[Fast-track arthroplasty-intra- and post-operative management]

[Discharge readiness versus discharge-Results of the PROMISE study]

Hintergrund

Für Deutschland werden im Rahmen optimierter Behandlungsprozesse rund um die Implantation einer Knie- oder Hüftendoprothese stationäre Aufenthaltszeiten angegeben, die die international publizierten Zeiten deutlich übertreffen. Die vorliegende Analyse von Daten der PROMISE-Studie beschäftigt sich in diesem Zusammenhang mit dem Verhältnis von Entlassbarkeit und Entlassung.

Methode

In drei Krankenhäusern unterschiedlicher Versorgungsstufen wurde ein gemeinsam entwickelter, optimierter Versorgungsstandard etabliert und für eine weitgehend unselektionierte Patientenkohorte umgesetzt. Unter anderem wurden Daten zum Erreichen der Entlasskriterien (EK) und der tatsächlichen Entlassung erhoben. Univariate Vergleiche wurden durch Chi-Quadrat-Tests oder Mann-Whitney-U-Tests durchgeführt.

Ergebnisse

Insgesamt konnten 1782 Patienten eingeschlossen werden, von denen 85,3 % nach im Mittel (MW) 2,4 Tagen (Median 2) postoperativ alle zuvor definierten EK erreicht haben. Die Entlassung für diese Gruppe erfolgte nach 5,4 (MW) Tagen (Median 5). Die restlichen Probanden (14,7 %) hatten bei Entlassung nach 6,5 (MW) Tagen (Median 6) mindestens ein EK nicht erreicht. Für verschiedene Subgruppen konnten signifikante Unterschiede festgestellt werden.

Fazit

Die sogenannten EK werden als relative Kriterien eingesetzt. Das Erreichen führt im Allgemeinen nicht zu einer zeitnahen Entlassung der Patienten aus dem Krankenhaus. Wäre dies der Fall, wären auch in Deutschland international übliche Aufenthaltszeiten Realität. Was die Entlassung tatsächlich bestimmt, bleibt offen. Eine Vielzahl von medizinischen, organisatorischen, strukturellen und finanziellen Einflussfaktoren könnten bedeutend sein.

[Perioperative management in fast-track arthroplasty]

The optimization of organizational processes, as well as surgical procedures intra- and perioperatively, are essential components with respect to fast-track programs in clinical routine. Treatment concepts focus on early postoperative mobilization of patients after joint replacement surgery in an interdisciplinary setting to avoid pain and complications on a scientific basis. This article gives a comprehensive and detailed overview regarding evidence-based peri- and intraoperative fast-track treatment methods: from pain treatment with intraoperative local infiltration analgesia and tranexamic acid application under minimally invasive surgical approach in short-lasting spinal anesthesia to renunciation of drains, regional pain- and urinary catheters, tourniquets, and restrictions.

[Rehabilitation after Hip Arthroplasty - Between Fast-Track Surgery and Orthogeriatrics]

Surgical procedures as well as length of stay and age limits have changed significantly in recent years in the context of hip arthroplasty. While hospitals are becoming increasingly specialised and patients are sometimes discharged to follow-up rehabilitation after only three to four days, the rehabilitation clinic providing follow-up care has to maintain a well-differentiated treatment pathway in order to meet the different requirements and needs between patients with fast-track surgery and orthogeriatric patients.

[Fast track in hip and knee arthroplasty]

Fast-track treatment concepts were developed decades ago in general and abdominal surgery and have been adapted in recent years for the special requirements of hip and knee arthroplasty. In this field, Hendrik Husted in particular was able to demonstrate scientific evidence for the components of fast-track concepts. The primary aim is not so much to shorten the patient's hospital length of stay (LOS) but rather to effectively increase the quality of medical treatment for the patient and to reduce complications. The optimization of organizational processes as well as intraoperative and perioperative surgical approaches are essential components regarding the introduction of fast track into the clinical routine. This article gives a comprehensive overview of fast-track treatment concepts and explains the scientific principles for the approach.

[Battle: Total hip arthroplasty or spine surgery first in patients with hip-spine-syndrome? : The arthroplasty surgeon's point of view]

BACKGROUND

Frequently, patients with hip complaints also report lower back pain, and elective surgery may be indicated due to end-stage hip osteoarthritis and degenerative disc disease. Thus, we aim to answer the question of whether total hip arthroplasty (THA) or lumbar spine surgery should be performed first in patients with hip-spine-syndrome, from an arthroplasty surgeon's point of view.

DECISION-MAKING

The present review demonstrates that in patients with an acute neurological deficit, lumbar spine surgery should be performed first. However, in patients without these symptoms, several arguments favour performing THA first, especially the increased risk of dislocation when performing THA after lumbar spine fusion (LSF) in comparison to "THA first" (4.6 vs. 1.7% after 2 years; p < 0,001). However, the risk of dislocation after THA remains increased in both scenarios, independent of surgical order. Consequently, arthroplasty surgeons should pay great attention to optimum component positioning, reconstruction of the hip anatomy, leg length and soft-tissue tension, while considering using large prosthesis heads or dual mobility cups when performing primary THA in patients with an increased risk of dislocation. In complex cases, we would encourage arthroplasty and spine surgeons working in cooperation on highly individual treatment concepts.