Epiphyseolysis capitis femoris

[Pediatric developmental disorders of the musculoskeletal system]

CLINICAL/METHODICAL ISSUE

In pediatric musculoskeletal disorders, a distinction is made between normal and abnormal development.

STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL METHODS

X‑ray examination is the standard diagnostic procedure.

METHODOLOGICAL INNOVATIONS

Cross-sectional imaging, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), and ultrasonography (US) are increasingly used.

PERFORMANCE

X‑ray imaging is still the examination method of choice but can be supplemented by cross-sectional imaging depending on clinical situation.

ACHIEVEMENTS

Cross-sectional imaging is helpful and necessary in many cases but significantly more time-consuming and costly than x‑ray examinations.

PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS

Initially standard x‑rays should be taken, which can then be supplemented with cross-sectional imaging depending on the result and clinical question (MRI and US are preferred as there is no radiation).

Evaluation of the Three-Dimensional Translational and Angular Deformity in Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis

The purpose of this study was to quantify three-dimensional translational and angular deformity (defined as theta) present at the proximal femoral physis in slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE), and to use theta to differentiate between SCFE hips, contralateral unaffected hips, and normal hips by comparing to the current gold standard measure of the Southwick slip angle (SSA). 3DCT reconstructions of the pelvis and femur in SCFE patients and normal adolescents were obtained and pelvic position was standardized. The center point and direction vector of the femoral epiphysis was determined. The femoral neck axis was defined. The angle between the femoral neck axis and epiphysis vector defined the 3D angle of deformity (theta). The 3D translation of the femoral epiphysis, measured as a percentage of femoral neck diameter, was measured in three planes. The average theta angle was significantly greater in SCFE hips (46.5 ± 24.3°) compared with control (13.7 ± 6.4°) or normal (11.7 ± 3.7°) hips (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in theta angle between control and normal hips (p = 0.468). Theta angle correlated strongly with SSA (r_s  = 0.737, p < 0.001). Statement of clinical significance: The proximal femoral deformity in patients with slipped capital femoral epiphysis can be defined by measuring displacement of the epiphysis in all three dimensions in relation to the femoral neck axis. This information can be used in epiphyseal reorientation surgery to ensure anatomic reduction. The similarity between control and normal hips may argue against the thought that there is pre-existing deformity in a pre-slip condition of unaffected contralateral hips in SCFE patients. © 2019 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 38:1081-1088, 2020.

[Slipped capital femoral epiphysis-etiology and pathogenesis]

BACKGROUND

Slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is the most significant hip disease in adolescence. Because of its typical occurrence at the time of the pubertal growth spurt and some particular clinical symptoms, it has been a topic of special interest in orthopedic research for a long time. A large number of etiological factors have been described, however their meaning in detail is still controversial.

OBJECTIVES

After a short summary of the structure and function of the epiphysis, an overview of concepts in the pathogenesis of SCFE is given.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A selective review of literature was performed.

RESULTS

Etiology of SCFE includes genetic, endocrinologic, histochemical and biomechanical factors. During puberty, obesity together with reduced femoral antetorsion are the main risk factors for the disease. The rarer atypical SCFE is closely related to metabolic disorders or other chronical diseases. The pathogenesis is characterized by the disproportion between the load-bearing capacity of the epiphysis and the acting forces on the proximal femur.

CONCLUSIONS

The concept of the multifactorial etiology of SCFE is convincing. The susceptibility of the femoral epiphysis is explained considering the remarkable biomechanic local forces. The initial damage can be shown on the histological and the histochemical level. Important new aspects refer to the leptin-metabolism. However, in the majority of cases, biomechanical factors seem to be more significant than endocrinological phenomena. A complete understanding has not succeeded to date.