Multi-pathogen real-time PCR system adds benefit for my patients: yes

Real-time PCR versus MALDI-TOF MS and culture-based techniques for diagnosis of bloodstream and pyogenic infections in humans and animals

AIMS

This study was applied to evaluate the usefulness of a high-throughput sample preparation protocol prior to the application of quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) for the early diagnosis of bloodstream and pyogenic infections in humans and animals compared to matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) and classical culture.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Saponin-mediated selective host cell lysis combined with DNase-1 was applied for processing of whole blood and pus clinical samples collected from suspected cases of septicaemia and pyogenic infections in humans and animals. The pre-PCR processing strategy enabled the recovery of microbial cells with no changes in their colony forming units immediately after the addition of saponin. DNase-1 was efficient for removing the DNAs from the host cells as well as dead cells with damaged cell membranes. The metagenomic qPCR and MALDI-TOF MS could identify the bacterial community of sepsis at species level with a concordance of 97·37% unlike the conventional culture. According to qPCR results, Staphylococcus aureus (24·24%) was predominated in animal pyogenic infections, whereas Klebsiella pneumonia (31·81%) was commonly detected in neonatal sepsis.

CONCLUSIONS

Saponin combined with DNase-1 allowed the efficient recovery of microbial DNA from blood and pus samples in sepsis using qPCR assay.

SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY

Metagenomic qPCR could identify a broad range of bacteria directly from blood and pus with more sensitivity, higher discriminatory power and shorter turnaround time than those using MALDI-TOF MS and conventional culture. This might allow a timely administration of a prompt treatment.

Performance and economic evaluation of the molecular detection of pathogens for patients with severe infections: the EVAMICA open-label, cluster-randomised, interventional crossover trial

Purpose

Microbiological diagnosis (MD) of infections remains insufficient. The resulting empirical antimicrobial therapy leads to multidrug resistance and inappropriate treatments. We therefore evaluated the cost-effectiveness of direct molecular detection of pathogens in blood for patients with severe sepsis (SES), febrile neutropenia (FN) and suspected infective endocarditis (SIE).

Methods

Patients were enrolled in a multicentre, open-label, cluster-randomised crossover trial conducted during two consecutive periods, randomly assigned as control period (CP; standard diagnostic workup) or intervention period (IP; additional testing with LightCycler^®SeptiFast). Multilevel models used to account for clustering were stratified by clinical setting (SES, FN, SIE).

Results

A total of 1416 patients (907 SES, 440 FN, 69 SIE) were evaluated for the primary endpoint (rate of blood MD). For SES patients, the MD rate was higher during IP than during CP [42.6% (198/465) vs. 28.1% (125/442), odds ratio (OR) 1.89, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.43–2.50; P < 0.001], with an absolute increase of 14.5% (95% CI 8.4–20.7). A trend towards an association was observed for SIE [35.4% (17/48) vs. 9.5% (2/21); OR 6.22 (0.98–39.6)], but not for FN [32.1% (70/218) vs. 30.2% (67/222), P = 0.66]. Overall, turn-around time was shorter during IP than during CP (22.9 vs. 49.5 h, P < 0.001) and hospital costs were similar (median, mean ± SD: IP €14,826, €18,118 ± 17,775; CP €17,828, €18,653 ± 15,966). Bootstrap analysis of the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio showed weak dominance of intervention in SES patients.

Conclusion

Addition of molecular detection to standard care improves MD and thus efficiency of healthcare resource usage in patients with SES.

ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT00709358.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00134-017-4766-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Emerging methodologies for pathogen identification in positive blood culture testing

Bloodstream infections (BSIs) represent a major cause of death in developed countries and are associated with long-term loss of functions. Blood culture remains the gold standard for BSI diagnosis, as it is easy to perform and displays a good analytical sensitivity. However, its major drawback remains the long turnaround time, which can result in inappropriate therapy, fall of survival rate, emergence of antibiotic resistance and increase of medical costs. Over the last 10 years, molecular tools have been the alternative to blood cultures, allowing early identification of pathogens involved in sepsis, as well detection of critical antibiotic resistance genes. Besides, the advent of MALDI-TOF revolutionized practice in routine microbiology significantly reduced the time to result. Reviewed here are recent improvements in early BSI diagnosis and these authors' view for the future is presented, including innovative high-throughput technologies.