1
|
Assimakopoulos SF, Bhagani S, Aggeletopoulou I, Tsounis EP, Tsochatzis EA. The role of gut barrier dysfunction in postoperative complications in liver transplantation: pathophysiological and therapeutic considerations. Infection 2024; 52:723-736. [PMID: 38324146 PMCID: PMC11143052 DOI: 10.1007/s15010-024-02182-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2023] [Accepted: 01/11/2024] [Indexed: 02/08/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Gut barrier dysfunction is a pivotal pathophysiological alteration in cirrhosis and end-stage liver disease, which is further aggravated during and after the operational procedures for liver transplantation (LT). In this review, we analyze the multifactorial disruption of all major levels of defense of the gut barrier (biological, mechanical, and immunological) and correlate with clinical implications. METHODS A narrative review of the literature was performed using PubMed, PubMed Central and Google from inception until November 29th, 2023. RESULTS Systemic translocation of indigenous bacteria through this dysfunctional barrier contributes to the early post-LT infectious complications, while endotoxin translocation, through activation of the systemic inflammatory response, is implicated in non-infectious complications including renal dysfunction and graft rejection. Bacterial infections are the main cause of early in-hospital mortality of LT patients and unraveling the pathophysiology of gut barrier failure is of outmost importance. CONCLUSION A pathophysiology-based approach to prophylactic or therapeutic interventions may lead to enhancement of gut barrier function eliminating its detrimental consequences and leading to better outcomes for LT patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stelios F Assimakopoulos
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, University of Patras, University Hospital of Patras, Rion, 26504, Patras, Greece.
| | - Sanjay Bhagani
- Department of Infectious Diseases/HIV Medicine, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
| | - Ioanna Aggeletopoulou
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Patras, Patras, Greece
| | - Efthymios P Tsounis
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Patras, Patras, Greece
| | - Emmanuel A Tsochatzis
- UCL Institute for Liver and Digestive Health, Royal Free Hospital and UCL, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hurley J. Rebound Inverts the Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia Prevention Effect of Antibiotic Based Decontamination Interventions in ICU Cohorts with Prolonged Length of Stay. Antibiotics (Basel) 2024; 13:316. [PMID: 38666992 PMCID: PMC11047347 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics13040316] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2024] [Revised: 03/25/2024] [Accepted: 03/28/2024] [Indexed: 04/29/2024] Open
Abstract
Could rebound explain the paradoxical lack of prevention effect against Staphylococcus aureus blood stream infections (BSIs) with antibiotic-based decontamination intervention (BDI) methods among studies of ICU patients within the literature? Two meta-regression models were applied, each versus the group mean length of stay (LOS). Firstly, the prevention effects against S. aureus BSI [and S. aureus VAP] among 136 studies of antibiotic-BDI versus other interventions were analyzed. Secondly, the S. aureus BSI [and S. aureus VAP] incidence in 268 control and intervention cohorts from studies of antibiotic-BDI versus that among 165 observational cohorts as a benchmark was modelled. In model one, the meta-regression line versus group mean LOS crossed the null, with the antibiotic-BDI prevention effect against S. aureus BSI at mean LOS day 7 (OR 0.45; 0.30 to 0.68) inverted at mean LOS day 20 (OR 1.7; 1.1 to 2.6). In model two, the meta-regression line versus group mean LOS crossed the benchmark line, and the predicted S. aureus BSI incidence for antibiotic-BDI groups was 0.47; 0.09-0.84 percentage points below versus 3.0; 0.12-5.9 above the benchmark in studies with 7 versus 20 days mean LOS, respectively. Rebound within the intervention groups attenuated and inverted the prevention effect of antibiotic-BDI against S. aureus VAP and BSI, respectively. This explains the paradoxical findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Hurley
- Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia;
- Ballarat Health Services, Grampians Health, Ballarat, VIC 3350, Australia
- Ballarat Clinical School, Deakin University, Ballarat, VIC 3350, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jeanmougin T, Cole E, Duceau B, Raux M, James A. Heterogeneity in defining multiple trauma: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Crit Care 2023; 27:363. [PMID: 37736733 PMCID: PMC10515068 DOI: 10.1186/s13054-023-04637-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2023] [Accepted: 09/05/2023] [Indexed: 09/23/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION While numerous randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have been conducted in the field of trauma, a substantial portion of them are yielding negative results. One potential contributing factor to this trend could be the lack of agreement regarding the chosen definitions across different trials. The primary objective was to identify the terminology and definitions utilized for the characterization of multiple trauma patients within randomized controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS A systematic review of the literature was performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE and clinicaltrials.gov between January 1, 2002, and July 31, 2022. RCTs or RTCs protocols were eligible if they included multiple trauma patients. The terms employed to characterize patient populations were identified, and the corresponding definitions for these terms were extracted. The subsequent impact on the population recruited was then documented to expose clinical heterogeneity. RESULTS Fifty RCTs were included, and 12 different terms identified. Among these terms, the most frequently used were "multiple trauma" (n = 21, 42%), "severe trauma" (n = 8, 16%), "major trauma" (n = 4, 8%), and trauma with hemorrhagic shock" (n = 4, 8%). Only 62% of RCTs (n = 31) provided a definition for the terms used, resulting a total of 21 different definitions. These definitions primarily relied on the injury severity score (ISS) (n = 15, 30%), displaying an important underlying heterogeneity. The choice of the terms had an impact on the study population, affecting both the ISS and in-hospital mortality. Eleven protocols were included, featuring five different terms, with "severe trauma" being the most frequent, occurring six times (55%). CONCLUSION This systematic review uncovers an important heterogeneity both in the terms and in the definitions employed to recruit trauma patients within RCTs. These findings underscore the imperative of promoting the use of a unique and consistent definition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Jeanmougin
- Sorbonne University, GRC 29, AP-HP, DMU DREAM, Department of Anesthesiology and critical care, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Elaine Cole
- Centre of Trauma Sciences, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Baptiste Duceau
- Sorbonne University, GRC 29, AP-HP, DMU DREAM, Department of Anesthesiology and critical care, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Mathieu Raux
- Sorbonne Université, INSERM, UMRS1158 Neurophysiologie Respiratoire Expérimentale et Clinique; AP-HP, Groupe Hospitalier Universitaire APHP-Sorbonne Université, site Pitié-Salpêtrière, Département d'Anesthésie Réanimation, F-75013, Paris, France
| | - Arthur James
- Sorbonne University, GRC 29, AP-HP, DMU DREAM, Department of Anesthesiology and critical care, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France.
- Centre of Trauma Sciences, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Myburgh JA, Seppelt IM, Goodman F, Billot L, Correa M, Davis JS, Gordon AC, Hammond NE, Iredell J, Li Q, Micallef S, Miller J, Mysore J, Taylor C, Young PJ, Cuthbertson BH, Finfer SR. Effect of Selective Decontamination of the Digestive Tract on Hospital Mortality in Critically Ill Patients Receiving Mechanical Ventilation: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2022; 328:1911-1921. [PMID: 36286097 PMCID: PMC9607966 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2022.17927] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Whether selective decontamination of the digestive tract (SDD) reduces mortality in critically ill patients remains uncertain. OBJECTIVE To determine whether SDD reduces in-hospital mortality in critically ill adults. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A cluster, crossover, randomized clinical trial that recruited 5982 mechanically ventilated adults from 19 intensive care units (ICUs) in Australia between April 2018 and May 2021 (final follow-up, August 2021). A contemporaneous ecological assessment recruited 8599 patients from participating ICUs between May 2017 and August 2021. INTERVENTIONS ICUs were randomly assigned to adopt or not adopt a SDD strategy for 2 alternating 12-month periods, separated by a 3-month interperiod gap. Patients in the SDD group (n = 2791) received a 6-hourly application of an oral paste and administration of a gastric suspension containing colistin, tobramycin, and nystatin for the duration of mechanical ventilation, plus a 4-day course of an intravenous antibiotic with a suitable antimicrobial spectrum. Patients in the control group (n = 3191) received standard care. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality within 90 days. There were 8 secondary outcomes, including the proportion of patients with new positive blood cultures, antibiotic-resistant organisms (AROs), and Clostridioides difficile infections. For the ecological assessment, a noninferiority margin of 2% was prespecified for 3 outcomes including new cultures of AROs. RESULTS Of 5982 patients (mean age, 58.3 years; 36.8% women) enrolled from 19 ICUs, all patients completed the trial. There were 753/2791 (27.0%) and 928/3191 (29.1%) in-hospital deaths in the SDD and standard care groups, respectively (mean difference, -1.7% [95% CI, -4.8% to 1.3%]; odds ratio, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.82-1.02]; P = .12). Of 8 prespecified secondary outcomes, 6 showed no significant differences. In the SDD vs standard care groups, 23.1% vs 34.6% had new ARO cultures (absolute difference, -11.0%; 95% CI, -14.7% to -7.3%), 5.6% vs 8.1% had new positive blood cultures (absolute difference, -1.95%; 95% CI, -3.5% to -0.4%), and 0.5% vs 0.9% had new C difficile infections (absolute difference, -0.24%; 95% CI, -0.6% to 0.1%). In 8599 patients enrolled in the ecological assessment, use of SDD was not shown to be noninferior with regard to the change in the proportion of patients who developed new AROs (-3.3% vs -1.59%; mean difference, -1.71% [1-sided 97.5% CI, -∞ to 4.31%] and 0.88% vs 0.55%; mean difference, -0.32% [1-sided 97.5% CI, -∞ to 5.47%]) in the first and second periods, respectively. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Among critically ill patients receiving mechanical ventilation, SDD, compared with standard care without SDD, did not significantly reduce in-hospital mortality. However, the confidence interval around the effect estimate includes a clinically important benefit. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02389036.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - John A Myburgh
- Critical Care Division, The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
- St George Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Ian M Seppelt
- Critical Care Division, The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Sydney, Australia
- Nepean Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Fiona Goodman
- Critical Care Division, The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, Australia
| | - Laurent Billot
- Critical Care Division, The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Maryam Correa
- Critical Care Division, The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, Australia
| | - Joshua S Davis
- John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, Australia
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia
- Menzies School of Heath Research, Newcastle, Australia
| | - Anthony C Gordon
- Critical Care Division, The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, England
| | - Naomi E Hammond
- Critical Care Division, The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
- Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jon Iredell
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Sydney, Australia
- Centre for Infectious Disease and Microbiology Westmeath Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, Australia
| | - Qiang Li
- Critical Care Division, The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, Australia
| | - Sharon Micallef
- Critical Care Division, The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jennene Miller
- Critical Care Division, The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, Australia
- St George Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jayanthi Mysore
- Critical Care Division, The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, Australia
| | - Colman Taylor
- Critical Care Division, The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, Australia
| | - Paul J Young
- Wellington Hospital, Wellington, New Zealand
- Medical Research Institute of New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Brian H Cuthbertson
- Critical Care Division, The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, Australia
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Simon R Finfer
- Critical Care Division, The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, England
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hammond NE, Myburgh J, Seppelt I, Garside T, Vlok R, Mahendran S, Adigbli D, Finfer S, Gao Y, Goodman F, Guyatt G, Santos JA, Venkatesh B, Yao L, Di Tanna GL, Delaney A. Association Between Selective Decontamination of the Digestive Tract and In-Hospital Mortality in Intensive Care Unit Patients Receiving Mechanical Ventilation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA 2022; 328:1922-1934. [PMID: 36286098 PMCID: PMC9607997 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2022.19709] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2022] [Accepted: 10/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
Importance The effectiveness of selective decontamination of the digestive tract (SDD) in critically ill adults receiving mechanical ventilation is uncertain. Objective To determine whether SDD is associated with reduced risk of death in adults receiving mechanical ventilation in intensive care units (ICUs) compared with standard care. Data Sources The primary search was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases until September 2022. Study Selection Randomized clinical trials including adults receiving mechanical ventilation in the ICU comparing SDD vs standard care or placebo. Data Extraction and Synthesis Data extraction and risk of bias assessments were performed in duplicate. The primary analysis was conducted using a bayesian framework. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was hospital mortality. Subgroups included SDD with an intravenous agent compared with SDD without an intravenous agent. There were 8 secondary outcomes including the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia, ICU-acquired bacteremia, and the incidence of positive cultures of antimicrobial-resistant organisms. Results There were 32 randomized clinical trials including 24 389 participants in the analysis. The median age of participants in the included studies was 54 years (IQR, 44-60), and the median proportion of female trial participants was 33% (IQR, 25%-38%). Data from 30 trials including 24 034 participants contributed to the primary outcome. The pooled estimated risk ratio (RR) for mortality for SDD compared with standard care was 0.91 (95% credible interval [CrI], 0.82-0.99; I2 = 33.9%; moderate certainty) with a 99.3% posterior probability that SDD reduced hospital mortality. The beneficial association of SDD was evident in trials with an intravenous agent (RR, 0.84 [95% CrI, 0.74-0.94]), but not in trials without an intravenous agent (RR, 1.01 [95% CrI, 0.91-1.11]) (P value for the interaction between subgroups = .02). SDD was associated with reduced risk of ventilator-associated pneumonia (RR, 0.44 [95% CrI, 0.36-0.54]) and ICU-acquired bacteremia (RR, 0.68 [95% CrI, 0.57-0.81]). Available data regarding the incidence of positive cultures of antimicrobial-resistant organisms were not amenable to pooling and were of very low certainty. Conclusions and Relevance Among adults in the ICU treated with mechanical ventilation, the use of SDD compared with standard care or placebo was associated with lower hospital mortality. Evidence regarding the effect of SDD on antimicrobial resistance was of very low certainty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naomi E. Hammond
- Critical Care Program, The George Institute for Global Health and University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Malcolm Fisher Department of Intensive Care, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - John Myburgh
- Critical Care Program, The George Institute for Global Health and University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Intensive Care, St George Hospital, Kogarah, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ian Seppelt
- Critical Care Program, The George Institute for Global Health and University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Nepean Hospital, Penrith, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Tessa Garside
- Critical Care Program, The George Institute for Global Health and University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Malcolm Fisher Department of Intensive Care, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ruan Vlok
- Malcolm Fisher Department of Intensive Care, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Sajeev Mahendran
- Malcolm Fisher Department of Intensive Care, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Derick Adigbli
- Critical Care Program, The George Institute for Global Health and University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Malcolm Fisher Department of Intensive Care, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Simon Finfer
- Critical Care Program, The George Institute for Global Health and University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- The George Institute for Global Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ya Gao
- Evidence-Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Fiona Goodman
- Critical Care Program, The George Institute for Global Health and University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Gordon Guyatt
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Joseph Alvin Santos
- Biostatistics and Data Science Division, Meta-Research and Evidence Synthesis, The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Balasubramanian Venkatesh
- Critical Care Program, The George Institute for Global Health and University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Intensive Care Unit, Wesley and Princess Alexandra Hospitals, Queensland, Australia
| | - Liang Yao
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Gian Luca Di Tanna
- Biostatistics and Data Science Division, Meta-Research and Evidence Synthesis, The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Innovative Technologies, University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland, Viganello-Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Anthony Delaney
- Critical Care Program, The George Institute for Global Health and University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Malcolm Fisher Department of Intensive Care, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Barsuk AL, Nekaeva ES, Lovtsova LV, Urakov AL. Selective Intestinal Decontamination as a Method for Preventing Infectious Complications (Review). Sovrem Tekhnologii Med 2021; 12:86-95. [PMID: 34796022 PMCID: PMC8596238 DOI: 10.17691/stm2020.12.6.10] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2020] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Infectious complications are the most common cause of death in patients with severe burns. To date, there is no generally accepted method for preventing such complications in burn injury. One of the possible prevention options is selective intestinal decontamination (SID). This method is based on the enteral administration of non-absorbable antimicrobial agents. The preventive effect of SID involves inhibition of intestinal microflora translocation through the mucous membranes, inasmuch as studies demonstrate that endogenous opportunistic microorganisms are a common cause of infectious complications in various critical conditions. The SID method was originally developed in the Netherlands for patients suffering from mechanical injury. Antimicrobial drugs were selected based on their high activity in relation to the main endogenous opportunistic pathogens and minimal activity against normal intestinal microflora components. The combination of polymyxin (B or E), tobramycin, and amphotericin B with intravenous cefotaxime was chosen as the first SID regimen. Other regimens were proposed afterwards, and the application field of the method was expanded. In particular, it became the method of choice for prevention of infectious complications in patients with severe burn injury. Clinical studies demonstrate efficacy of some SID regimens for preventing infectious complications in patients with thermal injury. Concomitant administration of SID and systemic preventive antibiotics and addition of oropharyngeal decontamination increases the method efficacy. SID is generally well-tolerated, but some studies show an increased risk of diarrhea with this preventive option. In addition, SID increases the risk of developing antibiotic resistance like any other antibiotic regimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A L Barsuk
- Associate Professor, Department of General and Clinical Pharmacology; Privolzhsky Research Medical University, 10/1 Minin and Pozharsky Square, Nizhny Novgorod, 603005, Russia
| | - E S Nekaeva
- Head of Admission and Consultation Department, Clinical Pharmacologist, University Clinic; Privolzhsky Research Medical University, 10/1 Minin and Pozharsky Square, Nizhny Novgorod, 603005, Russia
| | - L V Lovtsova
- Associate Professor, Head of the Department of General and Clinical Pharmacology; Privolzhsky Research Medical University, 10/1 Minin and Pozharsky Square, Nizhny Novgorod, 603005, Russia
| | - A L Urakov
- Professor, Head of the Department of General and Clinical Pharmacology; Izhevsk State Medical Academy, 281 Kommunarov St., Izhevsk, 426034, Udmurt Republic, Russia; Leading Researcher, Department of Modeling and Synthesis of Technological Processes Udmurt Federal Research Center, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 34 Tatyany Baramzinoy St., Izhevsk, 426067, Udmurt Republic, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Minozzi S, Pifferi S, Brazzi L, Pecoraro V, Montrucchio G, D'Amico R. Topical antibiotic prophylaxis to reduce respiratory tract infections and mortality in adults receiving mechanical ventilation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2021; 1:CD000022. [PMID: 33481250 PMCID: PMC8094382 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd000022.pub4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients treated with mechanical ventilation in intensive care units (ICUs) have a high risk of developing respiratory tract infections (RTIs). Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) has been estimated to affect 5% to 40% of patients treated with mechanical ventilation for at least 48 hours. The attributable mortality rate of VAP has been estimated at about 9%. Selective digestive decontamination (SDD), which consists of the topical application of non-absorbable antimicrobial agents to the oropharynx and gastroenteric tract during the whole period of mechanical ventilation, is often used to reduce the risk of VAP. A related treatment is selective oropharyngeal decontamination (SOD), in which topical antibiotics are applied to the oropharynx only. This is an update of a review first published in 1997 and updated in 2002, 2004, and 2009. OBJECTIVES To assess the effect of topical antibiotic regimens (SDD and SOD), given alone or in combination with systemic antibiotics, to prevent mortality and respiratory infections in patients receiving mechanical ventilation for at least 48 hours in ICUs. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), which contains the Cochrane Acute Respiratory Infections (ARI) Group's Specialised Register, PubMed, and Embase on 5 February 2020. We also searched the WHO ICTRP and ClinicalTrials.gov for ongoing and unpublished studies on 5 February 2020. All searches included non-English language literature. We handsearched references of topic-related systematic reviews and the included studies. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and cluster-RCTs assessing the efficacy and safety of topical prophylactic antibiotic regimens in adults receiving intensive care and mechanical ventilation. The included studies compared topical plus systemic antibiotics versus placebo or no treatment; topical antibiotics versus no treatment; and topical plus systemic antibiotics versus systemic antibiotics. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. MAIN RESULTS We included a total of 41 trials involving 11,004 participants (five new studies were added in this update). The minimum duration of mechanical ventilation ranged from 2 (19 studies) to 6 days (one study). Thirteen studies reported the mean length of ICU stay, ranging from 11 to 33 days. The percentage of immunocompromised patients ranged from 0% (10 studies) to 22% (1 study). The reporting quality of the majority of included studies was very poor, so we judged more than 40% of the studies as at unclear risk of selection bias. We judged all studies to be at low risk of performance bias, though 47.6% were open-label, because hospitals usually have standardised infection control programmes, and possible subjective decisions on who should be tested for the presence or absence of RTIs are unlikely in an ICU setting. Regarding detection bias, we judged all included studies as at low risk for the outcome mortality. For the outcome RTIs, we judged all double-blind studies as at low risk of detection bias. We judged five open-label studies as at high risk of detection bias, as the diagnosis of RTI was not based on microbiological exams; we judged the remaining open-label studies as at low risk of detection bias, as a standardised set of diagnostic criteria, including results of microbiological exams, were used. Topical plus systemic antibiotic prophylaxis reduces overall mortality compared with placebo or no treatment (risk ratio (RR) 0.84, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.73 to 0.96; 18 studies; 5290 participants; high-certainty evidence). Based on an illustrative risk of 303 deaths in 1000 people this equates to 48 (95% CI 15 to 79) fewer deaths with topical plus systemic antibiotic prophylaxis. Topical plus systemic antibiotic prophylaxis probably reduces RTIs (RR 0.43, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.53; 17 studies; 2951 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Based on an illustrative risk of 417 RTIs in 1000 people this equates to 238 (95% CI 196 to 271) fewer RTIs with topical plus systemic antibiotic prophylaxis. Topical antibiotic prophylaxis probably reduces overall mortality compared with no topical antibiotic prophylaxis (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.05; 22 studies, 4213 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Based on an illustrative risk of 290 deaths in 1000 people this equates to 19 (95% CI 37 fewer to 15 more) fewer deaths with topical antibiotic prophylaxis. Topical antibiotic prophylaxis may reduce RTIs (RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.74; 19 studies, 2698 participants; low-certainty evidence). Based on an illustrative risk of 318 RTIs in 1000 people this equates to 137 (95% CI 83 to 178) fewer RTIs with topical antibiotic prophylaxis. Sixteen studies reported adverse events and dropouts due to adverse events, which were poorly reported with sparse data. The certainty of the evidence ranged from low to very low. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Treatments based on topical prophylaxis probably reduce respiratory infections, but not mortality, in adult patients receiving mechanical ventilation for at least 48 hours, whereas a combination of topical and systemic prophylactic antibiotics reduces both overall mortality and RTIs. However, we cannot rule out that the systemic component of the combined treatment provides a relevant contribution in the observed reduction of mortality. No conclusion can be drawn about adverse events as they were poorly reported with sparse data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silvia Minozzi
- Department of Epidemiology, Lazio Regional Health Service, Rome, Italy
| | - Silvia Pifferi
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milano, Italy
| | - Luca Brazzi
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
- Department of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care and Emergency, 'Città della salute e della Scienza' Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Valentina Pecoraro
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Ospedale Civile Sant'Agostino Estense, Modena, Italy
| | - Giorgia Montrucchio
- Department of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care and Emergency, 'Città della salute e della Scienza' Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Roberto D'Amico
- Italian Cochrane Centre, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Children and Adults, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia School of Medicine, Modena, Italy
- Unit of Methodological/Statistical Support to Clinical Research, Azienda-Ospedaliero Universitaria, Modena, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Gut-origin sepsis in the critically ill patient: pathophysiology and treatment. Infection 2018; 46:751-760. [PMID: 30003491 DOI: 10.1007/s15010-018-1178-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 124] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2018] [Accepted: 07/06/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Gut permeability is increased in critically ill patients, and associated with the development of the systemic inflammatory response syndrome and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS). The pathogenetic link(s) and potential therapies are an area of intense research over the last decades. METHODS We thoroughly reviewed the literature on gut-origin sepsis and MODS in critically ill patients, with emphasis on the implicated pathophysiological mechanisms and therapeutic interventions. FINDINGS Intestinal barrier failure leading to systemic bacterial translocation associated with MODS was the predominant pathophysiological theory for several years. However, clinical studies with critically ill patients failed to provide the evidence of systemic spread of gut-derived bacteria and/or their products as a cause of MODS. Newer experimental data highlight the role of the mesenteric lymph as a carrier of gut-derived danger-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) to the lung and the systemic circulation. These substances are recognized by pattern recognition receptor-bearing cells in diverse tissues and promote proinflammatory pathways and the development MODS. Therefore, the gut becomes a pivotal proinflammatory organ, driving the systemic inflammatory response through DAMPs release in mesenteric lymph, without the need for systemic bacterial translocation. CONCLUSIONS There is an emerging need for application of sensitive non-invasive and easily measured biomarkers of early intestinal injury (e.g., citrulline, intestinal fatty acid protein, and zonulin) in our everyday clinical practice, guiding the early pharmacological intervention in critically ill patients to restore or prevent intestinal injury and improve their outcomes.
Collapse
|
9
|
Algera AG, Pisani L, Bergmans DCJ, den Boer S, de Borgie CAJ, Bosch FH, Bruin K, Cherpanath TG, Determann RM, Dondorp AM, Dongelmans DA, Endeman H, Haringman JJ, Horn J, Juffermans NP, van Meenen DM, van der Meer NJ, Merkus MP, Moeniralam HS, Purmer I, Tuinman PR, Slabbekoorn M, Spronk PE, Vlaar APJ, Gama de Abreu M, Pelosi P, Serpa Neto A, Schultz MJ, Paulus F. RELAx - REstricted versus Liberal positive end-expiratory pressure in patients without ARDS: protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2018; 19:272. [PMID: 29739430 PMCID: PMC5941564 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-018-2640-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2017] [Accepted: 04/10/2018] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evidence for benefit of high positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is largely lacking for invasively ventilated, critically ill patients with uninjured lungs. We hypothesize that ventilation with low PEEP is noninferior to ventilation with high PEEP with regard to the number of ventilator-free days and being alive at day 28 in this population. METHODS/DESIGN: The "REstricted versus Liberal positive end-expiratory pressure in patients without ARDS" trial (RELAx) is a national, multicenter, randomized controlled, noninferiority trial in adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients with uninjured lungs who are expected not to be extubated within 24 h. RELAx will run in 13 ICUs in the Netherlands to enroll 980 patients under invasive ventilation. In all patients, low tidal volumes are used. Patients assigned to ventilation with low PEEP will receive the lowest possible PEEP between 0 and 5 cm H2O, while patients assigned to ventilation with high PEEP will receive PEEP of 8 cm H2O. The primary endpoint is the number of ventilator-free days and being alive at day 28, a composite endpoint for liberation from the ventilator and mortality until day 28, with a noninferiority margin for a difference between groups of 0.5 days. Secondary endpoints are length of stay (LOS), mortality, and occurrence of pulmonary complications, including severe hypoxemia, major atelectasis, need for rescue therapies, pneumonia, pneumothorax, and development of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Hemodynamic support and sedation needs will be collected and compared. DISCUSSION RELAx will be the first sufficiently sized randomized controlled trial in invasively ventilated, critically ill patients with uninjured lungs using a clinically relevant and objective endpoint to determine whether invasive, low-tidal-volume ventilation with low PEEP is noninferior to ventilation with high PEEP. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov , ID: NCT03167580 . Registered on 23 May 2017.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Geke Algera
- Department of Intensive Care, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Luigi Pisani
- Department of Intensive Care, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dennis C. J. Bergmans
- Department of Intensive Care, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Sylvia den Boer
- Department of Intensive Care, Spaarne Gasthuis, Haarlem and Hoofddorp, The Netherlands
| | | | - Frank H. Bosch
- Department of Intensive Care, Rijnstate, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Karina Bruin
- Department of Intensive Care, Westfriesgasthuis, Hoorn, The Netherlands
| | - Thomas G. Cherpanath
- Department of Intensive Care, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rogier M. Determann
- Department of Intensive Care, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Arjen M. Dondorp
- Department of Intensive Care, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Madihol–Oxford Research Unit (MORU), Madihol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Dave A. Dongelmans
- Department of Intensive Care, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Henrik Endeman
- Department of Intensive Care, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Janneke Horn
- Department of Intensive Care, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Laboratory of Experimental Intensive Care and Anesthesiology (L·E·I·C·A), Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nicole P. Juffermans
- Department of Intensive Care, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Laboratory of Experimental Intensive Care and Anesthesiology (L·E·I·C·A), Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - David M. van Meenen
- Department of Intensive Care, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Hazra S. Moeniralam
- Department of Intensive Care, Sint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Ilse Purmer
- Department of Intensive Care, Haga Hospital, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Pieter Roel Tuinman
- Department of Intensive Care, VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- REVIVE Research VU Medical Center, VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mathilde Slabbekoorn
- Department of Intensive Care, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Peter E. Spronk
- Department of Intensive Care, Gelre Hospital, Apeldoorn, The Netherlands
| | - Alexander P. J. Vlaar
- Department of Intensive Care, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Laboratory of Experimental Intensive Care and Anesthesiology (L·E·I·C·A), Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marcelo Gama de Abreu
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
| | - Paolo Pelosi
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics, San Martino Policlinico Hospital – IRCCS for Oncology, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Ary Serpa Neto
- Department of Intensive Care, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Marcus J. Schultz
- Department of Intensive Care, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Intensive Care, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Laboratory of Experimental Intensive Care and Anesthesiology (L·E·I·C·A), Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frederique Paulus
- Department of Intensive Care, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - for the RELAx Investigators and the PROVE Network Investigators
- Department of Intensive Care, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Intensive Care, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Intensive Care, Spaarne Gasthuis, Haarlem and Hoofddorp, The Netherlands
- Clinical Research Unit, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Intensive Care, Rijnstate, Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Department of Intensive Care, Westfriesgasthuis, Hoorn, The Netherlands
- Department of Intensive Care, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Madihol–Oxford Research Unit (MORU), Madihol University, Bangkok, Thailand
- Department of Intensive Care, Isala Clinics, Zwolle, The Netherlands
- Laboratory of Experimental Intensive Care and Anesthesiology (L·E·I·C·A), Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Intensive Care, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands
- Department of Intensive Care, Sint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
- Department of Intensive Care, Haga Hospital, The Hague, The Netherlands
- Department of Intensive Care, VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- REVIVE Research VU Medical Center, VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Intensive Care, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, The Netherlands
- Department of Intensive Care, Gelre Hospital, Apeldoorn, The Netherlands
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics, San Martino Policlinico Hospital – IRCCS for Oncology, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Selective digestive and oropharyngeal decontamination in medical and surgical ICU patients: individual patient data meta-analysis. Clin Microbiol Infect 2018; 24:505-513. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2017.08.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2017] [Revised: 08/23/2017] [Accepted: 08/23/2017] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
11
|
Selective Digestive Decontamination Attenuates Organ Dysfunction in Critically Ill Burn Patients. Shock 2018; 46:492-497. [PMID: 27755474 DOI: 10.1097/shk.0000000000000664] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate whether selective decontamination of the digestive tract (SDD) attenuates organ dysfunction in critically ill burn patients. BACKGROUND The effect of SDD on the development and progression of organ dysfunction, as an important determinant of mortality in burned patients, is still unknown. We asked whether organ dysfunction is mitigated by treatment with SDD. METHODS Patients with burns >20% of total body surface or suspected inhalation injury from a randomized placebo-controlled trial were analyzed to determine the relationship between treatment received (placebo or SDD) and the severity of organ dysfunction as measured by the area under the curve of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score (and its individual components) from day 1 to day 7 of admission. RESULTS One hundred seven patients (53 in the SDD group and 54 in the placebo group) were included. Survival was significantly higher in SDD-treated patients (48 of 53, 90.6%) than in placebo-treated patients (39 of 54, 72.2%, P = 0.013). Total (P < 0.01) and respiratory (P < 0.01), cardiovascular (P = 0.04) and hematological (not reaching statistical significance, P = 0.07) organ dysfunction was associated with mortality after adjusting for predicted mortality. In multivariate logistic regression, SDD treatment was independently associated with total (P < 0.01), respiratory (P = 0.02), and hematological (P < 0.01) dysfunction over the first week postinjury. CONCLUSIONS The beneficial effect of SDD on mortality in critically ill burned patients is accompanied by a reduction in the degree of organ dysfunction. SDD seems to be a valuable therapeutic strategy to prevent organ dysfunction and, more specifically, respiratory and hematological dysfunction in severely ill burn patients.
Collapse
|
12
|
Unusually High Incidences of Staphylococcus aureus Infection within Studies of Ventilator Associated Pneumonia Prevention Using Topical Antibiotics: Benchmarking the Evidence Base. Microorganisms 2018; 6:microorganisms6010002. [PMID: 29300363 PMCID: PMC5874616 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms6010002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2017] [Revised: 12/29/2017] [Accepted: 01/02/2018] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Selective digestive decontamination (SDD, topical antibiotic regimens applied to the respiratory tract) appears effective for preventing ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP) in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. However, potential contextual effects of SDD on Staphylococcus aureus infections in the ICU remain unclear. The S. aureus ventilator associated pneumonia (S. aureus VAP), VAP overall and S. aureus bacteremia incidences within component (control and intervention) groups within 27 SDD studies were benchmarked against 115 observational groups. Component groups from 66 studies of various interventions other than SDD provided additional points of reference. In 27 SDD study control groups, the mean S. aureus VAP incidence is 9.6% (95% CI; 6.9–13.2) versus a benchmark derived from 115 observational groups being 4.8% (95% CI; 4.2–5.6). In nine SDD study control groups the mean S. aureus bacteremia incidence is 3.8% (95% CI; 2.1–5.7) versus a benchmark derived from 10 observational groups being 2.1% (95% CI; 1.1–4.1). The incidences of S. aureus VAP and S. aureus bacteremia within the control groups of SDD studies are each higher than literature derived benchmarks. Paradoxically, within the SDD intervention groups, the incidences of both S. aureus VAP and VAP overall are more similar to the benchmarks.
Collapse
|
13
|
van Steen SC, Rijkenberg S, Sechterberger MK, DeVries JH, van der Voort PH. Glycemic Effects of a Low-Carbohydrate Enteral Formula Compared With an Enteral Formula of Standard Composition in Critically Ill Patients: An Open-Label Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2017; 42:1035-1045. [DOI: 10.1002/jpen.1045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2017] [Accepted: 10/31/2017] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sigrid C. van Steen
- Department of Endocrinology; Academic Medical Center; University of Amsterdam; Amsterdam the Netherlands
- Department of Intensive Care; OLVG; Amsterdam the Netherlands
| | | | - Marjolein K. Sechterberger
- Department of Endocrinology; Academic Medical Center; University of Amsterdam; Amsterdam the Netherlands
- Department of Intensive Care; OLVG; Amsterdam the Netherlands
| | - J. Hans DeVries
- Department of Endocrinology; Academic Medical Center; University of Amsterdam; Amsterdam the Netherlands
| | - Peter H.J. van der Voort
- Department of Intensive Care; OLVG; Amsterdam the Netherlands
- TIAS; School for Business and Society; Tilburg University; Tilburg the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Pfeifer C, Noll S, Gerecke H, Fassauer G, Jira T, Remane Y, Vogel J, Frontini R, Reinhardt R. A stability study of amphotericin B, colistin and tobramycin in a hydrophilic suspension commonly used for selective decontamination of the digestive tract by HPLC and in vitro potency measurements. Eur J Hosp Pharm 2017; 24:235-241. [PMID: 31156945 DOI: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2016-000931] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2016] [Revised: 06/16/2016] [Accepted: 07/05/2016] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives A suspension for oral use which consists of three non-absorbable antibiotics (amphotericin B, colistin and tobramycin) is often used in clinical practice for the selective decontamination of the digestive tract (SDD) of patients in intensive care. Such a therapy is a preventive tool to minimise the risk of pneumonia and bacteraemia in intubated patients. The administration and the treatment results are controversially discussed. One limiting factor for a unique SDD treatment in the hospitals is a lack of adequate data regarding batch formula and stability for such a formulation. Since no detailed procedures, specifications or stability data are available for manufacturing this formulation there may be discrepancies regarding formulation and stability of suspensions prepared in different pharmacies. The aim of this research was to collect the physicochemical and microbiological stability data of a developed, stable standard formulation under defined storage conditions. The effectiveness of the SDD suspension should be preferably proven over a long period. This would help guarantee that all patients receive the same preparation, therefore, ensuring similar efficacy and improved safety. Methods An adequate formulation composed of the registered, marketed medicinal product Ampho-Moronal suspension (Dermapharm AG, Germany) and a buffered, preserved aqueous solution of colistin and tobramycin both as sulfates has been developed. A stability study has been performed on two batches of the formulation. During the storage, samples were taken and compatibility was verified by physicochemical and microbiological testing in stability-indicating terms of colour, odour, flavour, pH, chemical and microbiological purity as well as in vitro potency. The test methods were built and tailored to be suitable, reliable and precise for the test needs. Results The results show the physicochemical and microbiological stability of the described formulation for defined storage conditions. Conclusions A standardised formulation with a proven stability for at least 6 months under fridge (5°C±3°C) conditions for the SDD of patients in intensive care was established.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Corina Pfeifer
- Development Department, mibe GmbH Arzneimittel, Brehna, Germany
| | - Sylvia Noll
- Development Department, mibe GmbH Arzneimittel, Brehna, Germany
| | - Hagen Gerecke
- Development Department, mibe GmbH Arzneimittel, Brehna, Germany
| | - Georg Fassauer
- Institute of Pharmacy, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-University Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Thomas Jira
- Institute of Pharmacy, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-University Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Yvonne Remane
- Hospital Pharmacy, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Jan Vogel
- Hospital Pharmacy, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Resino E, San-Juan R, Aguado JM. Selective intestinal decontamination for the prevention of early bacterial infections after liver transplantation. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22:5950-5957. [PMID: 27468189 PMCID: PMC4948279 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i26.5950] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2016] [Revised: 05/06/2016] [Accepted: 05/23/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Bacterial infection in the first month after liver transplantation is a frequent complication that poses a serious risk for liver transplant recipients as contributes substantially to increased length of hospitalization and hospital costs being a leading cause of death in this period. Most of these infections are caused by gram-negative bacilli, although gram-positive infections, especially Enterococcus sp. constitute an emerging infectious problem. This high rate of early postoperative infections after liver transplant has generated interest in exploring various prophylactic approaches to surmount this problem. One of these approaches is selective intestinal decontamination (SID). SID is a prophylactic strategy that consists of the administration of antimicrobials with limited anaerobicidal activity in order to reduce the burden of aerobic gram-negative bacteria and/or yeast in the intestinal tract and so prevent infections caused by these organisms. The majority of studies carried out to date have found SID to be effective in the reduction of gram-negative infection, but the effect on overall infection is limited due to a higher number of infection episodes by pathogenic enterococci and coagulase-negative staphylococci. However, difficulties in general extrapolation of the favorable results obtained in specific studies together with the potential risk of selection of multirresistant microorganisms has conditioned controversy about the routinely application of these strategies in liver transplant recipients.
Collapse
|
16
|
Hurley JC. Impact of selective digestive decontamination on respiratory tract Candida among patients with suspected ventilator-associated pneumonia. A meta-analysis. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2016; 35:1121-35. [PMID: 27116009 DOI: 10.1007/s10096-016-2643-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2016] [Accepted: 03/29/2016] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
The purpose here is to establish the incidence of respiratory tract colonization with Candida (RT Candida) among ICU patients receiving mechanical ventilation within studies in the literature. Also of interest is its relationship with candidemia and the relative importance of topical antibiotic (TA) use as within studies of selective digestive decontamination (SDD) versus other candidate risk factors towards it. The incidence of RT Candida was extracted from component (control and intervention) groups decanted from studies of various TA and non-TA ICU infection prevention methods with summary estimates derived using random effects. A benchmark RT Candida incidence to provide overarching calibration was derived using (observational) groups from studies without any prevention method under study. A multi-level regression model of group level data was undertaken using generalized estimating equation (GEE) methods. RT Candida data were sourced from 113 studies. The benchmark RT Candida incidence is 1.3; 0.9-1.8 % (mean and 95 % confidence intervals). Membership of a concurrent control group of a study of SDD (p = 0.02), the group-wide presence of candidemia risk factors (p < 0.001), and proportion of trauma admissions (p = 0.004), but neither the year of study publication, nor membership of any other component group, nor the mode of respiratory sampling are predictive of the RT Candida incidence. RT Candida and candidemia incidences are correlated. RT Candida incidence can serve as a basis for benchmarking. Several relationships have been identified. The increased incidence among concurrent control groups of SDD studies cannot be appreciated in any single study examined in isolation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J C Hurley
- Department of Rural Health, Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia. .,Internal Medicine Service Ballarat Health Services, PO Box 577, Ballarat, Australia, 3353. .,Infection Control Committees, St John of God Hospital and Ballarat Health Services, Ballarat, Victoria, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Does selective digestive decontamination prevent ventilator-associated pneumonia in trauma patients? Am J Ther 2015; 21:470-6. [PMID: 23567785 DOI: 10.1097/mjt.0b013e31825e7a8f] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
The incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is particularly high in patients with trauma. The efficacy and safety of selective digestive decontamination (SDD) was not studied extensively. We aimed in our randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate whether SDD prevents VAP onset in multiple trauma patients. All adult patients admitted in our intensive care unit for multiple trauma with a predicted duration of mechanical ventilation (MV) over 48 hours were included. We included 44 patients who were divided into 4 groups: group A receiving subglottic and gastric treatment suspension (polymyxin E 100 mg, vancomycin 1 g, and amphotericin B 500 mg), group B receiving placebo, group C receiving subglottic placebo and gastric treatment suspension, and group D receiving subglottic treatment suspension and gastric placebo. The suspension was given 4 times a day during 7 consecutive days. To this topical treatment, we associated an intravenous administration of cefotaxime (1 g 3 times a day during 4 consecutive days). The incidence of VAP in the 4 groups was, respectively, 45.5%, 46.2%, 22.2%, and 27.3% (P=0.236). In multivariate analysis, none of the 3 tested regimens was identified as a protective factor against VAP. However, prolonged duration of MV was the only independent factor predicting VAP onset (odds ratio=1.1; 95% confidence interval [1.1-1.4]; P=0.049).
Collapse
|
18
|
Pfeifer C, Fassauer G, Gerecke H, Jira T, Remane Y, Frontini R, Byrne J, Reinhardt R. Purity determination of amphotericin B, colistin sulfate and tobramycin sulfate in a hydrophilic suspension by HPLC. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 2015; 990:7-14. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2015.02.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2014] [Revised: 02/25/2015] [Accepted: 02/27/2015] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
19
|
Hurley JC. Topical antibiotics as a major contextual hazard toward bacteremia within selective digestive decontamination studies: a meta-analysis. BMC Infect Dis 2014; 14:714. [PMID: 25551776 PMCID: PMC4300056 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-014-0714-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2014] [Accepted: 12/11/2014] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Among methods for preventing pneumonia and possibly also bacteremia in intensive care unit (ICU) patients, Selective Digestive Decontamination (SDD) appears most effective within randomized concurrent controlled trials (RCCT's) although more recent trials have been cluster randomized. However, of the SDD components, whether protocolized parenteral antibiotic prophylaxis (PPAP) is required, and whether the topical antibiotic actually presents a contextual hazard, remain unresolved. The objective here is to compare the bacteremia rates and patterns of isolates in SDD-RCCT's versus the broader evidence base. METHODS Bacteremia incidence proportion data were extracted from component (control and intervention) groups decanted from studies investigating antibiotic (SDD) or non-antibiotic methods of VAP prevention and summarized using random effects meta-analysis of study and group level data. A reference category of groups derived from purely observational studies without any prevention method under study provided a benchmark incidence. RESULTS Within SDD RCCTs, the mean bacteremia incidence among concurrent component groups not exposed to PPAP (27 control; 17.1%; 13.1-22.1% and 12 intervention groups; 16.2%; 9.1-27.3%) is double that of the benchmark bacteremia incidence derived from 39 benchmark groups (8.3; 6.8-10.2%) and also 20 control groups from studies of non-antibiotic methods (7.1%; 4.8 - 10.5). There is a selective increase in coagulase negative staphylococci (CNS) but not in Pseudomonas aeruginosa among bacteremia isolates within control groups of SDD-RCCT's versus benchmark groups with data available. CONCLUSIONS The topical antibiotic component of SDD presents a major contextual hazard toward bacteremia against which the PPAP component partially mitigates.
Collapse
|
20
|
Zandstra DF, VAN Saene HKF, Strinnholm M. Trauma patients requiring treatment on the intensive care unit (ICU) need antimicrobial prophylaxis to prevent pneumonia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2014; 58:1287-8. [PMID: 25039239 DOI: 10.1111/aas.12365] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
21
|
Roquilly A, Marret E, Abraham E, Asehnoune K. Pneumonia Prevention to Decrease Mortality in Intensive Care Unit: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis 2014; 60:64-75. [DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciu740] [Citation(s) in RCA: 82] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
|
22
|
Short-Term Decline in All-Cause Acquired Infections With the Routine Use of a Decontamination Regimen Combining Topical Polymyxin, Tobramycin, and Amphotericin B With Mupirocin and Chlorhexidine in the ICU. Crit Care Med 2014; 42:1121-30. [DOI: 10.1097/ccm.0000000000000140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
23
|
Price R, MacLennan G, Glen J. Selective digestive or oropharyngeal decontamination and topical oropharyngeal chlorhexidine for prevention of death in general intensive care: systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMJ 2014; 348:g2197. [PMID: 24687313 PMCID: PMC3970764 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.g2197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 163] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/03/2014] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To determine the effect on mortality of selective digestive decontamination, selective oropharyngeal decontamination, and topical oropharyngeal chlorhexidine in adult patients in general intensive care units and to compare these interventions with each other in a network meta-analysis. DESIGN Systematic review, conventional meta-analysis, and network meta-analysis. Medline, Embase, and CENTRAL were searched to December 2012. Previous meta-analyses, conference abstracts, and key journals were also searched. We used pairwise meta-analyses to estimate direct evidence from intervention-control trials and a network meta-analysis within a Bayesian framework to combine direct and indirect evidence. INCLUSION CRITERIA Prospective randomised controlled trials that recruited adult patients in general intensive care units and studied selective digestive decontamination, selective oropharyngeal decontamination, or oropharyngeal chlorhexidine compared with standard care or placebo. RESULTS Selective digestive decontamination had a favourable effect on mortality, with a direct evidence odds ratio of 0.73 (95% confidence interval 0.64 to 0.84). The direct evidence odds ratio for selective oropharyngeal decontamination was 0.85 (0.74 to 0.97). Chlorhexidine was associated with increased mortality (odds ratio 1.25, 1.05 to 1.50). When each intervention was compared with the other, both selective digestive decontamination and selective oropharyngeal decontamination were superior to chlorhexidine. The difference between selective digestive decontamination and selective oropharyngeal decontamination was uncertain. CONCLUSION Selective digestive decontamination has a favourable effect on mortality in adult patients in general intensive care units. In these patients, the effect of selective oropharyngeal decontamination is less certain. Both selective digestive decontamination and selective oropharyngeal decontamination are superior to chlorhexidine, and there is a possibility that chlorhexidine is associated with increased mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Price
- Intensive Care Unit, Royal Alexandra Hospital, Paisley PA2 9PN, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Duncan EM, Cuthbertson BH, Prior ME, Marshall AP, Wells EC, Todd LE, Bolsover D, Newlands RS, Webster F, Rose L, Campbell MK, Bellingan G, Seppelt IM, Francis JJ. The views of health care professionals about selective decontamination of the digestive tract: an international, theoretically informed interview study. J Crit Care 2014; 29:634-40. [PMID: 24747038 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.03.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2013] [Revised: 03/10/2014] [Accepted: 03/17/2014] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Selective decontamination of the digestive tract (SDD) as a prophylactic intervention improves hospital-acquired infection and survival rates. Uptake of SDD is low and remains controversial. This study applied the theoretical domains framework to assess intensive care unit clinicians' views about SDD in regions with limited or no adoption of SDD. MATERIALS AND METHODS Participants were health professionals with "decisional authority" for the adoption of SDD. Semistructured interviews were conducted as the first round of a Delphi study. Views about SDD adoption, delivery, and further SDD research were explored. Directed content analysis of interview data identified subthemes, which informed item development for subsequent Delphi rounds. Linguistic features of interview data were also explored. RESULTS One hundred forty-one participants provided interview data. Fifty-six subthemes were identified; 46 were common across regions. Beliefs about consequences were the most widely elaborated theme. Linguistic features of how participants discussed SDD included caution expressed when discussing the risks and benefits and words such as "worry," "anxiety," and "fear" when discussing potential antibiotic resistance associated with SDD. CONCLUSIONS We identified salient beliefs, barriers, and facilitators to SDD adoption and delivery. What participants said about SDD and the way in which they said it demonstrated the degree of clinical caution, uncertainty, and concern that SDD evokes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eilidh M Duncan
- Aberdeen Health Psychology Group, Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK; Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Brian H Cuthbertson
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre and Department of Anesthesia, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Maria E Prior
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Andrea P Marshall
- Centre for Health Practice Innovation, Griffith Health Institute, Griffith University, and The Gold Coast Hospital, Griffith, Queensland, Australia
| | - Elisabeth C Wells
- Centre for the Study of Social and Legal Responses to Violence, University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada
| | - Laura E Todd
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Denise Bolsover
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | | | - Fiona Webster
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Louise Rose
- Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | | | - Geoff Bellingan
- Intensive Care Unit, University College Hospital, London, UK
| | - Ian M Seppelt
- George Institute for Global Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jill J Francis
- School of Health Sciences, City University London, London, UK.
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Attributable mortality of ventilator-associated pneumonia – Authors' reply. THE LANCET. INFECTIOUS DISEASES 2013; 13:1015. [DOI: 10.1016/s1473-3099(13)70326-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
26
|
Medina-Presentado JC, Seija V, Vignoli R, Pontet J, Robino L, Cordeiro NF, Bado I, García-Fulgueiras V, Berro M, Bazet C, Savio E, Rieppi G. Polyclonal endemicity of Acinetobacter baumannii in ventilated patients in an intensive care unit in Uruguay. Int J Infect Dis 2013; 17:e422-7. [PMID: 23415583 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2012.12.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2012] [Revised: 11/21/2012] [Accepted: 12/31/2012] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To identify the mechanisms responsible for respiratory infections by Acinetobacter baumannii in intubated patients and risk factors for digestive colonization and infection by A. baumannii. METHODS We conducted a prospective study in an intensive care unit (ICU) between May 2005 and November 2006, including 175 consecutive patients at the beginning of invasive ventilation (day 1). We performed pharyngeal and rectal swabs on days 1, 4, 7, 10, 13, and 16. Respiratory samples were taken on days 1 and 7, or on suspicion of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). RESULTS We detected 62 patients with A. baumannii digestive colonization and 20 cases of A. baumannii lower respiratory infection (14 VAP and six purulent tracheobronchitis (PTB)). Digestive colonization by A. baumannii was an independent risk factor for lower respiratory tract infections with that microorganism (p<0.0001; relative risk 8.71, 95% confidence interval 2.73-27.77). Respiratory and rectal A. baumannii isolates from the same patients were compared by enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus (ERIC)-PCR; in 9/11 cases (eight VAP and one PTB) results suggested events of exogenous pneumonia with previous colonization, whereas the remaining two cases (two PTB) were suggestive of exogenous infection without previous colonization. CONCLUSIONS In our unit the pathogenesis of VAP by A. baumannii is mixed, most cases corresponding to exogenous pneumonia with previous colonization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julio Cesar Medina-Presentado
- Cátedra de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Instituto de Higiene, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de la República, Av. Alfredo Navarro 3051, Montevideo, 11600, Uruguay.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Silvestri L, de la Cal MA, van Saene HKF. Selective decontamination of the digestive tract: the mechanism of action is control of gut overgrowth. Intensive Care Med 2012; 38:1738-50. [PMID: 23001446 DOI: 10.1007/s00134-012-2690-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2012] [Accepted: 08/03/2012] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Gut overgrowth is the pathophysiological event in the critically ill requiring intensive care. In relation to the risk of developing a clinically important outcome, gut overgrowth is defined as ≥10(5) potential pathogens including 'abnormal' aerobic Gram-negative bacilli (AGNB), 'normal' bacteria and yeasts, per mL of digestive tract secretion. Surveillance samples of throat and gut are the only samples to detect overgrowth. Gut overgrowth is the crucial event which precedes both primary and secondary endogenous infection, and a risk factor for the development of de novo resistance. Selective decontamination of the digestive tract (SDD) is an antimicrobial prophylaxis designed to control overgrowth. METHODS There have been 65 randomised controlled trials of SDD in 15,000 patients over 25 years and 11 meta-analyses, which are reviewed. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS These trials demonstrate that the full SDD regimen using parenteral and enteral antimicrobials reduces lower airway infection by 72 %, blood stream infection by 37 %, and mortality by 29 %. Resistance is also controlled. Parenteral cefotaxime which reaches high salivary and biliary concentrations eradicates overgrowth of 'normal' bacteria such as Staphylococcus aureus in the throat. Enteral polyenes control 'normal' Candida species. Enteral polymyxin and tobramycin, eradicate, or prevent gut overgrowth of 'abnormal' AGNB. Enteral vancomycin controls overgrowth of 'abnormal' methicillin-resistant S. aureus. SDD controls overgrowth by achieving high antimicrobial concentrations effective against 'normal' and 'abnormal' potential pathogens rather than by selectivity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luciano Silvestri
- Department of Emergency, Unit of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Presidio Ospedaliero di Gorizia, Via Fatebenefratelli 34, 34170, Gorizia, Italy
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Khan AS, Dancer SJ, Humphreys H. Priorities in the prevention and control of multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae in hospitals. J Hosp Infect 2012; 82:85-93. [PMID: 22863084 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2012.06.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2011] [Accepted: 06/26/2012] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (MDE) are a major public health threat due to international spread and few options for treatment. Furthermore, unlike meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), MDE encompass several genera and multiple resistance mechanisms, including extended-spectrum beta-lactamases and carbapenemases, which complicate detection in the routine diagnostic laboratory. Current measures to contain spread in many hospitals are somewhat ad hoc as there are no formal national or international guidelines. AIM We sought to establish what should be the priorities for the prevention and control of MDE and what is feasible for implementation. We also identify areas for further research. METHODS We reviewed the published literature and other sources e.g. national agencies, for measures and interventions used to control MDE. FINDINGS Certain categories of at risk patients should be screened, especially in critical care areas, using appropriate laboratory methods. Standard and contact precautions are essential and hand hygiene compliance requires continued emphasis and high compliance levels. As MDE may persist on environmental surfaces for weeks, environmental decontamination could also be an effective control intervention. There are limited options for decolonisation with inadequate studies to date and antibiotic stewardship within and outside the hospital remains important. CONCLUSION As there is a clear deficit in the evidence base to infor guidance on prevention and control, research in key areas, such as rapid detection, is urgently required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A S Khan
- Department of Microbiology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Silvestri L, van Saene HKF, Petros AJ. Selective digestive tract decontamination in critically ill patients. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2012; 13:1113-29. [PMID: 22533385 DOI: 10.1517/14656566.2012.681778] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Selective decontamination of the digestive tract (SDD) has been proposed to prevent endogenous and exogenous infections and to reduce mortality in critically ill patients. Although the efficacy of SDD has been confirmed by randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and systematic reviews, SDD has been the subject of intense controversy, based mainly on an insufficient evidence of efficacy and on concerns about resistance. AREAS COVERED This article reviews the philosophy, the current evidence on the efficacy of SDD and the issue of emergence of resistance. All SDD RCTs were searched using Embase and Medline, with no restriction of language, gender or age. Personal archives were also explored, including abstracts from major scientific meetings; references in papers and published meta-analyses on SDD were crosschecked. Up-to-date evidence of the impact of SDD on carriage, infections and mortality is presented, and the efficacy of SDD in selected patient groups was investigated, along with the problem of the emergence of resistance. EXPERT OPINION SDD significantly reduces the number of infections of the lower respiratory tract and bloodstream, multiple organ failure and mortality. It also controls resistance, particularly when the full protocol of parenteral and enteral antimicrobials is used.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luciano Silvestri
- Department of Emergency, Unit of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Presidio Ospedaliero di Gorizia, Via Fatebenefratelli 34, 34170 Gorizia, Italy.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Johnson K, Domb A, Johnson R. One evidence based protocol doesn't fit all: brushing away ventilator associated pneumonia in trauma patients. Intensive Crit Care Nurs 2012; 28:280-7. [PMID: 22534495 DOI: 10.1016/j.iccn.2012.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2011] [Revised: 02/02/2012] [Accepted: 02/17/2012] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Evaluate change in ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP) and nurse's attitudes, beliefs post implementation of an evidence based practice (EBP) oral hygiene protocol. METHODOLOGY/DESIGN/SETTING: Descriptive pre and post test design in two critical care units in a Level One Trauma Community Hospital. Oral hygiene protocol data was reanalysed to examine effects in medical surgical and trauma subgroups. OUTCOME MEASURES Oral care practices, attitudes and beliefs among nurses, and VAP rates according to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines. RESULTS Trauma rates increased from 6.4% to 10.0% (p=0.346), and medical/surgical rates decreased from 3.3% to 1.0% (p=0.042). Results revealed changes in nurses' beliefs regarding pre-admission colonisation (p=0.027) and having adequate training. Nurses' perception of facility support improved, by having suitable equipment and readily available supplies. Foam swabs with moisture agents at 4hours or less was 88.6% and toothbrush use at 12hours or less was 71%, with significant changes in frequency of oral care post intervention. CONCLUSIONS Trauma patients present with unique characteristics which compromise oral care. Understanding risk and prognostic factors, mechanisms of transmission and systemic inflammatory response are important when implementing EBP protocols. Nurses' attitudes, beliefs are important, and staff adherence considered when initiating EBP changes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kari Johnson
- Critical Care Services, John C. Lincoln North Mountain Hospital, Phoenix, AZ 85020, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Deitch EA, Fujita T, Yanagisawa N. Gut-origin sepsis: evolution of a concept. Surgeon 2012; 10:350-6. [PMID: 22534256 DOI: 10.1016/j.surge.2012.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 234] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2012] [Revised: 03/19/2012] [Accepted: 03/19/2012] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
The concept of bacterial translocation and gut-origin sepsis as a cause of systemic infectious complications and the multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) in surgical and ICU patients has emerged over the last several decades, although the exact clinical relevance of these phenomena continues to be debated. Thus, the goal of this review is to trace the evolution of gut-origin sepsis and gut-induced MODS and put these disorders and observations into clinical perspective. Additionally, the mechanisms leading to gut-derived complications are explored as well as therapeutic options to limit or prevent these complications. From this work, several major conclusions emerge. First, that bacterial translocation occurs clinically and is responsible for increased infectious complications in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. However, the phenomenon of bacterial translocation is not sufficient to explain the development of MODS in ICU patients. Instead, the development of MODS in these high-risk patients is likely due to gut injury and the systemic spread of non-microbial, tissue-injurious factors that reach the systemic circulation via the intestinal lymphatics. These observations have resulted in the gut-lymph hypothesis of MODS.
Collapse
|
32
|
Garcin F, Textoris J, Ragonnet B, Antonini F, Martin C, Leone M. Selective digestive decontamination and empirical antimicrobial therapy of late–onset ventilator–associated pneumonia in trauma patients. JOURNAL OF ACUTE DISEASE 2012. [DOI: 10.1016/s2221-6189(13)60001-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
|
33
|
sTREM-1 and LBP in central venous catheter-associated bloodstream infections in pediatric intestinal failure. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2011; 53:627-33. [PMID: 21701408 DOI: 10.1097/mpg.0b013e3182294fcc] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Central venous catheter-associated bloodstream infections (CVC-BSIs) are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the pediatric intestinal failure (IF) population. We assessed plasma lipopolysaccharide-binding protein (LBP) and soluble triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-1 (sTREM-1) as biomarkers for CVC-BSI. We hypothesized that sTREM-1 and LBP rise with BSI and decline following treatment, and that baseline LBP is higher in the IF population than in controls. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients younger than 4 years were recruited from the IF registry at Cincinnati Children's Hospital. LBP and sTREM-1 levels were measured on 22 patients with IF at baseline, 17 patients with IF with BSIs, and 11 healthy controls. RESULTS Mean sTREM-1 level (pg/mL) and LBP level (μg/mL) rose with CVC-BSI over baseline (115.0 ± 51.2 vs 85.9 ± 27.6, P = 0.011 and 79.8 ± 45.4 vs 20.5 ± 11.3, P < 0.001, respectively) and declined following antibiotic therapy (115.0 ± 51.2 vs 77.9 ± 29.8, P = 0.003 and 79.8 ± 45.4 vs 26.2 ± 10.8, P < 0.001, respectively). Receiver operating characteristic curves showed that neither sTREM-1 nor LBP is sufficient to predict bacteremia versus fever without bacteremia (area under these curves = 0.57 and 0.82, respectively). Baseline LBP was higher in hospitalized patients than in outpatients (27.5 ± 8.7 vs 13.5 ± 9.2, P = 0.002), patients with previous BSIs versus those without (23.5 ± 10.4 vs 10.1 ± 8.3, P = 0.016), and those listed for transplantation versus those not listed (29.6 ± 9.8 vs 16.2 ± 9.5, P = 0.033). CONCLUSIONS sTREM-1 and LBP rise with CVC-BSI in IF and decline after treatment; however, neither distinguishes infection from nonbacteremic febrile episodes. Baseline LBP may be a marker of disease severity in IF.
Collapse
|
34
|
Estimating the attributable mortality of ventilator-associated pneumonia from randomized prevention studies*. Crit Care Med 2011; 39:2736-42. [DOI: 10.1097/ccm.0b013e3182281f33] [Citation(s) in RCA: 132] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
35
|
Morowitz MJ, Carlisle EM, Alverdy JC. Contributions of intestinal bacteria to nutrition and metabolism in the critically ill. Surg Clin North Am 2011; 91:771-85, viii. [PMID: 21787967 DOI: 10.1016/j.suc.2011.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 113] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Important advances in the study of bacteria associated with the human gastrointestinal tract have significant implications for clinicians striving to meet the metabolic and nutritional needs of critically ill patients. This article offers a broad overview of the importance of the host-microbe relationship, discusses what is currently known about the role of gut microbes in nutrition and metabolism in the healthy human host, reviews how gut microbes are affected by critical illness, and discusses interventions that have already been used to manipulate the gut microbiome in patients in the intensive care unit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael J Morowitz
- Division of Pediatric General and Thoracic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC, Faculty Pavilion 7th Floor, 4401 Penn Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15224, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Selective digestive tract decontamination: A tough pill to swallow. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES & MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY 2011; 20:9-11. [PMID: 20190888 DOI: 10.1155/2009/290130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2009] [Accepted: 02/26/2009] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
|
37
|
Di Filippo A, Casini A, de Gaudio AR. Infection prevention in the intensive care unit: review of the recent literature on the management of invasive devices. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2011; 43:243-50. [PMID: 21265584 DOI: 10.3109/00365548.2011.552070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
Over the last 5 y, clinical trials investigating products, procedures, and treatments aimed at preventing infections in the intensive care unit have been described. The findings of these studies appear to confirm the effectiveness of certain preventive procedures. With regard to ventilator-associated pneumonia, the efficacies of decontamination of the oral cavity, continuous suction of subglottic secretions, positioning of the patient, selective decontamination of the digestive tract, and (for higher-risk patients) endotracheal tubes coated with silver, have been demonstrated. Medicated catheters and chlorhexidine-based dressings have been found useful for catheter-related bloodstream infections, and medical catheters have also been shown to be efficacious against urinary tract infections. All these procedures can be incorporated into departmental protocols for the prevention of nosocomial infections in the intensive care unit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Di Filippo
- Department of Critical Care, Section of Anaesthesia, University of Florence, Florence, Italy. adifi lippo@unifi .it
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Hurley JC. Paradoxical ventilator associated pneumonia incidences among selective digestive decontamination studies versus other studies of mechanically ventilated patients: benchmarking the evidence base. CRITICAL CARE : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE CRITICAL CARE FORUM 2011; 15:R7. [PMID: 21214897 PMCID: PMC3222036 DOI: 10.1186/cc9406] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2010] [Revised: 10/18/2010] [Accepted: 01/07/2011] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
Introduction Selective digestive decontamination (SDD) appears to have a more compelling evidence base than non-antimicrobial methods for the prevention of ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP). However, the striking variability in ventilator associated pneumonia-incidence proportion (VAP-IP) among the SDD studies remains unexplained and a postulated contextual effect remains untested for. Methods Nine reviews were used to source 45 observational (benchmark) groups and 137 component (control and intervention) groups of studies of SDD and studies of three non-antimicrobial methods of VAP prevention. The logit VAP-IP data were summarized by meta-analysis using random effects methods and the associated heterogeneity (tau2) was measured. As group level predictors of logit VAP-IP, the mode of VAP diagnosis, proportion of trauma admissions, the proportion receiving prolonged ventilation and the intervention method under study were examined in meta-regression models containing the benchmark groups together with either the control (models 1 to 3) or intervention (models 4 to 6) groups of the prevention studies. Results The VAP-IP benchmark derived here is 22.1% (95% confidence interval; 95% CI; 19.2 to 25.5; tau2 0.34) whereas the mean VAP-IP of control groups from studies of SDD and of non-antimicrobial methods, is 35.7 (29.7 to 41.8; tau2 0.63) versus 20.4 (17.2 to 24.0; tau2 0.41), respectively (P < 0.001). The disparity between the benchmark groups and the control groups of the SDD studies, which was most apparent for the highest quality studies, could not be explained in the meta-regression models after adjusting for various group level factors. The mean VAP-IP (95% CI) of intervention groups is 16.0 (12.6 to 20.3; tau2 0.59) and 17.1 (14.2 to 20.3; tau2 0.35) for SDD studies versus studies of non-antimicrobial methods, respectively. Conclusions The VAP-IP among the intervention groups within the SDD evidence base is less variable and more similar to the benchmark than among the control groups. These paradoxical observations cannot readily be explained. The interpretation of the SDD evidence base cannot proceed without further consideration of this contextual effect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James C Hurley
- Rural Health Academic Centre, Melbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, 'Dunvegan' 806 Mair St, Ballarat, Victoria 3350, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Silvestri L, Milanese M, Taylor N, Piacente N, Zandstra DF, van Saene HKF. Selective digestive decontamination reduces ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis. Respir Med 2010; 104:1953-5. [PMID: 20850287 DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2010.05.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2010] [Accepted: 05/13/2010] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
40
|
Ventilator-associated pneumonia and mortality: a systematic review of observational studies. Crit Care Med 2009; 37:2709-18. [PMID: 19885994 DOI: 10.1097/ccm.0b013e3181ab8655] [Citation(s) in RCA: 99] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the attributable mortality of ventilator-associated pneumonia in a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Ventilator-associated pneumonia is generally believed to increase the mortality of patients. This notion is predominantly based on the results of observational studies. DATA SOURCE We performed a systematic search strategy using PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase from their inception through February 2007. In addition, a reference and related article search was performed. STUDY SELECTION Studies were included if they reported mortality rates of patients with and without ventilator-associated pneumonia. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Fifty-two studies with a total of 17,347 patients met the inclusion criteria. Pooling of all studies resulted in relative risk of 1.27 (95% Confidence Interval = 1.15-1.39), but heterogeneity was considerable (I2 statistic = 69%). The origin of heterogeneity could not be explained by differences in study design, study quality, and diagnostic approach. However, heterogeneity was limited for studies investigating only trauma patients (I2 = 1.3%) or patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (I2 = 0%), with estimated relative risk of 1.09 (95% Confidence Interval = 0.87-1.37) among trauma patients and 0.86 (95% Confidence Interval = 0.72-1.04) among patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. CONCLUSIONS There is no evidence of attributable mortality due to ventilator-associated pneumonia in patients with trauma or acute respiratory distress syndrome. However, in other nonspecified patient groups, there is evidence for attributable mortality due to ventilator-associated pneumonia, but this could not be quantified due to heterogeneity in study results. More detailed studies, allowing subgroup analyses, are needed to determine the attributable mortality of ventilator-associated pneumonia in these patient populations.
Collapse
|
41
|
Lyte M. Reciprocal gut–brain evolutionary symbiosis provokes and amplifies the postinjury systemic inflammatory response syndrome. Surgery 2009; 146:950-4. [DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2009.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2008] [Accepted: 06/03/2009] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
42
|
D'Amico R, Pifferi S, Torri V, Brazzi L, Parmelli E, Liberati A. Antibiotic prophylaxis to reduce respiratory tract infections and mortality in adults receiving intensive care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009; 2009:CD000022. [PMID: 19821262 PMCID: PMC7061255 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd000022.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 99] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pneumonia is an important cause of mortality in intensive care units (ICUs). The incidence of pneumonia in ICU patients ranges between 7% and 40%, and the crude mortality from ventilator-associated pneumonia may exceed 50%. Although not all deaths in patients with this form of pneumonia are directly attributable to pneumonia, it has been shown to contribute to mortality in ICUs independently of other factors that are also strongly associated with such deaths. OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of prophylactic antibiotic regimens, such as selective decontamination of the digestive tract (SDD) for the prevention of respiratory tract infections (RTIs) and overall mortality in adults receiving intensive care. SEARCH STRATEGY We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2009, issue 1), which contains the Cochrane Acute Respiratory Infections (ARI) Group's Specialised Register; MEDLINE (January 1966 to March 2009); and EMBASE (January 1990 to March 2009). SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of antibiotic prophylaxis for RTIs and deaths among adult ICU patients. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS At least two review authors independently extracted data and assessed trial quality. MAIN RESULTS We included 36 trials involving 6914 people. There was variation in the antibiotics used, patient characteristics and risk of RTIs and mortality in the control groups. In trials comparing a combination of topical and systemic antibiotics, there was a significant reduction in both RTIs (number of studies = 16, odds ratio (OR) 0.28, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.20 to 0.38) and total mortality (number of studies = 17, OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.65 to 0.87) in the treated group. In trials comparing topical antimicrobials alone (or comparing topical plus systemic versus systemic alone) there was a significant reduction in RTIs (number of studies = 17, OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.63) but not in total mortality (number of studies = 19, OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.16) in the treated group. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS A combination of topical and systemic prophylactic antibiotics reduces RTIs and overall mortality in adult patients receiving intensive care. Treatment based on the use of topical prophylaxis alone reduces respiratory infections but not mortality. The risk of resistance occurring as a negative consequence of antibiotic use was appropriately explored only in one trial which did not show any such effect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto D'Amico
- University of Modena and Reggio EmiliaStatistics Unit, Department of clinical and diagnostic medicine and public health, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, ItalyVia del Pozzo 71ModenaItaly41121
| | - Silvia Pifferi
- Policlinico San Matteo, PaviaVia F. Sporza 35MilanoItaly20122
| | - Valter Torri
- Mario Negri InstituteLaboratorio di Epidemiologia ClinicaVia Eritrea 62MilanoMilanoItaly20157
| | - Luca Brazzi
- Università degli Studi di SassariDipartimento di Scienze Chirurgiche, Microchirurgiche e MedicheVia le San Peitro, 43 ‐ Palazzo ClementeSassariItaly07100
| | - Elena Parmelli
- University of Modena and Reggio EmiliaDepartment of Oncology, Hematology and Respiratory DiseasesVia del Pozzo 71ModenaItaly41100
| | - Alessandro Liberati
- Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological ResearchItalian Cochrane CentreVia La Masa, 19MilanItaly20156
| | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
|
44
|
Olaechea PM. [Bacterial infections in critically ill patients: review of studies published between 2006 and 2008]. Med Intensiva 2009; 33:196-206. [PMID: 19558941 DOI: 10.1016/s0210-5691(09)71216-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
A systematic revision of medical publications between 2006 and 2008 regarding bacterial infections that affect the critical patients was performed. Four subjects were selected: Community-acquired pneumonia, ventilator-associated pneumonia, catheter-related bloodstream infection and new antimicrobial treatments. When dealing with community-acquired pneumonia and due to the absence of completely reliable standards, it is necessary to follow the locally adapted guidelines of clinical practice, to identify patients related to the health-care system and admit patients to the ICU in accordance with the criteria. Regarding the etiological diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia, any microbiological information available must be used. Due to the risk of multidrug bacteria, combined empiric therapy should be initiated immediately and then mono-therapy adjusted to the antibiogram should be established. Already established measures for mechanical ventilation associated pneumonia and catheter-related bacteriemias, which have been effective, should be implemented. The empirical treatment of catheter-related bacteremia must be directed towards the most probable pathogens according to the puncture site. The most recently sold antibiotics are basically directed towards multidrug gram positive resistant bacteria. However, for the treatment of gram negative resistant bacilli, the use of the new antimicrobials must be combined with a new evaluation of the antibiotics that have been used for years and the possibility of choosing different administration forms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pedro M Olaechea
- Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos, Hospital de Galdakao-Usansolo, Galdakao, Vizcaya, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Wilhelm J, Ebelt H, Buerke M, Schlitt A. Selective decontamination of the digestive tract and oropharynx: new findings for an old approach still under discussion. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 2009; 7:399-402. [DOI: 10.1586/eri.09.22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
|
46
|
Cohen MJ, Sahar T, Benenson S, Elinav E, Brezis M, Soares-Weiser K. Antibiotic prophylaxis for spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in cirrhotic patients with ascites, without gastro-intestinal bleeding. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009:CD004791. [PMID: 19370611 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd004791.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis is frequent among cirrhotic patients, associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Selective intestinal decontamination employing antibiotics is a proposed prophylactic measure. While data regarding this modality among cirrhotic patients with gastrointestinal bleeding exist, there is insufficient data synthesis regarding cirrhotic patients with ascites and no gastrointestinal bleeding. OBJECTIVES To assess whether antibiotic prophylaxis decreases spontaneous bacterial peritonitis and mortality among cirrhotic patients with ascites and no gastrointestinal bleeding. SEARCH STRATEGY We identified relevant randomised trials by searching trial registries of The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group and The Cochrane Collaboration, medical literature search engines, and reviewing all literature we found on the topic until February 2009. SELECTION CRITERIA We searched for randomised clinical trials assessing prophylactic treatment among adult cirrhotic patients with ascites and no gastrointestinal bleeding, comparing antibiotic therapy with no intervention, placebo, or with another antibiotic regimen. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Three independent authors searched for and collected the trials and extracted relevant data. Four other independent authors validated the findings and assessed them. The studies were assessed for design, patient and intervention characteristics, and quality. A meta-analysis was performed to estimate measures of association between antibiotic prophylaxis and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis or mortality. MAIN RESULTS Nine trials were included in the review. Seven trials, comparing antibiotics to placebo or no treatment, were meta-analysed. Systematic bias in design or publication is suggested by trial results. The randomisation results suggest that the probability that true randomisation took place in all trials is very small and the report of most trials regarding design was poor. The proportion of participants with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis varied between the trials from 15% to 50%. The calculated relative risks (95% confidence interval) of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis and mortality among patients treated with antibiotics compared with no treatment/placebo were 0.20 (0.11 to 0.37) and 0.61 (0.43 to 0.87). There were very few reports of adverse events. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS The pooled estimates suggest that antibiotic prophylaxis might be prudent among cirrhotic patients with ascites and no gastrointestinal bleeding. However, poor trial methodology and report coupled with findings suggesting systematic bias in publication and design reflect the fragility of these findings. Potential hazard to society and the patients themselves from resistant pathogens should be considered when promoting long-lasting antibiotic prophylaxis. It seems that recommending antibiotic prophylaxis is still far from being a substantiated prevention strategy. Trials of better design, well reported, and of longer follow-up are greatly needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matan J Cohen
- Center for Clinical Quality & Safety, Hadassah Medical Center, Ein Kessem Campus, Box 53, POB12000, Jerusalem, Israel, 91120.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Silvestri L, van Saene HKF, Weir I, Gullo A. Survival benefit of the full selective digestive decontamination regimen. J Crit Care 2009; 24:474.e7-14. [PMID: 19327325 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2008.11.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2008] [Revised: 10/17/2008] [Accepted: 11/23/2008] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE We assessed the impact of the full protocol of selective decontamination of the digestive tract (SDD) using parenteral and enteral antimicrobials on mortality. MATERIALS AND METHODS A systematic review was performed searching MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, previous meta-analyses, and conferences proceedings. We included all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the full protocol of SDD, including oropharyngeal and intestinal administration of antibiotics combined with the parenteral component, with no treatment or placebo. The primary end points were overall mortality, mortality attributable to infection, early, and late mortality. RESULTS Twenty-one RCTs on 4902 patients were included. Overall mortality was significantly reduced (odds ratio [OR], 0.71; 95% confidence interval [CI]; 0.61-0.82; P < .001). There was a nonsignificant reduction in infection-related mortality (6 RCTs; OR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.10-1.59; P = .19) and early mortality (4 RCTs; OR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.34-1.19; P = 0.16), and a significant reduction in late mortality (5 RCTs; OR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.40-0.77; P < .001). The subgroup analysis showed a significant mortality reduction in successfully decontaminated patients (OR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.45-0.77; P < .001), and when parenteral and enteral antimicrobials were administered to every patient receiving treatment in the intensive care unit (OR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.42-0.82; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS The findings strongly indicated that the full protocol of SDD reduces mortality in critically ill patients, in particular when successful decontamination is obtained. Eighteen patients should be treated with SDD to prevent one death.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luciano Silvestri
- Unit of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Department of Emergency, Presidio Ospedaliero di Gorizia, 34170 Gorizia, Italy.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
de Smet AMGA, Kluytmans JAJW, Cooper BS, Mascini EM, Benus RFJ, van der Werf TS, van der Hoeven JG, Pickkers P, Bogaers-Hofman D, van der Meer NJM, Bernards AT, Kuijper EJ, Joore JCA, Leverstein-van Hall MA, Bindels AJGH, Jansz AR, Wesselink RMJ, de Jongh BM, Dennesen PJW, van Asselt GJ, te Velde LF, Frenay IHME, Kaasjager K, Bosch FH, van Iterson M, Thijsen SFT, Kluge GH, Pauw W, de Vries JW, Kaan JA, Arends JP, Aarts LPHJ, Sturm PDJ, Harinck HIJ, Voss A, Uijtendaal EV, Blok HEM, Thieme Groen ES, Pouw ME, Kalkman CJ, Bonten MJM. Decontamination of the digestive tract and oropharynx in ICU patients. N Engl J Med 2009; 360:20-31. [PMID: 19118302 DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa0800394] [Citation(s) in RCA: 497] [Impact Index Per Article: 33.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Selective digestive tract decontamination (SDD) and selective oropharyngeal decontamination (SOD) are infection-prevention measures used in the treatment of some patients in intensive care, but reported effects on patient outcome are conflicting. METHODS We evaluated the effectiveness of SDD and SOD in a crossover study using cluster randomization in 13 intensive care units (ICUs), all in The Netherlands. Patients with an expected duration of intubation of more than 48 hours or an expected ICU stay of more than 72 hours were eligible. In each ICU, three regimens (SDD, SOD, and standard care) were applied in random order over the course of 6 months. Mortality at day 28 was the primary end point. SDD consisted of 4 days of intravenous cefotaxime and topical application of tobramycin, colistin, and amphotericin B in the oropharynx and stomach. SOD consisted of oropharyngeal application only of the same antibiotics. Monthly point-prevalence studies were performed to analyze antibiotic resistance. RESULTS A total of 5939 patients were enrolled in the study, with 1990 assigned to standard care, 1904 to SOD, and 2045 to SDD; crude mortality in the groups at day 28 was 27.5%, 26.6%, and 26.9%, respectively. In a random-effects logistic-regression model with age, sex, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) score, intubation status, and medical specialty used as covariates, odds ratios for death at day 28 in the SOD and SDD groups, as compared with the standard-care group, were 0.86 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.74 to 0.99) and 0.83 (95% CI, 0.72 to 0.97), respectively. CONCLUSIONS In an ICU population in which the mortality rate associated with standard care was 27.5% at day 28, the rate was reduced by an estimated 3.5 percentage points with SDD and by 2.9 percentage points with SOD. (Controlled Clinical Trials number, ISRCTN35176830.)
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A M G A de Smet
- Division of Perioperative and Emergency Care, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Spontaneous perforation of the cystic duct in streptococcal toxic shock syndrome: a case report. J Med Case Rep 2008; 2:338. [PMID: 18959771 PMCID: PMC2584008 DOI: 10.1186/1752-1947-2-338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2008] [Accepted: 10/29/2008] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Streptococcal toxic shock syndrome is a complication of group A streptococcal infection, most often originating from the skin. The syndrome is characterized by fever, hypotension and multiple organ failure. Mortality rate may be as high as 80%. Case presentation A 25-year-old man of Indian origin presented with abdominal complaints, rash and fever after an episode of pharyngitis. The patient was operated and a biliary peritonitis was found caused by perforation of the cystic duct in the absence of calculi. Cholecystectomy was performed, but after the operation, the patient's condition worsened and multi-organ failure developed. Group A streptococci were cultured in blood taken at admission and streptococcal toxic shock syndrome was diagnosed. Treatment consisted of antibiotics, corticosteroids, immunoglobulin and supportive treatment for haemodynamic, respiratory and renal failure. Conclusion This is a patient with streptococcal toxic shock syndrome complicated by spontaneous perforation of the cystic duct. Spontaneous perforation of the cystic duct is a rare finding, most often reported in children and secondary to anatomic defects. We found only one similar adult case in the literature. Perforation may be due to microthrombosis and ischaemia, and so be a part of the multi-organ failure often found in streptococcal toxic shock syndrome.
Collapse
|
50
|
Affiliation(s)
- George C Velmahos
- John F. Burke Professor of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Chief, Division of Trauma, Emergency Surgery, and Surgical Critical Care, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|