Inkontinenz nach radikaler Prostatektomie: „Male sling“ oder gleich „die richtige Lösung“?

[Use of implants to treat male urinary incontinence]

Treatments for benign and malignant pathologies of the prostate can compromise urine control. Urinary incontinence (UI) affects the quality of life of patients and limits their ability to carry out usual activities. The degree of impact of UI is variable and the associated discomforts make patients seek treatment for it. At the center of the management of urinary incontinence in men are surgical interventions that seek to replace the affected sphincter function through implants. The artificial urinary sphincter since its development in the 1970s has been considered the standard of treatment for UI in men. More recently artificial sphincter and slings have been shown to be effective in a selected group of incontinent men. The goals of surgical treatment of incontinence include the preservation of bladder function, the ability to improve the strength of the urinary sphincter, and to reduce or eliminate urine leakage, and thereby improve the quality of life. The aim of the article is to present various implants for the correction of male urinary incontinence.

[The "right" patient for implant surgery in urology : Why patient selection, informed consent, and communication are so important for patient satisfaction]

In implant surgery for erectile dysfunction and urinary incontinence, adequate patient selection is essential for postoperative therapy success. Several scientific studies report patient satisfaction rates for penile implants and artificial urinary sphincter implantation of over 90%. Nevertheless, studies also report, that between 5 and 30% of the patients are not satisfied with the result of their operation. Sufficient patient information and consent prior surgical procedure in urological prosthetics are a key determinant for later patient satisfaction and therapy success. Diligent assessment of realistic expectations, possible complications, and risks must be made. Unrealistic and exaggerated expectations need to be met and discussed with the patient. Therefore adequate physician-patient communication is essential. Especially in the case of surgical revision or for patients with risk factors, the probability of complications is higher and may significantly increase later dissatisfaction. Also, the involvement of the partner plays a major role in later patient satisfaction in urological implant surgery. Finally, there is a group of patients for which the risk of later dissatisfaction is particularly high. These are patients with compulsive/obsessive behavior, unrealistic expectations, patients after revision surgery, self-entitled patients, as well as those patients who deny the extent of their illness, visit multiple surgeons (surgeon hopping) or have psychiatric illnesses. These patients are referred to with the acronym "CURSED" patients.

Improving early urinary continence recovery after radical prostatectomy by applying a sutureless technique for maximal preservation of the intrapelvic urethra: A 17-year single-surgeon experience

BACKGROUND

There is a growing concern about postsurgical outcomes of radical prostatectomy, especially in the younger population and patients with earlier tumor stages. Here, we present our 17 years' experience of sutureless vesico-urethral alignment after radical prostatectomy with a focus on postoperative functional urinary outcomes.

METHODS

Data of 784 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy during 2001-2017 were evaluated retrospectively. Before surgery, patients' demographic information, pathologic stage, margin of surgery, prostate-specific antigen, and Gleason score were obtained. Then, serum prostate-specific antigen level, urinary continence, potency, and other functional outcomes of surgery were recorded after each postoperative visit.

RESULTS

The mean age (±standard deviation) of patients was 61.3 (±6.30) years. The median (IQ_25-75) duration of follow-up was 30 (12-72) months. Full continence was achieved in 90% and 95.9% of patients at 3 and 6 months post surgery and 96.4% of the patients were continent at the last follow-up visit. Bladder neck stricture occurred in 167 patients (21.3%). During the follow-up period, none of the patients complained of total incontinence and at the last visit, 36.6% of patients reported potency. The frequency of grade 2 continence was significantly higher in patients with high-stage tumors (T3/T4), high Gleason score (⩾8), high preoperative serum prostate-specific antigen (>20 ng/dL), and positive margin of surgery. Potency had a significant relationship with age, stage of the disease, and preoperative prostate-specific antigen.

CONCLUSION

Maximal sparing of intrapelvic urethral length through sutureless vesico-urethral alignment technique results in excellent early urinary continence recovery after radical prostatectomy. A more advanced tumor stage (T1/T2), a higher Gleason score, high preoperative prostate-specific antigen, as well as positive surgical margin are risk factors of postoperative incontinence in patients who undergo radical prostatectomy.