplant.

METHODS

This is a cross-sectional study that included 460 patients, from a single healthcare center, who had undergone a kidney transplant procedure >4 weeks ago. A total of 112 respondents (mean = 55.5 years, SD = 11.4) answered the questionnaires properly.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

All recruited patients answered a self-reported sociodemographic questionnaire, in addition to the International Index of Erectile function, the New Scale of Sexual Satisfaction, the Brief Symptom Inventory, and the Body Image Scale.

RESULTS

A correlation was found between sexual function and sexual satisfaction (r = 0.598, P < .001, n = 112), as well as between body image satisfaction and sexual function (r = -0.193, P = .042, n = 112). The length of time after a kidney transplant (≤ or >36 months) was not associated with a difference in sexual functioning or sexual satisfaction.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

This study showed the obvious implications of sexual function on sexual satisfaction, which should alert healthcare professionals to the importance of identifying and managing sexual dysfunction in patients with chronic kidney disease, to optimize their global and sexual health satisfaction.

STRENGTH & LIMITATIONS

This study identified a high prevalence of sexual dysfunction among kidney transplant recipients. This should reinforce the need for the medical community to evaluate the quality-of-life domains of patients with chronic disease. There is still a lack of information concerning any longitudinal evaluation of kidney transplant patients' sexual function and the effects that this surgery has on sexuality.

CONCLUSIONS

This study corroborated the severe effects that kidney transplant patients often report regarding their sexuality. Among the patients who participated in the study, sexual function proved to be relevant in relation to sexual satisfaction. Mota RL, Fonseca R, Santos JC, et al. Sexual Dysfunction and Satisfaction in Kidney Transplant Patients. J Sex Med 2019;16:1018-1028.

Narratives: an essential tool for evaluating living kidney donations

Norway's living kidney donation-rate is among the highest in the world (36 per million). According to questionnaire-results, donors enjoy better than average health, presumably due to the strict medical criteria for being allowed to donate and life long medical follow up. However, in recent years international studies have cast doubt on the predominantly positive picture of donors and recipients, particularly regarding psychological aspects of transplantation surgery and donor evalutation. Findings in this study derive from anthropological fieldwork lasting 36 months at three university hospitals in the Oslo-basin. 18 end stage kidney disease patients and their potential donors were recruited opportunistically and interviewed (separately) in three or more semi-structured conversations during the evaluation process and after transplantation. 3 cases are discussed in detail. Notes were transcribed and analysed according to narrative theory. Focus was to explore the content of donors' and recipients' pre- and post-transplantation narratives and to examine whether these accounts warrant a need for more comprehensive psychological assessment than is current practice in Norway. Donor- and recipient-narratives are well suited as a tool to improve living kidney donation-decisions. The material indicates a need to offer psychological care to LKD-partners, before and after transplantation.