Arthroskopisch assistierte Versorgung lateraler Klavikulafrakturen und akuter Instabilitäten des Schultereckgelenks

Arthroscopically assisted single tunnel reconstruction for acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint dislocation with an additional acromioclavicular joint cerclage

PURPOSE

Purpose of this study was to demonstrate that a single tunnel reconstruction of high-grade acromioclavicular (AC) joint instabilities with implants of the second generation is sufficient for stabilisation, especially in combination with an AC cerclage.

METHODS

Patients with an acute AC-joint dislocation type Rockwood III-B and V were included. Besides clinical follow-up examination, radiographs were analysed. The functional outcome measures were Constant Score (CS), Taft score (TS), ACJI score and patient's satisfaction. Horizontal instability was evaluated by clinical examination and radiological with an Alexander view.

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients with a mean follow-up of 29 months were included. Ninety-seven per cent were satisfied with their result, with an average Subjective Shoulder Value of 90%. The CS averaged at 90 ± 10 points, TS at 11 ± 1 points and ACJI at 78 ± 18 points. Radiologically, 3 of 29 patients (10%) showed a persisting horizontal instability. The coracoclavicular (CC) distance improved from 22 preoperative to 10 mm postoperative, which was comparable to the contralateral side (10 mm, p = 0.103). At follow-up the CC distance increased to 13 mm (p = 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

AC-joint stabilisation with a single tunnel reconstruction using a second-generation implant results in good to excellent clinical results with high patient satisfaction. The additional AC augmentation improves stability in horizontal instable AC-joints and is recommended in all high-grade AC joint stabilisations. Nonetheless, reduction was slightly lost over time due to an elongation or suture failure of the coraco-clavicular fixation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Which lateral clavicle fractures can be treated by an arthroscopic-assisted endobutton procedure? An analysis of risk factors

INTRODUCTION

Arthroscopy-assisted treatment of lateral clavicle fractures with coracoclavicular stabilization and an endobutton device have gained popularity over recent years. There is little evidence to support which types of lateral clavicle fractures are suitable for this treatment. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical und radiological outcomes of this treatment and to identify which fracture types are suitable. The secondary outcome was to evaluate potential risk factors for complications MATERIAL/METHODS: A retrospective single center review of 20 unstable lateral clavicle fractures treated with an arthroscopy-assisted CC stabilization technique and Endobutton device between September 2012 and August 2016. The functional outcome was evaluated using Constant and DASH Scores, VAS and SSV.

RESULTS

Between September 2012 and August 2016, 20 patients were treated using this method (average age 45 years; male: female ratio 14:6). The DASH Score was on average 2.0 (0-9.82) and the Constant Score on average 81.8 points (range 68-93) with an average difference between the affected and the unaffected side of 4.1 points (range 0-15). Six patients had nonunion fractures of which two needed revision.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study shows that arthroscopy-assisted CC stabilization using an endobutton technique delivers good functional results. Highly lateral unstable clavicle fractures seem to be especially suitable for this surgical technique. There was a high number of delayed unions. Analysis of risk factors showed that early mechanical stress, a lateral clavicular fragment larger than 3 cm and a time delay to surgery could be risk factors for nonunions.