Biomechanische Aspekte von Wechselkomponenten für den Kniegelenkersatz

Comparison of cross-sections of different femoral components for revision total knee replacement

PURPOSE. To compare the inner contour of the femoral component of 10 total knee replacement (TKR) designs for possible exchange in use.

METHODS

Inner contours of the femoral components of 10 cemented, cruciate-retaining TKR designs (e.motion, Genesis, Genia, Innex, LCS, Multigen Plus, NexGen, PFC, Scorpio, Vanguard) were scanned and reconstructed to 2-dimensional contours. Their cross-sections were compared by superimposition and aligning at the distal and anterior cuts. The patellar notch and outer contour were not analysed.

RESULTS

The maximum deviation was 5 mm in the posterior and posterior oblique cuts and 10 mm in the anterior oblique cut. Based on similarity of the inner contour, LCS and Innex was classified as group I, e.motion, Genesis, Scorpio, Vanguard, and Multigen Plus as group II, and Genia, NexGen, and PFC as group III. All 2 designs in group I were not compatible with the other 8 designs. Four of the 5 designs in group II showed good compatibility. All 3 designs in group III significantly differed in the posterior and oblique cuts.

CONCLUSION

A standardised inner contour of the femoral component can increase compatibility of different TKR systems in revision surgery and reduces the extent of bone resection.

[The modular MML revision system in knee revision and tumor arthroplasty]

Increasing age and a higher level of mobility lead to an increasing incidence in revision arthroplasty after total knee replacement and tumor surgery. So far, the reconstruction of large defects in bony and soft tissue environments can be accomplished by the modern modular components of revision implants. The consecutive reconstruction of the extensor mechanism in extended revision has its own drawbacks and is often associated with significant functional limitations for the patient. Specially designed implants and methods are required to generate good functional results. The modular knee revision system MML provides specific modifications of the tibial component for reconstruction of the extensor mechanism. Combined with artificial strips, an excellent functional outcome could be achieved. In this study, 70 patients were operated with the MML endoprosthesis in knee revision or tumor surgery. An excellent functional outcome could be determined. At 7 years after surgery, an average of 32+/-13 points was achieved on the Oxford Knee Score. The outcome measurement using the functional scoring system of the American Knee Society (AKS score) showed similarly good results with 71+/-25 points out of 100. A minor deficit of only 2 degrees in active extension could be observed after reconstruction of the extensor mechanism. In conclusion, we have demonstrated that the MML modular revision system is appropriate for reconstruction of segmental bone defects.