Lipopolysaccharide-binding protein: a possible diagnostic marker for Gram-negative bacteremia in neutropenic cancer patients

Novel biomarkers to identify complicated course of febrile neutropenia in hematological patients receiving intensive chemotherapy

Febrile neutropenia (FN) is a common consequence of intensive chemotherapy in hematological patients. More than 90% of the patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) develop FN, and 5%-10% of them die from subsequent sepsis. FN is very common also in autologous stem cell transplant recipients, but the risk of death is lower than in AML patients. In this review, we discuss biomarkers that have been evaluated for diagnostic and prognostic purposes in hematological patients with FN. In general, novel biomarkers have provided little benefit over traditional inflammatory biomarkers, such as C-reactive protein and procalcitonin. The utility of most biomarkers in hematological patients with FN has been evaluated in only a few small studies. Although some of them appear promising, much more data is needed before they can be implemented in the clinical evaluation of FN patients. Currently, close patient follow-up is key to detect complicated course of FN and the need for further interventions such as intensive care unit admission. Scoring systems such as q-SOFA (Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment) or NEWS (National Early Warning Sign) combined with traditional and/or novel biomarkers may provide added value in the clinical evaluation of FN patients.

Intestinal permeability in patients undergoing stem cell transplantation correlates with systemic acute phase responses and dysbiosis

Intestinal permeability may correlate with adverse outcomes during hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), but longitudinal quantification with traditional oral mannitol and lactulose is not feasible in HSCT recipients because of mucositis and diarrhea. A modified lactulose:rhamnose (LR) assay is validated in children with environmental enteritis. Our study objective was to quantify peri-HSCT intestinal permeability changes using the modified LR assay. The LR assay was administered before transplant, at day +7 and +30 to 80 pediatric and young adult patients who received allogeneic HSCT. Lactulose and rhamnose were detected using urine mass spectrometry and expressed as an L:R ratio. Metagenomic shotgun sequencing of stool for microbiome analyses and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay analyses of plasma lipopolysaccharide binding protein (LBP), ST2, REG3α, claudin1, occludin, and intestinal alkaline phosphatase were performed at the same timepoints. L:R ratios were increased at day +7 but returned to baseline at day +30 in most patients (P = .014). Conditioning regimen intensity did not affect the trajectory of L:R (P = .39). Baseline L:R ratios did not vary with diagnosis. L:R correlated with LBP levels (r2 = 0.208; P = .0014). High L:R ratios were associated with lower microbiome diversity (P = .035), loss of anaerobic organisms (P = .020), and higher plasma LBP (P = .0014). No adverse gastrointestinal effects occurred because of LR. Intestinal permeability as measured through L:R ratios after allogeneic HSCT correlates with intestinal dysbiosis and elevated plasma LBP. The LR assay is well-tolerated and may identify transplant recipients who are more likely to experience adverse outcomes.

Routine laboratory biomarkers used to predict Gram-positive or Gram-negative bacteria involved in bloodstream infections

This study evaluated routine laboratory biomarkers (RLB) to predict the infectious bacterial group, Gram-positive (GP) or Gram-negative (GN) associated with bloodstream infection (BSI) before the result of blood culture (BC). A total of 13,574 BC of 6787 patients (217 BSI-GP and 238 BSI-GN) and 68 different RLB from these were analyzed. The logistic regression model was built considering BSI-GP or BSI-GN as response variable and RLB as covariates. After four filters applied total of 320 patients and 16 RLB remained in the Complete-Model-CM, and 4 RLB in the Reduced-Model-RM (RLB p > 0.05 excluded). In the RM, only platelets, creatinine, mean corpuscular hemoglobin and erythrocytes were used. The reproductivity of both models were applied to a test bank of 2019. The new model presented values to predict BSI-GN of the area under the curve (AUC) of 0.72 and 0.69 for CM and RM, respectively; with sensitivity of 0.62 and 0.61 (CM and RM) and specificity of 0.67 for both. These data confirm the discriminatory capacity of the new models for BSI-GN (p = 0.64). AUC of 0.69 using only 4 RLB, associated with the patient's clinical data could be useful for better targeted antimicrobial therapy in BSI.

Biomarkers of sepsis: time for a reappraisal

INTRODUCTION

Sepsis biomarkers can have important diagnostic, therapeutic, and prognostic functions. In a previous review, we identified 3370 references reporting on 178 different biomarkers related to sepsis. In the present review, we evaluate the progress in the research of sepsis biomarkers.

METHODS

Using the same methodology as in our previous review, we searched the PubMed database from 2009 until September 2019 using the terms "Biomarker" AND "Sepsis." There were no restrictions by age or language, and all studies, clinical and experimental, were included.

RESULTS

We retrieved a total of 5367 new references since our previous review. We identified 258 biomarkers, 80 of which were new compared to our previous list. The majority of biomarkers have been evaluated in fewer than 5 studies, with 81 (31%) being assessed in just a single study. Apart from studies of C-reactive protein (CRP) or procalcitonin (PCT), only 26 biomarkers have been assessed in clinical studies with more than 300 participants. Forty biomarkers have been compared to PCT and/or CRP for their diagnostic value; 9 were shown to have a better diagnostic value for sepsis than either or both of these biomarkers. Forty-four biomarkers have been evaluated for a role in answering a specific clinical question rather than for their general diagnostic or prognostic properties in sepsis.

CONCLUSIONS

The number of biomarkers being identified is still increasing although at a slower rate than in the past. Most of the biomarkers have not been well-studied; in particular, the clinical role of these biomarkers needs to be better evaluated.

The Effect of Glutamine Supplementation on Microbial Invasion in Surgical Infants Requiring Parenteral Nutrition: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

To determine whether parenteral plus enteral glutamine supplementation influences microbial invasion in surgical infants who require parenteral nutrition (PN).

METHODS

An prospective double-blind randomized controlled trial studying surgical infants receiving PN for at least 5 days for congenital or acquired intestinal anomalies (2009-2012) was used. Infants were randomized to receive either glutamine supplementation (parenteral plus enteral; total 400 mg/kg/d) or isonitrogenous control. The primary end point was microbial invasion evaluated after 5 days of supplementation and defined as: (i) positive conventional blood culture, (ii) evidence of microbial DNA in blood (polymerase chain reaction), (iii) plasma endotoxin level ≥50 pg/mL, or (iv) plasma level of lipopolysaccharide binding protein ≥50 ng/mL. Data are given as median (range) and compared by logistic regression.

RESULTS

Sixty infants were randomized and reached the primary end point. Twenty-five patients had intestinal obstruction, 19 had abdominal wall defects, and 13 had necrotizing enterocolitis. Thirty-six infants showed evidence of microbial invasion during the study, and 17 of these were not detected by conventional blood culture. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups in the primary outcome; evidence of microbial invasion after 5 days was found in 9/31 (control group) and 8/29 (glutamine group) (odds ratio 0.83 [0.24-2.86; P = 0.77]).

CONCLUSION

More than half of surgical infants requiring PN showed evidence of microbial invasion. Approximately half of this was not detectable by conventional blood cultures. Parenteral plus enteral glutamine supplementation had no effect on incidence of microbial invasion.

Neither Single nor a Combination of Routine Laboratory Parameters can Discriminate between Gram-positive and Gram-negative Bacteremia

Adequate early empiric antibiotic therapy is pivotal for the outcome of patients with bloodstream infections. In clinical practice the use of surrogate laboratory parameters is frequently proposed to predict underlying bacterial pathogens; however there is no clear evidence for this assumption. In this study, we investigated the discriminatory capacity of predictive models consisting of routinely available laboratory parameters to predict the presence of Gram-positive or Gram-negative bacteremia. Major machine learning algorithms were screened for their capacity to maximize the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC) for discriminating between Gram-positive and Gram-negative cases. Data from 23,765 patients with clinically suspected bacteremia were screened and 1,180 bacteremic patients were included in the study. A relative predominance of Gram-negative bacteremia (54.0%), which was more pronounced in females (59.1%), was observed. The final model achieved 0.675 ROC-AUC resulting in 44.57% sensitivity and 79.75% specificity. Various parameters presented a significant difference between both genders. In gender-specific models, the discriminatory potency was slightly improved. The results of this study do not support the use of surrogate laboratory parameters for predicting classes of causative pathogens. In this patient cohort, gender-specific differences in various laboratory parameters were observed, indicating differences in the host response between genders.

Sepsis biomarkers in neutropaenic systemic inflammatory response syndrome patients on standard care wards

BACKGROUND

Neutropaenic patients are at a high risk of contracting severe infections. In particular, in these patients, parameters with a high negative predictive value are desirable for excluding infection or bacteraemia. This study evaluated sepsis biomarkers in neutropaenic patients suffering from systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). Further, the predictive capacities of evaluated biomarkers in neutropaenic SIRS patients were compared to non-neutropaenic SIRS patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this prospective observational cohort study, patients with clinically suspected sepsis were screened. The predictive capacities of procalcitonin (PCT), C-reactive protein and lipopolysaccharide-binding protein (LBP) in neutropaenic SIRS patients were evaluated in terms of their potential to identify infection or bacteraemia and were compared to results for non-neutropaenic SIRS patients. To select an appropriate control cohort, propensity score matching was applied, balancing confounding factors between neutropaenic and non-neutropaenic SIRS patients.

RESULTS

Of 3370 prospectively screened patients with suspected infection, 51 patients suffered from neutropaenic SIRS. For the identification of infection, none of the assessed biomarkers presented a clinically relevant discriminatory potency. Lipopolysaccharide-binding protein and PCT demonstrated discriminatory capacity to discriminate between nonbacteraemic and bacteraemic SIRS in patients with neutropaenia [receiver-operating characteristics-area under the curves (ROC-AUCs): 0.860, 0.818]. In neutropaenic SIRS patients, LBP had a significantly better ROC-AUC than in a comparable non-neutropaenic patient cohort for identifying bacteraemia (P = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

In neutropaenic SIRS patients, none of the evaluated biomarkers was able to adequately identify infection. LBP and PCT presented a good performance in identifying bacteraemia. Therefore, these markers could be used for screening purposes to increase the pretest probability of blood culture analysis.

Discovery and Validation of Predictive Biomarkers of Survival for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Undergoing Radical Radiotherapy: Two Proteins With Predictive Value

Lung cancer is the most frequent cause of cancer-related death world-wide. Radiotherapy alone or in conjunction with chemotherapy is the standard treatment for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Currently there is no predictive marker with clinical utility to guide treatment decisions in NSCLC patients undergoing radiotherapy. Identification of such markers would allow treatment options to be considered for more effective therapy. To enable the identification of appropriate protein biomarkers, plasma samples were collected from patients with non-small cell lung cancer before and during radiotherapy for longitudinal comparison following a protocol that carries sufficient power for effective discovery proteomics. Plasma samples from patients pre- and during radiotherapy who had survived > 18 mo were compared to the same time points from patients who survived < 14 mo using an 8 channel isobaric tagging tandem mass spectrometry discovery proteomics platform. Over 650 proteins were detected and relatively quantified. Proteins which showed a change during radiotherapy were selected for validation using an orthogonal antibody-based approach. Two of these proteins were verified in a separate patient cohort: values of CRP and LRG1 combined gave a highly significant indication of extended survival post one week of radiotherapy treatment.

Value of lipopolysaccharide binding protein as diagnostic marker of infection in adult cancer patients with febrile neutropenia: comparison with C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, and interleukin 6

PURPOSE

Early detection of infection is essential for initial management of cancer patients with chemotherapy-associated febrile neutropenia in the emergency department. In this study, we evaluated lipopolysaccharide binding protein (LBP) as predictor for infection in febrile neutropenia and compared with other biomarkers previously studied: C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), and interleukin (IL)-6.

METHODS

A total of 61 episodes of chemotherapy-associated febrile neutropenia in 58 adult cancer patients were included. Serum samples were collected on admission at emergency department and CRP, LBP, PCT, and IL-6 were measured. Patients were classified into fever of unknown origin and infection, including microbiologically and clinically documented infection, groups. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed for each biomarker for the diagnosis of infection.

RESULTS

Thirty-two of the 61 episodes were classified as infection. On admission, CRP, PCT, IL-6, and LBP were significantly increased in patients with infection compared to fever of unknown origin group. Area under the ROC curve (AUC ROC) of CRP, PCT, IL-6, and LBP for discriminating both groups was 0.77, 0.88, 0.82, and 0.82, respectively, without significant difference between them. The combination of IL-6 and PCT or LBP did not lead to a significant improvement of the diagnostic accuracy of PCT or LBP alone.

CONCLUSIONS

On admission, LBP has a similar diagnostic accuracy than PCT or IL-6 for the diagnosis of infection and might be used as additional diagnostic tool in adult cancer patients with chemotherapy-associated febrile neutropenia.

Increased Anti-Flagellin and Anti-Lipopolysaccharide Immunoglobulins in Pediatric Intestinal Failure: Associations With Fever and Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections

BACKGROUND

Central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) pose a significant challenge in the lives of patients with intestinal failure (IF). We hypothesized that plasma immunoglobulins against flagellin (FLiC) and lipopolysaccharide (LPS) would be able to differentiate CLABSIs from nonbacterial febrile episodes and that levels would increase with infection and decline following appropriate antibiotic treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with IF, due to short bowel syndrome, between the ages of 3 months and 4 years of age, were recruited at Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center. Anti-FLiC and anti-LPS plasma antibody levels were measured in 13 children with IF at baseline, during febrile events, and also following treatment with antibiotics. These were also measured in 11 healthy children without IF who were recruited as controls.

RESULTS

Plasma anti-FLiC IgA levels increased during febrile episodes in all patients with IF (baseline mean of 1.10 vs febrile episode mean of 1.32 optical density units, respectively; P = .046). Neither plasma anti-FLiC nor anti-LPS IgA or IgG levels distinguished CLABSI from nonbacterial febrile episodes compared with baseline levels. Compared with controls, patients with IF had significantly higher plasma levels of anti-FLiC and anti-LPS IgA at baseline.

CONCLUSION

Plasma anti-FLiC IgA antibody levels rise during febrile episodes but do not differentiate between nonbacterial febrile illnesses and CLABSIs in pediatric IF. However, the upregulation of these antibodies in IF suggests the baseline systemic presence of Gram-negative bacterial products.

Sepsis: multiple abnormalities, heterogeneous responses, and evolving understanding

Sepsis represents the host's systemic inflammatory response to a severe infection. It causes substantial human morbidity resulting in hundreds of thousands of deaths each year. Despite decades of intense research, the basic mechanisms still remain elusive. In either experimental animal models of sepsis or human patients, there are substantial physiological changes, many of which may result in subsequent organ injury. Variations in age, gender, and medical comorbidities including diabetes and renal failure create additional complexity that influence the outcomes in septic patients. Specific system-based alterations, such as the coagulopathy observed in sepsis, offer both potential insight and possible therapeutic targets. Intracellular stress induces changes in the endoplasmic reticulum yielding misfolded proteins that contribute to the underlying pathophysiological changes. With these multiple changes it is difficult to precisely classify an individual's response in sepsis as proinflammatory or immunosuppressed. This heterogeneity also may explain why most therapeutic interventions have not improved survival. Given the complexity of sepsis, biomarkers and mathematical models offer potential guidance once they have been carefully validated. This review discusses each of these important factors to provide a framework for understanding the complex and current challenges of managing the septic patient. Clinical trial failures and the therapeutic interventions that have proven successful are also discussed.

Diagnostic accuracy of lipopolysaccharide-binding protein for predicting bacteremia/clinical sepsis in children with febrile neutropenia: comparison with interleukin-6, procalcitonin, and C-reactive protein

PURPOSE

In febrile neutropenia (FN), no reliable marker has been identified to discriminate between severe infection and other causes of fever early in the clinical course. Since lipopolysaccharide-binding protein (LBP) has proven to be an accurate biomarker of bacteremia/clinical sepsis in critically ill non-immunocompromised infants and children, we performed a prospective study to determine the diagnostic accuracy of LBP in children with FN.

METHODS

Concentrations of LBP, procalcitonin (PCT), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and C-reactive protein (CRP) were prospectively measured on two consecutive days in 90 FN episodes experienced by 47 children. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed for each biomarker to predict bacteremia/clinical sepsis and severe sepsis.

RESULTS

Eighteen of the 90 episodes were classified as bacteremia/clinical sepsis. On both days 1 and 2, all biomarkers had a low to intermediate diagnostic accuracy for sepsis, and no significant differences were found between them (area under the curve (AUC) for LBP, 0.648 and 0.714; for PCT, 0.665 and 0.744; for IL-6, 0.775 and 0.775; and for CRP, 0.695 and 0.828). Comparison of their AUCs to the AUC of maximum body temperature on admission (AUC = 0.668) also failed to show any significant differences. In severe sepsis, however, the best diagnostic accuracies were found for IL-6 and PCT (AUC 0.892 and 0.752, respectively), and these were significantly higher than those for LBP (AUC 0.566) on admission.

CONCLUSIONS

On admission and 24 h later, the LBP concentration is less accurate for predicting bacteremia/clinical sepsis compared to IL-6, PCT, and CRP.

Early diagnosis of sepsis using serum biomarkers

Sepsis, an innate immunological response of systemic inflammation to infection, is a growing problem worldwide with a relatively high mortality rate. Immediate treatment is required, necessitating quick, early and accurate diagnosis. Rapid molecular-based tests have been developed to address this need, but still suffer some disadvantages. The most commonly studied biomarkers of sepsis are reviewed for their current uses and diagnostic accuracies, including C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, serum amyloid A, mannan and IFN-γ-inducible protein 10, as well as other potentially useful biomarkers. A singular ideal biomarker has not yet been identified; an alternative approach is to shift research focus to determine the diagnostic relevancy of multiple biomarkers when used in concert. Challenges facing biomarker research, including lack of methodology standardization and assays with better detection limits, are discussed. The ongoing efforts in the development of a multiplex point-of-care testing kit, enabling quick and reliable detection of serum biomarkers, may have great potential for early diagnosis of sepsis.

Novel biomarkers for the detection of wound infection by wound fluid RT-PCR in rats

Wound infection is a form of host damage resulting from an imbalance in pathogen virulence and the host immune response. However, at present, diagnosis is based solely on bacterial numbers or inflammatory signs and is therefore not precise. Thus, infection diagnosis requires indicators of both of these factors. We focused on wound fluid because it includes both bacteria and host cells. The purpose of this study was to establish biomarkers that reflect both bacterial and host factors using the reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction method on the centrifugal precipitation of wound fluids (wound fluid RT-PCR). We created full thickness wounds in animal models of the three groups: control, colonization and infection, which were conditioned by administration of different concentrations of Pseudomonas aeruginosa dispersion. Messenger RNA expression in bacteria and host cells was analysed. Expression of bacterial housekeeping genes was detected in the samples in the colonization and infection groups. Expression of host housekeeping genes was detected in all samples from the three groups. Expression of toxA, encoding the virulence factor exotoxin A, was detected in 90% of samples in the infection group only. Expression of Foxp3, encoding the transcription factor forkhead box P3, was detected in 100% of samples only in the colonization group. These results revealed that wound fluid RT-PCR analysis reflected both bacterial virulence and the host immune status, and we determined the combination of novel biomarkers that can discriminate these three groups. We anticipate that wound fluid RT-PCR could be applied in the future to diagnose wound infection.

sTREM-1 and LBP in central venous catheter-associated bloodstream infections in pediatric intestinal failure

OBJECTIVE

Central venous catheter-associated bloodstream infections (CVC-BSIs) are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the pediatric intestinal failure (IF) population. We assessed plasma lipopolysaccharide-binding protein (LBP) and soluble triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-1 (sTREM-1) as biomarkers for CVC-BSI. We hypothesized that sTREM-1 and LBP rise with BSI and decline following treatment, and that baseline LBP is higher in the IF population than in controls.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients younger than 4 years were recruited from the IF registry at Cincinnati Children's Hospital. LBP and sTREM-1 levels were measured on 22 patients with IF at baseline, 17 patients with IF with BSIs, and 11 healthy controls.

RESULTS

Mean sTREM-1 level (pg/mL) and LBP level (μg/mL) rose with CVC-BSI over baseline (115.0 ± 51.2 vs 85.9 ± 27.6, P = 0.011 and 79.8 ± 45.4 vs 20.5 ± 11.3, P < 0.001, respectively) and declined following antibiotic therapy (115.0 ± 51.2 vs 77.9 ± 29.8, P = 0.003 and 79.8 ± 45.4 vs 26.2 ± 10.8, P < 0.001, respectively). Receiver operating characteristic curves showed that neither sTREM-1 nor LBP is sufficient to predict bacteremia versus fever without bacteremia (area under these curves = 0.57 and 0.82, respectively). Baseline LBP was higher in hospitalized patients than in outpatients (27.5 ± 8.7 vs 13.5 ± 9.2, P = 0.002), patients with previous BSIs versus those without (23.5 ± 10.4 vs 10.1 ± 8.3, P = 0.016), and those listed for transplantation versus those not listed (29.6 ± 9.8 vs 16.2 ± 9.5, P = 0.033).

CONCLUSIONS

sTREM-1 and LBP rise with CVC-BSI in IF and decline after treatment; however, neither distinguishes infection from nonbacteremic febrile episodes. Baseline LBP may be a marker of disease severity in IF.

Sepsis biomarkers: a review

INTRODUCTION

Biomarkers can be useful for identifying or ruling out sepsis, identifying patients who may benefit from specific therapies or assessing the response to therapy.

METHODS

We used an electronic search of the PubMed database using the key words "sepsis" and "biomarker" to identify clinical and experimental studies which evaluated a biomarker in sepsis.

RESULTS

The search retrieved 3370 references covering 178 different biomarkers.

CONCLUSIONS

Many biomarkers have been evaluated for use in sepsis. Most of the biomarkers had been tested clinically, primarily as prognostic markers in sepsis; relatively few have been used for diagnosis. None has sufficient specificity or sensitivity to be routinely employed in clinical practice. PCT and CRP have been most widely used, but even these have limited ability to distinguish sepsis from other inflammatory conditions or to predict outcome.

Neutrophil and monocyte CD64 indexes, lipopolysaccharide-binding protein, procalcitonin and C-reactive protein in sepsis of critically ill neonates and children

OBJECTIVE

To compare the diagnostic accuracy of neutrophil and monocyte CD64 indexes (CD64in and CD64im) for sepsis in critically ill neonates and children with that of lipopolysaccharide-binding protein (LBP), procalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive protein (CRP).

DESIGN AND SETTING

Prospective, observational study in a level III multidisciplinary neonatal and pediatric intensive care unit (ICU).

PATIENTS

Forty-six neonates and 36 children with systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and suspected infection, classified into two groups: those with bacterial sepsis (microbiologically proven or clinical sepsis) and those without bacterial sepsis (infection not supported by subsequent clinical course, laboratory data and microbiological tests).

INTERVENTIONS AND MEASUREMENTS

Flow cytometric CD64in and CD64im, serum LBP, PCT and CRP measurement on 2 consecutive days from admission to the ICU.

RESULTS

There were 17 cases of bacterial sepsis in neonates and 24 cases of bacterial sepsis in children. All neonates and the majority of children were mechanically ventilated, and more than two-thirds of neonates with sepsis and one-third of children with sepsis needed inotropic/vasopressor drugs. The highest diagnostic accuracy for sepsis on the 1st day of suspected sepsis was achieved by LBP in neonates (0.86) and by CD64in in children (0.88) and 24 h later by CD64in in neonates (0.96) and children (0.98).

CONCLUSIONS

Neutrophil CD64 index (CD64in) is the best individual marker for bacterial sepsis in children, while in neonates the highest diagnostic accuracy at the time of suspected sepsis was achieved by LBP and 24 h later by CD64in.

Inflammation markers in point-of-care testing (POCT)

Inflammation is a central issue in medicine. Inflammatory processes may be local or systemic, acute or chronic, and they may be benign or fatal. In bacterial or viral infections fast and reliable diagnosis is essential for appropriate treatment, e.g. antimicrobial therapy. The time to diagnosis is critical because uncontrolled infections may lead to sepsis with a mortality rate close to 50%. Beside clinical signs, laboratory markers are important in detecting, differentiating, and monitoring inflammation, particularly acute infections. Currently several inflammation markers including leukocyte count and leukocyte differentiation, C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), and interleukins (IL) 6 and 8, is available, and potential future serum markers are under development. In this article the clinical use of these markers in routine laboratory and in point-of-care testing is described and the diagnostic value of the four groups of laboratory marker is compared. Current data show that leukocyte count or, better, neutrophil count, CRP, and PCT are well suited to support of rapid diagnosis of inflammation and infections in children and adults whereas measurement of IL-6 and 8 are preferable for detection of sepsis in neonates.

Using innate immunity to characterize the host response to microbial invasion in severe sepsis

Severe sepsis is a life-threatening systemic inflammatory response to microbial infection. Although mortality from severe sepsis has decreased modestly over the past three decades, its incidence is increasing dramatically. Current treatment of severe sepsis relies primarily on identification and appropriate antibiotic coverage of the invading pathogen, with supportive therapies aimed primarily at reducing the risk of associated organ injury. Current efforts to identify the invading pathogens are successful in approximately only 50% of patients with severe sepsis. In this review, we examine host-pathogen interactions through the Toll-like receptors and Nod signaling systems as principal mechanisms of the innate immune response, and explore the application of high-throughput genomic technologies that have permitted a more complete dissection of the innate immune response during severe sepsis. Early controlled studies suggest that these genome-wide tools can readily identify pathogen-specific host responses in macrophages and dendritic cells. However, despite considerable progress, clinical application of these approaches to pathogen recognition in hospitalized patients with severe sepsis is still years away.

Lipopolysaccharide binding protein in a surgical intensive care unit: a marker of sepsis?

OBJECTIVES

We investigated the time course of lipopolysaccharide binding protein (LBP) plasma concentrations in patients in the surgical intensive care unit (ICU), their value in discriminating sepsis from systemic inflammatory response syndrome, and their association with severity of sepsis and outcome in these patients compared with interleukin (IL)-6, C-reactive protein, and procalcitonin.

DESIGN

Prospective, observational, cohort study.

SETTING

Academic ICU.

PATIENTS

All 327 consecutively admitted patients.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Serum LBP concentrations were higher in patients who had severe sepsis/septic shock on ICU admission than in patients who never had sepsis (20.5 [8.1-38.8] vs. 14.2 [7.7-22.2] microg/mL, p < .05) but were similar in patients with sepsis without organ failure and those who never had sepsis. After 3 days, LBP levels were similar in all groups. In a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, LBP concentrations moderately discriminated sepsis from systemic inflammatory response syndrome (area under curve [AUC] = .66) and severe sepsis from sepsis without organ failure (AUC = .71). IL-6 had the highest AUC in discriminating sepsis from other conditions (AUC = .76) and procalcitonin had the highest AUC for discrimination of severe sepsis from sepsis (AUC = .86). LBP concentrations on admission and during the first week were similar in patients with gram-positive and those with gram-negative infections (15.9 [11-26.7] and 37.2 [25.1-62.4] vs. 16.3 [5.3-31.6] and 31.6 [13.4], microg/mL, p > .2). LBP concentrations on admission were similar in nonsurvivors and survivors and did not discriminate ICU mortality. However, the maximum LBP concentration during the first 3 days in the ICU discriminated moderately between survivors and nonsurvivors.

CONCLUSIONS

In the surgical ICU, LBP moderately discriminated patients without infection from patients with severe sepsis but not from patients with sepsis without organ dysfunction. LBP concentrations did not distinguish between gram-positive and gram-negative infections. The correlation of LBP concentrations with disease severity and outcome is weak compared with other markers and its use as a biomarker is not warranted in this patient population.

A comparison of high-mobility group-box 1 protein, lipopolysaccharide-binding protein and procalcitonin in severe community-acquired infections and bacteraemia: a prospective study

Introduction

High-mobility group box-1 protein (HMGB1) has been known as a chromosomal protein for many years. HMGB1 has recently been shown to be a proinflammatory cytokine with a role in the immunopathogenesis of sepsis. Lipopolysaccharide-binding protein (LBP) has a central role in the innate immune response when the host is challenged by bacterial pathogens. Procalcitonin (PCT) has been suggested as a marker of severe bacterial infections and sepsis. The aim of the present study was to investigate levels of HMGB1, LBP and PCT in a well-characterised sepsis cohort. The study plan included analysis of the levels of the inflammatory markers in relation to the severity of infection, to the prognosis and to the ability to identify patients with bacteraemia.

Methods

Patients suspected of having severe infections and admitted to a department of internal medicine were included in a prospective manner. Demographic data, comorbidity, routine biochemistry, microbiological data, infection focus, severity score and mortality on day 28 were recorded. Plasma and serum were sampled within 24 hours after admission. Levels of all studied markers (HMGB1, LBP, PCT, IL-6, C-reactive protein, white blood cell count and neutrophils) were measured with commercially available laboratory techniques.

Results

A total of 185 adult patients were included in the study; 154 patients fulfilled our definition of infection. Levels of HMGB1, LBP and PCT were higher in infected patients compared with a healthy control group (P < 0.0001). Levels of HMGB1, LBP and PCT were higher in the severe sepsis group compared with the sepsis group (P < 0.01). No differences were observed in levels of the inflammatory markers in fatal cases compared with survivors. Levels of all studied markers were higher in bacteraemic patients compared with nonbacteraemic patients (P < 0.05). PCT performed best in a receiver–operator curve analysis discriminating between bacteraemic and nonbacteraemic patients (P < 0.05). HMGB1 correlated to LBP, IL-6, C-reactive protein, white blood cell count and neutrophils (P < 0.001). LBP correlated to PCT, IL-6 and C-reactive protein (P < 0.001).

Conclusion

Levels of HMGB1, PCT and LBP were higher in infected patients compared with those in healthy controls, and levels were higher in severe sepsis patients compared with those in sepsis patients. Levels of all studied inflammatory markers (HMGB1, LBP, PCT, IL-6) and infection markers (C-reactive protein, white blood cell count, neutrophils) were elevated among bacteraemic patients. PCT performed best as a diagnostic test marker for bacteraemia.

New immunological serum markers in bacteraemia: anti-inflammatory soluble CD163, but not proinflammatory high mobility group-box 1 protein, is related to prognosis

High mobility group-box 1 protein (HMGB1) is a late-onset proinflammatory cytokine. Soluble haemoglobin scavenger receptor (sCD163) is a specific marker of anti-inflammatory macrophages. The study purpose was to relate the levels of these new markers in bactaeremic patients to levels of well-known pro- and anti-inflammatory markers [procalcitonin, lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-binding protein, interleukin (IL)-6, IL-10] and to evaluate the levels in relation to disease severity and aetiology. A total of 110 patients with bacteraemia were included in a prospective manner from the medical department at a large Danish university hospital. Levels of HMGB1 and sCD163 were higher in patients with bacteraemia compared to controls (P < 0.001). HMGB1 correlated with proinflammatory molecules [procalcitonin (PCT)] and traditional infectious parameters [C-reactive proteins (CRP), white blood cells (WBC) and neutrophils], whereas sCD163 correlated with levels of IL-6, IL-10 but not to lipopolysaccharide-binding protein (LBP), PCT or CRP. Levels of sCD163 and IL-6 were significantly higher among non-survivors compared to survivors (P < 0.05). Neither HMGB1 nor any of the proinflammatory markers were elevated in fatal cases compared to survivors. There was no statistically significant difference in HMGB1 and sCD163 levels in Gram-negative versus Gram-positive bacteraemia. HMGB1 reflects proinflammatory processes, whereas sCD163 reflects anti-inflammatory processes as judged by correlations with traditional marker molecules. sCD163 and IL-6, but not HMGB1, were prognostic markers in this cohort pointing to an anti-inflammatory predominance in patients with fatal disease outcome.

Current approaches for risk stratification of infectious complications in pediatric oncology

Infections are serious complications of cytoreductive therapy in pediatric cancer patients presenting with febrile neutropenia. It is standard of care to initiate empirical intravenous broad-spectrum antibiotics until the fever and neutropenia resolve. However, it might be effective and safe to allow for early hospital discharge in certain subgroups of patients. Two strategies for risk stratification of pediatric cancer patients with regard to infectious complications are discussed in this review: (1) clinical risk parameters and laboratory measures to assist therapeutic management at presentation with fever in neutropenia, and (2) investigations of individual genetic susceptibility factors to tailor potential prophylactic approaches. Given the data available from a significant number of small studies, a large prospective non-inferiority trial is essential to assess low-risk clinical factors and additional laboratory or genetic markers for their predictive value.

Sepsis in 2003: are we still in the middle of nowhere?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Although enthusiasm of intensivists has been raised during the last 2-3 years due to several successful clinical trials, severe sepsis and septic shock still have an increasing incidence with more or less unchanged mortality. Within the last 12 months, the progress in sepsis research covering definitions, epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, standard and adjunctive therapy, as well as experimental approaches is encouraging. In this review, state-of-the-art publications of 2003 are presented to elucidate the possible impact on clinical routine.

RECENT FINDINGS

The rationale for using a new definition based on the PIRO system has been widely acknowledged, although it is not yet applicable in clinical practice. This includes genomic information for stratifying subgroups of patients, and a broader field of laboratory diagnostics due to clinical studies and basic research on the cellular mechanisms of inflammation and organ dysfunction. Early diagnosis is important for a fast implementation of specific therapies, and it has been confirmed that the time until the start of therapy has an impact on patient outcome. Thorough data analysis of successful trials with activated protein C has revealed encouraging details on long-term outcome and subgroup effects. Together with new findings on low-dose hydrocortisone, this stresses the relevance of adjunctive therapy in severe sepsis and septic shock.

SUMMARY

Scientific progress in areas of sepsis has been continuing throughout 2003, although the challenges are still enormous. The identification of more specific markers and new therapeutic approaches will hopefully improve the diagnosis, monitoring of therapy, and outcome in the septic patient.

Procalcitonin, lipopolysaccharide-binding protein, interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein in community-acquired infections and sepsis: a prospective study

INTRODUCTION

Clinicians are in need of better diagnostic markers in diagnosing infections and sepsis. We studied the ability of procalcitonin, lipopolysaccharide-binding protein, IL-6 and C-reactive protein to identify patients with infection and sepsis.

METHODS

Plasma and serum samples were obtained on admission from patients with suspected community-acquired infections and sepsis. Procalcitonin was measured with a time-resolved amplified cryptate emission technology assay. Lipopolysaccharide-binding protein and IL-6 were measured with a chemiluminescent immunometric assay.

RESULTS

Of 194 included patients, 106 had either infection without systemic inflammatory response syndrome or sepsis. Infected patients had significantly elevated levels of procalcitonin, lipopolysaccharide-binding protein, C-reactive protein and IL-6 compared with noninfected patients (P < 0.001). In a receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis, C-reactive protein and IL-6 performed best in distinguishing between noninfected and infected patients, with an area under the curve larger than 0.82 (P < 0.05). IL-6, lipopolysaccharide-binding protein and C-reactive protein performed best in distinguishing between systemic inflammatory response syndrome and sepsis, with an area under the curve larger than 0.84 (P < 0.01). Procalcitonin performed best in distinguishing between sepsis and severe sepsis, with an area under the curve of 0.74 (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

C-reactive protein, IL-6 and lipopolysaccharide-binding protein appear to be superior to procalcitonin as diagnostic markers for infection and sepsis in patients admitted to a Department of Internal Medicine. Procalcitonin appears to be superior as a severity marker.

Markers for sepsis diagnosis: what is useful?

Timely diagnosis of the different severities of septic inflammation is potentially lifesaving because therapies that have been shown to lower mortality should be initiated early. Sepsis and severe sepsis are accompanied by clinical and laboratory signs of systemic inflammation but patients with inflammation caused by noninfectious causes may present with similar signs and symptoms. It is important to identify markers for an early diagnosis of sepsis and organ dysfunction. This article presents currently interesting sepsis biomarkers. Other novel markers and their potential role are discussed.

Serum Lipopolysaccharide-Binding Protein Concentrations in Trauma Victims

BACKGROUND

In low concentrations, lipopolysaccharide-binding protein (LBP), an acute-phase protein recognizing lipopolysaccharide (LPS), catalyzes its transfer to the cellular receptor consisting of CD14 and Toll-like receptor-4. Previous studies have documented increased serum LBP concentrations in patients with sepsis, systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), or acute pancreatitis and after cardiopulmonary bypass. No prior studies have examined LBP expression in trauma victims. We hypothesized that admission LBP plasma concentrations are predictive of outcome (mortality) in trauma. This study assessed time-dependent changes in serum LBP concentrations in trauma patients soon after injury.

METHODS

A prospective, single-institution, observational cohort study of 121 adult trauma patients (age > or =17 years) with moderate to severe injury who required hospitalization. The trauma patients were male in 79.6% of the cases and had a mean age of 43.0 +/- 20.6 years. The mean injury severity score (ISS) was 23 +/- 12, and the crystalloid resuscitation volume given in the first 24 h averaged 6,640 +/- 3,729 mL. Informed consent was obtained on admission, and blood samples were drawn on admission and at 24 h postadmission. Prospective data were collected for daily SIRS score, multiple organ dysfunction score (MODS), and sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, complications, and outcomes. Plasma concentrations of LBP were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

RESULTS

Sixty patients (48.8% of the study cohort) required emergency surgical intervention and sustained a substantial intraoperative blood loss (mean 1,404 +/- 2,757 mL). The hospital mortality rate was 16.3% (20 patients). The mean intensive care unit stay was 8.9 +/- 16.4 days, and the hospital stay was 14.8 +/- 19.6 days. The patients had a significantly higher serum concentrations of LBP on admission (mean 28.0 +/- 25.3 mg/L; range 2-100 mg/L) than did control subjects (mean 6.2 +/- 2.1 mg/L; range 1.3-12.8 mg/L; p < 0.01), similar to the plasma concentrations previously reported in septic patients. A significant increase in LBP concentration was noted at 24 h (mean 72.3 +/- 45.7 mg/L; range 8-210 mg/L; p < 0.05). The admission LBP concentration was significantly greater in nonsurvivors than in survivors. However, after controlling for age and ISS, the admission LBP concentration did not predict death.

Biomarkers of sepsis: clinically useful?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to indicate recent developments in biomarkers of sepsis and to evaluate their impact on clinical use. According to the 'surviving sepsis campaign,' diagnosis of sepsis and infection is urgent; early and specific treatment is most effective to reduce complications and to decrease mortality.

RECENT FINDINGS

A variety of biomarkers of sepsis is presently available. The diagnostic spectrum of the various markers, however, is different. Some primarily indicate severity of inflammation (e.g. interleukin-6), others respond to infection, but do not indicate the host response well (endotoxin, lipoprotein binding protein, triggering receptor on myeloid cells). There are new markers with limited clinical experience, for example triggering receptor on myeloid cells or mid-pro atrial natriuretic peptide (Seristra, Brahms AG, Hennigsdorf, Germany). Procalcitonin is a well-established biomarker of sepsis that fulfills several criteria of clinical needs: it responds both to infection and severity of inflammation and thus has an impact on therapy. Recent studies indicate that antibiotic treatment can also be guided by procalcitonin. Further indications, including diagnosis of invasive bacterial infections and diagnosis of sepsis in neonates and children have been reported recently.

SUMMARY

Recent data and cumulative analyses indicate that biomarkers of sepsis improve diagnosis of sepsis. However, only a few markers have impact on therapy and fulfill the clinical requirements. Procalcitonin is a well-established marker, indicating infection, sepsis, and progression to the more severe stages of the disease. Today, this biomarker should be in the diagnostic portfolio of an intensive care unit or emergency ward.

The role of lipopolysaccharide-binding protein in modulating the innate immune response

Lipopolysaccharide-binding protein (LBP) has a well-established role in Gram-negative infection. New data suggest a more expanded role for LBP as a general recognition molecule. Several bacterial surface components from Gram-positive pathogens are also recognized by this molecule. LBP may also serve as a clinical marker in severe infections and may carry therapeutic potential.

Non-LPS targets and actions of LPS binding protein (LBP)

LPS binding protein (LBP) was discovered about 20 years ago because of its ability to bind to bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS). We have shown that in addition to its complex function of transferring LPS to its cellular receptor into the cell or into lipoproteins, LBP also binds to other bacterial compounds and can modulate their ability to stimulate the host's innate immune system. The majority of compounds found to also interact with LBP are amphiphilic molecules such as glycolipids or lipoproteins. Lipoteichoic acid (LTA) of different Gram-positive bacteria is recognized by LBP and both its complexation with CD14 and biological activity towards immune cells is modulated by LBP. LTA-like glycolipids isolated from spirochetes are recognized by LBP and initiate signaling in the presence of LBP. Lipopeptides corresponding to lipoproteins present in spirochetes, Mycobacterium spp. and Gram-negative bacteria as well as Mycoplasma spp. are also recognized by LBP. Together with the growing number of related proteins of the BPI-PLUNC family, LBP apparently as soluble mediator has the important ability to recognize a variety of bacterial pathogens before cellular contact has been established. The different sources of LBP in tissues such as lung and intestine further support its role as an important defense molecule.

Lipopolysaccharide-binding protein in critically ill neonates and children with suspected infection: comparison with procalcitonin, interleukin-6, and C-reactive protein

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate markers of infection in critically ill neonates and children, comparing lipopolysaccharide-binding protein (LBP) with procalcitonin (PCT), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and C-reactive protein (CRP).

DESIGN AND SETTING

Prospective, observational study in the level III multidisciplinary neonatal and pediatric intensive care unit.

PATIENTS

Sixty patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and suspected infection classified into two groups: SIRS/sepsis ( n=33) and SIRS/no sepsis ( n=27). We included 29 neonates aged less than 48 h (neonates <48 h), 12 neonates older than 48 h (neonates >48 h), and 19 children. Median disease severity was high in neonates aged under 48 h and moderate in neonates aged over 48 h and children.

INTERVENTIONS

Serum LBP, PCT, IL-6, and CRP were measured on two consecutive days. Area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were evaluated.

RESULTS

Serum LBP was higher in patients with SIRS/sepsis than in patients with SIRS/no sepsis. AUC for LBP on the first day of suspected infection was 0.89 in the younger neonates, 0.93 in the older neonates, and 0.91 in children.

CONCLUSIONS

In critically ill neonates aged under 48 h LBP on the first day of suspected infection is a better marker of sepsis than IL-6 and PCT, and is similar to CRP. In critically ill neonates aged over 48 h and children LBP is a better marker than IL-6 and CRP, and is similar to PCT.