[Therapy-resistant coccygodynia should no longer be considered a myth : The surgical approach]

[Treatment options for coccygodynia]

BACKGROUND

To this day, patients with coccyx problems are the most frequently underestimated patient population in orthopedic practices. The clinical picture of coccygodynia was first described in 1859. Nevertheless, discussions about the importance of coccyx problems remain a tiresome topic. All patients have in common that they have gone through a long ordeal with many therapists, examinations and therapeutic approaches without having received a real diagnosis.

DIAGNOSTIC

The main symptom of coccygodynia is the pain directly on the lowest segment of the coccyx, which often only occurs when sitting and is intensified by the change in position, usually from a sitting to a standing position. Trauma can only be described as the trigger in 50% of cases. Women are four times more likely to be affected than men. The gold standard for imaging should be viewed from standing and seated dynamic lateral radiographs of the coccyx.

TREATMENT

After the diagnosis has been made, conservative treatment should first be started with oral NSAIDs, relief with a coccyx cushion with a recess and, if necessary, physiotherapy to strengthen or loosen the pelvic floor. Local infiltrations with a glucocorticoid and local anesthetic directly in the painful area are also often promising. If the symptoms persist for more than 6 months, surgical treatment in the sense of removing the coccyx can be discussed with the patient. The literature shows a success rate of 80-90% if the indication was correct.

[Coccygodynia-An often underestimated clinical picture]

One of the most frequently underestimated symptoms in orthopedic practices is coccygodynia. The clinical picture of coccygodynia was first described in 1859. Nevertheless, discussions about the importance of coccygeal problems remain a controversial topic. All patients have in common that they have gone through a long ordeal with many therapists, examinations and therapeutic approaches without having received a real diagnosis. The main symptom of coccygodynia is pain directly on the lowest segment of the coccyx, which often only occurs when sitting and is intensified by a change in position, usually from a sitting to a standing position. Trauma can only be described as the trigger in 50% of cases. Women are four times more likely to be affected than men. The gold standard for imaging should be viewed from standing and seated dynamic lateral radiographs of the coccyx. After the diagnosis has been made, conservative treatment should first be started with oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID), relief with a coccyx cushion with a recess and, if necessary, physiotherapy to strengthen or loosen the pelvic floor. Local infiltration with a glucocorticoid and a local anesthetic directly in the painful area are also often promising. If the symptoms persist for more than 6 months, surgical treatment in the sense of removing the coccyx can be discussed with the patient. The literature shows a success rate of 80-90% if the indications are correct.

Management of Persistent Coccygodynia and Health Behavior: A Survey Study on Patients with Coccygodynia of Age 41 to 69 years

Objectives: Coccygodynia, with trauma as a common etiologic factor, is a clinical condition of pain around the coccygeal region. This research aimed at investigating the level of satisfaction in surgical and non- surgical treatment of coccygodynia among Turkish patients and their health behavior. Methods: There is no dearth of studies on coccygodynia; however, a clear gap in research exists of studying coccygodynia patient satisfaction of specific age groups. Turkish patients aged 41 to 69 years and suffering from coccygodynia in different public sector clinics were the respondents in this research. The major criteria of sampling were Turkish patients of coccygodynia, aged 41 to 69 years, satisfied with both surgical and non-surgical methods of treatment, and varying in the nature of the infection. Results: The study found out that coccygodynia patients had a higher probability to receive timely, successful treatment; and that there exists a positive relationship between coccygodynia patients' health behavior and coccygodynia treatment satisfaction.Conclusion: This research is a significant contribution understanding the patients with coccygodynia, and whether they improved their health in a better way with surgical or non-surgical method of treatment.

A novel radiological classification for displaced os coccyx: the Benditz-König classification

BACKGROUND

Treatment of coccygodynia is still a challenging entity. Clear surgical selection criteria are still lacking. The aim of the investigation was to establish a novel radiological classification for surgical decision-making in coccygodynia cases.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Retrospective analysis of standing and sitting X-rays of coccygodynia patients referred to a single centre from 2018 to 2020. The sacro-coccygeal angle (SCA), the intra-coccygeal angle (ICA) and the difference of the intervertebral disc height (∆IDH) were measured. All coccyges were distributed in subtypes and correlated with the patients' treatment.

RESULTS

In total, 138 patients (female/male: 103/35) with a mean age of 45.6 ± 15.4 years were included in the study. In total, 49 patients underwent coccygectomy. Four different subtypes of displaced coccyges were identified: Type I with a non-segmented coccyx, anterior pivot, increased SCA and ICA from standing to sitting, ∆IDH = 1.0 ± 1.5 mm. Type II with a multisegmented coccyx, anterior pivot, increased SCA and ICA standing/sitting, ∆IDH = 1.1 ± 1.6 mm. Type III showed a posterior pivoted coccyx, negative SCA and ICA, ∆IDH = 0.6 ± 1.6 mm. Type IV is characterized by an anterior-posterior dissociation of the tail bone with a positive SCA, and the ICA shifted from a posterior to an anterior orientation. ∆IDH was - 0.6 ± 1.8 mm.

CONCLUSION

The presented radiological classification could help to facilitate the surgical decision-making for patients with displaced os coccyx. In addition, lateral and sitting X-rays were easy to perform and did not need unnecessary ionizing radiation like in CT scans and were more cost-effective than MRI investigations. The subtypes III and especially IV were more likely leading to surgery.

The coccygeal pressure ulcer-does coccygectomy prevent recurrence?

STUDY DESIGN

This is a retrospective, non-randomized cohort study, with data collected during the regular annual visits between 2001 and 2019.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of coccygectomy for coccygeal pressure ulcers in individuals with paraplegia due to spinal cord injury or other neurological causes and to evaluate its role in the prophylaxis of ulcer recurrence.

SETTINGS

This study included inpatients and outpatients with a coccygeal pressure ulcer who were treated surgically at our Institution REHAB Basel and were followed with regular annual check-ups.

METHODS

Individuals with category 3 or 4 acute or chronic coccygeal pressure ulcer (classification according European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (EPUAP)) received coccygectomy in addition to rotation flap surgery. The operative care was provided exclusively by the head of the plastic surgery department at REHAB Basel. Standardized follow-up treatment was carried out according to the "Basel Decubitus Concept" and thus allowed continuous and usually lifelong, regular follow-up care.

RESULTS

Forty-nine individuals underwent coccygectomy from 2001 to 2019 due to coccygeal category 3 or 4 pressure ulcers. The observation period was between 1.5 and 18.3 years. In 86% of the individuals, no relapse occurred during the first year. Over the next 5 years 78% remained relapse free.

CONCLUSIONS

In coccygeal pressure ulcer category 3 or 4, coccygectomy, in addition to sufficient rotation flap surgery, is a suitable method for recurrence prevention of pressure ulcer in this anatomic area.