[Diagnosis and treatment of interstitial cystitis (IC/PBS) : S2k guideline of the German Society of Urology]

[Interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS)]

BACKGROUND

In this review, aspects of interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS) are presented against the background of the German S2k guideline on this disease.

OBJECTIVE

Quite often this disease, characterized by bladder or lower abdominal pain (permanent or intermittent) and pollakisuria without pathogenic bacteria in the urine culture, is diagnosed much too late.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The debate on disease definition, aspects on pathophysiology and epidemiology are presented. For diagnosis, disease severity must be determined and relevant differential diagnoses like bladder cancer must be excluded. Conservative measures (clothing, food, sexuality, sport, bladder training, sufficient fluid intake, prevention of hypothermia) are effective especially in early stages of the disease. Combination drug therapy with mucosa stabilizing, anti-inflammatory, psychotropic, and pain-reducing drugs should be adjusted individually. Inpatient rehabilitation, hydrodistension, laser- and electrocoagulation, neuromodulation (sacral or pudendal) or hyperbaric oxygen therapy may help after pharmacotherapy failure. Cystectomy and urinary diversion are used in irreversible shrunken urinary bladder.

RESULTS

If all treatment modalities are consequently used, many patients may reach a state that is more bearable.

CONCLUSION

With a high level of suffering in many patients with IC/BPS, all available treatment modalities should be known and used.

Bladder Microbiome in the Context of Urological Disorders—Is There a Biomarker Potential for Interstitial Cystitis?

Since the development of modern cultivation and sequencing techniques, the human microbiome has increasingly become the focus of scientific attention. Even in the bladder, long considered to be a sterile niche, a highly variable and complex microbial colonization has now been demonstrated. Especially in the context of diseases such as interstitial cystitis, whose etiopathogenesis is largely unknown, and whose diagnosis is based on a process of exclusion of confusable diseases, science hopes to gain far-reaching insights for etiology and diagnosis, including the identification of potential biomarkers. While for functional disorders such as urge urinary incontinence and overactive bladder syndrome, initial associations have been demonstrated between reduced microbial diversity and increased symptomatology, as well as shifts in the abundance of specific microorganisms such as Lactobacillus or Proteus, studies in interstitial cystitis show conflicting results and have failed to identify a putative organism or urotype that clearly distinguishes the urinary microbiome of patients with IC/BPS from that of healthy controls. At the present time, therefore, the new insights into the bladder microbiome and its potential influence on urologic disease cannot yet be used in the context of elucidating possible etiopathogenetic causes, as well as in the use of a biomarker for diagnostic or prognostic purposes. Further studies should focus primarily on uniform procedures and detection methods to achieve better comparability of results and increase the likelihood of detecting hidden patterns.

An indirect comparison meta-analysis of noninvasive intravesical instillation and intravesical injection of botulinum toxin-A in bladder disorders

BACKGROUND

Botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) intravesical instillation and BTX-A intravesical injection are both effective treatments or overactive bladder (OAB) and interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS), but direct comparative studies of the two treatments are lacking.

METHODS

We conducted a pairs-comparison meta-analysis and an adjusted indirect comparison meta-analysis extracting published data from randomized controlled trials in literature databases from the inception of each database to Aug. 31, 2021, evaluating efficacy and safety of BTX-A intravesical instillation and BTX-A intravesical injection. We also carried out a subgroup analysis.

RESULTS

We identified 24 trials in 21 studies were included in our study, of which 18 trials in 17 studies were BTX-A intravesical injections, 6 trials in 4 studies were BTX-A intravesical instillation. Compared with the normal saline injection, BTX-A intravesical injections for patients with OAB and IC/ BPS can obviously improve the symptoms of urinary frequency, urgency episode, UI and UUI, but BTX-A significantly increased the rate of urinary retention and urinary tract infection and increased PVR (p < 0.05). Adjusted indirect comparison meta-analysis showed that BTX-A intravesical injections was more effective than BTX-A intravesical instillation (p > 0.05). Surprisingly, BTX-A intravesical instillation had fewer side effects than BTX-A intravesical injections (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Although BTX-A intravesical injections of OAB and IC/BPS has been significantly superior the BTX-A intravesical instillation, it has major side effects, but this needs to be confirmed by more large-scale, multicenter, direct comparison randomized controlled trials.

[Interstitial cystitis: interventions and surgery - more than a last resort?]

Interstitial cystitis is an underdiagnosed chronic-relapsing to chronic-progressive urinary bladder disease, whose pathogenesis and aetiology has not been fully elucidated. The disease itself cannot be cured and treatment is symptomatic. Treatment options comprise conservative and medicinal approaches as well as a large number of interventional/surgical procedures. These include intravesical instillation, transurethral procedures such as injections of botulinum toxin A, corticosteroids and local anaesthetics, hydrodistension and neuromodulation as well as (laser) fulguration, resection and cystectomy. Although surgical procedures are considered a late option and are often referred to as last-resort therapy, these interventional options often show good to very good response rates, manageable complications and a favourable risk-benefit evaluation. An overall generalisation of surgery as a last-resort treatment option should therefore be avoided and its use should be discussed based on the individual needs of each patient.

[Rehabilitation of patients with interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS)]

After unsuccessful outpatient conservative treatment or invasive inpatient treatment and after cystectomy in interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS), an inpatient discipline-specific urological rehabilitation (rehab) should be proposed according to the German guideline on IC/BPS. During rehab, diagnostic results will be completed. Multimodal therapy includes the optimisation of lifestyle and medication. Intensive psychotherapy may frequently improve the processing of the disease. Various forms of exercise therapy and physical therapy with water applications, thermotherapy, several forms of massage and electrical or magnetic therapies as well as nutritional advice frequently alleviate complaints in IC/BPS. The different therapies are modified during rehab, if necessary. Social medicine evaluation and advice, e.g. on grade of handicap or ability to work, are also important issues in rehab. Two-thirds of patients show an essential improvement after rehab, which lasts for a prolonged period in about 50% of patients.

Association of Elmiron (pentosanpolysulphate sodium) with pigmented maculopathy: An update for urologists and patients

Introduction:

Bladder pain syndrome (BPS) is a difficult disorder to diagnose and manage with a limited number of treatment options that have a good evidence base. Elmiron (pentosanpolysulphate sodium (PPS)) is recognised as a main second-line treatment option in many international guidelines. Recently published retrospective studies suggest that there is an association between Elmiron and pigmented maculopathy, a rare disease associated with visual impairment.

Objectives:

To review the known literature on Elmiron and pigmented maculopathy and alternative oral pharmacotherapy options for BPS. To promote awareness on this topic and aid urologists in managing Elmiron prescription.

Methods:

We reviewed the most commonly used oral treatments for BPS, in particular Elmiron, the current evidence to support this association with eye disease and its position in the management pathway of this complex condition.

Conclusions:

Recent retrospective longitudinal studies have demonstrated an association of Elmiron with pigmented maculopathy. However, as yet the exact nature of this relationship is unknown. Nevertheless, Elmiron remains an important part of the treatment pathway for BPS. We suggest clinicians should fully inform patients of this association, including patients who have been previously comenced on Elmiron. There should be ongoing and continuing reviews of all treatments to review its efficacy in indiviual patients.

Level of evidence:

Not applicable