Candidemia and non-candidemia related septic shock: are there differences between them?

Nosocomial Candidiasis: Antifungal Stewardship and the Importance of Rapid Diagnosis

Candidemia and other forms of candidiasis are associated with considerable excess mortality and costs. Despite the addition of several new antifungal agents with improved spectrum and potency, the frequency of Candida infection and associated mortality have not decreased in the past two decades. The lack of rapid and sensitive diagnostic tests has led to considerable overuse of antifungal agents resulting in increased costs, selection pressure for resistance, unnecessary drug toxicity, and adverse drug interactions. Both the lack of timely diagnostic tests and emergence of antifungal resistance pose considerable problems for antifungal stewardship. Whereas antifungal stewardship with a focus on nosocomial candidiasis should be able to improve the administration of antifungal therapy in terms of drug selection, proper dose and duration, source control and de-escalation therapy, an important parameter, timeliness of antifungal therapy, remains a victim of slow and insensitive diagnostic tests. Fortunately, new proteomic and molecular diagnostic tools are improving the time to species identification and detection. In this review we will describe the potential impact that rapid diagnostic testing and antifungal stewardship can have on the management of nosocomial candidiasis.

Effects of empiric antifungal therapy for septic shock on time to appropriate therapy for Candida infection: a pilot study

PURPOSE

Inappropriate initial therapy for Candida-related septic shock is common and associated with a high mortality rate. This before-after pilot study was conducted to determine the feasibility of using empiric therapy for reducing the time to appropriate antifungal therapy in patients with Candida-related septic shock.

METHODS

Patients aged 18-99 years with septic shock presenting to Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, Missouri, in 2012-2013 were assigned to 1 of 2 groups. Patients presenting between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2012, were managed according to local standard of care for patients with septic shock, to include antifungal therapy at the discretion of the treating physician (standard therapy group). Patients presenting between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2013, received empiric antifungal therapy (primarily micafungin 100 mg/d or fluconazole 800 mg on day 1, followed by 400 mg/d), facilitated by a clinical pharmacist in the medical intensive care unit, until microbiologic cultures were available to determine the cause of septic shock (empiric therapy group). The primary outcome was time to appropriate therapy after shock onset.

FINDINGS

A total of 28 patients were enrolled (mean age, 56.3 [15.1] years [range, 30-92 years]; 16 [57.1%] men). The time to appropriate therapy after shock onset was statistically shorter with empiric therapy (n = 13) compared with standard therapy (n = 15) (10.6 [15.8] vs 40.5 [26.0] hours; P = 0.001). Patients receiving empiric therapy were more likely to have received appropriate therapy within 12 hours (69.2% vs 6.7%; P = 0.001) and within 24 hours (76.9% vs 40.0%; P = NS) of shock onset. In an analysis to determine the number of septic shock patients needed to be treated with empiric antifungal therapy for 1 patient with Candida-related septic shock to receive appropriate treatment, 256 patients without Candida infection received a total of 687 doses of empiric antifungal therapy (mean, 2.7 doses per patient) compared with 136 patients who received 382 doses of standard antifungal therapy (mean, 2.8 doses per patient); the number needed to treat was 19.6.

IMPLICATIONS

The present pilot study demonstrated that the use of empiric antifungal therapy for Candida-related septic shock was associated with a statistically shorter time to administration of appropriate treatment. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier.