What's new in intensive care: disease tolerance

S1PR3 agonism and S1P lyase inhibition rescue mice in the severe state of experimental sepsis

Sepsis is characterized as life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to an infection. Despite numerous clinical trials that addressed this syndrome, there is still no causative treatment available to dampen its severity. Curtailing the infection at an early stage with anti-infectives is the only effective treatment regime besides intensive care. In search for additional treatment options, we recently discovered the inhibition of the sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) lyase and subsequent activation of the S1P receptor type 3 (S1PR3) in pre-conditioning experiments as promising targets for sepsis prevention. Here, we demonstrate that treatment of septic mice with the direct S1P lyase inhibitor C31 or the S1PR3 agonist CYM5541 in the advanced phase of sepsis resulted in a significantly increased survival rate. A single dose of each compound led to a rapid decline of sepsis severity in treated mice and coincided with decreased cytokine release and increased lung barrier function with unaltered bacterial load. The survival benefit of both compounds was completely lost in S1PR3 deficient mice. Treatment of the murine macrophage cell line J774.1 with either C31 or CYM5541 resulted in decreased protein kinase B (Akt) and stress-activated protein kinase/c-Jun N-terminal kinase (SAPK/JNK) phosphorylation without alteration of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) p38 and p44/42 phosphorylation. Thus, activation of S1PR3 in the acute phase of sepsis by direct agonism or S1P lyase inhibition dampened Akt and JNK phosphorylation, resulting in decreased cytokine release, improved lung barrier stability, rapid decline of sepsis severity and better survival in mice.

Epirubicin for the Treatment of Sepsis and Septic Shock (EPOS-1): study protocol for a randomised, placebo-controlled phase IIa dose-escalation trial

INTRODUCTION

Sepsis remains the major cause of death among hospitalised patients in intensive care. While targeting sepsis-causing pathogens with source control or antimicrobials has had a dramatic impact on morbidity and mortality of sepsis patients, this strategy remains insufficient for about one-third of the affected individuals who succumb. Pharmacological targeting of mechanisms that reduce sepsis-defining organ dysfunction may be beneficial. When given at low doses, the anthracycline epirubicin promotes tissue damage control and lessens the severity of sepsis independently of the host-pathogen load by conferring disease tolerance to infection. Since epirubicin at higher doses can be myelotoxic, a first dose-response trial is necessary to assess the potential harm of this drug in this new indication.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Epirubicin for the Treatment of Sepsis and Septic Shock-1 is a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 dose-escalation phase IIa clinical trial to assess the safety of epirubicin as an adjunctive in patients with sepsis. The primary endpoint is the 14-day myelotoxicity. Secondary and explorative outcomes include 30-day and 90-day mortality, organ dysfunction, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) and cytokine release. Patients will be randomised in three consecutive phases. For each study phase, patients are randomised to one of the two study arms (epirubicin or placebo) in a 4:1 ratio. Approximately 45 patients will be recruited. Patients in the epirubicin group will receive a single dose of epirubicin (3.75, 7.5 or 15 mg/m2 depending on the study phase. After each study phase, a data and safety monitoring board will recommend continuation or premature stopping of the trial. The primary analyses for each dose level will report the proportion of myelotoxicity together with a 95% CI. A potential dose-toxicity association will be analysed using a logistic regression model with dose as a covariate. All further analyses will be descriptive.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The protocol is approved by the German Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices. The results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05033808.

Targeting the host response in sepsis: current approaches and future evidence

Sepsis, a dysregulated host response to infection characterized by organ failure, is one of the leading causes of death worldwide. Disbalances of the immune response play an important role in its pathophysiology. Patients may develop simultaneously or concomitantly states of systemic or local hyperinflammation and immunosuppression. Although a variety of effective immunomodulatory treatments are generally available, attempts to inhibit or stimulate the immune system in sepsis have failed so far to improve patients' outcome. The underlying reason is likely multifaceted including failure to identify responders to a specific immune intervention and the complex pathophysiology of organ dysfunction that is not exclusively caused by immunopathology but also includes dysfunction of the coagulation system, parenchymal organs, and the endothelium. Increasing evidence suggests that stratification of the heterogeneous population of septic patients with consideration of their host response might led to treatments that are more effective. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of current studies aimed at optimizing the many facets of host response and to discuss future perspectives for precision medicine approaches in sepsis.