How do we optimize outcomes for patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia?

Clinical and economic burden of community-acquired pneumonia in the Veterans Health Administration, 2011: a retrospective cohort study

Purpose

The burden of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is not well described in the US Veterans Health Administration (VHA).

Methods

CAP was defined as having a pneumonia diagnosis with evidence of chest X-ray, and no evidence of prior (90 days) hospitalization/long-term care. We calculated incidence rates of adult CAP occurring in inpatient or outpatient VHA settings in 2011. We also estimated the proportion of VHA CAP patients who were hospitalized, were readmitted within 30 days of hospital discharge, and died (any cause) in the year following diagnosis. Incremental costs during the 90 days following a CAP diagnosis were estimated from the perspective of the VHA.

Results

In 2011, 34,101 Veterans developed CAP (35,380 episodes) over 7,739,757 VHA person-years. Median age of CAP patients was 65 years (95 % male). CAP incidence rates were higher for those aged ≥50 years. A majority of Veterans aged 50–64 (53 %) and ≥65 (66 %) years had ≥1 chronic medical (moderate risk) or immunocompromising (high risk) condition. Compared to those at low-risk (healthy), moderate- and high-risk Veterans were >3 and >6 times more likely to develop CAP, respectively. The percentage of CAP patients who were hospitalized was 45 %, ranging from 12 % (age 18–49, low risk) to 57 % (age ≥65, high risk). One-year all-cause mortality rates ranged from 1 % (age 18–49, low risk) to 36 % (age ≥65, high risk). Annual VHA medical expenditure related to CAP was estimated to be $750 million (M) ($415M for those aged ≥65 years).

Conclusion

A focus on CAP prevention among older Veterans and those with comorbid or immunocompromising conditions is important.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s15010-015-0789-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Time to intubation is associated with outcome in patients with community-acquired pneumonia

Introduction

It has been suggested that delayed intensive care unit (ICU) transfer is associated with increased mortality for patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). However, ICU admission policies and patient epidemiology vary widely across the world depending on local hospital practices and organizational constraints. We hypothesized that the time from the onset of CAP symptoms to invasive mechanical ventilation could be a relevant prognostic factor.

Methods

One hundred patients with a CAP and necessitating invasive mechanical ventilation were included. Prospectively collected data were retrospectively analysed. Two study groups were identified based on the time of the initiation of invasive mechanical ventilation (rapid respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation within 72 h of the onset of CAP and progressive respiratory failure requiring invasive mechanical ventilation 4 or more days after the onset of CAP).

Results

Excepting more COPD patients in the rapid respiratory failure group and more patients with diabetes in the progressive respiratory failure group, these patients had similar characteristics. The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 28% in the rapid respiratory failure group and 51% in the progressive respiratory failure group (P = 0.03). The ICU and the day 30 mortality rates were higher in the progressive respiratory failure group (47% vs. 23%, P = 0.02; and 37.7% vs. 21.3%, P = 0.03; respectively). After adjusting for the propensity score and other potential confounding factors, progressive respiratory failure remained associated with hospital mortality only after 12 days of invasive mechanical ventilation.

Conclusions

This study suggested that the duration or delay in the time to intubation from the onset of CAP symptoms was associated with the outcomes in those patients who ultimately required invasive mechanical ventilation.

Antibiothérapie des pneumonies aiguës communautaires à Streptococcus pneumoniae : impact clinique de la résistance bactérienne

The emergence of Streptococcus pneumoniae strains with reduced susceptibility to beta-lactams and with multiple drug resistance has not led to major changes in recommendations for antibiotic therapy in patients with acute community-acquired pneumococcal pneumonia. Numerous factors explain the limited clinical impact of this major microbiological change. The frequency of intermediate strains is high but the frequency of resistant strains to beta-lactams is very low. There is a complex relation between the acquisition of resistance to beta-lactams and the decreased virulence of S. pneumoniae strains. The only finding in studies of humanized experimental animal models of lethal bacteremic pneumonia caused by resistance and tolerant strains was a slowing in the kinetics of beta-lactams bactericidal activity, especially for amoxicillin. Taken together, this preclinical data shows that microbiological resistance of pneumococci to beta-lactams has very little influence on a possible failure of recommanded treatment regimens for pneumococcal pneumonia. The high rate of multiple drug resistance, particularly among beta-lactam resistant strains, rules out the probabilistic use of macrolides. Conversely, fluoroquinolone (FQ) resistance remains low, inferior to 3%, and the same is true for ketolides (<1%). Only a global strategy of patient management in the use of these new drugs could ensure their long-term activity. The high mortality rate of hospitalized S. pneumoniae pneumonia will only be improved with a better understanding of the complex host-bacteria interactions.

Monotherapy versus Dual Therapy for Community-Acquired Pneumonia in Hospitalized Patients

Several medical-specialty professional societies have suggested that combination therapy with a beta -lactam plus a macrolide or doxycycline or monotherapy with a "respiratory quinolone" (i.e., levofloxacin, gatifloxacin, moxifloxacin, or gemifloxacin) are optimal first-line therapy for patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia. These recommendations are based predominantly on retrospective studies that suggest improved rates of morbidity and mortality and hospital length of stay among patients treated in such a fashion. Well-designed, prospective, randomized studies confirming this tenet of therapy have not been published, although numerous prospective studies have provided indirect confirmation. The biological rationale for such a differential response (i.e., favoring combination therapy or fluoroquinolone therapy) includes the immunomodulatory effects of macrolides or more-optimal treatment of primary infection or coinfection with atypical pathogens. Well-designed, prospective, randomized trials are required to best define the effectiveness of combination therapy with a beta -lactam plus macrolide or doxycycline or with a respiratory quinolone in hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia.

Guidelines for community-acquired pneumonia in the ICU

Community-acquired pneumonia remains a common and serious condition worldwide. Severe community-acquired pneumonia requiring ICU admission is a distinct entity with different pathogens, outcomes, and management. The mortality rate in severe community-acquired pneumonia can be more than 50%. Over the past decade, some international guidelines for the management of community-acquired pneumonia have been developed in an attempt to optimize patient care. These guidelines have developed prediction tools to direct clinicians in the management of community-acquired pneumonia, including when to admit a patient to the ICU and selecting appropriate investigations and antimicrobial therapy. The individual recommendations of these guidelines and the guidelines as a whole require further studies.