[Patella navigation in computer-assisted TKA : Intraoperative measurement of patellar kinematics. Video article]

Investigation of femoral condyle height changes during flexion of the knee: implication to gap balance in TKA surgery

BACKGROUND

Gap balance of the knee at 0° and 90° of flexion has been pursued in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with the trans-epicondyle axis (TEA) as a reference. This study investigated the height changes of the tibiofemoral articulation and compared the data with the femoral condyle height changes measured using different flexion axes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty healthy knees were investigated during an in vivo weightbearing flexion using a technique combining MRI and a dual fluoroscopic imaging system (DFIS). The tibiofemoral contact points and the femoral condyle heights [measured using: TEA, geometric center axis (GCA), and iso-height axis (IHA)] were determined at each flexion angle. The height changes of the articular contact points and the femoral condyles were compared along the flexion path.

RESULTS

The changes of the medial and lateral contact point heights were within 2.5 mm along the flexion path. The changes of the medial and lateral condyle heights were within 8.9 mm for TEA, within 4.2 mm for GCA and within 3.0 mm for IHA. The height changes measured by the contact points and IHA are similar (p > 0.05), and both are significantly smaller than those measured using the TEA and GCA (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The TEA and GCA measured varying femoral condyle heights, but the IHA resulted in minimal condyle height changes and could better represent the articulation characteristics of the knee. The data suggested that the IHA could be used as an alternative reference to guide surgical preparation of gap balance along the knee flexion path during TKA surgeries.

Accurate implant fit and leg alignment after cruciate-retaining patient-specific total knee arthroplasty

Background

For improved outcomes in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) correct implant fitting and positioning are crucial. In order to facilitate a best possible implant fitting and positioning patient-specific systems have been developed. However, whether or not these systems allow for better implant fitting and positioning has yet to be elucidated. For this reason, the aim was to analyse the novel patient-specific cruciate retaining knee replacement system iTotal™ CR G2 that utilizes custom-made implants and instruments for its ability to facilitate accurate implant fitting and positioning including correction of the hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA).

Methods

We assessed radiographic results of 106 patients who were treated with the second generation of a patient-specific cruciate retaining knee arthroplasty using iTotal™ CR G2 (ConforMIS Inc.) for tricompartmental knee osteoarthritis (OA) using custom-made implants and instruments. The implant fit and positioning as well as the correction of the mechanical axis (hip-knee-ankle angle, HKA) and restoration of the joint line were determined using pre- and postoperative radiographic analyses.

Results

On average, HKA was corrected from 174.4° ± 4.6° preoperatively to 178.8° ± 2.2° postoperatively and the coronal femoro-tibial angle was adjusted on average 4.4°. The measured preoperative tibial slope was 5.3° ± 2.2° (mean +/− SD) and the average postoperative tibial slope was 4.7° ± 1.1° on lateral views. The joint line was well preserved with an average modified Insall-Salvati index of 1.66 ± 0.16 pre- and 1.67 ± 0.16 postoperatively. The overall accuracy of fit of implant components was decent with a measured medial overhang of more than 1 mm (1.33 mm ± 0.32 mm) in 4 cases only. Further, a lateral overhang of more than 1 mm (1.8 mm ± 0.63) (measured in the anterior-posterior radiographs) was observed in 11 cases, with none of the 106 patients showing femoral notching.

Conclusion

The patient-specific iTotal™ CR G2 total knee replacement system facilitated a proper fitting and positioning of the implant components. Moreover, a good restoration of the leg axis towards neutral alignment was achieved as planned. Nonetheless, further clinical follow-up studies are necessary to validate our findings and to determine the long-term impact of using this patient- specific system.

Evaluation of implant fit and frontal plane alignment after bi-compartmental knee arthroplasty using patient-specific instruments and implants

INTRODUCTION

The goals of successful bi-compartmental knee arthroplasty are to achieve correct fit and positioning of the implant, while appropriately correcting the mechanical alignment of the leg after surgery. As these requirements are not always reliably fulfilled using off-the-shelf implant systems, newer approaches for bi-compartmental resurfacing have been explored.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this article we report the radiographic results of 30 patients with anteromedial osteoarthritis (OA) who were treated with a novel patient-specific fixed-bearing bi-compartmental knee resurfacing system using custom-made implants and instruments. Utilizing standardized pre- and postoperative radiographic analyses (based on anterior-posterior and lateral, anterior-posterior weight-bearing full-length radiographs, patella skyline views and preoperative computed tomography (CT) scanning) implant fit and positioning as well as correction of the mechanical axis (hip-knee-ankle angle, HKA) were determined.

RESULTS

On average, HKA was corrected from 173.4 ±3.47° preoperatively to 179.4 ±2.85° postoperatively. The coronal femoro-tibial angle was corrected on average 5.61°. The preoperative tibial slope measured on lateral views was 6.38 ±2.4°, while the average slope in the CT-based planning protocol (iView) was 6.14 ±2.40°. Postoperative lateral tibial slope was determined to be 5.77 ±1.97°. The thickness of the posterior femoral cuts was measured intraoperatively and, in all cases, corresponded well to the targeted thickness of the cuts provided by the iView. The joint line was preserved in all cases and the average Insall-Salvati index was 1.078 ±0.11 pre- and 1.072 ±0.11 postoperatively. The fit of the implant components measured by over- or underhang was excellent throughout (< 1.01 mm).

CONCLUSIONS

Custom-made bicompartmental knee arthroplasty can ensure optimized fitting and positioning of the implant with restoration of the leg axis. These implants could be considered as an alternative primary solution for knee surgeons treating bi-compartmental disease.