DTPA Fe(III) decreases cytokines and hypotension but worsens survival with Escherichia coli sepsis in rats

The individual survival benefits of tumor necrosis factor soluble receptor and fluid administration are not additive in a rat sepsis model

BACKGROUND

Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists [e.g., TNF soluble receptor (TNFsr)] improved survival in preclinical but not clinical sepsis trials. However fluid support-itself beneficial-is standard clinically but rarely employed in preclinical sepsis models. We hypothesized that these therapies may not have additive benefit.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Antibiotic-treated rats (n = 156) were randomized to intratracheal or intravenous Escherichia coli challenges (>LD50) and either placebo or TNFsr and 24 h fluid treatments alone or together. The survival effects of these therapies did not differ significantly comparing challenge routes. When averaged across route, while TNFsr or fluid alone decreased the hazard ratio of death significantly [ln ± standard error (SE): -0.65 ± 0.30 and -0.62 ± 0.30, respectively, p ≤ 0.05], together they did not (p = 0.16). Furthermore, the observed effect of TNFsr and fluid together on reducing the hazard ratio was significantly less than estimated (-0.37 ± 0.29 versus -1.27 ± 0.43, respectively, p = 0.027) based on TNFsr and fluid alone. While each treatment increased central venous pressure at 6 and 24 h, the observed effects of the combination were also less than estimated ones (p ≤ 0.0005).

CONCLUSIONS

The individual survival benefits of TNFsr and fluids were not additive in this rat sepsis model. Investigating new sepsis therapies together with conventional ones during preclinical testing may be informative.

Risk of death does not alter the efficacy of hydrocortisone therapy in a mouse E. coli pneumonia model: risk and corticosteroids in sepsis

BACKGROUND

Risk of death may influence the efficacy of anti-inflammatory agents in sepsis. "Physiologic" dose corticosteroids, while improving survival in earlier trials with higher control mortality rates (>50%), were not beneficial in the recent CORTICUS trial with lower control mortality (31%). We investigated whether risk of death altered the effects of hydrocortisone in a mouse pneumonia model.

METHODS

Mice (n=637) challenged with high, medium or low intratracheal E. coli doses were randomized to receive one of three hydrocortisone doses (5, 25 or 125 mg/kg) or normal saline (NS) only (control) for 4 days. All animals were treated with similar volumes of ceftriaxone and NS support following E. coli and were observed for 168 h.

RESULTS

Decreasing E. coli doses reduced control mortality rates (from 94 to 12%). In similar patterns (not significant) each hydrocortisone dose increased the odds ratio (OR) of survival (95% confidence interval) with each E. coli dose (ORs ranging from 1.2 [0.4, 3.7] to 6.1 [0.6, 61.0]). The effect of hydrocortisone on the OR was not related to control mortality rate (r=-0.13, p=0.29) and overall was highly significant (2.04 [1.37, 3.03], p=0.0004). In randomly selected animals 48 h after the highest E. coli dose, compared with the control, hydrocortisone (125 mg/kg) significantly decreased IL-6, INFgamma, and nitric oxide levels.

CONCLUSIONS

In this mouse model the beneficial effects of hydrocortisone were independent of risk of death. These findings suggest that factors other than risk of death may underlie the differing effects of corticosteroids in recent sepsis trials.