Roush KS, Jeffries MKS. Gonadosomatic index as a confounding variable in fish-based screening assays for the detection of anti-estrogens and nonaromatizable androgens.
ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY 2019;
38:603-615. [PMID:
30614037 DOI:
10.1002/etc.4353]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2018] [Revised: 09/19/2018] [Accepted: 12/27/2018] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
The presence of reproductive endocrine-disrupting compounds (REDCs) in the environment poses a potential threat to fish and wildlife, because exposures are capable of altering sexual development, reproductive success, and behavior. Fish-based screening assays are often utilized to screen for the presence of REDCs in surface waters and to assess single chemicals for potential endocrine-disrupting activity. In an effort to improve such screening assays, the goal of the present study was to determine whether the gonadosomatic index (GSI) of female fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas), as assessed via external characteristics, influences their response to REDC exposure. Specifically, we sought to determine whether low-GSI females differed from high-GSI females in their responses to the model anti-estrogen fadrozole and the model androgen 17β-trenbolone, and whether there was a preferable classification in the context of REDC screening. Low-GSI females were more sensitive to fadrozole at the lower concentration of fadrozole (5 µg/L) and to the higher concentration of trenbolone (50 ng/L), whereas high-GSI females were more sensitive at the lower concentration of trenbolone (5 ng/L). The differential response of low- and high-GSI females to REDCs indicates that GSI influences exposure outcome, and should subsequently be taken into consideration in the implementation of screening assays, as failure to utilize fish of the appropriate reproductive status may skew the test results. Environ Toxicol Chem 2019;38:603-615. © 2019 SETAC.
Collapse