Overexpression of MIC-3 indicates a direct role for the MIC gene family in mediating Upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) resistance to root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognita)

Transcriptome Analysis of Resistant Cotton Germplasm Responding to Reniform Nematodes

Reniform nematode (Rotylenchulus reniformis) is an important microparasite for Upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) production. Growing resistant cultivars is the most economical management method, but only a few G. barbadense genotypes and some diploid Gossypium species confer high levels of resistance. This study conducted a transcriptome analysis of resistant genotypes to identify genes involved in host plant defense. Seedlings of G. arboreum accessions PI 529728 (A2-100) and PI 615699 (A2-190), and G. barbadense genotypes PI 608139 (GB 713) and PI 163608 (TX 110), were inoculated with the reniform nematode population MSRR04 and root samples were collected on the fifth (D5) and ninth (D9) day after inoculation. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified by comparing root transcriptomes from inoculated plants with those from non-inoculated plants. Accessions A2-100 and A2-190 showed 52 and 29 DEGs on D5, respectively, with 14 DEGs in common, and 18 DEGs for A2-100 and 11 DEGs for A2-190 on chromosome 5. On D9, four DEGs were found in A2-100 and two DEGs in A2-190. For GB 713, 52 and 43 DEGs were found, and for TX 110, 29 and 117 DEGs were observed on D5 and D9, respectively. Six DEGs were common at the two sampling times for these genotypes. Some DEGs were identified as Meloidogyne-induced cotton (MIC) 3 and 4, resistance gene analogs, or receptor-like proteins. Other DEGs have potential roles in plant defense, such as peroxidases, programmed cell death, pathogenesis related proteins, and systemic acquired resistance. Further research on these DEGs will aid in understanding the mechanisms of resistance to explore new applications for the development of resistant cultivars.

Understanding Root Rot Disease in Agricultural Crops

Root rot diseases remain a major global threat to the productivity of agricultural crops. They are usually caused by more than one type of pathogen and are thus often referred to as a root rot complex. Fungal and oomycete species are the predominant participants in the complex, while bacteria and viruses are also known to cause root rot. Incorporating genetic resistance in cultivated crops is considered the most efficient and sustainable solution to counter root rot, however, resistance is often quantitative in nature. Several genetics studies in various crops have identified the quantitative trait loci associated with resistance. With access to whole genome sequences, the identity of the genes within the reported loci is becoming available. Several of the identified genes have been implicated in pathogen responses. However, it is becoming apparent that at the molecular level, each pathogen engages a unique set of proteins to either infest the host successfully or be defeated or contained in attempting so. In this review, a comprehensive summary of the genes and the potential mechanisms underlying resistance or susceptibility against the most investigated root rots of important agricultural crops is presented.

Coupling of MIC-3 overexpression with the chromosomes 11 and 14 root-knot nematode (RKN) (Meloidogyne incognita) resistance QTLs provides insights into the regulation of the RKN resistance response in Upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)

Genetic analysis of MIC-3 transgene with RKN resistance QTLs provides insight into the resistance regulatory mechanism and provides a framework for testing additional hypotheses. Resistance to root-knot nematode (RKN) (Meloidogyne incognita) in Upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) is mediated by two major quantitative trait loci (QTL) located on chromosomes 11 and 14. The MIC-3 (Meloidogyne Induced Cotton3) protein accumulates specifically within the immature galls of RKN-resistant plants that possess these QTLs. Recently, we showed that MIC-3 overexpression in an RKN-susceptible cotton genotype suppressed RKN egg production but not RKN-induced root galling. In this study, the MIC-3 overexpression construct T-DNA in the single-copy transgenic line '14-7-1' was converted into a codominant molecular marker that allowed the marker assisted selection of F2:3 cotton lines, derived from a cross between 14-7-1 and M-240 RNR, having all possible combinations of the chromosomes 11 and 14 QTLs with and without the MIC-3 overexpression construct. Root-knot nematode reproduction (eggs g(-1) root) and severity of RKN-induced root galling were assessed in these lines. We discovered that the addition of MIC-3 overexpression suppressed RKN reproduction in lines lacking both resistance QTLs and in lines having only the chromosome 14 QTL, suggesting an additive effect of the MIC-3 construct with this QTL. In contrast, MIC-3 overexpression did not improve resistance in lines having the single chromosome 11 QTL or in lines having both resistance QTLs, suggesting an epistatic interaction between the chromosome 11 QTL and the MIC-3 construct. Overexpression of MIC-3 did not affect the severity of RKN-induced root galling regardless of QTL genotype. These data provide new insights into the relative order of action of the chromosomes 11 and 14 QTLs and their potential roles in regulating MIC-3 expression as part of the RKN resistance response.

Fine mapping and identification of candidate genes for a QTL affecting Meloidogyne incognita reproduction in Upland cotton

Background

The southern root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognita; RKN) is one of the most important economic pests of Upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Host plant resistance, the ability of a plant to suppress nematode reproduction, is the most economical, practical, and environmentally sound method to provide protection against this subterranean pest. The resistant line Auburn 623RNR and a number of elite breeding lines derived from it remain the most important source of root-knot nematode (RKN) resistance. Prior genetic analysis has identified two epistatically interacting RKN resistance QTLs, qMi-C11 and qMi-C14, affecting gall formation and RKN reproduction, respectively.

Results

We developed a genetic population segregating only for the qMi-C14 locus and evaluated the genetic effects of this QTL on RKN resistance in the absence of the qMi-C11 locus. The qMi-C14 locus had a LOD score of 12 and accounted for 24.5 % of total phenotypic variation for egg production. In addition to not being significantly associated with gall formation, this locus had a lower main effect on RKN reproduction than found in our previous study, which lends further support to evidence of epistasis with qMi-C11 in imparting RKN resistance in the Auburn 623RNR source. The locus qMi-C14 was fine-mapped with the addition of 16 newly developed markers. By using the reference genome sequence of G. raimondii, we identified 20 candidate genes encoding disease resistance protein homologs in the newly defined 2.3 Mb region flanked by two SSR markers. Resequencing of an RKN resistant and susceptible G. hirsutum germplasm revealed non-synonymous mutations in only four of the coding regions of candidate genes, and these four genes are consequently of high interest.

Conclusions

Our mapping results validated the effects of the qMi-C14 resistance locus, delimiting the QTL to a smaller region, and identified tightly linked SSR markers to improve the efficiency of marker-assisted selection. The candidate genes identified warrant functional studies that will help in identifying and characterizing the actual qMi-C14 defense gene(s) against root-knot nematodes.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12864-016-2954-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Entomopathogenic and plant pathogenic nematodes as opposing forces in agriculture

Plant-parasitic nematodes are responsible for substantial damages within the agriculture industry every year, which is a challenge that has thus far gone largely unimpeded. Chemical nematicides have been employed with varying degrees of success, but their implementation can be cumbersome, and furthermore they could potentially be neutralising an otherwise positive effect from the entomopathogenic nematodes that coexist with plant-parasitic nematodes in soil environments and provide protection for plants against insect pests. Recent research has explored the potential of employing entomopathogenic nematodes to protect plants from plant-parasitic nematodes, while providing their standard degree of protection against insects. The interactions involved are highly complex, due to both the three-organism system and the assortment of variables present in a soil environment, but a strong collection of evidence has accumulated regarding the suppressive capacity of certain entomopathogenic nematodes and their mutualistic bacteria, in the context of limiting the infectivity of plant-parasitic nematodes. Specific factors produced by certain entomopathogenic nematode complexes during the process of insect infection appear to have a selectively nematicidal, or at least repellant, effect on plant-parasitic nematodes. Using this information, an opportunity has formed to adapt this relationship to large-scale, field conditions and potentially relieve the agricultural industry of one of its most substantial burdens.