Management von Prothesen­infektionen

Implementation of Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy (OPAT) in Patients with Complicated Periprosthetic Joint Infections

Periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) are a serious complication of arthroplasty with high morbidity. With growing bacterial resistance and limited disposability of oral antibiotics with sufficient bioavailability, the need for intravenous antibiotic application is raising. This causes long-term hospital stays and rising costs. In the course of transferring procedures into an outpatient setting as well as coping with pressures on hospital capacity, outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) can build a bridge for the treatment of such infections.In a single centre analysis, 47 cases treated with OPAT were studied in relation to pathogen, antimicrobial resistance, indication for OPAT and follow up. Furthermore, the patients received an anonymised questionnaire with 4 clusters of interest in terms of internal quality assessment on the success and evaluation of this therapeutic procedure. Special attention was paid to the descriptive analysis of patients with periprosthetic joint infections (n = 30).Between May 2021 and October 2022 out of 47 patients with OPAT, 30 cases with periprosthetic joint infections were identified. For infected hip- and knee arthroplasties, a remarkable spectrum of pathogens was found. In hip infections highly resistant strains of Staphylococcus epidermidis and Enterococci were detected. In knee infections, the pathogens were more susceptible, but however highly virulent Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococci. Difficult to treat, mixed infections were found in both locations. The indication for OPAT was based in half of the cases on the high level of antimicrobial resistance, with availability of only parenteral applicable antibiotics. Further indications were mixed infections and difficult to treat pathogens, with flucloxacillin therapy as well as OPAT as the last therapeutic option. The questionnaire showed 96% patient satisfaction in terms of organisation and acceptance of this kind of therapy. Complications or unexpected outpatient/ hospital treatments were very rare in connection with OPAT. Two thirds of patients reported completion of the treatment. In the clinical follow up (average of 5.7 months), 96.6% of cases were declared free of infection. In one patient the infection persisted.OPAT is a safe and reliable therapeutic option for outpatients to continue parenteral antimicrobial treatment in joint infections. Due to increasing pressure on hospitals in terms of costs and capacity, this therapy offers an alternative to inpatient treatment. The indication for OPAT should be set individually, risk adjusted and not generalised for all patients. The outpatient sector needs financial and structural support for comprehensive roll-out of this treatment in Germany. A further focus should be on the prevention of periprosthetic joint infections. With the knowledge of the expected pathogens and the surgical resources, the standards should be adapted. The choice of the antibiotic should be specified and the intervals of application be shortened, according to the surgical course, in order to yield high levels of agent concentration in the surgical area. Further investigations are required to test the superiority of OPAT versus the oral administration of antibiotics in long-term observations as well as to define the necessary duration of OPAT.

Preoperative Decolonization Appears to Reduce the Risk of Infection in High-Risk Groups Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Periprosthetic infections represent a major challenge for doctors and patients. The aim of this study was therefore to determine whether the risk of infection can be positively influenced by preoperative decolonization of the skin and mucous membranes.

METHODS

In a retrospective analysis of 3082 patients who had undergone THA between 2014 and 2020, preoperative decolonization with octenidine dihydrochlorid was performed in the intervention group. In an interval of 30 days, soft tissue and prosthesis infections were detected, and an evaluation between the study groups was made by using a bilateral t-test regarding the presence of an early infection. The study groups were identical with regard to the ASA score, comorbidities, and risk factors.

RESULTS

Patients treated preoperatively with the octenidine dihydrochloride protocol showed lower early infection rates. In the group of intermediate- and high-risk patients (ASA 3 and higher), there was generally a significantly increased risk. The risk of wound or joint infection within 30 days was 1.99% higher for patients with ASA 3 or higher than for patients with standard care (4.11% [13/316] vs. 2.02% [10/494]; p = 0.08, relative risk 2.03). Preoperative decolonization shows no effect on the risk of infection that increases with age, and a gender-specific effect could not be detected. Looking at the body mass index, it could be shown that sacropenia or obesity leads to increased infection rates. Preoperative decolonization led to lower infection rates in percentage terms, which, however, did not prove to be significant (BMI < 20 1.98% [5/252] vs. 1.31% [5/382], relative risk 1.43, BMI > 30 2.58% [5/194] vs. 1.20% [4/334], relative risk 2.15). In the spectrum of patients with diabetes, it could be shown that preoperative decolonization leads to a significantly lower risk of infection (infections without protocol 18.3% (15/82), infections with protocol 8.50% (13/153), relative risk 2.15, p = 0.04.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative decolonization appears to show a benefit, especially for the high-risk groups, despite the fact that in this patient group there is a high potential for resulting complications.

Preoperative joint aspiration culture results and causative pathogens in total hip and knee prosthesis infections: mind the gap

OBJECTIVES

In prosthetic joint infections (PJIs), there is no consensus about the utility of the preoperative joint aspiration culture to guide antimicrobial treatment. The main objective of this retrospective study was to investigate the value of these preoperative samples to narrow immediate postoperative empirical antimicrobial treatment in patients with a knee or hip PJI.

METHODS

Adult patients admitted for an exchange procedure between June 2007 and July 2016 for whom a preoperative joint aspiration within 6 months prior to the procedure was available and with an antibiotic-free interval before sampling, were eligible. Per PJI, taking both preoperative joint aspiration and intraoperative deep samples into account, causative pathogen(s) were assessed by the current Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) guidelines. Per PJI, agreement of preoperative joint aspiration cultures corresponding to the causative pathogen(s) was investigated both on species and on Gram/fungi level.

RESULTS

From the 85 PJIs, on species level, the total agreement was found in 58 (68%) PJIs. On Gram/fungi level, when preoperative joint aspiration cultures yielded exclusively Gram-positive microorganisms (n = 61), a 100% predictive value for Gram positive causing pathogens was attained. Insufficient predictive value was observed in PJIs with preoperative joint aspiration yielding Gram-negative microorganisms (n = 4), a fungus (n = 1) or with sterile results (n = 19).

CONCLUSION

In the immediate postoperative setting, the treating team might consider a broad spectrum empirical antibiotic regime, guided by the local epidemiology and susceptibility, which can be narrowed to Gram-positive coverage if preoperative joint aspiration cultures yield exclusively Gram-positive microorganisms.

[Approach to joint effusion]

The fundamental components of the differential diagnostics of joint effusions are the patient history and clinical examination. In the case of unclear findings, arthrosonography can provide information for the distinction between intra-articular and extra-articular pathologies. In atraumatic joint effusions inflammatory parameters in blood are determined in order to differentiate between systemic inflammatory and local inflammatory joint effusions. In the case of normal values further diagnostics are carried out using imaging. With elevated inflammatory parameters the main differential diagnoses are gouty arthritis, autoimmune joint processes and septic arthritis. When in doubt, a joint aspiration and synovial fluid analysis should be performed to rule out septic arthritis or if necessary confirmation of gouty arthritis.