[Morphological and functional cartilage imaging]

[Update cartilage imaging of the small joints : Focus on high-field MRI]

BACKGROUND

Cartilage imaging of small joints is increasingly of interest, as early detection of cartilage damage may be relevant regarding individualized surgical therapies and long-term outcomes.

PURPOSE

The aim of this review is to explain modern cartilage imaging of small joints with emphasis on MRI and to discuss the role of methods such as CT arthrography as well as compositional and high-field MRI.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A PubMed literature search was performed for the years 2008-2018.

RESULTS

Clinically relevant cartilage imaging to detect chondral damage in small joints remains challenging. Conventional MRI at 3 T can still be considered as a reference for cartilage imaging in clinical routine. In terms of sensitivity, MR arthrography (MR-A) and computed tomography arthrography (CT-A) are superior to non-arthrographic MRI at 1.5 T in the detection of chondral damage. Advanced degenerative changes of the fingers and toes are usually sufficiently characterized by conventional radiography. MRI at field strengths of 3 T and ultrahigh-field imaging at 7 T can provide additional quantifiable, functional and metabolic information.

CONCLUSION

Standardized cartilage imaging plays an important role in clinical diagnostics in the ankle joint due to the availability of different and individualized therapeutic concepts. In contrast, cartilage imaging of other small joints as commonly performed in clinical studies has not yet become standard of care in daily clinical routine. Although individual study results are promising, additional studies with large patient collectives are needed to validate these techniques. With rapid development of new treatment concepts radiological diagnostics will play a more significant role in the diagnosis of cartilage lesions of small joints.

Clinical and radiographical ten years long-term outcome of microfracture vs. autologous chondrocyte implantation: a matched-pair analysis

PURPOSE

To compare the clinical and radiographical long-term outcome of microfracture (MFX) and first-generation periosteum-covered autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI-P).

METHODS

All subjects (n = 86) who had been treated with knee joint ACI-P or microfracture (n = 76) with a post-operative follow-up of at least ten years were selected. Clinical pre- and post-operative outcomes were analyzed by numeric analog scale (NAS) for pain, Lysholm, Tegner, IKDC, and KOOS score. Radiographical evaluation was visualized by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Assessment of the regenerate quality was performed by the magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) and modified knee osteoarthritis scoring system (mKOSS). Relaxation time (RT) of T2 maps enabled a microstructural cartilage analysis.

RESULTS

MFX and ACI of 44 patients (24 females, 20 males; mean age 38.9 ± 12.1 years) resulted in a good long-term outcome with low pain scores and significant improved clinical scores. The final Lysholm and functional NAS scores were significantly higher in the MFX group (Lysholm: MFX 82 ± 15 vs. ACI-P 71 ± 18 p = 0.027; NAS function: MFX 8.1 ± 3.5 vs. ACI-P 6.0 ± 2.5; p = 0.003). The MOCART score did not show any qualitative differences. KOSS analysis demonstrated that cartilage repair of small defects resulted in a significant better outcome. T2-relaxation times were without difference between groups at the region of the regenerate tissue.

CONCLUSION

This study did not demonstrate coherent statistical differences between both cartilage repair procedures. MFX might be superior in the treatment of small cartilage defects.