Intensive care medicine in 2050: NEWS for hemodynamic monitoring

Wearable sensors for prediction of intraamniotic infection in women with preterm premature rupture of membranes: a prospective proof of principle study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the use of wearable sensors for prediction of intraamniotic infection in pregnant women with PPROM.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In a prospective proof of principle study, we included 50 patients diagnosed with PPROM at the University Hospital Zurich between November 2017 and May 2020. Patients were instructed to wear a bracelet during the night, which measures physiological parameters including wrist skin temperature, heart rate, heart rate variability, and breathing rate. A two-way repeated measures ANOVA was performed to evaluate the difference over time of both the wearable device measured parameters and standard clinical monitoring values, such as body temperature, pulse, leucocytes, and C-reactive protein, between women with and without intraamniotic infection.

RESULTS

Altogether, 23 patients (46%) were diagnosed with intraamniotic infection. Regarding the physiological parameters measured with the bracelet, we observed a significant difference in breathing rate (19 vs 16 per min, P < .01) and heart rate (72 vs 67 beats per min, P = .03) in women with intraamniotic infection compared to those without during the 3 days prior to birth. In parallel to these changes standard clinical monitoring values were significantly different in the intraamniotic infection group compared to women without infection in the 3 days preceding birth.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that wearable sensors are a promising, noninvasive, patient friendly approach to support the early detection of intraamniotic infection in women with PPROM. However, confirmation of our findings in larger studies is required before implementing this technique in standard clinical management.

Systematized and efficient: organization of critical care in the future

Since the advent of critical care in the twentieth century, the core elements that are the foundation for critical care systems, namely to care for critically ill and injured patients and to save lives, have evolved enormously. The past half-century has seen dramatic advancements in diagnostic, organ support, and treatment modalities in critical care, with further improvements now needed to achieve personalized critical care of the highest quality. For critical care to be even higher quality in the future, advancements in the following areas are key: the physical ICU space; the people that care for critically ill patients; the equipment and technologies; the information systems and data; and the research systems that impact critically ill patients and families. With acutely and critically ill patients and their families as the absolute focal point, advancements across these areas will hopefully transform care and outcomes over the coming years.

[Hemodynamic Monitoring 2.0 - What is Possible on Normal Wards?]

Life threatening events after surgery often occur on the ward. These events could be prevented by early detection of clinical deterioration of patients' health status during ward care. Therefore, an adequate monitoring could help to identify patients at risk, since there is an imbalance of monitoring intensity and the occurrence of life-threatening events during hospital stay.Additional monitoring on the general ward could lead to more patient safety. The practicability of additional monitoring needs to be considered, and therefore the use of available monitoring systems on the ward is limited. Capillary refill time (CRT) and the passive leg raise test (PLR) seem to be usable intermittent monitoring techniques.Continuous monitoring systems ensure a better detection of unwanted events and hemodynamic trends. However, the increased workload for the nursing staff and tethered monitors are unfavorable. Future trends of developing wireless monitoring systems are of paramount importance in this respect. Controlling artefacts is crucial for the successful balance between false alarms and "missed events". An adequate reaction is needed when detecting adverse events to avoid a "failure to rescue".

Automated Ambulatory Blood Pressure Measurements and Intraoperative Hypotension in Patients Having Noncardiac Surgery with General Anesthesia: A Prospective Observational Study

BACKGROUND

Normal blood pressure varies among individuals and over the circadian cycle. Preinduction blood pressure may not be representative of a patient's normal blood pressure profile and cannot give an indication of a patient's usual range of blood pressures. This study therefore aimed to determine the relationship between ambulatory mean arterial pressure and preinduction, postinduction, and intraoperative mean arterial pressures.

METHODS

Ambulatory (automated oscillometric measurements at 30-min intervals) and preinduction, postinduction, and intraoperative mean arterial pressures (1-min intervals) were prospectively measured and compared in 370 American Society of Anesthesiology physical status classification I or II patients aged 40 to 65 yr having elective noncardiac surgery with general anesthesia.

RESULTS

There was only a weak correlation between the first preinduction and mean daytime mean arterial pressure (r = 0.429, P < 0.001). The difference between the first preinduction and mean daytime mean arterial pressure varied considerably among individuals. In about two thirds of the patients, the lowest postinduction and intraoperative mean arterial pressures were lower than the lowest nighttime mean arterial pressure. The difference between the lowest nighttime mean arterial pressure and a mean arterial pressure of 65 mmHg varied considerably among individuals. The lowest nighttime mean arterial pressure was higher than 65 mmHg in 263 patients (71%).

CONCLUSIONS

Preinduction mean arterial pressure cannot be used as a surrogate for the normal daytime mean arterial pressure. The lowest postinduction and intraoperative mean arterial pressures are lower than the lowest nighttime mean arterial pressure in most patients.

Less or more hemodynamic monitoring in critically ill patients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Hemodynamic investigations are required in patients with shock to identify the type of shock, to select the most appropriate treatments and to assess the patient's response to the selected therapy. We discuss how to select the most appropriate hemodynamic monitoring techniques in patients with shock as well as the future of hemodynamic monitoring.

RECENT FINDINGS

Over the last decades, the hemodynamic monitoring techniques have evolved from intermittent toward continuous and real-time measurements and from invasive toward less-invasive approaches. In patients with shock, current guidelines recommend the echocardiography as the preferred modality for the initial hemodynamic evaluation. In patients with shock nonresponsive to initial therapy and/or in the most complex patients, it is recommended to monitor the cardiac output and to use advanced hemodynamic monitoring techniques. They also provide other useful variables that are useful for managing the most complex cases. Uncalibrated and noninvasive cardiac output monitors are not reliable enough in the intensive care setting.

SUMMARY

The use of echocardiography should be initially encouraged in patients with shock to identify the type of shock and to select the most appropriate therapy. The use of more invasive hemodynamic monitoring techniques should be discussed on an individualized basis.

Automated continuous noninvasive ward monitoring: future directions and challenges

Automated continuous noninvasive ward monitoring may enable subtle changes in vital signs to be recognized. There is already some evidence that automated ward monitoring can improve patient outcome. Before automated continuous noninvasive ward monitoring can be implemented in clinical routine, several challenges and problems need to be considered and resolved; these include the meticulous validation of the monitoring systems with regard to their measurement performance, minimization of artifacts and false alarms, integration and combined analysis of massive amounts of data including various vital signs, and technical problems regarding the connectivity of the systems.

Clinical Requirements of Future Patient Monitoring in the Intensive Care Unit: Qualitative Study

Background

In the intensive care unit (ICU), continuous patient monitoring is essential to detect critical changes in patients’ health statuses and to guide therapy. The implementation of digital health technologies for patient monitoring may further improve patient safety. However, most monitoring devices today are still based on technologies from the 1970s.

Objective

The aim of this study was to evaluate statements by ICU staff on the current patient monitoring systems and their expectations for future technological developments in order to investigate clinical requirements and barriers to the implementation of future patient monitoring.

Methods

This prospective study was conducted at three intensive care units of a German university hospital. Guideline-based interviews with ICU staff—5 physicians, 6 nurses, and 4 respiratory therapists—were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using the grounded theory approach.

Results

Evaluating the current monitoring system, ICU staff put high emphasis on usability factors such as intuitiveness and visualization. Trend analysis was rarely used; inadequate alarm management as well as the entanglement of monitoring cables were rated as potential patient safety issues. For a future system, the importance of high usability was again emphasized; wireless, noninvasive, and interoperable monitoring sensors were desired; mobile phones for remote patient monitoring and alarm management optimization were needed; and clinical decision support systems based on artificial intelligence were considered useful. Among perceived barriers to implementation of novel technology were lack of trust, fear of losing clinical skills, fear of increasing workload, and lack of awareness of available digital technologies.

Conclusions

This qualitative study on patient monitoring involves core statements from ICU staff. To promote a rapid and sustainable implementation of digital health solutions in the ICU, all health care stakeholders must focus more on user-derived findings. Results on alarm management or mobile devices may be used to prepare ICU staff to use novel technology, to reduce alarm fatigue, to improve medical device usability, and to advance interoperability standards in intensive care medicine. For digital transformation in health care, increasing the trust and awareness of ICU staff in digital health technology may be an essential prerequisite.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03514173; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03514173 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/77T1HwOzk)

Continuous Non-Invasive Arterial Pressure Assessment during Surgery to Improve Outcome

Blood pressure (BP) is one of the most important variables evaluated during almost every medical examination. Most national anesthesiology societies recommend BP monitoring at least once every 5 min in anesthetized subjects undergoing surgical procedures. In most cases, BP is monitored non-invasively using oscillometric cuffs. Although the risk of arterial cannulation is not very high, the invasive BP monitoring is usually indicated only in the case of high-risk patients or in complex surgical procedures. However, recent evidence points out that when using intermittent BP monitoring short periods of hypotension may be overlooked. In addition, large datasets have demonstrated that even short periods of low BP (or their cumulative duration) may have a detrimental impact on the development of postoperative outcome including increased risk of acute kidney or myocardial injury development. Recently marketed continuous non-invasive blood pressure monitoring tools may help us to recognize the BP fluctuation without the associated burden of arterial cannulation filling the gap between intermittent non-invasive cuff and continuous invasive arterial pressure. Among others, several novel devices based either on volume clamp/vascular unloading method or on applanation tonometry are nowadays available. Moreover, several near-future smart technologies may lead to better hypotension recognition or even prediction potentially improving our ability to maintain BP stability throughout the anesthesia or surgical procedure. In this review, novel or emerging technologies of non-invasive continuous blood pressure assessment and their potential to improve postoperative outcome are discussed.