Minimal-invasive vs. offene Nierenteilresektionen: Perioperative Erfolgs- und Komplikationsraten

Early perioperative outcomes of single-port compared to multi-port robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy

Single-port (SP) robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (RAPN) is a promising new technique. The aim of this study was to compare surgical and oncological outcomes of SP-RAPN to the multi-port (MP) surgical platform. This is a retrospective, cohort-based study involving patients undergoing SP-RAPN between 2019 and 2020 at a single institution. Demographic, preoperative, surgical, and postoperative outcomes data were gathered and compared to a 1-to-1 matched MP cohort. A total of 50 SP and 50 matched MP cases were included. Length of surgery and ischemia time were not statistically significant between the two cohorts; however, estimated blood loss (EBL) was significantly lower in the SP group than in the MP (IQR 25-50 vs. IQR 50-100 mL, p = 0.002). No differences were seen in regard to the 30-day readmission rate, surgical margin status, pain scores, and complications between the two approaches. We found no statistically significant differences in positive margins, pain score, length of stay, or readmission rate between matched SP and MP patients. These data support the viability of the SP technique as an alternative to MP-RAPN when in the hands of experienced surgeons.

Can Aortic and Renal Arteries Calcium Scores Be New Factors to Predict Post-Operative Renal Function After Nephron Sparing Surgery?

INTRODUCTION

This study aims to investigate whether the calcification of renal arteries and aorta may be risk factors for developing chronic kidney disease (CKD) after Nephron sparing surgery (NSS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The patients that underwent either open or laparoscopic NSS from 2000 to 2019 in 4 different centers were retrospectively assessed. Of these patients, 328 had a non-contrast-enhanced computer tomography. Calcium scores of the renal arteries and abdominal aorta were measured in the non-contrast-enhanced images with the calcium score plugin (version 2.0) of Horos™. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to determine significant risk factors for developing CKD at the last check-up. Roc curve analysis was performed to determine the optimal cut-off values of age and abdominal aorta calcium scores.

RESULTS

A total of 302 patients, of which 52 (16,6%) with CKD and 252 (83,4%) without CKD at the last check-up, were included in the analysis. The mean warm ischemia duration was significantly higher in patients with CKD (18,79±6,72 vs 16,38±5,57 minutes, p=0,016). The mean size of the tumor diameter and the number of the patients with ≥stage T1b were higher in the group with CKD (p=0,024 and 0,005, respectively). The median calcium scores of the aorta and renal arteries were higher in the group with CKD (p<0,001 and p<0,001, respectively). In multivariate analysis, age >60 years (OR:3,65, p=0,022), calcium score of the aorta (OR:4,07, p=0,029), tumor diameter (OR:1,03, p=0,026) and pre-operative CKD stage (OR:10,13, p<0,001) found the be significant factors for predicting last check-up CKD.

CONCLUSION

The calcium score of the aorta may be used as an additional risk factor to predict post-operative CKD risk after NSS with sensitivity over 80%.

Nephrometry Scores: Can Preoperative Assessment of Sectional Imaging Really Mirror Intraoperative Renal Tumor Anatomy?

INTRODUCTION

To compare RENAL, preoperative aspects and dimensions used for an anatomical (PADUA) classification, and Mayo Adhesive Probability (MAP) scores with the respective intraoperative findings and surgeon's assessment in predicting surgical outcome of patients undergoing partial nephrectomy.

METHODS

Data of 150 eligible patients treated at the University Medical Center Mannheim between 2016 and 2018 were analyzed. Tumors were radiologically and intraoperatively assessed by PADUA, RENAL, and MAP scores and surgeon's assessment. Correlations and regression models were created to predict ischemia time (IT), major complications, and Trifecta (negative surgical margin, IT < 25 min, and absence of major complications).

RESULTS

There were strong correlations between radiological and intraoperative RENAL (r = 0.68; p < 0.001) and PADUA scores (r = 0.72; p < 0.001). Radiological RENAL, PADUA, and MAP scores and surgeon's assessment were independent predictors of Trifecta (OR = 0.71, p = 0.015; OR = 0.77, p = 0.035; OR = 0.65, p = 0.012; OR = 0.40, p = 0.005, respectively). IT showed significant associations with radiological RENAL, PADUA, and surgeon's assessment (OR = 1.41, p = 0.033; OR = 1.34, p = 0.044; OR = 3.04, p = 0.003, respectively). MAP score proved as only independent predictor of major complications (OR = 2.12, p = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

Radiologically and intraoperatively assessed scores correlated well with each other. Intraoperative nephrometry did not outperform radiological scores in predicting outcome confirming the value of the existing systems. MAP score correlates well with surgeon's assessment of perirenal fat and major complications underlining the importance of perirenal fat characteristics.

Retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial versus radical nephrectomy for large (≥ 4 cm) and anatomically complex renal tumors: A propensity score matching study

INTRODUCTION

To assess the safety and efficiency of retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (RLPN) and retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (RLRN) for large (≥4 cm) renal tumors with a RENAL nephrometry score ≥7.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively identified and analyzed the data of 254 patients who underwent RLPN or RLRN for large (≥4 cm) and anatomically complex renal tumors between 2008 and 2017. Propensity score matching (PSM) (1:1) method was conducted to adjust for preoperative clinical characteristics. Preoperative, renal functional, and oncological outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

Finally, no significant differences in the baseline characteristics existed between the two groups after PSM. Within the well-balanced matched cohort, longer operating time (OT) and higher estimated blood loss (EBL) were found in RLPN group (p = 0.015 and p = 0.019, respectively), and RLPN trended to protect renal function better at a higher risk of low-grade complications (-10.9 vs -16.8 ml/min, p = 0.001; 23.0% vs 10.8%, p = 0.048, respectively). The patients in the RLPN group had a better overall survival (OS) than those in RLRN group, but cancer-specific survival and progression-free survival didn't differ significantly between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

For patients with large (≥4 cm) and anatomically complex renal tumors, RLPN by highly experienced hands has an evident tendency to a better protection of renal function and a longer OS without waiving oncological control in comparison with RLRN, but at the expense of longer OT, a higher EBL and a higher risk of low-grade complications.