Cerebral complications of solid organ transplantation

Trends and Outcomes of Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion in Renal and Liver Transplant Recipients: Insights From the United States National Inpatient and Readmission Database

Left atrial appendage occlusion using the Watchman device has emerged as an alternative treatment strategy for preventing strokes in patients with atrial fibrillation. However, there is no data on its safety and clinical outcomes in prior renal or liver transplant recipients. We included a total of 61,995 patients from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS, in-hospital outcomes) and 55,048 patients from the National Readmission Database (NRD, 30-day outcomes) who underwent percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO). From this group, 0.65% (n=405) and 0.62% (n=339) were renal and liver transplant recipients in NIS and NRD respectively. Transplant recipients were younger compared with non-transplant recipients (mean age 69 vs 77 years, P=<0.01). There was little difference in terms of in-hospital mortality (0% vs 0.2%, P=0.43), major complications (6.2% vs 5.6%, P=0.61), cardiovascular complications (2.5% vs 2.8%, P=0.73), neurological complications (1.2% vs 0.7%, P=0.21) or bleeding complications (1.2% vs 0.7%, P=0.99) between transplant vs. non-transplant patients. Based on the NRD database, 30-day readmission rate was not meaningfully different for transplant recipients undergoing LAAO (9.44%) when compared to non-transplant patients (8.12%, [log-rank, P=0.56]). There was no difference between 30-day major or cardiovascular complications, however vascular complication rates were significantly higher for transplant recipients (OR 2.56, 95% CI [(1.66-3.47]). Our study findings suggest that LAAO may be safe for patients with a prior renal or liver transplant in terms of major complications, cardiovascular complications, and all-cause readmission rates. However vascular complications may be higher in transplant recipients. Further large-scale studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Neurologic Complications in Heart Transplant Recipients Readmitted to the Intensive Care Unit

Introduction Neurologic complications after transplantation surgery are major causes of morbidity, and the incidence of neurologic complications among heart transplant recipients varies from 7% to 81%. In our study, we aimed to determine the incidence, etiologies, and risk factors of neurologic complications among patients readmitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) after heart transplantation. Method In this retrospective cohort study, the medical records of all patients who underwent cardiac transplantation from February 2003 to July 2019 were reviewed, and those admitted to the ICU due to neurologic complications during the early and late postoperative period were evaluated. The patients were divided into two groups based on the development of neurologic complications to compare demographic and other characteristics. Results A total of 130 heart transplant recipients were analyzed. We excluded 33 patients from the study because they either had neurologic complications or died postoperatively without discharge from the intensive care unit. The mean age of the cohort was 35.4 ± 18.5 years, and 74 (76.3%) were male. Out of those 97 heart transplant recipients, 22 (22.7%) developed neurologic complications. Five patients (22.7% ) were admitted to the ICU in the first month, six patients (27.3%) were admitted to the ICU between one and six months, and 11 patients (50%) were admitted to the ICU six months after transplantation due to neurologic complications. The most common diagnosis was posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) (n = 6, 27.3%). The other diagnoses were calcineurin inhibitor toxicity (n = 5, 22.7%), intracranial hemorrhage (n = 3, 13.6%), seizures (n = 2, 9.2%), stroke (n = 2, 9.2%), femoral neuropathy (n = 1, 4.5%), myopathy (n = 1, 4.5%), phrenic nerve damage (n = 1, 4.5%), and cerebral abscess (n = 1, 4.5%). The rate of neurologic complications was higher in males when compared with females (p = 0.03). Both groups were similar in terms of the etiologies of cardiac failure, coexisting disease, and anticoagulant and immunosuppressive usage. The requirement for mechanical ventilation, renal replacement therapy, and the incidence of acute kidney injury were similar in both groups (p > 0.05). The incidence of sepsis was significantly higher in patients with neurologic complications (n = 8, 36.4%, versus n = 5, 6.7%; p < 0.001). The mean length of hospital stay was significantly higher in patients with neurologic complications (21.4 ± 15.8 versus 11.1 ± 13.3 days, p = 0.01). The risk of developing neurologic complications is 3.036 times higher in males, and this is statistically significant (odds ratio (OR), 3.036; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.078-8.444; p = 0.036). Conclusion Our results suggest that neurologic complications develop in 22.7% of heart transplant recipients admitted to the ICU, and half of them are seen after six months postoperatively. PRES was the most frequent (27.3%) neurologic complication. The risk of neurologic complications is three times higher for males. The mean length of hospital stay and incidence of sepsis were significantly higher in heart transplant recipients who developed neurologic complications.

Diagnostic and therapeutic approach to infectious diseases in solid organ transplant recipients

Purpose

Prognosis of solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients has improved, mainly because of better prevention of rejection by immunosuppressive therapies. However, SOT recipients are highly susceptible to conventional and opportunistic infections, which represent a major cause of morbidity, graft dysfunction and mortality.

Methods

Narrative review.

Results

We cover the current epidemiology and main aspects of infections in SOT recipients including risk factors such as postoperative risks and specific risks for different transplant recipients, key points on anti-infective prophylaxis as well as diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. We provide an up-to-date guide for management of the main syndromes that can be encountered in SOT recipients including acute respiratory failure, sepsis or septic shock, and central nervous system infections as well as bacterial infections with multidrug-resistant strains, invasive fungal diseases, viral infections and less common pathogens that may impact this patient population.

Conclusion

We provide state-of the art review of available knowledge of critically ill SOT patients with infections.