High versus standard-volume haemofiltration in hyperdynamic porcine peritonitis: effects beyond haemodynamics?

Effects of high volume haemodiafiltration on inflammatory response profile and microcirculation in patients with septic shock

BACKGROUND

High volumes of haemofiltration are used in septic patients to control systemic inflammation and improve patient outcomes. We aimed to clarify if extended intermittent high volume online haemodiafiltration (HVHDF) influences patient haemodynamics and cytokines profile and/or has effect upon sublingual microcirculation in critically ill septic shock patients.

METHODS

Main haemodynamic and clinical variables and concentrations of cytokines were evaluated before and after HVHDF in 19 patients with septic shock requiring renal replacement therapy due to acute kidney injury. Sublingual microcirculation was assessed in 9 patients.

RESULTS

The mean (SD) time of HVHDF was 9.4 (1.8) hours. The median convective volume was 123 mL/kg/h. The mean (SD) dose of norepinephrine required to maintain mean arterial pressure at the target range of 70-80 mmHg decreased from 0.40 (0.43) μg/kg/min to 0.28 (0.33) μg/kg/min (p = 0.009). No significant changes in the measured cytokines or microcirculatory parameters were observed before and after HVHDF.

CONCLUSIONS

The single-centre study suggests that extended HVHDF results in decrease of norepinephrine requirement in patients with septic shock. Haemodynamic improvement was not associated with decrease in circulating cytokine levels, and sublingual microcirculation was well preserved.

Searching for mechanisms that matter in early septic acute kidney injury: an experimental study

Introduction

In almost half of all sepsis patients, acute kidney injury (AKI) develops. However, the pathobiologic differences between sepsis patients with and without AKI are only poorly understood. We used a unique opportunity to examine dynamic inflammatory, renal hemodynamic, and microvascular changes in two clinically relevant large-animal models of sepsis. Our aim was to assess variability in renal responses to sepsis and to identify both hemodynamic and nonhemodynamic mechanisms discriminating individuals with AKI from those in whom AKI did not develop.

Methods

Thirty-six pigs were anesthetized, mechanically ventilated, and instrumented. After a recovery period, progressive sepsis was induced either by peritonitis (n = 13) or by continuous intravenous infusion of live Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 15). Eight sham operated-on animals served as time-matched controls. All animals received standard intensive care unit (ICU) care, including goal-directed hemodynamic management. Before, and at 12, 18, and 22 hours of sepsis, systemic and renal (ultrasound flow probe) hemodynamics, renal cortex microcirculation (laser Doppler), inflammation (interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), oxidative stress (thiobarbituric acid reactive species (TBARS), nitrite/nitrate concentrations (NOx), and renal oxygen kinetics and energy metabolism were measured.

Results

In 14 (50%) pigs, AKI developed (62% in peritonitis, 40% in bacteria infusion model). Fecal peritonitis resulted in hyperdynamic circulation, whereas continuous bacteria infusion was associated with normodynamic hemodynamics. Despite insults of equal magnitude, comparable systemic hemodynamic response, and uniform supportive treatment, only those pigs with AKI exhibited a progressive increase in renal vascular resistance. This intrarenal vasoconstriction occurred predominantly in the live-bacteria infusion model. In contrast to AKI-free animals, the development of septic AKI was preceded by early and remarkable inflammatory response (TNF-α, IL-6) and oxidative stress (TBARS).

Conclusions

The observed variability in susceptibility to septic AKI in our models replicates that of human disease. Early abnormal host response accompanied by subsequent uncoupling between systemic and renal vascular resistance appear to be major determinants in the early phase of porcine septic AKI. Nonuniform and model-related renal hemodynamic responses that are unpredictable from systemic changes should be taken into consideration when evaluating hemodynamic therapeutic interventions in septic AKI.

Tissue concentrations of vasoactive intestinal peptide are affected by peritonitis-induced sepsis and hemofiltration in pigs

Vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) is a neuropeptide released from the autonomic nerves exerting multiple antiinflammatory effects. The aim of the present study was to investigate the impact of severe sepsis and hemofiltration in two settings on plasma and tissue concentrations of VIP in a porcine model of sepsis. Thirty-two pigs were divided into 5 groups: 1) control group; 2) control group with conventional hemofiltration; 3) septic group; 4) septic group with conventional hemofiltration; 5) septic group with high-volume hemofiltration. Sepsis induced by faecal peritonitis continued for 22 hours. Hemofiltration was applied for the last 10 hours. Hemodynamic, inflammatory and oxidative stress parameters (heart rate, mean arterial pressure, cardiac output, systemic vascular resistance, plasma concentrations of tumor necrosis factor-alpha, interleukin-6, thiobarbituric acid reactive species, nitrate + nitrite, asymmetric dimethylarginine) and the systemic VIP concentrations were measured before faeces inoculation and at 12 and 22 hours of peritonitis. VIP tissue levels were determined in the left ventricle, mesenteric and coronary arteries. Sepsis induced significant increases in VIP concentrations in the plasma and mesenteric artery, but it decreased peptide levels in the coronary artery. Hemofiltration in both settings reduced concentrations of VIP in the mesenteric artery. In severe sepsis, VIP seems to be rapidly depleted from the coronary artery and, on the other hand, upregulated in the mesenteric artery. Hemofiltration in both settings has a tendency to drain away these upregulated tissue stores which could result in the limited secretory capacity of the peptide.

Clinical review: blood purification for sepsis

Sepsis is the primary cause of death in the intensive care unit. Extracorporeal blood purification therapies have been proposed for patients with sepsis in order to improve outcomes since these therapies can alter the host inflammatory response by non-selective removal of inflammatory mediators or bacterial products or both. Recent technological progress has increased the number of techniques available for blood purification and their performance. In this overview, we report on the latest advances in blood purification for sepsis and how they relate to current concepts of disease, and we review the current evidence for high-volume hemofiltration, cascade hemofiltration, hemoadsorption, coupled plasma filtration adsorption, high-adsorption hemofiltration, and high-cutoff hemofiltration/hemodialysis. Promising results have been reported with all of these blood purification therapies, showing that they are well tolerated, effective in clearing inflammatory mediators or bacterial toxins (or both) from the plasma, and efficacious for improvement of various physiologic outcomes (for example, hemodynamics and oxygenation). However, numerous questions, including the timing, duration, and frequency of these therapies in the clinical setting, remain unanswered. Large multicenter trials evaluating the ability of these therapies to improve clinical outcomes (that is, mortality or organ failure), rather than surrogate markers such as plasma mediator clearance or transient improvement in physiologic variables, are required to define the precise role of blood purification in the management of sepsis.

Evaluation of the effects of pulse high-volume hemofiltration in patients with severe sepsis: a preliminary study

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of pulse high-volume hemofiltration (PHVHF) in patients with severe sepsis.

METHODS

Twenty-two patients with severe sepsis admitted to XiJing hospital between January 2009 and January 2010 were included in the present study. Patients were randomly divided into the control group (conventional treatment) and the PHVHF group. Patients in the PHVHF group received 72 h of PHVHF treatment in addition to conventional treatment after admission. PHVHF was conducted as follows: HVHF 85 ml/kg per hour for 6 h followed by continuous venovenous hemofiltration 35 ml/kg per hour for 18 h with an AN69 membrane. The hemofilter was replaced every 24 h and PHVHF was performed with 250 to 300 ml/min blood flow rate. The blood samples were taken to measure the changes of plasma cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1, IL-4, IL-6 and IL-10).

RESULTS

With 72 h of PHVHF treatment, there was an improvement in clinical features and hemodynamics variables in PHVHF-treated patients. All plasma cytokines after PHVHF treatment were significantly lower than those at the start of PHVHF treatment (p<0.05). In contrast, there was no significant change in control patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that PHVHF is a feasible adjuvant modality in the treatment of patients with severe sepsis. With the application of PHVHF treatment, plasma cytokines are effectively removed. Considering the lower cost and better feasibility than continuous high-volume hemofiltration (CHVF), PHVHF shows promising prospects for the future.

Sublingual microcirculatory changes during high-volume hemofiltration in hyperdynamic septic shock patients

INTRODUCTION

Previous studies have suggested that high volume hemofiltration (HVHF) may contribute to revert hypotension in severe hyperdynamic septic shock patients. However, arterial pressure stabilization occurs due to an increase in systemic vascular resistance, which could eventually compromise microcirculatory blood flow and perfusion. The goal of this study was to determine if HVHF deteriorates sublingual microcirculation in severe hyperdynamic septic shock patients.

METHODS

This was a prospective, non-randomized study at a 16-bed, medical-surgical intensive care unit of a university hospital. We included 12 severe hyperdynamic septic shock patients (norepinephrine requirements > 0.3 μg/kg/min and cardiac index > 3.0 L/min/m2) who underwent a 12-hour HVHF as a rescue therapy according to a predefined algorithm. Sublingual microcirculation (Microscan for NTSC, Microvision Medical), systemic hemodynamics and perfusion parameters were assessed at baseline, at 12 hours of HVHF, and 6 hours after stopping HVHF.

RESULTS

Microcirculatory flow index increased after 12 hours of HVHF and this increase persisted 6 hours after stopping HVHF. A similar trend was observed for the proportion of perfused microvessels. The increase in microcirculatory blood flow was inversely correlated with baseline levels. There was no significant change in microvascular density or heterogeneity during or after HVHF. Mean arterial pressure and systemic vascular resistance increased while lactate levels decreased after the 12-hour HVHF.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of HVHF as a rescue therapy in patients with severe hyperdynamic septic shock does not deteriorate sublingual microcirculatory blood flow despite the increase in systemic vascular resistance.