[Arthroscopy prior to osteotomy in cases of unicondylar osteoarthritis]

The influence of the weight-bearing state on three-dimensional (3D) planning in lower extremity realignment - analysis of novel vs. state-of-the-art planning approaches

BACKGROUND

The use of 3D planning to guide corrective osteotomies of the lower extremity is increasing in clinical practice. The use of computer-tomography (CT) data acquired in supine position neglects the weight-bearing (WB) state and the gold standard in 3D planning involves the manual adaption of the surgical plan after considering the WB state in long-leg radiographs (LLR). However, this process is subjective and dependent on the surgeons experience. A more standardized and automated method could reduce variability and decrease costs.

PURPOSE

The aim of the study was (1) to compare three different three-dimensional (3D) planning modalities for medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOWHTO) and (2) to describe the current practice of adapting NWB CT data after considering the WB state in LLR. The purpose of this study is to validate a new, standardized approach to include the WB state into the 3D planning and to compare this method against the current gold standard of 3D planning. Our hypothesis is that the correction is comparable to the gold standard, but shows less variability due compared to the more subjective hybrid approach.

METHODS

Three surgical planning modalities were retrospectively analyzed in 43 legs scheduled for MOWHTO between 2015 and 2019. The planning modalities included: (1) 3D hybrid (3D non-weight-bearing (NWB) CT models after manual adaption of the opening angle considering the WB state in LLR, (2) 3D NWB (3D NWB CT models) and (3) 3D WB (2D/3D registration of 3D NWB CT models onto LLR to simulate the WB state). The pre- and postoperative hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) and the planned opening angle (°) were assessed and differences among modalities reported. The relationship between the reported differences and BMI, preoperative HKA (LLR), medial meniscus extrusion, Outerbridge osteoarthritis grade and joint line convergence angle (JLCA) was analyzed.

RESULTS

The mean (std) planned opening angle of 3D hybrid did not differ between 3D hybrid and 3D WB (0.4 ± 2.1°) (n.s.) but was higher in 3D hybrid compared to 3D NWB (1.1° ± 1.1°) (p = 0.039). 3D WB demonstrated increased preoperative varus deformity compared to 3D NWB: 6.7 ± 3.8° vs. 5.6 ± 2.7° (p = 0.029). Patients with an increased varus deformity in 3D WB compared to 3D NWB (> 2 °) demonstrated more extensive varus alignment in LLR (p = 0.009) and a higher JLCA (p = 0.013).

CONCLUSION

Small intermodal differences between the current practice of the reported 3D hybrid planning modality and a 3D WB approach using a 2D/3D registration algorithm were reported. In contrast, neglecting the WB state underestimates preoperative varus deformity and results in a smaller planned opening angle. This leads to potential under correction in MOWHTO, especially in patients with extensive varus deformities or JLCA.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Incorporating the WB state in 3D planning modalities has the potential to increase accuracy and lead to a more consistent and reliable planning in MOWHTO. The inclusion of the WB state in automatized surgical planning algorithms has the potential to reduce costs and time in the future.

[The influence of axial deformities and their correction on the development and progression of osteoarthritis]

Die Beachtung der Beinachse und die Möglichkeiten zur deren Korrektur stellen beim jungen Patienten mit Arthrose ein Grundpfeiler der Therapie dar. Die Kombination einer Gelenksverletzung und einer Achsdeviation führt unweigerlich, je nach Ausmaß und Komorbiditäten, schon nach wenigen Jahren zur fortschreitenden Gonarthrose. Neben der genauen Deformitätenanalyse zur Osteotomieplanung, gilt es, Normbereiche der entsprechenden Winkel zu kennen und eine Zielgröße zur Achskorrektur festzulegen. Aus dem Repertoire der verschiedenen kniegelenksnahen Osteotomien sind dann die Nebeneffekte in Bezug auf patellofemorales Maltracking, ligamentäres Balancing und die Beinlänge abzuschätzen. Gerade im Hinblick auf mögliche (und wahrscheinliche) Folgeoperationen beim jungen Patienten müssen neue knöcherne Deformitäten oder ligamentäre Insuffizienzen, welche potenziell bei Überkorrektur entstehen, unbedingt vermieden werden.

Patellofemoral dysbalance and genua valga: outcome after femoral varisation osteotomies

INTRODUCTION

Patellofemoral dysbalance may be caused by trochlear dysplasia, an elevated TTTG distance, femoral or tibial torsional deformities, patella alta, or a genu valgum. The surgical procedure for the treatment of a genu valgum is varisation osteotomy, usually in the femoral aspect. Several authors believe that a genu valgum is one cause of patellofemoral dysbalance, but studies about the outcome of the treatment with a varisation osteotomy are rare.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Nineteen knees in 18 patients, aged on average 28 (16-52) years were investigated in a retrospective study. The patients had symptoms of patellofemoral instability or anterior knee pain due to a genu valgum, without symptoms of a lateral femorotibial compartment. All patients underwent a femoral varisation osteotomy. The diagnostic investigation prior to surgery included full-leg radiographs and torsional angle CT scans. The pre-surgery and follow-up investigation included the visual analog scale (VAS), the Kujala score, the Japanese Knee Society score, the Lysholm score.

RESULTS

The mean duration of follow-up was 44(10-132) months. The mean preoperative mechanical valgus was 5.6° (range 4-10°). Twelve patients mentioned patellar instability as the main symptom while 14 mentioned anterior knee pain. No redislocation occurred in the follow-up period. Anterior knee pain on the VAS (p value < 0.001) was significantly reduced (5.6-2.1). The Japanese Knee Society score improved from 87 to 93 (p value 0.013) points, the Kujala score improved significantly from 72 to 87 (p value 0.009), and the Lysholm score significantly from 76 to 92 (p value < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Genua valga can lead to patellofemoral dysbalance, treatment of this condition is femoral varisation osteotomy. In this study, patellofemoral stability was achieved and anterior knee pain was significantly reduced. Significant improvements in clinical scores proved the success of the treatment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, case series.

Simultaneous ipsilateral knee arthroscopy and unicondylar knee arthroplasty is effective for bicompartmental symptoms

BACKGROUND

Patients with unicompartmental radiographic arthritis but bicompartmental symptoms pose a clinical challenge. Some surgeons may perceive it as a contraindication for unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA). We investigated patient outcomes 2 years after simultaneous ipsilateral arthroscopy and UKA as compared to a similar group of patients who had total knee replacement (TKA) for a similar clinical presentation.

METHODS

We identified 9 patients with simultaneous ipsilateral arthroscopy and UKA between 2004 and 2013, and 12 clinically similar patients treated with TKA.

RESULTS

At 1- and 2-years, SF-12 physical scores were significantly improved in the UKA-scope group than in the TKA group (47.2 vs 40.3, p = 0.042; 48.3 vs 32.6, p = 0.026). WOMAC pain score, WOMAC stiffness score, WOMAC function and KSFS were significantly improved in the UKA-scope group at 2 years as compared to the TKA group (98.7 vs 63.8, p = 0.030), (90.1 vs 43.8, p = 0.013), (92.3 vs 55.2, p = 0.027 and (92.3 vs 55.2, p = 0.027), respectively). Change in score from baseline for KSFS, SF-12 physical and WOMAC stiffness were significantly improved in the UKA-scope group at 2 years compared to TKA, (28.3 vs -5, p = 0.041), (13.6 vs 3.0, p = 0.026), (52.6 vs -6.3, p = 0.025), respectively.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that patients with isolated compartment radiographic disease but with bicompartmental symptoms can benefit from UKA and simultaneous arthroscopy. Further, TKA for isolated compartment radiographic disease in this limited series had poorer outcomes. We obtain MRI selectively when physical exam and radiographic findings suggest isolated arthritic disease in patients with bicompartmental symptoms.

Torsional osteotomies of the tibia in patellofemoral dysbalance

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Anterior knee pain or patellofemoral instability is common symptom of patellofemoral dysbalance or maltracking. Tibial torsional deformities can be the reason of this pathology. After appropriate diagnostic investigation, the treatment of choice is a torsional osteotomy. This study addresses the diagnostic investigation, treatment, and the outcome of torsional osteotomies of the tibia. Does this treatment result in patellofemoral stability and provide pain relief?

METHODS

Forty-nine tibial torsional osteotomies were included. The major symptoms were patellofemoral instability in 19 cases and anterior knee pain in 42 cases. In addition to clinical and radiographic analysis, a torsional angle CT scan was performed pre-operatively. A visual analog scale (VAS), the Japanese Knee Society score, the Tegner activity score, and the Lysholm score were assessed pre-operatively and at the 42-month follow-up.

RESULTS

Mean tibial external torsion was 47.4° (SD 5.41; range 37°-66°; standard value 34°). Surgical treatment consisted of an acute supratuberositary tibial internal torsional osteotomy (mean 10.8°; SD 3.01°; range 5°-18°). At the follow-up investigation, the Tegner activity score was increased 0.4 points (p value 0.014) from 3.9 (SD 1.33; range 2-7) to 4.3 (SD 1.25; range 0-7). The Lysholm score increased 26 points (SD 16.32; p value 0.001) from 66 (SD 14.94; range 32-94) to 92 (SD 9.29; range 70-100) and the Japanese Knee Society score increased 18 points (SD 14.70; p value 0.001) from 72 (SD 13.72, range 49-100) to 90 (SD 9.85, range 60-100). VAS was reduced 3.4 points (SD 2.89; p value 0.001) from 5.7 (SD 2.78; range 0-10) to 2.3 (SD 1.83; range 0-7). As regards patellofemoral instability, no redislocation occurred in the follow-up period.

INTERPRETATION

The results of this study show that in cases of tibial maltorsion, a torsional osteotomy can lead to patellofemoral stability and pain relief, and should be considered as a treatment option. The improved clinical scores in the present investigation show the value of the procedure. Level of evidence Level IV.