Periazetabuläre Osteotomie – Welchen Einfluss hat das Alter auf patientenrelevante Ergebnisse?: Eine prospektive 5‑Jahres-Untersuchung

Periacetabular osteotomy for symptomatic hip dysplasia in middle aged patients: does age alone matter?

BACKGROUND

Conflicting evidence exists regarding outcomes in middle-aged patients undergoing periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) for symptomatic developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH).

AIMS

To compare patient reported outcomes (PROMs) of middle-aged PAO patients with younger patient groups.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of PAO patients between 01/2015 and 06/2017 at a single orthopedic university center with a primary diagnosis of symptomatic DDH. The cohort was divided into four age groups and compared: < 20, 20-30, 30-40 and > 40 years. Joint function was assessed using iHOT-12, mHHS and SHV. Activity level was assessed using UCLA Activity score. Patient satisfaction and pain were assessed on the numerical rating scale 0-10. Conversion rates to THA were assessed.

RESULTS

Out of 202 PAOs, 120 cases with complete data were included. Mean follow-up was 63 months (range 47-81 months). Eighteen patients were < 20 years old, 54 were 20-30 years, 37 were 30-40 years, 11 patients were older than 40. No significant differences were observed for preoperative or postoperative iHOT-12 (p = 0.898; p = 0.087), mHHS (p = 0.878; p = 0.103), SHV (p = 0.602; p = 0.352) or UCLA (p = 0.539; p = 0.978) between groups. Improvement deltas were also not significantly different for all PROMs. Postoperative patient satisfaction was similar between groups (p = 0.783).

CONCLUSION

Patients with symptomatic DDH may benefit from PAO even at middle age with similar outcomes and pre- to postoperative improvements as younger age groups. Indication should be based on biological age and preoperative joint condition rather than age.

Periacetabular Osteotomy with a Modified Fixation Technique Using K-Wires Shows Clinical Results Comparable to Screw Fixation at Mid-Term Follow-Up

BACKGROUND

The optimal fixation technique in periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) remains controversial. Modified fixation with Kirschner wires (K-wires) was described as a feasible and safe alternative. However, clinical follow-up of patients treated with this technique is lacking.

AIMS

To assess patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) in patients treated with PAO with the K-wire fixation technique and to compare it with the screw fixation technique.

METHODS

We conducted an analysis of 202 consecutive PAOs at a single university center between January 2015 and June 2017. A total of 120 cases with complete datasets were included in the final analysis. PAOs with K-wire fixation (n = 63) were compared with screw fixation (n = 57). Mean follow-up was 63 ± 10 months. PROMs assessed included the International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT 12), Subjective Hip Value (SHV), and UCLA activity score (UCLA). Pain and patient satisfaction (NRS) were evaluated. Joint preservation was defined as non-conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA).

RESULTS

Preoperative baseline PROMs in both fixation groups were similar. In both groups, PROMs (p = <0.001) and pain (p = <0.001) improved significantly. Postoperative functional outcome was similar in both groups: iHOT 12 (71.8 ± 25.1 vs. 73 ± 21.1; p = 0.789), SHV (77.9 ± 21.2 vs. 82.4 ± 13.1; p = 0.192), UCLA (6.9 ± 1.6 vs. 6.9 ± 1.9; p = 0.909), and pain (2.4 ± 2.1 vs. 2.0 ± 2.1; p = 0.302). Patient satisfaction did not differ significantly (7.6 ± 2.6 vs. 8.2 ± 2.2; p = 0.170). Conversion to THA was low in both groups (two vs. none; p = 0.497).

CONCLUSION

Periacetabular osteotomy with K-wire fixation provided good clinical results at mid-term follow-up, comparable to those of screw fixation. The technique can therefore be considered a viable option when deciding on the fixation technique in PAO.

Periacetabular Osteotomy for Symptomatic Acetabular Dysplasia in Patients ≥40 Years Old: Intermediate and Long-Term Outcomes and Predictors of Failure

BACKGROUND

The Bernese periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is controversial as a treatment for symptomatic acetabular dysplasia in patients ≥40 years of age. We conducted a retrospective study to evaluate the outcomes, measure the survival rate, and identify factors associated with PAO failure in patients ≥40 years of age.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study of patients ≥40 years of age undergoing PAO. Study eligibility criteria were met by 166 patients (149 women; mean age, 44 ± 3 years), and 145 (87%) were followed for ≥4 years after PAO. We used a Kaplan-Meier curve with right-censoring to calculate survivorship, with "failure" defined as either conversion to or recommendation for total hip arthroplasty or a Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain score of ≥10 at the most recent follow-up. We used simple logistic regression models to determine whether any preoperative characteristics were significantly associated with PAO failure.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 9.6 years (range, 4.2 to 22.5 years). Sixty-one of 145 hips (42%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 34% to 51%) experienced PAO failure during follow-up. The median survival time was 15.5 years (95% CI = 13.4 to 22.1 years). The median survival time was longer for hips with no or mild preoperative osteoarthritis: 17.0 years for Tönnis grade 0, 14.6 years for grade 1, and 12.9 years for grade 2. Higher preoperative Tönnis arthritis grades (p = 0.03) and worse WOMAC function scores (p < 0.001) were associated with an increased likelihood of failure.

CONCLUSIONS

PAO is usually effective at improving function and is effective at preserving the hip in patients ≥40 years of age provided that they have good preoperative function and no or mild preoperative osteoarthritis (Tönnis grade 0 or 1). Patients who are ≥40 years old with advanced preoperative osteoarthritis (Tönnis grade 2) and those with poor preoperative dysfunction have a high risk of therapeutic failure after PAO.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

[Hip dysplasia: What influence do age, arthrosis and concomitant diseases have on the treatment result?]

Pelvic osteotomies are an established treatment for symptomatic adult hip dysplasia with a promising long-term outcome. Results depend not only on the achieved acetabular reorientation but also on patient-factors like preoperative joint condition (degree of osteoarthritis and joint congruency) and age. Additionally, the diagnosis and appropriate therapy of impingement-associated hip deformities is essential in order to achieve good mid- and long-term outcomes. The influence of chondrolabral pathology on the outcome of pelvic osteotomies is not yet defined. Symptomatic patients with residual dysplasia after previous pelvic or acetabular osteotomies can benefit from an additional osteotomy, although results can be worse in comparison to prior unoperated joints. Obesity can make surgery more demanding and increases the complication profile of PAO, although it has no influence on the postoperative outcome. Regarding the overall prognosis after an osteotomy, the consideration of combined risk factors is superior to the concentration on individual factors alone.

Correlation of Patient-Reported Outcomes After Periacetabular Osteotomy With Femoral Head Coverage and Acetabular Orientation: A Single-Center Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Gaining a better understanding of the underlying pattern of acetabular dysplasia 3-dimensionally can help better guide treatment and optimize clinical outcomes after periacetabular osteotomy (PAO).

PURPOSE

(1) To examine the relationship between femoral head coverage before and after PAO for dysplasia and patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) scores and (2) to assess if the direction/orientation of correction of the acetabulum can be predicted based on the Ottawa classification.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database from a single-center institutional registry of PAO was conducted, and PROM scores at a minimum of 2 years were analyzed. A total of 79 hips (67 patients [56 female]; mean age at surgery, 27.5 years [range, 15.8-53.7 years]) were available for inclusion. According to the Ottawa classification, 54 hips (68.4%) had global deficiency, 15 hips (18.9%) had posterior deficiency, and 10 hips (12.7%) had anterior deficiency. Hip2Norm software was used to analyze the 3-dimensional coverage of the femoral head. Statistical analysis was conducted to look at significant predictors of improvements in PROMs using the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) Activities of Daily Living subscale.

RESULTS

At a mean follow-up of 3.1 years (range, 2.0-7.4 years), all functional outcome scores improved significantly. A postoperative total femoral coverage <75.7%, posterior coverage (PC) <45.2%, and femoral head extrusion index >15.5% were all associated with not reaching the MCID for the HOOS Activities of Daily Living subscale. Multivariate analysis showed that PC was the single most important significant modifier influencing functional outcomes after PAO for the treatment of acetabular dysplasia, with an odds ratio of 6.0 (95% CI, 1.8-20.4; P = .004). One-way analysis of variance showed a significant difference comparing the mean change in radiographic measurements, that is, anterior coverage, PC, and total femoral coverage, per the Ottawa classification (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrated that postoperative femoral head coverage and acetabular orientation were significant predictors of PROM scores. Classifying acetabular dysplasia into 3 groups based on the plane of instability could optimize the planning of PAO by giving a better understanding of the 3-dimensional deformity.