[Scaphoid pseudarthrosis : Indications for avascular iliac crest or radius bone grafts]

Treatment of scaphoid fractures and pseudarthroses with the human allogeneic cortical bone screw. A multicentric retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Allograft bone screws are rarely described for the fixation of the scaphoid. When fresh fractures are treated, metal screws are mainly used; when pseudarthrosis is the indication, plates in combination with vascularized or non-vascularized bone grafts are mainly used. The necessity of metallic screw removal is under debate, but it is mandatory for plates because of movement restrictions due to the plate. The use of biomaterials in scaphoid fracture fixation was described as leading to union rates of between 64 and 100%. Brcic showed the incorporation of an allogeneic cortical bone screw at 10 weeks postoperative, along with revascularization and stable osteosynthesis with primary bone healing, without any signs of immunological rejection. The purpose of this retrospective study was to explore the results obtained using an allogenic cortical bone screw (Shark Screw®) in patients with fresh scaphoid fracture fixation and pseudarthroses with respect to union rates and time to union.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 75 patients: 31 with fresh fractures and 44 pseudarthrosis patients. The Shark Screw® was used for the fixation of the scaphoid in the fresh-fracture and pseudarthrosis patients. We evaluated the union rate, complication rate and time to union.

RESULTS

Using the human allogeneic cortical bone screw for scaphoid fracture fixation led to a high union rate (94-96%). There were two nonunions in the fresh fracture group and two nonunions in the pseudarthrosis group. The complication rate was 1.3% (1 patient). Median time to union was 16, 18 and 29 weeks for the fresh-fracture, pseudarthrosis and delayed-union patients, respectively. The treatment of fresh scaphoid fractures and pseudarthroses showed similar union rates to those described in the literature, uses a shorter and less invasive surgical method with no need for hardware removal, and has a low complication rate.

CONCLUSION

Using the human allogenic cortical bone screw (Shark Screw®) led to similar union rates in fresh fractures-but better union rates in pseudarthrosis patients-compared to those presented in the literature for other scaphoid fracture fixation techniques, and it enabled a short and low-invasive procedure without any donor site morbidity and without the necessity to remove the hardware in a second surgery. The pseudarthrosis patient group showed a particularly strong benefit from this new procedure. The physiological bone metabolism remodels the cortical bone screw without scars.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III: retrospective cohort study, therapeutic investigation of a treatment.

[Scaphoid pseudarthrosis : Complex reconstruction using vascularized bone grafts]

The most important goals of scaphoid reconstruction in pseudarthrosis are correction of the humpback deformity, the realignment of the proximal carpal row and the bony union of the scaphoid. Therefore, in most cases bone grafting is required. To increase the healing rate and to improve vascularization, several kinds of vascularized bone grafts have been developed. Pedicled grafts are preferably harvested from the dorsal or palmar side of the distal radius with fusion rates between 27% and 100%. Free microvascular grafts can be obtained from the iliac crest and the medial or lateral femoral condyle with fusion rates between 60% and 100%. For their application microsurgical equipment and skills are required. Up to now osteochondral grafts from the femoral condyle offer the only chance for joint surface replacement by transferring part of the surface of the femoropatellar joint. The use of vascularized grafts is still a matter of controversy, since their superiority is still unproven compared to nonvascularized grafts, which also achieved 100% fusion rates in several series. They are indicated in secondary procedures after failed reconstruction and nonunion with small avascular proximal pole fragments. Since no evidence-based guidelines exist, this article provides an experience-based treatment algorithm for scaphoid nonunion with special consideration to vascularized bone grafts.

Correlation of CT imaging and histology to guide bone graft selection in scaphoid non-union surgery

INTRODUCTION

For the treatment of scaphoid non-unions (SNU), different surgical techniques, including vascularized and non-vascularized bone grafts, are applied. Besides stability, vascularity, and the biological situation at the non-union site are important for healing and the appropriate choice of treatment. We assessed the healing potential of SNUs by histological parameters and compared it to CT parameters of bone structure and fracture location. Based on the results, we developed a CT classification and a treatment algorithm to impact graft selection in SNU surgery.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Preoperative 2D-CT reformations of 29 patients were analyzed for trabecular structure, sclerosis, and fragmentation of the proximal fragment. The fracture location was assessed on 3D-CT reconstructions and grouped in three zones depending on the potential blood supply. Samples were taken during surgery for histological evaluation. Histological parameters of bone healing were defined and a bone healing capacity score (BHC), reflecting histological bone viability, was calculated. CT findings were compared to BHC, age of SNU, and time to union.

RESULTS

Cases with trabecular structure and without fragmentation showed a statistically significant higher BHC. Time to union was significantly faster if trabecular structure was present and sclerosis was absent. In intraarticular proximal pole non-unions, where no blood supply is assumed, the BHC was statistically significantly lower and time to union was longer compared to SNUs of the other locations. A statistically significant correlation between BHC and time to union was found in the proximal and distal fragment with higher BHC associated with faster healing.

CONCLUSIONS

CT parameters of bone structure and fracture location can reflect histological healing capacity of SNUs. This can guide bone graft selection in SNU surgery.

Stabilization of scaphoid type B2 fractures with one or two headless compression screws

INTRODUCTION

Fractures of the scaphoid account for the most commonly injured carpal bone. Minimally displaced fractures of the waist will heal in 85-90% when using a below elbow cast. However, fractures with displacement have a higher risk for nonunion. Therefore, open reduction and fixation with headless compression screws (HCS) have become the preferred method of treatment. The aim of this study was to compare the radiological and clinical outcome of unstable scaphoid B2 type fractures, stabilized using one or two headless compression screws.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 47 unstable scaphoid B2 type fractures were included in this retrospective follow-up study. Twelve patients were not accessable and three refused to attend follow-up checks. Therefore, a total of 32 patients were included in this study with a mean follow-up interval of 43 (12-81) months. Twenty-two patients were treated using one HCS and ten with two HCS. Clinical assessment included range of motion (ROM), pain according to the visual analogue scale (VAS), grip strength, Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Score, Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation Score, Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire and modified Green O'Brien Wrist Score. The follow-up study on each patient included a CT-Scan of the wrist which was analyzed for union, osteoarthritis, dorsiflexed intercalated segment instability and humpback deformity.

RESULTS

Radiologically, 29/32 (91%) of the scaphoid B2 type fractures showed union, 10/10 (100%) in the two HCS group and 19/22 (86%) in the one HCS group (p < 0.05). No significant differences could be found in respect to ROM, grip strength, VAS and scores between the groups. Screw removal was necessary in two patients in the two HCS group and one in the one HCS group.

CONCLUSION

The unstable B2 type fractures of the scaphoid, when using two HCS without bone grafting is a safe method, shows a significantly higher union rate and equal clinical outcome compared to stabilization using only one HCS.