1
|
Bass GA, Kaplan LJ, Gaarder C, Coimbra R, Klingensmith NJ, Kurihara H, Zago M, Cioffi SPB, Mohseni S, Sugrue M, Tolonen M, Valcarcel CR, Tilsed J, Hildebrand F, Marzi I. European society for trauma and emergency surgery member-identified research priorities in emergency surgery: a roadmap for future clinical research opportunities. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2024; 50:367-382. [PMID: 38411700 PMCID: PMC11035411 DOI: 10.1007/s00068-023-02441-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2023] [Accepted: 12/28/2023] [Indexed: 02/28/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND European Society for Trauma and Emergency Surgery (ESTES) is the European community of clinicians providing care to the injured and critically ill surgical patient. ESTES has several interlinked missions - (1) the promotion of optimal emergency surgical care through networked advocacy, (2) promulgation of relevant clinical cognitive and technical skills, and (3) the advancement of scientific inquiry that closes knowledge gaps, iteratively improves upon surgical and perioperative practice, and guides decision-making rooted in scientific evidence. Faced with multitudinous opportunities for clinical research, ESTES undertook an exercise to determine member priorities for surgical research in the short-to-medium term; these research priorities were presented to a panel of experts to inform a 'road map' narrative review which anchored these research priorities in the contemporary surgical literature. METHODS Individual ESTES members in active emergency surgery practice were polled as a representative sample of end-users and were asked to rank potential areas of future research according to their personal perceptions of priority. Using the modified eDelphi method, an invited panel of ESTES-associated experts in academic emergency surgery then crafted a narrative review highlighting potential research priorities for the Society. RESULTS Seventy-two responding ESTES members from 23 countries provided feedback to guide the modified eDelphi expert consensus narrative review. Experts then crafted evidence-based mini-reviews highlighting knowledge gaps and areas of interest for future clinical research in emergency surgery: timing of surgery, inter-hospital transfer, diagnostic imaging in emergency surgery, the role of minimally-invasive surgical techniques and Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols, patient-reported outcome measures, risk-stratification methods, disparities in access to care, geriatric outcomes, data registry and snapshot audit evaluations, emerging technologies interrogation, and the delivery and benchmarking of emergency surgical training. CONCLUSIONS This manuscript presents the priorities for future clinical research in academic emergency surgery as determined by a sample of the membership of ESTES. While the precise basis for prioritization was not evident, it may be anchored in disease prevalence, controversy around aspects of current patient care, or indeed the identification of a knowledge gap. These expert-crafted evidence-based mini-reviews provide useful insights that may guide the direction of future academic emergency surgery research efforts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gary Alan Bass
- Division of Traumatology, Emergency Surgery and Surgical Critical Care, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 51 N. 39th Street, MOB 1, Suite 120, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
- Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics (LDI), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
- Center for Perioperative Outcomes Research and Transformation (CPORT), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| | - Lewis Jay Kaplan
- Division of Traumatology, Emergency Surgery and Surgical Critical Care, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 51 N. 39th Street, MOB 1, Suite 120, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- Surgical Critical Care, Corporal Michael J Crescenz VA Medical Center, 3900 Woodland Avenue, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Christine Gaarder
- Department of Traumatology at Oslo University Hospital Ullevål (OUH U), Olso, Norway
| | - Raul Coimbra
- Riverside University Health System Medical Center, Moreno Valley, CA, USA
- Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, CA, USA
- Comparative Effectiveness and Clinical Outcomes Research Center - CECORC, Moreno Valley, CA, USA
| | - Nathan John Klingensmith
- Division of Traumatology, Emergency Surgery and Surgical Critical Care, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 51 N. 39th Street, MOB 1, Suite 120, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Hayato Kurihara
- State University of Milan, Milan, Italy
- Emergency Surgery Unit, Ospedale Policlinico di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Mauro Zago
- General & Emergency Surgery Division, A. Manzoni Hospital, ASST, Lecco, Lombardy, Italy
| | | | - Shahin Mohseni
- Department of Surgery, Sheikh Shakhbout Medical City (SSMC), Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
- Division of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, Department of Surgery, Orebro University Hospital, 701 85, Orebro, Sweden
- Faculty of School of Medical Sciences, Orebro University, 702 81, Orebro, Sweden
| | - Michael Sugrue
- Letterkenny Hospital and Galway University, Letterkenny, Ireland
| | - Matti Tolonen
- Emergency Surgery, Meilahti Tower Hospital, HUS Helsinki University Hospital, Haartmaninkatu 4, PO Box 340, 00029, Helsinki, HUS, Finland
| | | | - Jonathan Tilsed
- Hull Royal Infirmary, Anlaby Road, Hu3 2Jz, Hull, England, UK
| | - Frank Hildebrand
- Department of Orthopaedics Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Ingo Marzi
- Department of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Piliuk K, Tomforde S. Artificial intelligence in emergency medicine. A systematic literature review. Int J Med Inform 2023; 180:105274. [PMID: 37944275 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2023.105274] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2023] [Revised: 10/21/2023] [Accepted: 10/26/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023]
Abstract
Motivation and objective: Emergency medicine is becoming a popular application area for artificial intelligence methods but remains less investigated than other healthcare branches. The need for time-sensitive decision-making on the basis of high data volumes makes the use of quantitative technologies inevitable. However, the specifics of healthcare regulations impose strict requirements for such applications. Published contributions cover separate parts of emergency medicine and use disparate data and algorithms. This study aims to systematize the relevant contributions, investigate the main obstacles to artificial intelligence applications in emergency medicine, and propose directions for further studies. METHODS The contributions selection process was conducted with systematic electronic databases querying and filtering with respect to established exclusion criteria. Among the 380 papers gathered from IEEE Xplore, ACM Digital Library, Springer Library, ScienceDirect, and Nature databases 116 were considered to be a part of the survey. The main features of the selected papers are the focus on emergency medicine and the use of machine learning or deep learning algorithms. FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION The selected papers were classified into two branches: diagnostics-specific and triage-specific. The former ones are focused on either diagnosis prediction or decision support. The latter covers such applications as mortality, outcome, admission prediction, condition severity estimation, and urgent care prediction. The observed contributions are highly specialized within a single disease or medical operation and often use privately collected retrospective data, making them incomparable. These and other issues can be addressed by creating an end-to-end solution based on human-machine interaction. CONCLUSION Artificial intelligence applications are finding their place in emergency medicine, while most of the corresponding studies remain isolated and lack higher generalization and more sophisticated methodology, which can be a matter of forthcoming improvements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sven Tomforde
- Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, 24118 Kiel, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Duffy CC, Bass GA, Yura C, Dymek M, Lorenzi C, Kaplan LJ, Clapp JT, Atkins JH. Thematic mapping of perioperative incident reporting data to relational coordination domains. J Interprof Care 2023; 37:245-253. [PMID: 36739556 DOI: 10.1080/13561820.2022.2057454] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Communication failure is a common root cause of adverse clinical events. Problematic communication domains are difficult to decipher, and communication improvement strategies are scarce. This study compared perioperative incident reports (IR) identifying potential communication failures with the results of a contemporaneous peri-operative Relational Coordination (RC) survey. We hypothesised that IR-prevalent themes would map to areas-of-weakness identified in the RC survey. Perioperative IRs filed between 2018 and 2020 (n = 6,236) were manually reviewed to identify communication failures (n = 1049). The IRs were disaggregated into seven RC theory domains and compared with the RC survey. Report disaggregation ratings demonstrated a three-way inter-rater agreement of 91.2%. Of the 1,049 communication failure-related IRs, shared knowledge deficits (n = 479, 46%) or accurate communication (n = 465, 44%) were most frequently identified. Communication frequency failures (n = 3, 0.3%) were rarely coded. Comparatively, shared knowledge was the weakest domain in the RC survey, while communication frequency was the strongest, correlating well with our IR data. Linking IR with RC domains offers a novel approach to assessing the specific elements of communication failures with an acute care facility. This approach provides a deployable mechanism to trend intra- and inter-domain progress in communication success, and develop targeted interventions to mitigate against communication failure-related adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caoimhe C Duffy
- Department of Anesthesiology & Critical Care, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Division of Perioperative & Procedural Services, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Gary A Bass
- Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Division of Trauma, Surgical Critical Care and Emergency Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Chris Yura
- Division of Perioperative & Procedural Services, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Malwina Dymek
- Department of Anesthesiology & Critical Care, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Cara Lorenzi
- Division of Perioperative & Procedural Services, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Lewis J Kaplan
- Division of Trauma, Surgical Critical Care and Emergency Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Section of Surgical Critical Care, Corporal Michael Crescencz Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Justin T Clapp
- Department of Anesthesiology & Critical Care, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Joshua H Atkins
- Department of Anesthesiology & Critical Care, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Seastedt KP, Schwab P, O’Brien Z, Wakida E, Herrera K, Marcelo PGF, Agha-Mir-Salim L, Frigola XB, Ndulue EB, Marcelo A, Celi LA. Global healthcare fairness: We should be sharing more, not less, data. PLOS DIGITAL HEALTH 2022; 1:e0000102. [PMID: 36812599 PMCID: PMC9931202 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/16/2023]
Abstract
The availability of large, deidentified health datasets has enabled significant innovation in using machine learning (ML) to better understand patients and their diseases. However, questions remain regarding the true privacy of this data, patient control over their data, and how we regulate data sharing in a way that that does not encumber progress or further potentiate biases for underrepresented populations. After reviewing the literature on potential reidentifications of patients in publicly available datasets, we argue that the cost-measured in terms of access to future medical innovations and clinical software-of slowing ML progress is too great to limit sharing data through large publicly available databases for concerns of imperfect data anonymization. This cost is especially great for developing countries where the barriers preventing inclusion in such databases will continue to rise, further excluding these populations and increasing existing biases that favor high-income countries. Preventing artificial intelligence's progress towards precision medicine and sliding back to clinical practice dogma may pose a larger threat than concerns of potential patient reidentification within publicly available datasets. While the risk to patient privacy should be minimized, we believe this risk will never be zero, and society has to determine an acceptable risk threshold below which data sharing can occur-for the benefit of a global medical knowledge system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenneth P. Seastedt
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Patrick Schwab
- GlaxoSmithKline, Artificial Intelligence & Machine Learning, Zug, Switzerland
| | - Zach O’Brien
- Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre (ANZIC-RC), Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Edith Wakida
- Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda
| | - Karen Herrera
- Quality and Patient Safety, Hospital Militar, Managua, Nicaragua
| | - Portia Grace F. Marcelo
- Department of Family & Community Medicine, University of the Philippines, Manila, Philippines
| | - Louis Agha-Mir-Salim
- Institute of Medical Informatics, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin (corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health), Berlin, Germany
- Laboratory for Computational Physiology, Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences & Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Xavier Borrat Frigola
- Laboratory for Computational Physiology, Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences & Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America
- Anesthesiology and Critical Care Department, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Emily Boardman Ndulue
- Department of Journalism, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Alvin Marcelo
- Department of Surgery, University of the Philippines, Manila, Philippines
| | - Leo Anthony Celi
- Laboratory for Computational Physiology, Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences & Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America
- Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
- Department of Biostatistics Harvard T.H, Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|