|
1
|
Pulzová LB, Roška J, Kalman M, Kliment J, Slávik P, Smolková B, Goffa E, Jurkovičová D, Kulcsár Ľ, Lešková K, Bujdák P, Mego M, Bhide MR, Plank L, Chovanec M. Screening for the Key Proteins Associated with Rete Testis Invasion in Clinical Stage I Seminoma via Label-Free Quantitative Mass Spectrometry. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13215573. [PMID: 34771736 PMCID: PMC8583098 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13215573] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2021] [Revised: 10/11/2021] [Accepted: 10/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Rete testis invasion (RTI) is an unfavourable prognostic factor for the risk of relapse in clinical stage I (CS I) seminoma patients. Notably, no evidence of difference in the proteome of RTI-positive vs. -negative CS I seminomas has been reported yet. Here, a quantitative proteomic approach was used to investigate RTI-associated proteins. 64 proteins were differentially expressed in RTI-positive compared to -negative CS I seminomas. Of them, 14-3-3γ, ezrin, filamin A, Parkinsonism-associated deglycase 7 (PARK7), vimentin and vinculin, were validated in CS I seminoma patient cohort. As shown by multivariate analysis controlling for clinical confounders, PARK7 and filamin A expression lowered the risk of RTI, while 14-3-3γ expression increased it. Therefore, we suggest that in real clinical biopsy specimens, the expression level of these proteins may reflect prognosis in CS I seminoma patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucia Borszéková Pulzová
- Biomedical Research Center, Department of Genetics, Cancer Research Institute, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 9, 845 05 Bratislava, Slovakia; (L.B.P.); (J.R.); (E.G.); (D.J.); (Ľ.K.); (M.M.)
| | - Jan Roška
- Biomedical Research Center, Department of Genetics, Cancer Research Institute, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 9, 845 05 Bratislava, Slovakia; (L.B.P.); (J.R.); (E.G.); (D.J.); (Ľ.K.); (M.M.)
| | - Michal Kalman
- Department of Pathological Anatomy, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital in Martin, Comenius University, Malá Hora 4A, 036 01 Martin, Slovakia; (M.K.); (P.S.); (K.L.); (L.P.)
| | - Ján Kliment
- Clinic of Urology, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital in Martin, Comenius University, Malá Hora 4A, 036 01 Martin, Slovakia;
| | - Pavol Slávik
- Department of Pathological Anatomy, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital in Martin, Comenius University, Malá Hora 4A, 036 01 Martin, Slovakia; (M.K.); (P.S.); (K.L.); (L.P.)
| | - Božena Smolková
- Biomedical Research Center, Department of Molecular Oncology, Cancer Research Institute, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 9, 845 05 Bratislava, Slovakia;
| | - Eduard Goffa
- Biomedical Research Center, Department of Genetics, Cancer Research Institute, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 9, 845 05 Bratislava, Slovakia; (L.B.P.); (J.R.); (E.G.); (D.J.); (Ľ.K.); (M.M.)
| | - Dana Jurkovičová
- Biomedical Research Center, Department of Genetics, Cancer Research Institute, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 9, 845 05 Bratislava, Slovakia; (L.B.P.); (J.R.); (E.G.); (D.J.); (Ľ.K.); (M.M.)
| | - Ľudovít Kulcsár
- Biomedical Research Center, Department of Genetics, Cancer Research Institute, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 9, 845 05 Bratislava, Slovakia; (L.B.P.); (J.R.); (E.G.); (D.J.); (Ľ.K.); (M.M.)
| | - Katarína Lešková
- Department of Pathological Anatomy, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital in Martin, Comenius University, Malá Hora 4A, 036 01 Martin, Slovakia; (M.K.); (P.S.); (K.L.); (L.P.)
| | - Peter Bujdák
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University, 813 72 Bratislava, Slovakia;
| | - Michal Mego
- Biomedical Research Center, Department of Genetics, Cancer Research Institute, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 9, 845 05 Bratislava, Slovakia; (L.B.P.); (J.R.); (E.G.); (D.J.); (Ľ.K.); (M.M.)
- 2nd Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University and National Cancer Institute, Klenová 1, 833 10 Bratislava, Slovakia
| | - Mangesh R. Bhide
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Veterinary Medicine, Komenského 73, 041 81 Košice, Slovakia;
- Institute of Neuroimmunology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 9, 845 05 Bratislava, Slovakia
| | - Lukáš Plank
- Department of Pathological Anatomy, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital in Martin, Comenius University, Malá Hora 4A, 036 01 Martin, Slovakia; (M.K.); (P.S.); (K.L.); (L.P.)
| | - Miroslav Chovanec
- Biomedical Research Center, Department of Genetics, Cancer Research Institute, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 9, 845 05 Bratislava, Slovakia; (L.B.P.); (J.R.); (E.G.); (D.J.); (Ľ.K.); (M.M.)
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
|
3
|
Testicular seminoma clinical stage 1: treatment outcome on a routine care level. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2016; 142:1599-607. [PMID: 27116691 PMCID: PMC4899489 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-016-2162-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2016] [Accepted: 04/11/2016] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Clinical stage 1 (CS1) testicular seminoma involves an almost 100 % disease-specific survival in controlled clinical trials. We aimed to find out whether these results can be matched in patients managed on the routine care level. Patients, methods In total, 725 patients with seminoma CS1 were prospectively enrolled from 130 institutions. Adjuvant management as decided by local physicians involved surveillance (n = 256), radiotherapy (41), 1× Carboplatin (362), and 2× Carboplatin (66). We registered type of management, age, duration of follow-up (F/U), relapse, rete testis invasion (RTI), and tumor size. Actuarial relapse-free survival curves were calculated for treatment modalities and stratified for tumor sizes and RTI. A Cox regression model was calculated to explore for factors influencing relapses. Results Disease-specific survival was 100 %. Crude relapse rates were 8.2, 2.4, 5.0, and 1.5 % for surveillance, radiotherapy, 1× Carboplatin, and 2× Carboplatin after a median F/U of 30 months. RTI and tumor size were not associated with progression in surveillance patients. One course Carboplatin caused relapses in 6.8 % in tumor sizes >4 cm and 9.3 % (actuarial 13 %) in sizes >5 cm. The Cox model revealed the association of tumor size with recurrence in the entire seminoma population (Hazard ratio 1.17; 95 % confidence intervals 1.03–1.33). Conclusions The overall outcome of CS1 seminoma managed on the routine care level mirrors that of controlled trials. Unexpectedly, the risk factors in surveillance patients were not confirmed, but tumor size proved to be a risk indicator in the entire group of seminoma. Importantly, one course Carboplatin involved low efficacy to control the disease in large tumors. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00432-016-2162-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
|
|
4
|
Dieckmann KP, Dralle-Filiz I, Heinzelbecker J, Matthies C, Bedke J, Ellinger J, Sommer J, Haben B, Souchon R, Anheuser P, Pichlmeier U. Seminoma Clinical Stage 1 - Patterns of Care in Germany. Urol Int 2016; 96:390-8. [DOI: 10.1159/000443214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2015] [Accepted: 12/07/2015] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|