1
|
Zevallos MSC, Jara KSS, Ramírez CAC, Carreazo NY. Impact of Early Enteral Nutrition on the Hospital Stay of Pediatric Patients Undergoing Mechanical Ventilation. J Pediatr Intensive Care 2024; 13:147-154. [PMID: 38919690 PMCID: PMC11196157 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1744296] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2021] [Accepted: 01/27/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Early initiation of enteral nutrition (EN) in pediatrics has been associated with improved clinical outcomes in critically ill pediatric patients. This research study aimed to measure the effect of early EN in intubated children on the length of stay (LOS) and days of mechanical ventilation (DMV). A retrospective cohort observational study was performed on patients admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). We gathered the information from available medical records. Our exposure variable was EN, which can be classified as either early-onset (less than 72 hours following PICU admission) or late-onset (greater than or equal to 72 hours following PICU admission). The response variables were LOS defined as the period of time from either hospital or PICU admission to the time of hospital discharge and DMV defined as the length of time from endotracheal intubation to successful extubation. Late EN was associated with an increase in both hospital LOS consisting of 9.82 days and PICU LOS consisting of 5.89 days, and DMV consisting of 3.92 days compared with those patients receiving early EN. In addition, the disruption of EN was also associated with an increased hospital LOS consisting of 10.7 days. Patients in the PICU, undergoing mechanical ventilation, who received late EN have an increased risk of unfavorable outcomes consisting of prolonged hospital LOS, PICU-LOS, and DMV which may be further aggravated by any disruption of EN.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Nilton Yhuri Carreazo
- School of Medicine, Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas, Santiago de Surco, Peru
- Intensive Care Unit, Hospital de Emergencias Pediatricas, Lima, Peru
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fell DM, Bitetto EA, Skillman HE. Timing of enteral nutrition and parenteral nutrition in the PICU. Nutr Clin Pract 2023; 38 Suppl 2:S174-S212. [PMID: 37721466 DOI: 10.1002/ncp.11050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2023] [Revised: 06/04/2023] [Accepted: 07/08/2023] [Indexed: 09/19/2023] Open
Abstract
The timing of nutrition support initiation has the potential to positively impact nutrition and clinical outcomes in infants and children with critical illness. Early enteral nutrition within 24-48 h and attainment of both a 60% energy and protein goal by the end of the first week of pediatric intensive care unit admission are reported to be significantly associated with improved survival in large observational studies. The results of one randomized controlled trial demonstrated increased morbidity in infants and children with critical illness assigned to early vs delayed supplemental parenteral nutrition. Observational studies in this population also suggest increased mortality with exclusive parenteral nutrition and worse nutrition outcomes when parenteral nutrition is delayed. Subsequently, current nutrition support guidelines recommend early enteral nutrition and avoidance of early parenteral nutrition, although the available evidence used to create the guidelines was inadequate to inform bedside nutrition support practice to improve outcomes. These guidelines are limited by the included studies with small numbers and heterogeneity of patients and research design that confound study outcomes and interpretation. This article provides a narrative review of the timing of nutrition support on outcomes in infants and children with critical illness, strategies to optimize timing and adequacy of nutrition support, and literature gaps, including the timing of parenteral nutrition initiation for children with malnutrition and those with contraindications to enteral nutrition and accurate measurement of energy requirements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donna M Fell
- Department of Clinical Nutrition, Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Emily A Bitetto
- Department of Clinical Nutrition, Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Heather E Skillman
- Department of Clinical Nutrition, Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gupta S, Sankar J. Advances in Shock Management and Fluid Resuscitation in Children. Indian J Pediatr 2023; 90:280-288. [PMID: 36715864 PMCID: PMC9885414 DOI: 10.1007/s12098-022-04434-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2022] [Accepted: 11/30/2022] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
Shock in children is associated with significant mortality and morbidity, particularly in resource-limited settings. The principles of management include early recognition, fluid resuscitation, appropriate inotropes, antibiotic therapy in sepsis, supportive therapy for organ dysfunction, and regular hemodynamic monitoring. During the past decade, each step has undergone several changes and evolved as evidence that has been translated into recommendations and practice. There is a paradigm shift from protocolized-based care to personalized management, from liberal strategies to restrictive strategies in terms of fluids, blood transfusion, ventilation, and antibiotics, and from clinical monitoring to multimodal monitoring using bedside technologies. However, uncertainties are still prevailing in terms of the volume of fluids, use of steroids, and use of extracorporeal and newer therapies while managing shock. These changes have been summarized along with evidence in this article with the aim of adopting an evidence-based approach while managing children with shock.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samriti Gupta
- Department of Pediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bilaspur, Himachal Pradesh, India
| | - Jhuma Sankar
- Department of Pediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Room 3055, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, 110029, India.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Early Enteral Feeding Improves Tolerance of Parenteral Nutrition in Preterm Newborns. Nutrients 2021; 13:nu13113886. [PMID: 34836137 PMCID: PMC8621891 DOI: 10.3390/nu13113886] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2021] [Revised: 10/26/2021] [Accepted: 10/28/2021] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: The tolerance of preterm newborns for the high nutritional intakes given by parenteral nutrition (PN) is still debated because of the risk of metabolic complications. Despite enteral nutrition (EN) being the preferred route of nutrition, an exclusive enteral feeding is not always possible, as in preterm newborns, the gut is immature and less tolerant of EN. We aimed to study the impact of a minimal enteral feeding (MEF) on the possible early metabolic complications of PN in a cohort of preterms with gestational age at birth GA ≤ 29 + 6/7 weeks of postmenstrual age. (2) Methods: We divided the study sample in two cohorts: 1) Late-Feeding (cohort 1), newborns who received MEF starting from the 8th day of age, and (2) Early-Feeding (cohort 2), newborns who received MEF, consisting of the administration of at least 4–5 mL/kg/day by the enteral route, in the first 7 days of age. The primary outcome of the study was the rate of at least one metabolic complication, including hyperglycemia, hypertriglyceridemia, or metabolic acidosis. (3) Results: We enrolled 80 newborns (Late-Feeding cohort 51 vs. Early-Feeding cohort 29). The rate of all metabolic complications was statistically higher in the Late-Feeding cohort compared to the Early-Feeding cohort. Binary logistic regression analysis showed that late administration of MEF negatively influenced the rate of all metabolic complications. (4) Conclusions: Early minimal administration of EN is associated with less frequent PN-related metabolic side effects and a higher rate of survival in critically ill newborns.
Collapse
|
5
|
Early Enteral Nutrition Is Associated With Improved Clinical Outcomes in Critically Ill Children: A Secondary Analysis of Nutrition Support in the Heart and Lung Failure-Pediatric Insulin Titration Trial. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2020; 21:213-221. [PMID: 31577692 PMCID: PMC7060827 DOI: 10.1097/pcc.0000000000002135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The impact of early enteral nutrition on clinical outcomes in critically ill children has not been adequately described. We hypothesized that early enteral nutrition is associated with improved clinical outcomes in critically ill children. DESIGN Secondary analysis of the Heart and Lung Failure-Pediatric Insulin Titration randomized controlled trial. SETTING Thirty-five PICUs. PATIENTS Critically ill children with hyperglycemia requiring inotropic support and/or invasive mechanical ventilation who were enrolled for at least 48 hours with complete nutrition data. INTERVENTIONS Subjects received nutrition via guidelines that emphasized enteral nutrition and were classified into early enteral nutrition (enteral nutrition within 48 hr of study randomization) and no early enteral nutrition (enteral nutrition after 48 hr of study randomization, or no enteral nutrition at any time). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS Of 608 eligible subjects, 331 (54%) received early enteral nutrition. Both early enteral nutrition and no early enteral nutrition groups had similar daily caloric intake over the first 8 study days (median, 36 vs 36 kcal/kg/d; p = 0.93). After controlling for age, body mass index z scores, primary reason for ICU admission, severity of illness, and mean Vasopressor-Inotrope Score at the time of randomization, and adjusting for site, early enteral nutrition was associated with lower 90-day hospital mortality (8% vs 17%; p = 0.007), more ICU-free days (median, 20 vs 17 d; p = 0.02), more hospital-free days (median, 8 vs 0 d; p = 0.003), more ventilator-free days (median, 21 vs 19 d; p = 0.003), and less organ dysfunction (median maximum Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction, 11 vs 12; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS In critically ill children with hyperglycemia requiring inotropic support and/or mechanical ventilation, early enteral nutrition was independently associated with better clinical outcomes.
Collapse
|
6
|
Gadhvi KR, Valla FV, Tume LN. Review of Outcomes Used in Nutrition Trials in Pediatric Critical Care. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2020; 44:1210-1219. [PMID: 32010996 DOI: 10.1002/jpen.1765] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2019] [Accepted: 12/04/2019] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Generating robust evidence within pediatric intensive care (PIC) can be challenging because of low patient numbers and patient heterogeneity. Systematic reviews may overcome small study biases but are limited by lack of standardization in outcome measures and their definition. Trials of nutrition interventions in PIC are increasing; thus, we wanted to examine the outcome measures being used in these trials. OBJECTIVE Our objective was to systematically describe outcome measures used when a nutrition intervention has been evaluated in a PIC randomized controlled trial. METHODS A systematic literature review of all studies involving a PIC trial of a nutrition intervention was undertaken from January 1, 1996, until February 20, 2018. RESULTS Twenty-nine trials met the criteria and were reviewed. They included a total of 3226 patients across all trials. Thirty-seven primary outcomes and 83 secondary outcomes were found. These were categorized into PIC-related outcomes (infection, intensive care dependency, organ dysfunction, and mortality) and nutrition outcomes (energy targets, nutrition parameters, and feeding tolerance). We found large variation in the outcome measures used. Outcome domains of energy targets, feeding tolerance, and infection were not adequately defined. CONCLUSIONS Considerable variation in the outcome measures chosen and their definitions exist within PIC nutrition trials. Optimal nutrition outcomes for PIC must be agreed upon and defined, specifically domains of nutrition efficiency, nutrition tolerance, and non-nutrition PIC outcomes. The next step is to conduct an international Delphi study to gain expert consensus and develop a core outcome set to be reported in future pediatric nutrition trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kunal R Gadhvi
- Bristol Royal Hospital for Children, Bristol, UK.,Faculty of Health and Applied Sciences, The University of the West of England, Stapleton, Bristol, UK
| | - Frédéric V Valla
- Faculty of Health and Applied Sciences, The University of the West of England, Stapleton, Bristol, UK.,Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Hôpital Femme Mère Enfant, Hospices Civils de Lyon, CarMEN INSERM UMR 1060, Lyon-Bron, France
| | - Lyvonne N Tume
- Bristol Royal Hospital for Children, Bristol, UK.,Faculty of Health and Applied Sciences, The University of the West of England, Stapleton, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Weiss SL, Peters MJ, Alhazzani W, Agus MSD, Flori HR, Inwald DP, Nadel S, Schlapbach LJ, Tasker RC, Argent AC, Brierley J, Carcillo J, Carrol ED, Carroll CL, Cheifetz IM, Choong K, Cies JJ, Cruz AT, De Luca D, Deep A, Faust SN, De Oliveira CF, Hall MW, Ishimine P, Javouhey E, Joosten KFM, Joshi P, Karam O, Kneyber MCJ, Lemson J, MacLaren G, Mehta NM, Møller MH, Newth CJL, Nguyen TC, Nishisaki A, Nunnally ME, Parker MM, Paul RM, Randolph AG, Ranjit S, Romer LH, Scott HF, Tume LN, Verger JT, Williams EA, Wolf J, Wong HR, Zimmerman JJ, Kissoon N, Tissieres P. Surviving sepsis campaign international guidelines for the management of septic shock and sepsis-associated organ dysfunction in children. Intensive Care Med 2020; 46:10-67. [PMID: 32030529 PMCID: PMC7095013 DOI: 10.1007/s00134-019-05878-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 283] [Impact Index Per Article: 70.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To develop evidence-based recommendations for clinicians caring for children (including infants, school-aged children, and adolescents) with septic shock and other sepsis-associated organ dysfunction. DESIGN A panel of 49 international experts, representing 12 international organizations, as well as three methodologists and three public members was convened. Panel members assembled at key international meetings (for those panel members attending the conference), and a stand-alone meeting was held for all panel members in November 2018. A formal conflict-of-interest policy was developed at the onset of the process and enforced throughout. Teleconferences and electronic-based discussion among the chairs, co-chairs, methodologists, and group heads, as well as within subgroups, served as an integral part of the guideline development process. METHODS The panel consisted of six subgroups: recognition and management of infection, hemodynamics and resuscitation, ventilation, endocrine and metabolic therapies, adjunctive therapies, and research priorities. We conducted a systematic review for each Population, Intervention, Control, and Outcomes question to identify the best available evidence, statistically summarized the evidence, and then assessed the quality of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. We used the evidence-to-decision framework to formulate recommendations as strong or weak, or as a best practice statement. In addition, "in our practice" statements were included when evidence was inconclusive to issue a recommendation, but the panel felt that some guidance based on practice patterns may be appropriate. RESULTS The panel provided 77 statements on the management and resuscitation of children with septic shock and other sepsis-associated organ dysfunction. Overall, six were strong recommendations, 49 were weak recommendations, and nine were best-practice statements. For 13 questions, no recommendations could be made; but, for 10 of these, "in our practice" statements were provided. In addition, 52 research priorities were identified. CONCLUSIONS A large cohort of international experts was able to achieve consensus regarding many recommendations for the best care of children with sepsis, acknowledging that most aspects of care had relatively low quality of evidence resulting in the frequent issuance of weak recommendations. Despite this challenge, these recommendations regarding the management of children with septic shock and other sepsis-associated organ dysfunction provide a foundation for consistent care to improve outcomes and inform future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scott L Weiss
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| | - Mark J Peters
- Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK
| | - Waleed Alhazzani
- Department of Medicine, Division of Critical Care, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
- Department of Health Research Methods and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Michael S D Agus
- Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | | | - Luregn J Schlapbach
- Paediatric Critical Care Research Group, The University of Queensland and Queensland Children's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Robert C Tasker
- Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Andrew C Argent
- Red Cross War Memorial Children's Hospital and University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Joe Brierley
- Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | | - Karen Choong
- Department of Medicine, Division of Critical Care, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
- Department of Health Research Methods and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Jeffry J Cies
- St. Christopher's Hospital for Children, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Daniele De Luca
- Paris South University Hospitals-Assistance Publique Hopitaux de Paris, Paris, France
- Physiopathology and Therapeutic Innovation Unit-INSERM U999, South Paris-Saclay University, Paris, France
| | | | - Saul N Faust
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust and University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | | | - Mark W Hall
- Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA
| | | | | | | | - Poonam Joshi
- All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Oliver Karam
- Children's Hospital of Richmond at VCU, Richmond, VA, USA
| | | | - Joris Lemson
- Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Graeme MacLaren
- National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
- Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Nilesh M Mehta
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain, Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | | | - Akira Nishisaki
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Mark E Nunnally
- New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Raina M Paul
- Advocate Children's Hospital, Park Ridge, IL, USA
| | - Adrienne G Randolph
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain, Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Judy T Verger
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- College of Nursing, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | | | - Joshua Wolf
- St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | | | | | | | - Pierre Tissieres
- Paris South University Hospitals-Assistance Publique Hopitaux de Paris, Paris, France
- Institute of Integrative Biology of the Cell-CNRS, CEA, Univ Paris Sud, Gif-Sur-Yvette, France
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Weiss SL, Peters MJ, Alhazzani W, Agus MSD, Flori HR, Inwald DP, Nadel S, Schlapbach LJ, Tasker RC, Argent AC, Brierley J, Carcillo J, Carrol ED, Carroll CL, Cheifetz IM, Choong K, Cies JJ, Cruz AT, De Luca D, Deep A, Faust SN, De Oliveira CF, Hall MW, Ishimine P, Javouhey E, Joosten KFM, Joshi P, Karam O, Kneyber MCJ, Lemson J, MacLaren G, Mehta NM, Møller MH, Newth CJL, Nguyen TC, Nishisaki A, Nunnally ME, Parker MM, Paul RM, Randolph AG, Ranjit S, Romer LH, Scott HF, Tume LN, Verger JT, Williams EA, Wolf J, Wong HR, Zimmerman JJ, Kissoon N, Tissieres P. Surviving Sepsis Campaign International Guidelines for the Management of Septic Shock and Sepsis-Associated Organ Dysfunction in Children. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2020; 21:e52-e106. [PMID: 32032273 DOI: 10.1097/pcc.0000000000002198] [Citation(s) in RCA: 504] [Impact Index Per Article: 126.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To develop evidence-based recommendations for clinicians caring for children (including infants, school-aged children, and adolescents) with septic shock and other sepsis-associated organ dysfunction. DESIGN A panel of 49 international experts, representing 12 international organizations, as well as three methodologists and three public members was convened. Panel members assembled at key international meetings (for those panel members attending the conference), and a stand-alone meeting was held for all panel members in November 2018. A formal conflict-of-interest policy was developed at the onset of the process and enforced throughout. Teleconferences and electronic-based discussion among the chairs, co-chairs, methodologists, and group heads, as well as within subgroups, served as an integral part of the guideline development process. METHODS The panel consisted of six subgroups: recognition and management of infection, hemodynamics and resuscitation, ventilation, endocrine and metabolic therapies, adjunctive therapies, and research priorities. We conducted a systematic review for each Population, Intervention, Control, and Outcomes question to identify the best available evidence, statistically summarized the evidence, and then assessed the quality of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. We used the evidence-to-decision framework to formulate recommendations as strong or weak, or as a best practice statement. In addition, "in our practice" statements were included when evidence was inconclusive to issue a recommendation, but the panel felt that some guidance based on practice patterns may be appropriate. RESULTS The panel provided 77 statements on the management and resuscitation of children with septic shock and other sepsis-associated organ dysfunction. Overall, six were strong recommendations, 52 were weak recommendations, and nine were best-practice statements. For 13 questions, no recommendations could be made; but, for 10 of these, "in our practice" statements were provided. In addition, 49 research priorities were identified. CONCLUSIONS A large cohort of international experts was able to achieve consensus regarding many recommendations for the best care of children with sepsis, acknowledging that most aspects of care had relatively low quality of evidence resulting in the frequent issuance of weak recommendations. Despite this challenge, these recommendations regarding the management of children with septic shock and other sepsis-associated organ dysfunction provide a foundation for consistent care to improve outcomes and inform future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scott L Weiss
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Mark J Peters
- Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, United Kingdom
| | - Waleed Alhazzani
- Department of Medicine, Division of Critical Care, and Department of Health Research Methods and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Michael S D Agus
- Department of Pediatrics (to Dr. Agus), Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain (to Drs. Mehta and Randolph), Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | | | | | | | - Luregn J Schlapbach
- Paediatric Critical Care Research Group, The University of Queensland and Queensland Children's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Robert C Tasker
- Department of Pediatrics (to Dr. Agus), Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain (to Drs. Mehta and Randolph), Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Andrew C Argent
- Red Cross War Memorial Children's Hospital and University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Joe Brierley
- Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | - Karen Choong
- Department of Medicine, Division of Critical Care, and Department of Health Research Methods and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Jeffry J Cies
- St. Christopher's Hospital for Children, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | - Daniele De Luca
- Paris South University Hospitals-Assistance Publique Hopitaux de Paris, Paris, France.,Physiopathology and Therapeutic Innovation Unit-INSERM U999, South Paris-Saclay University, Paris, France
| | - Akash Deep
- King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Saul N Faust
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust and University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | | | - Mark W Hall
- Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH
| | | | | | | | - Poonam Joshi
- All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Oliver Karam
- Children's Hospital of Richmond at VCU, Richmond, VA
| | | | - Joris Lemson
- Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Graeme MacLaren
- National University Health System, Singapore, and Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Nilesh M Mehta
- Department of Pediatrics (to Dr. Agus), Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain (to Drs. Mehta and Randolph), Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | | | | | | | - Akira Nishisaki
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | | | | | - Adrienne G Randolph
- Department of Pediatrics (to Dr. Agus), Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain (to Drs. Mehta and Randolph), Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | | | | | | | - Lyvonne N Tume
- University of the West of England, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Judy T Verger
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA.,College of Nursing, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA
| | | | - Joshua Wolf
- St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN
| | | | | | - Niranjan Kissoon
- British Columbia Children's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Pierre Tissieres
- Paris South University Hospitals-Assistance Publique Hopitaux de Paris, Paris, France.,Institute of Integrative Biology of the Cell-CNRS, CEA, Univ Paris Sud, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Rice-Townsend SE, Aldrink JH. Controversies of enteral nutrition in select critically-ill surgical patients: Traumatic brain injury, extracorporeal life support, and sepsis. Semin Pediatr Surg 2019; 28:47-52. [PMID: 30824134 DOI: 10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2019.01.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Adequate nutritional support for critically ill pediatric patients is an essential component of optimal care in the intensive care unit. For select patient populations in this setting, the enteral delivery of nutrients can bring unique challenges and potential risks. The focus of this paper is to provide a review of existing literature concerning the safety, efficacy and benefits of enteral nutrition in select surgical patient populations for whom these discussions are most controversial: patients with traumatic brain injury, patients receiving extracorporeal life support (ECLS), and patients receiving vasopressor therapy, such as in sepsis. Recommendations in the context of consensus or a call to investigate research gaps are provided based on a review of the evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel E Rice-Townsend
- Department of Surgery, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Division of Critical Care Medicine; Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Division of Critical Care Medicine; Harvard Medical School Departments of Surgery & Anesthesia, Critical Care & Pain Medicine Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Jennifer H Aldrink
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Nationwide Children's Hospital; The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Hu B, Ouyang X, Lei L, Sun C, Chi R, Guo J, Guo W, Zhang Y, Li Y, Huang D, Sun H, Nie Z, Yu J, Zhou Y, Wang H, Zhang J, Chen C. Erythromycin versus metoclopramide for post-pyloric spiral nasoenteric tube placement: a randomized non-inferiority trial. Intensive Care Med 2018; 44:2174-2182. [PMID: 30465070 PMCID: PMC6280835 DOI: 10.1007/s00134-018-5466-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2018] [Accepted: 11/13/2018] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Purpose To determine whether erythromycin is non-inferior to metoclopramide in facilitating post-pyloric placement of self-propelled spiral nasoenteric tubes (NETs) in critically ill patients. Methods A prospective, multicenter, open-label, parallel, and non-inferiority randomized controlled trial was conducted comparing erythromycin with metoclopramide in facilitating post-pyloric placement of spiral NETs in critically ill patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) of eight tertiary hospitals in China. The primary outcome was procedure success defined as post-pyloric placement (spiral NETs reached the first portion of the duodenum or beyond confirmed by abdominal radiography 24 h after tube insertion). Results A total of 5688 patients were admitted to the ICUs. Of these, in 355 patients there was a plan to insert a nasoenteric feeding tube, of whom 332 were randomized, with 167 patients assigned to the erythromycin group and 165 patients assigned to the metoclopramide group. The success rate of post-pyloric placement was 57.5% (96/167) in the erythromycin group, as compared with 50.3% (83/165) in the metoclopramide group (a difference of 7.2%, 95% CI − 3.5% to 17.9%), in the intention-to-treat analysis, not including the prespecified margin of − 10% for non-inferiority. The success rates of post-D1 (reaching the second portion of the duodenum or beyond), post-D2 (reaching the third portion of the duodenum or beyond), post-D3 (reaching the fourth portion of the duodenum or beyond), and proximal jejunum placement and the incidence of any adverse events were not significantly different between the groups. Conclusions Erythromycin is non-inferior to metoclopramide in facilitating post-pyloric placement of spiral NETs in critically ill patients. The success rates of post-D1, post-D2, post-D3, and proximal jejunum placement were not significantly different.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bei Hu
- Department of Intensive Care Unit of Cardiovascular Surgery, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, 96 Dongchuan Road, Guangzhou, 510080, Guangdong, China
| | - Xin Ouyang
- Guangdong General Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, 106 Zhongshan Er Road, Guangzhou, 510080, Guangdong, China
| | - Liming Lei
- Department of Intensive Care Unit of Cardiovascular Surgery, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, 96 Dongchuan Road, Guangzhou, 510080, Guangdong, China
| | - Cheng Sun
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, 106 Zhongshan Er Road, Guangzhou, 510080, Guangdong, China
| | - Ruibin Chi
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Xiaolan People's Hospital of Zhongshan, Zhongshan, Guangdong, China
| | - Jian Guo
- Department of Intensive Care Unit, People's Hospital of Baise, Baise, Guangxi, China
| | - Wenlong Guo
- Department of Surgical Intensive Care Unit, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Traditional Chinese Medical College, Zhuzhou, Hunan, China
| | - Yanlin Zhang
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Xinjiang Kashgar First People's Hospital, Kashgar, Xinjiang, China
| | - Yong Li
- Department of Emergency, Cangzhou Central Hospital, Cangzhou, Hebei, China
| | - Daoyong Huang
- Department of Intensive Care Unit, Yangjiang City People's Hospital, Yangjiang, Guangdong, China
| | - Huafeng Sun
- Department of Intensive Care Unit, Chaozhou People's Hospital, Chaozhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Zhiqiang Nie
- Department of Epidemiology, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of South China Structural Heart Disease, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, 106 Zhongshan Er Road, Guangzhou, 510080, Guangdong, China
| | - Jieyang Yu
- Department of Intensive Care Unit, People's Hospital of Baise, Baise, Guangxi, China
| | - Yuan Zhou
- Department of Surgical Intensive Care Unit, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Traditional Chinese Medical College, Zhuzhou, Hunan, China
| | - Hao Wang
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Xinjiang Kashgar First People's Hospital, Kashgar, Xinjiang, China
| | - Jinhe Zhang
- Department of Intensive Care Unit, Chaozhou People's Hospital, Chaozhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Chunbo Chen
- Department of Intensive Care Unit of Cardiovascular Surgery, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, 96 Dongchuan Road, Guangzhou, 510080, Guangdong, China.
| |
Collapse
|