['Hip-in-a-Day']

[Fast-Track-Arthroplasty]

INTRODUCTION

Essential components of fast-track or enhanced recovery programs in arthroplasty are the optimization of interdisciplinary organizational processes, as well as pre-, intra- and postoperative procedures in everyday clinical practice. The early postoperative mobilization of patients after joint replacement surgery is of central importance, with the aim of avoiding pain and complications. This article provides a detailed overview of fast-track procedures that have already been established in many units. Furthermore, it demonstrates the clinical advantages of FastTrack for total hip arthroplasty (THA) in an evidence-based manner within the framework of a randomized study design.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

194 primary THA patients were examined after randomization into two single-blinded groups; Fast-Track (n = 98) or conventional treatment path (n = 96). Mobilization was defined as the primary outcome parameter, measured in seconds using the Timed Up and Go Test (TUG). Secondary parameters were the achievable walking distance in meters and pain using the numerical rating scale (NRS). All parameters were recorded preoperatively and daily until the sixth postoperative day.

RESULTS

No complications or revisions were recorded within the first postoperative week. The fast-track group showed significantly better TUG values and walking distance results compared to the conventional group until the sixth postoperative day (p < 0.05, respectively). There was no significant difference regarding the pain assessment (NRS) (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The use of Fast-Track in hip arthroplasty can evidently improve short-term postoperative clinical outcomes. This first prospective, single-blinded, randomized controlled study showed very good clinical results with comparable pain after FastTrack THA compared to a conventional treatment path. Fast-Track concepts are highly effective in terms of early mobilization and clinical outcome-without incurring a higher risk of complications in the short term.

Fast Track Protocols and Early Rehabilitation after Surgery in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Narrative Review

The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) or Fast Track is defined as a multi-disciplinary, peri- and post-operative approach finalized to reduce surgical stress and simplify post-operative recovery. It has been introduced more than 20 years ago by Khelet to improve outcomes in general surgery. Fast Track is adapted to the patient's condition and improves traditional rehabilitation methods using evidence-based practices. Fast Track programs have been introduced into total hip arthroplasty (THA) surgery, with a reduction in post-operative length of stay, shorter convalescence, and rapid functional recovery without increased morbidity and mortality. We have divided Fast Track into three cores: pre-, intra-, and post-operative. For the first, we analyzed the standards of patient selection, for the second the anesthesiologic and intraoperative protocols, for the third the possible complications and the appropriate postoperative management. This narrative review aims to present the current status of THA Fast Track surgery research, implementation, and perspectives for further improvements. By implementing the ERAS protocol in the THA setting, an increase in patient satisfaction can be obtained while retaining safety and improving clinical outcomes.

Why are there so many hospital beds in Germany?

The place of hospitals in health systems is undergoing rapid change worldwide due to the high cost of hospital care and the changing health needs of the population. The Covid-19 pandemic has recently drawn public attention towards hospital capacity and has added new urgency to discussions on the future role of hospitals. In this context, recent experience in Germany provides valuable information for health systems seeking to manage hospital capacity. Despite reform efforts to reduce hospital capacity, Germany has the highest rates of intensive care beds among high-income countries and the highest overall hospital capacity in Europe. The capacity of the German hospital system can be explained in large part by the high number of elderly in-patients. This, in turn, is driven by (1) a fragmented ambulatory care system; (2) physicians admitting and maintaining elderly patients in hospital at a high rate; (3) a hospital market adding incentives to admit patients; and (4) a political commitment to egalitarian access and universal care. Additionally, recent policies to reduce hospital capacity have had limited impact because hospitals have not responded to financial incentives in the expected manner. Countries looking to learn from Germany's hospital capacity must therefore consider systemic features, political commitments, and unintended policy consequences.

[Outpatient care through cross-sector prehabilitation and rehabilitation concepts in outpatient hip and knee arthroplasty]

Kein noch so flammender Appell eines Gesundheitspolitikers hat alle Versorgungsstrukturen unseres Gesundheitssystems so zur Überprüfung eigener Effizienz und Einsparpotenziale gezwungen, wie das SARS-CoV‑2. Fast-Track-Chirurgie, lange vor der aktuellen Pandemie entwickelt, kann auch unter Einbindung verzahnter Versorgungsstrukturen ein unverzichtbares Element moderner Krankenhausroutinen werden. Durch deutlich kürzere Krankenhausverweildauern, sinkende Komplikationsraten sowie durch zusätzliche Stärkung der Eigenkompetenz und Motivation der betroffenen Patientinnen und Patienten, kann die Patientenzufriedenheit und das klinische Outcome verbessert werden. Krankenhauspersonal könnte entlastet und Gesamtkosten, auch durch Einbindung externer Prähabilitationszentren, gespart werden. Es gilt nun, weiter Standards zum Aufbau und zur Umsetzung entsprechend abgestimmter Prähabilitations- und Rehabilitationskonzepte bei geplanter endoprothetischer Versorgung von Hüft- und Kniegelenken zu entwickeln und idealerweise gleichzeitig Ressourcen durch regionale Vernetzung zu sparen.

[Discharge readiness versus discharge-Results of the PROMISE study]

Hintergrund

Für Deutschland werden im Rahmen optimierter Behandlungsprozesse rund um die Implantation einer Knie- oder Hüftendoprothese stationäre Aufenthaltszeiten angegeben, die die international publizierten Zeiten deutlich übertreffen. Die vorliegende Analyse von Daten der PROMISE-Studie beschäftigt sich in diesem Zusammenhang mit dem Verhältnis von Entlassbarkeit und Entlassung.

Methode

In drei Krankenhäusern unterschiedlicher Versorgungsstufen wurde ein gemeinsam entwickelter, optimierter Versorgungsstandard etabliert und für eine weitgehend unselektionierte Patientenkohorte umgesetzt. Unter anderem wurden Daten zum Erreichen der Entlasskriterien (EK) und der tatsächlichen Entlassung erhoben. Univariate Vergleiche wurden durch Chi-Quadrat-Tests oder Mann-Whitney-U-Tests durchgeführt.

Ergebnisse

Insgesamt konnten 1782 Patienten eingeschlossen werden, von denen 85,3 % nach im Mittel (MW) 2,4 Tagen (Median 2) postoperativ alle zuvor definierten EK erreicht haben. Die Entlassung für diese Gruppe erfolgte nach 5,4 (MW) Tagen (Median 5). Die restlichen Probanden (14,7 %) hatten bei Entlassung nach 6,5 (MW) Tagen (Median 6) mindestens ein EK nicht erreicht. Für verschiedene Subgruppen konnten signifikante Unterschiede festgestellt werden.

Fazit

Die sogenannten EK werden als relative Kriterien eingesetzt. Das Erreichen führt im Allgemeinen nicht zu einer zeitnahen Entlassung der Patienten aus dem Krankenhaus. Wäre dies der Fall, wären auch in Deutschland international übliche Aufenthaltszeiten Realität. Was die Entlassung tatsächlich bestimmt, bleibt offen. Eine Vielzahl von medizinischen, organisatorischen, strukturellen und finanziellen Einflussfaktoren könnten bedeutend sein.

[Perioperative management in fast-track arthroplasty]

The optimization of organizational processes, as well as surgical procedures intra- and perioperatively, are essential components with respect to fast-track programs in clinical routine. Treatment concepts focus on early postoperative mobilization of patients after joint replacement surgery in an interdisciplinary setting to avoid pain and complications on a scientific basis. This article gives a comprehensive and detailed overview regarding evidence-based peri- and intraoperative fast-track treatment methods: from pain treatment with intraoperative local infiltration analgesia and tranexamic acid application under minimally invasive surgical approach in short-lasting spinal anesthesia to renunciation of drains, regional pain- and urinary catheters, tourniquets, and restrictions.

German surgeons' technical preferences for performing total hip arthroplasties: a survey from the National Endoprosthesis Society

PURPOSE

The goal of our study was to conduct an online survey that highlights patterns of practice during total hip arthroplasty (THA).

METHODS

The survey was conducted in June and August 2020. Three hundred thirteen members of the German Society for Endoprosthesis participated in the survey.

RESULTS

The anterolateral approach is by far the most popular approach used for primary total hip arthroplasty, followed by the anterior approach during minimally invasive (55% for the anterolateral and 29% for the anterior) and regular surgery (52% for the anterolateral and 20% for the anterior). Two-thirds of the orthopaedic surgeons do not use drainages during THA. Moreover, 80% of the survey participants routinely apply tranexamic acid during surgery. Surgeons who perform minimally invasive surgery for THA use more frequently fast-track-concepts for post-operative rehabilitation. According to the interviewees, the application of fast-track-concepts leads to reduced periods of hospital stay after THA.

CONCLUSION

Our data demonstrate that patterns of practice during THA in Germany are in line with the evidence provided by current literature. This study can be seen as a stimulus to conduct similar surveys in other countries in order to promote minimally invasive surgery for THA.

[Fast track in hip and knee arthroplasty]

Fast-track treatment concepts were developed decades ago in general and abdominal surgery and have been adapted in recent years for the special requirements of hip and knee arthroplasty. In this field, Hendrik Husted in particular was able to demonstrate scientific evidence for the components of fast-track concepts. The primary aim is not so much to shorten the patient's hospital length of stay (LOS) but rather to effectively increase the quality of medical treatment for the patient and to reduce complications. The optimization of organizational processes as well as intraoperative and perioperative surgical approaches are essential components regarding the introduction of fast track into the clinical routine. This article gives a comprehensive overview of fast-track treatment concepts and explains the scientific principles for the approach.