[Pharmacological treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia]

Cleistanthins A and B Ameliorate Testosterone-Induced Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia in Castrated Rats by Regulating Apoptosis and Cell Differentiation

Background The aging male population is at higher risk for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) wherein increased proliferation of stromal and epithelial cells of the prostate is observed. In this study, we investigated the effect of cleistanthins A and B on the inhibition of testosterone-induced BPH in castrated rats. Methodology Male Wistar rats were divided into eight groups (n = 6) and surgical castration was performed. BPH was induced by the administration of testosterone propionate in corn oil at 5 mg/kg for four weeks. The control group received corn oil, and the model group received testosterone propionate. The standard treatment group received finasteride orally along with testosterone. Cleistanthins A and B at 0.3, 1, and 3 mg/kg were administered by oral gavage along with testosterone. After four weeks, rats were sacrificed, and prostates were weighed and assessed for histomorphological, inflammatory, apoptotic, and proliferative markers. Results Cleistanthins A and B decreased prostatic enlargement and histopathological abnormalities. Elevated serum dihydrotestosterone levels were lowered significantly in both the cleistanthin A and cleistanthin B groups compared to the BPH model group. Cleistanthins A and B significantly lowered the serum interleukin (IL)-1β and tumor necrosis factor-alpha inflammatory markers in the test groups. Western blot analysis revealed cleistanthin A downregulated the IL-6, signal transducer and activator of transcription 3/cyclin D1 signaling pathway. Both cleistanthins A and B upregulated the apoptotic markers caspase-3 and cleaved caspase-3, whereas the cell proliferation markers cyclin D1 and proliferating cell nuclear antigen were found to be downregulated. Conclusions Both cleistanthins A and B inhibited BPH in a rat model by apoptotic induction and impeded cell proliferation.

Efficacy of a combination of dutasteride, tadalafil, and solifenacin in the treatment of previously unsuccessful patients

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of simultaneous administration of dutasteride, tadalafil and solifenacin in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) with overactive bladder symptoms and lower urinary tract obstruction in previously unsuccessfully treated men.

METHODS

Patients in Group A (n=97) received dutasteride 0.5 mg/day, tadalafil 2.5 mg/day, and solifenacin 2.5 mg/day; Group B (n=95) received dutasteride 0.5 mg/day, tadalafil 5 mg/day, and solifenacin 5 mg/day; Group C (n=103) received dutasteride 0.5 mg/day, tadalafil 20 mg/day, and solifenacin 10 mg/day. The functional status of the lower urinary tract was assessed using the International Prostate Symptom Score (I-PSS), Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OABq), International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), and Male Sexual Health Questionnaire Ejaculatory Dysfunction (MSHQ-EjD) as well as uroflowmetry.

RESULTS

The total score of the sexual function remained unchanged in Group B of patients 81.3 points vs. 80.2 points (p>0.05) according to MSHQ-EjD, 61.4 points vs. 51.2 points (p>0.05) according to IIEF data. The total assessment of symptoms of hyperactivity significantly decreased in Group C according to OABq data after the 4th week of the study (17.5 points vs. 26.1 points, p<0.05) and remained below the baseline until the end of the study (15.2 points).

CONCLUSIONS

The simultaneous administration of standard doses of dutasteride, solifenacin, and tadalafil for 3 months is safe, effective, and can be recommended for patients with BPH to reduce symptoms of obstruction and hyperactivity of the bladder and maintain sexual function.

Impact of early vs. delayed initiation of dutasteride/tamsulosin combination therapy on the risk of acute urinary retention or BPH-related surgery in LUTS/BPH patients with moderate-to-severe symptoms at risk of disease progression

Purpose

To evaluate the effect of delayed start of combination therapy (CT) with dutasteride 0.5 mg and tamsulosin 0.4 mg on the risk of acute urinary retention or benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)-related surgery (AUR/S) in patients with moderate-to-severe lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) at risk of disease progression.

Methods

Using a time-to-event model based on pooled data from 10,238 patients from Phase III/IV dutasteride trials, clinical trial simulations (CTS) were performed to assess the risk of AUR/S up to 48 months in moderate-to-severe LUTS/BPH patients following immediate and delayed start of CT for those not responding to tamsulosin monotherapy. Simulation scenarios (1300 subjects/arm) were investigated, including immediate start (reference) and alternative delayed start (six scenarios 1–24 months). AUR/S incidence was described by Kaplan–Meier survival curves and analysed using log-rank test. The cumulative incidence of events as well as the relative and attributable risks were summarised stratified by treatment.

Results

Survival curves for patients starting CT at month 1 and 3 did not differ from those who initiated CT immediately. By contrast, significant differences (p < 0.001) were observed when switch to CT occurs ≥ 6 months from the initial treatment. At month 48, AUR/S incidence was 4.6% vs 9.5%, 11.0% and 11.3% in patients receiving immediate CT vs. switchers after 6, 12 and 24 months, respectively.

Conclusions

Start of CT before month 6 appears to significantly reduce the risk of AUR/S compared with delayed start by ≥ 6 months. This has implications for the treatment algorithm for men with LUTS/BPH at risk of disease progression.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00345-020-03517-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Improvement of the symptoms of lower urinary tract and sexual dysfunction with tadalafil and solifenacin after the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia with dutasteride

Background

The aim of this research is to study the influence of simultaneous taking of tadalafil and solifenacin in standard and double dosage on the lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and sexual dysfunction in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia after the course of dutasteride.

Materials and methods

The research included 326 patients older than 50 years with benign prostatic hyperplasia coupled with LUTS and sexual dysfunction having undergone the course of treatment with dutasteride. After random division into three groups, patients from the Group A (n = 107) got tadalafil 5 mg/d as monotherapy, from the Group В (n = 107) got tadalafil 5 mg/d and solifenacin 10 mg/d, and from the Group С (n = 112) got tadalafil 5 mg/d and solifenacin 20 mg/d. The duration of treatment was 12 weeks. The rating of sexual function was made with the questionnaires International Index of Erectile Function and other.

Results

The results of rating of sexual function with the questionnaires MSHQ-EjD and International Index of Erectile Function correlated among themselves. According to MSHQ-EjD, overall rating of the sexual function increased in each of the three groups (A: 67.9 (12.4)/91.5 (10.4), P ≤ 0.05; B: 72.4 (14.5)/102.6 (16.9), P ≤ 0.05; C: 76.6 (16.3)/109.6 (15.6), P ≤ 0.05). The level of hyperactivity symptoms decreased in Groups В and С (В: urgency −2.9 (0.7)/1.1 (0.6), P ≤ 0.05; nocturia 2.7 (1.0)/0.7 (0.5), P ≤ 0.05; C: urgency −2.5 (0.5)/0.8 (0.6), P ≤ 0.05; nocturia −2.8 (0.6)/1.0 (0.5), P ≤ 0.05), and it did not change in the Group A.

Conclusions

The use of tadalafil as monotherapy significantly improves the sexual function but does not affect overactive bladder symptoms. The combination therapy of tadalafil and solifenacin leads to dramatic improvement of sexual function and reversibility of detrusor hyperactivity symptoms.

Phytotherapy Adds to the Therapeutic Armamentarium for the Treatment of Mild-To-Moderate Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms in Men

BACKGROUND

Practice guidelines hardly recommend herbal extracts for male lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). However, many patients are unsatisfied with first-line synthetic drugs and often prefer herbal medicines because of good tolerability. To improve the decision-making process, which should consider the patients' expectations, it is crucial to reflect on the role of phytotherapy in the treatment of LUTS. We (panel experts) reflected on current guideline recommendations and real practice across various European countries and debated the potential role of plant extracts with a focus on pumpkin seed soft extract investigated over 12 months in two randomised placebo-controlled trials.

SUMMARY

Most guidelines give no clear recommendations on phytotherapy due to the heterogeneity of clinically investigated extracts. Nevertheless, plant extracts are prescribed to patients with mild-to-moderate LUTS. Also, self-medicating patients often handle their complaints with herbal products. Many patients aim to avoid synthetic drugs for fear of sexual functional side effects and a negative impact on their quality of life. For the elderly, vasoactive comedications might become an issue. When taking plant extracts, patients experience an acceptable symptomatic relief similar to that achieved with synthetics but without side effects. Key Messages: In shared decision-making for purely symptomatic treatment, a low risk of side effects takes priority. We propose to consider patient preferences in the treatment of mild-to-moderate LUTS in men with a low risk of disease progression. We found a consensus that pumpkin seed soft extract adds to the therapeutic armamentarium for patients who cannot or do not want to apply synthetic drugs.

Management of BPH then 2000 and now 2016 - From BPH to BPO

The diagnosis and treatment of benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) is based on a number of well-known lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) feared by all ageing males with functional testes. The ascent of modern urology turned this disease from lethal into an annoying but treatable health problem in the previous century. We are able to relieve the great majority of patients from their bothersome symptoms to a respectable quality of life by medication or removal of the obstructive part of the enlarged prostate. We can be proud of some progress made in the new millennium to reach a correct diagnosis and subsequent choice of treatment aiming for quality of life and cost-efficiency for public health. Still it remains symptomatic treatment and we expect the new generation of urologists to close some gaps in our knowledge on the regulation of prostatic growth to focus on prevention and elimination of the disease in the foreseeable future.