Ergebnisse und Erfahrungen der Remobilisation von H�ftarthrodesen

Hip fusion takedown with total knee and hip arthroplasty in a patient with end-stage chronic kidney disease - a case report and narrative literature review

Hip fusion takedown and conversion to [total hip replacement (THR)] is a technically demanding procedure related to a high risk of complications, however, in selected patients, it might be required before performing [total knee arthroplasty (TKA)]. Currently, there is no standard of care, and each case has to be considered individually. We describe a case of a 70-year-old male with left hip ankylosis and debilitating pain in the ipsilateral knee. We describe the justification and technical issues related to the management of this case, and the difficulties associated with performing those in a dialyzed patient. Based on our experience and available literature, we conclude that the patient has to be informed of possible complications and outcomes. Even the presence of serious comorbidity does not necessarily preclude such a procedure if the patient is in good condition and the successful outcome is highly probable.

Not all primary total hip arthroplasties are equal-so is there a difference in reimbursement?

Background

Relative value units (RVUs) are a physician reimbursement model based on the effort required, or value, in providing a procedure or service for a patient. Procedures such as conversion total hip arthroplasties (THAs) can be compared to primary THAs, but many studies have revealed increased difficulties in conversion cases. Despite the increased time and effort for conversion THA, it is unknown if this is reflected in the RVU compensation model. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare the: (I) mean operative times; (II) mean RVUs; (III) RVU/minute for primary and conversion THAs; and (IV) perform an individualized idealized surgeon annual cost difference analysis.

Methods

A total of 103,702 primary THA patients were identified using CPT code 27130 and 2,986 conversion THA patients were identified using CPT code 27132 using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. The mean RVUs, operative times (minutes), and RVU/minute were calculated and compared. An annualize cost analysis of dollar amounts per case, day, and the year was also performed.

Results

The mean operative times for the primary and conversion THA cohorts were 94 vs. 146 minutes (P<0.001) and mean RVUs were 21.24 vs. 25.68 (P<0.001). Interestingly, the mean RVU per minute was higher for the primary THA compared to the conversion THA groups (0.26 vs. 0.21, P<0.001). Annualized cost analysis revealed a potential $173,529 difference from performing primary vs. conversion THAs.

Conclusions

Even though conversion THA can be considered to a more complex and demanding procedure, based on RVUs per minute of surgery, orthopaedic surgeons are reimbursed better for primary THA cases. This data could be used by orthopaedic surgeons to administer their practices better to yield the highest return on time.

Long-term results of custom cementless-stem total hip arthroplasty performed in hip fusion

INTRODUCTION

Due to complex anatomical considerations, results of cementless-stem total hip arthroplasty (THA) in hip fusion remain controversial compared with conventional THA. We therefore aimed to analyse 3D anatomy of the fused hip based on pre-operative computed tomography (CT) scans, functional outcomes based on the Harris Hip Score (HHS) and the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS), modifications of hip anatomy based on post-operative standardised radiography, and determine complication rate and long-term survival based on Kaplan-Meier analysis.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied 23 hips that underwent conversion of a fused hip to THA using a 3D CT scan-based custom titanium (Ti alloy hypoxyapetite (HA)-coated stem. The mean follow-up was 15 (9-22) years. Femur anteversion ranged from -29° to 80°.

RESULTS

HHS improved from 59 to 89 points and average range of motion (ROM) was 88° for flexion. Back pain decreased in 62%, and knee pain decreased in 42%. The mean post-operative leg-length discrepancy was 7.8 mm. No intra-operative complications occurred. One aseptic stem loosening for mechanical failure was observed. The Kaplan-Meier survivorship considering revision for any reasons as the end point was 95.6% [95% confidence interval (CI) 92.4-98.8] at 15 years.

CONCLUSION

Custom cementless stems may be an interesting solution to address the particular anatomical features of hip fusion at the time of THA, with an excellent survival rate at 15 years.

Ceramic on ceramic hip arthroplasty in fused hips

BACKGROUND

Most literature in the field of total hip arthroplasty (THA) for fused hips, until date has reported the results of using metal on polyethylene and ceramic on polyethylene bearings. Results of THA using ceramic on ceramic (CoC) bearings in fused hips have not been published in literature. This study reports the results of cementless THA using CoC articulation perfomed in fused hips.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-three patients (25 hips) with fused hips underwent conversion to THA using CoC bearings and were followed up for a mean 5.4 years. The conventional posterolateral approach was used in 15 hips, a modified two incision technique in 7 hips and a direct lateral approach with greater trochanteric osteotomy in 3 hips. Postoperatively, range of motion exercises were encouraged after 2-3 days of bed rest and subsequent gradual weight bearing using crutches was begun.

RESULTS

Mean Harris hip score improved from 42.4 to 84.2 and mean leg lengthening of 36.6 mm was achieved. In the average 5.4 years (range 2.8-9.1 years) followup there were no cases with osteolysis around acetabular cup and femoral stem. In this study, there was no case of ceramic fracture. There was one case of squeaking.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that cementless THA performed for fused hips with CoC bearings can provide good early clinical results.

Hip arthrodesis with the anterolateral plate: an innovating technique for an orphaned procedure

BACKGROUND

In developing countries hip osteoarthritis constitutes a major public health issue as it is highly prevalent in all age ranges of population, including the young. It often remains untreated because of the low accessibility of total hip prostheses. Hip arthrodesis still represents a major treatment option, but, for several reasons which are discussed in this paper, is nowadays infrequently performed. By means of reporting the results of a new simple technique, using a self-devised plate, the relevancy of hip arthrodesis in this particular environment is emphasized.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

Our series included 35 patients with painful hip osteoarthritis who underwent a hip fusion with the anterolateral arthrodesis plate. Two of them had a concurrent femoral osteotomy for correction of a vicious position of the limb and another patient had a femoral diaphysis osteotomy and placement of a Wagner elongating device in order to proceed with a limb lengthening by callotasis. The follow-up period averaged 16,9 months (9 to 34). All hips, except two, achieved solid fusion between 6 and 15 months after surgery. One failure of fusion was in the oldest patient, who presented a loosening of plate and screws due to an advanced degree of osteoporosis; the other was in a young patient who admitted having walked on his leg too soon. Patient satisfaction was high. We concluded that this technique is reliable and effective.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study should convince the hesitant surgeon and patient to consider hip arthrodesis an acceptable treatment option for disabling hip arthritis, compared to no treatment at all.

Is total hip arthroplasty after hip arthrodesis as good as primary arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND

Conversion of hip arthrodesis to a THA reportedly provides a reasonable solution, improving function, reducing back and knee pain, and slowing degeneration of neighboring joints associated with a hip fusion. Patients generally are satisfied with conversion despite the fact that range of mobility, muscle strength, leg-length discrepancy (LLD), persistence of limp, and need for assistive walking aids generally are worse than those for conventional primary THA.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We compared THA after hip arthrodesis and primary THA to determine whether these procedures would be associated with similar functional scores, maintenance of scores with time, complications and failures, survivorship of the arthroplasty, and patient satisfaction.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively matched 48 patients undergoing conversion of a fused hip to a THA between January 1980 and January 2000, with 50 patients receiving a primary THA during the same period. We prospectively followed all patients between January 2000 and January 2010. The changes in function and pain after THA were compared between the two cohorts using the Harris hip score (HHS) and the Rosser Index Matrix (RIM). The Oxford hip score (OHS) and the SF-36 also were used to assess quality of life (QOL) during followup. Complications were collected and survivorship of the THA was evaluated. Patient satisfaction was assessed using the Robertsson and Dunbar questionnaire. The minimum followup was 10 years (mean, 17 years; range, 10-29 years).

RESULTS

At last followup, hip function and health-related QOL were similar for patients having conversion of hip arthrodesis to THA and for patients having a routine THA. Scores diminished overall in the two groups between 2000 and 2010, but without a difference for the HHS, RIM QOL, and OHS in the study cohort. The rate of complications, THA survival, and patient satisfaction were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Conversion of hip arthrodesis to a THA provides substantial improvement of hip function and health-related QOL, with an acceptable rate of complications, good expectancy of survival for the arthroplasty, and high level of patient satisfaction comparable to those of primary THA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Total hip arthroplasty after hip joint ankylosis

BACKGROUND

Back pain and knee pain are typical secondary degeneration symptoms after hip ankylosis. Take down of hip ankylosis and implantation of a total hip arthroplasty (THA) is believed to be a promising treatment option.

METHODS

A total of 22 hip ankylosis patients [15 men, mean age 53.7 years (range 30-72 years); 7 women, mean age 50.8 years (range 42-61 years)] underwent THA during 1980-2000 after spontaneous (n = 10) or surgical (n = 12) fusion of the hip joint. The mean duration of ankylosis prior to THA was 32.5 years (range 2-61 years).

RESULTS

At the mean follow-up of 13.2 years (range 2-19 years), the Harris hip score averaged 84.9 points (range 70.1-99.0 points). All patients (100%) confirmed that they would undergo conversion surgery again. Aseptic loosening of two stems (one cemented, one cementless; 9.5%) and two deep infections (9.5%) required revision surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

THA is a promising option for treatment of secondary long-term hip ankylosis sequelae. A conversion operation after spontaneous ankylosis provides better functional outcome than after surgical fusion. However, full function with complete pain relief and a negative Trendelenburg sign might be not attainable in all cases.

Total hip arthroplasty for fused hips; planning and techniques

Conversion of an arthrodesed or fused hip to total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a challenging orthopedic problem due to the effects of previous operations, the altered anatomy, atrophy of the muscles, arthritis of neighboring joints, and limb length discrepancy. This prospective work included conversion of 19 arthrodesed hips to THA. The failure rate was 5% after an average follow-up period of 7 years. Specific preoperative planning and refined techniques have been elucidated to achieve a success rate nearly similar to that of primary THA.