Oberthür S, Sehmisch S, Weiser L, Viezens L, Stübig T. [Does navigation still have a value in trauma surgery?].
ORTHOPADIE (HEIDELBERG, GERMANY) 2022;
51:719-726. [PMID:
35960322 DOI:
10.1007/s00132-022-04288-9]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/12/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Navigation systems are supposed to increase precision and support surgeons while they perform certain interventions. 2D, or nowadays 3D, systems are used in image-based approaches. Image-free navigation uses 3D printing.
INDICATIONS
There are several studies on navigation procedures in trauma surgery. In contrast to limb surgery, the use of 3D navigation in pelvic and spine surgery is already well established. Navigation is especially regularly used to treat fractures of the posterior pelvic ring and for posterior stabilization of the cervical spine.
REQUIREMENTS
To be able to utilize navigation systems optimally, the learning curve should be completed, and the technique should be used regularly. In addition, the surgeon should know the surgical technique without navigation in order to recognize potential errors of the navigation.
ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES
Advantages include increased patient safety, reduction in radiation exposure and less invasive surgical procedures. However, among other disadvantages, initial costs are high.
Collapse