[Surgical treatment concepts for femoral head necrosis]

[Short hip stem for THA in avascular necrosis of the femoral head]

INTRODUCTION

Osteonecrosis of the femoral head or avascular necrosis of the femoral head (HKN) is a complex disease that, without treatment, leads to infraction of the femoral head in most cases. In these cases, only replacement of the hip joint will help, although there is no clear recommendation of an arthroplasty type. In the last two decades, the treatment of primary and secondary coxarthrosis with short-shaft prostheses with different anchoring philosophies has increased. Since short-shaft fitting is a possible option especially in younger patients, the question arises about possible fittings of advanced HKN with these stem types, especially with metaphyseal anchorage. The aim of this study was to review the existing literature on the results of short stem prosthesis in HKN and to present the advantages and disadvantages of short stem prosthesis in osteonecrosis of the femoral head.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This review analyzes the existing studies on short stem arthroplasty for HKN.

RESULTS

Only a few studies exist that have analyzed clinical and radiologic outcomes of short stem replacement in HKN.

CONCLUSION

The existing short- and medium-term results show mostly good outcomes. However, it is difficult to draw a general conclusion due to differences in stem design and fixation. Short stems with primary diaphyseal fixation do not show an increased risk of failed osseointegration or loosening. Constructions with primary metaphyseal fixation should undergo MRI to rule out the possibility of necrosis extending beyond the femoral neck.

Primary stability of calcar-guided short-stem total hip arthroplasty in the treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head: migration analysis using EBRA-FCA

INTRODUCTION

Osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) is a disabling condition that often results in secondary arthritis necessitating total hip arthroplasty (THA). Short-stem THA has constantly gained popularity. It remains controversial, whether ONFH represents a risk factor for failure after the implantation of short stems with pronounced metaphyseal anchorage. The potential spread of the osteonecrotic area and bone marrow edema into the metaphyseal bone might result in compromised stability. Early implant migration is considered predictive of subsequent aseptic loosening. The purpose of this study was a migration analysis of a modern, calcar-guided short-stem implant in patients with ONFH in a mid-term follow-up.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective analysis investigated the migration pattern of 45 calcar-guided short stems in patients with ONFH, using Einzel-Bild-Roentgen-Analyse Femoral-Component-Analysis (EBRA-FCA). Influencing factors such as ARCO categories, age, gender, body weight and BMI were analyzed. Complications and adverse events were documented.

RESULTS

At mid-term [48.1 months (SD 20.7 months)], mean axial migration was 1.56 mm (SD 1.77 mm). Mean migration rate stabilized after 2 years. No influence of ARCO categories, age and BMI was found. A tendency of increased axial migration was observed in male patients and in overweight patients. No revision surgeries had to be performed during follow-up.

CONCLUSION

The results indicate a migration pattern comparable to that of primary osteoarthritis patients with slight initial migration under full load followed by subsequent stabilization in the metaphyseal femur. The 100% survival rate at mid-term supports the usage of this short-stem design in patients with ONFH.

[Joint-preserving operative treatment of avascular necrosis of the femoral head]

The cause of avascular necrosis of the femoral head is multifactorial. Conservative treatment is only an option in the early stages. It is only symptomatic and not causative treatment. The implantation of an artificial hip joint should be postponed as the typically affected middle-aged males are right in the middle of their working life. Therefore, some joint-preserving operative therapies might be considered in stages ARCO I-III. Those range from core decompression to osteotomies and grafts, the advantages and disadvantages of which have to be weighted in each case. More recent therapies such as additive stem cells or platelet rich plasma (PRP) combined with core decompression have yet to prove their efficacy.

Long-term Outcome of Multiple Small-diameter Drilling Decompression Combined with Hip Arthroscopy versus Drilling Alone for Early Avascular Necrosis of the Femoral Head

BACKGROUND

Avascular necrosis of femoral head (AVNFH) typically presents in the young adults and progresses quickly without proper treatments. However, the optimum treatments for early stage of AVNFH are still controversial. This study was conducted to evaluate the therapeutic effects of multiple small-diameter drilling decompression combined with hip arthroscopy for early AVNFH compared to drilling alone.

METHODS

This is a nonrandomized retrospective case series study. Between April 2006 and November 2010, 60 patients (98 hips) with early stage AVNFH participated in this study. The patients underwent multiple small-diameter drilling decompression combined with hip arthroscopy in 26 cases/43 hips (Group A) or drilling decompression alone in 34 cases/55 hips (Group B). Patients were followed up at 6, 12, and 24 weeks, and every 6 months thereafter. Radiographs were taken at every follow-up, Harris scores were recorded at the last follow-up, the paired t-test was used to compare the postoperative Harris scores. Surgery effective rate of the two groups was compared using the Chi-square test.

RESULTS

All patients were followed up for an average of 57.6 months (range: 17-108 months). Pain relief and improvement of hip function were assessed in all patients at 6 months after the surgery. At the last follow-up, Group A had better outcome with mean Harris' scores improved from 68.23 ± 11.37 to 82.07 ± 2.92 (t = -7.21, P = 0.001) than Group B with mean Harris' scores improved from 69.46 ± 9.71 to 75.79 ± 4.13 (t = -9.47, P = 0.037) (significantly different: t = -2.54, P = 0.017). The total surgery effective rate was also significantly different between Groups A and B (86.0% vs. 74.5%; χ2 = 3.69, P = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

For early stage of AVNFH, multiple small-diameter drilling decompression combined with hip arthroscopy is more effective than drilling decompression alone.

Short-stem hip arthroplasty in osteonecrosis of the femoral head

INTRODUCTION

Osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) is a locally destructive and complex disorder. Without treatment, infraction of the femoral head is likely. There is also a lack of consensus in the literature about the most appropriate arthroplasty method in patients with progressive ONFH. During the last decade, the number of short-stem prostheses has increased. Some short-stem designs have a metaphyseal anchorage. It is questionable whether ONFH represents a risk factor for failure after implantation of short stems. The aim of this study was to review existing literature regarding the outcome of short-stem arthroplasty in ONFH and to present the pros and cons of short-stem hip arthroplasty in osteonecrosis of the femoral head.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This review summarises existing studies on short-stem hip arthroplasty in osteonecrosis of the femoral head.

RESULTS

Few studies have analysed the clinical and radiological outcome of short-stem THA in patients with ONFH. Only a handful of studies present clinical and radiological outcome after implantation of a short-stem arthroplasty in patients with the underlying diagnosis of osteonecrosis of the femoral head.

CONCLUSION

The short- to medium-term results show predominantly good outcomes. However, due to differences in the design of short stems and their fixation, it is hard to draw a general conclusion. Short stems with primary diaphyseal fixation do not reveal a high increased risk of failed osseointegration or loosening. For designs with a primary metaphyseal anchorage, an MRI should be conducted to exclude that the ostenecrosis exceeds the femoral neck.

Hip Microfracture: Indications, Technique, and Outcomes

Microfracture is a marrow-stimulating technique used in the hip to treat cartilage defects associated with femoro-acetabular impingement, instability, or traumatic hip injury. These defects have a low probability of healing spontaneously and therefore often require surgical intervention. Originally adapted from the knee, microfracture is part of a spectrum of cartilage repair options that include palliative procedures such as debridement and lavage, reparative procedures such as marrow-stimulating techniques (abrasion arthroplasty and microfracture), and restorative procedures such as autologous chondrocyte implantation and osteochondral allograft/autografts. The basic indications for microfracture of the hip include focal and contained lesions typically less than 4 cm in diameter, full-thickness (Outerbridge grade IV) defects in weightbearing areas, unstable lesions with intact subchondral bone, and focal lesions without evidence of surrounding chondromalacia. Although not extensively studied in the hip, there are some small clinical series with promising early outcomes. Although the widespread use of microfracture in the hip is hindered by difficulties in identifying lesions on preoperative imaging and instrumentation to circumvent the femoral head, this technique continues to gain acceptance as an initial treatment for small, focal cartilage defects.