Value of albumin dialysis therapy in severe liver insufficiency

Extracorporeal liver support with multipass albumin dialysis or plasmapheresis and filtering systems in acute liver failure

Acute liver failure is a very complex type of disease with a mortality of up to 90%, leading to numerous severe disturbances of the whole organism. Bleeding because of absent synthesis of various coagulation factors and disseminated intravascular coagulation, acute kidney failure, circulatory failure with vasopressor dependence, respiratory failure with adult respiratory distress syndrome, neurological failure up to coma because of hepatic encephalopathy, and a very high risk of infection and sepsis frequently result from the initial state of isolated liver failure. High urgency liver transplantation is a highly efficient therapy if performed in time. However, increasing the rate of spontaneous recovery of the patients' own liver, and reducing the need for liver transplantation is preferable and would further improve the outcome of acute liver failure. Extracorporeal liver support by multipass albumin dialysis or plasmapheresis and filtering systems may offer a possibility to fulfill these aims of therapy. A prospective study in 88 patients with acute liver failure has shown a nonsignificant trend in improvement of survival after acute liver failure by multipass albumin dialysis and filtering. Other retrospective studies have shown benefits in improving hepatic encephalopathy and brain oedema. Further, an increase in the rate of spontaneous recovery of liver function has been described. With regional citrate anticoagulation for multipass albumin dialysis and filtering, the need for systemic anticoagulation - a potentially very harmful measure in these patients - can be eliminated and the rate of filter clotting can extremely effectively be reduced.

Cost-utility of molecular adsorbent recirculating system treatment in acute liver failure

AIM: To determine the short-term cost-utility of molecular adsorbent recirculating system (MARS) treatment in acute liver failure (ALF).

METHODS: A controlled retrospective study was conducted with 90 ALF patients treated with MARS from 2001 to 2005. Comparisons were made with a historical control group of 17 ALF patients treated from 2000 to 2001 in the same intensive care unit (ICU) specializing in liver diseases. The 3-year outcomes and number of liver transplantations were recorded. All direct liver disease-related medical expenses from 6 mo before to 3 years after ICU treatment were determined for 31 MARS patients and 16 control patients. The health-related quality of life (HRQoL) before MARS treatment was estimated by a panel of ICU doctors and after MARS using a mailed 15D (15-dimensional generic health-related quality of life instrument) questionnaire. The HRQoL, cost, and survival data were combined and the incremental cost/quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) was calculated.

RESULTS: In surviving ALF patients, the health-related quality of life after treatmeant was generally high and comparable to the age- and gender-matched general Finnish population. Compared to the controls, the average cost per QALY was considerably lower in the MARS group (64 732€vs 133 858€) within a timeframe of 3.5 years. The incremental cost of standard medical treatment alone compared to MARS was 10 928€, and the incremental number of QALYs gained by MARS was 0.66.

CONCLUSION: MARS treatment combined with standard medical treatment for ALF in an ICU setting is more cost-effective than standard medical treatment alone.

Liver transplantation avoided in patients with fulminant hepatic failure who received albumin dialysis with the molecular adsorbent recirculating system while on the waiting list: impact of the duration of therapy

Eighteen patients with fulminant hepatic failure due to various medical causes were listed for emergency liver transplantation and treated with extracorporeal albumin dialysis sessions using the molecular adsorbent recirculating system (MARS) at our center over a 74-month period. Due to improvement of liver function, transplantation could be avoided in 9 patients (50%, 95% confidence interval 29% to 71%) who fully recovered afterwards. This improvement rate was higher than the rate of improvement in the French cohort of fulminant hepatic failure patients with similar etiologies (19.3%, 95% confidence interval 14.9% to 24.6%, P = 0.002). In our 18 patients, there were no statistically significant differences in any baseline characteristics or in the time with liver failure meeting transplant criteria between the patients who improved while waiting and those who did not. However, the patients who improved received a greater number of sessions and a longer total duration of MARS therapy (all P < 0.001). In the whole study population, a MARS therapy duration > or =15 h was significantly associated with improvement of liver function without transplantation (adjusted adds ratio [OR] 65.76, 2.48-1743.11, P = 0.01). Tolerance of therapy was acceptable. These results suggest that MARS therapy could contribute to native liver recovery and is safe in patients on the waiting list for fulminant hepatic failure. A minimum duration of therapy (> or =15 h) could be necessary to expect significant liver function improvement.

Survival predictors in patients treated with a molecular adsorbent recirculating system

AIM: To identify prognostic factors for survival in patients with liver failure treated with a molecular adsorbent recirculating system (MARS).

METHODS: MARS is a liver-assisting device that has been used in the treatment of liver failure to enable native liver recovery, and as a bridge to liver transplantation (LTX). We analyzed the 1-year outcomes of 188 patients treated with MARS, from 2001 to 2007, in an intensive care unit specializing in liver disease. Demographic, clinical and laboratory parameters were recorded before and after each treatment. One-year survival and the number of LTXs were recorded. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine factors predicting survival.

RESULTS: The study included 113 patients with acute liver failure (ALF), 62 with acute-on-chronic liver failure (AOCLF), 11 with graft failure (GF), and six with miscellaneous liver failure. LTX was performed for 29% of patients with ALF, 18% with AOCLF and 55% with GF. The overall 1-year survival rate was 74% for ALF, 27% for AOCLF, and 73% for GF. The poorest survival rate, 6%, was noted in non-transplanted patients with alcohol-related AOCLF and cirrhosis, whereas, patients with enlarged and steatotic liver had 55% survival. The etiology of liver failure was the most important predictor of survival (P < 0.0001). Other prognostic factors were encephalopathy (P = 0.001) in paracetamol-related ALF, coagulation factors (P = 0.049) and encephalopathy (P = 0.064) in non-paracetamol-related toxic ALF, and alanine aminotransferase (P = 0.013) and factor V levels (P = 0.022) in ALF of unknown etiology.

CONCLUSION: The etiology of liver disease was the most important prognostic factor. MARS treatment appears to be ineffective in AOCLF with end-stage cirrhosis without an LTX option.

Albumin dialysis has a favorable effect on amino acid profile in hepatic encephalopathy

According to one popular theory, hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is partly caused by an imbalance in plasma amino acid levels. The Fischer's ratio between branched chain amino acids (BCAAs) and aromatic amino acids (AAAs) correlates with the degree of HE; the lower Fischer's ratio, the higher the grade of HE. Extra-corporeal liver support systems, like MARS(R)-albumin dialysis (Molecular Adsorbents Recirculating System), can improve HE. The MARS(R) system uses a hyperosmolar albumin circuit to remove both water-soluble and albumin-bound substances. Plasma levels of neuroactive amino acids were analyzed in 82 consecutive patients with life-threatening liver failure admitted to our ICU. All patients fulfilled our indications for MARS treatment and most also fulfilled the criteria for liver transplantation (LTx). In patients with acute liver failure (ALF), as compared to those with acute decompensation of chronic liver failure (AcOChr), levels of leucine and isoleucine were significantly higher before MARS(R) treatment. In all patients, before MARS(R) treatment the higher the grade of HE grade the lower was the Fischer's ratio and higher were the levels of inhibitory neuroactive amino acids. During MARS(R) treatments the Fischer's ratio increased, and the grade of HE decreased. The increase in Fischer's ratio was mainly due to the decrease in AAAs. The plasma levels of neuroactive amino acids, methionine, glutamine, glutamate, histidine and taurine decreased during MARS(R)-treatment. In this study MARS(R)-albumin dialysis had a favorable effect on the plasma amino acid profile of patients with HE.

The effect of molecular adsorbent recirculating system treatment on survival, native liver recovery, and need for liver transplantation in acute liver failure patients

Acute liver failure (ALF) is a medical emergency. Molecular adsorbent recirculating system (MARS), an artificial liver support system, can partly compensate for the detoxifying function of the liver by removing toxins from blood. To analyze the efficacy of MARS treatment, the outcomes of 113 ALF patients, treated with MARS between 2001 and 2007, were compared with a historical control group of 46 ALF patients treated without MARS between 1995 and 2001. Overall survival of transplanted patients was 94% in the MARS group and 77% in the control group (P=0.06). Without transplantation, survival was 66% and 40% (P=0.03), respectively. However, the etiological distribution of ALF differed significantly between the groups. In ALF patients with unknown etiology, groups were comparable at baseline; 91% and 69% of transplanted patients survived the MARS and control groups and the native liver recovered in 20% and 8% of the patients, respectively. Of the originally nonencephalopathic patients of unknown etiology, 36% underwent liver transplantation in the MARS group compared to 100% in the control group. Interpretation of the results was difficult in toxic etiology patients on account of differing baseline statuses. MARS treatment might partly explain the trend toward increased survival of ALF patients with unknown etiology.

Cytokine profiles in acute liver failure treated with albumin dialysis

Cytokines are released within the liver in response to hepatic injury, and acute liver failure (ALF) triggers systemic inflammation. Pro-inflammatory (tumor necrosis factor-alpha [TNF-alpha] and interleukin-8 [IL-8]) and anti-inflammatory (interleukin-10 [IL-10] and interleukin-6 [IL-6]) cytokines and the lymphocyte activation marker (interleukin-2-soluble receptor alpha chain [IL-2sRalpha]) were monitored in 49 ALF patients considered for liver transplantation and treated with albumin dialysis (molecular adsorbent recirculating system [MARS]). Twenty-six patients were categorized by clinical outcome as "good" (native liver recovered) and 23 as "poor" (patient bridged to liver transplantation or deceased). MARS did not clearly affect cytokine profiles during treatment; only IL-10 levels decreased in the whole patient population and mostly in patients with the worst prognosis. In the good outcome group, IL-8 and IL-6 levels decreased during treatment; on the contrary, in poor outcome patients IL-6 levels even increased. Initial IL-2sRalpha levels were higher in poor outcome patients relative to the good outcome subset. Cytokine profiles seem to differ in ALF according to patient outcome. A deeper understanding of cytokine patterns during pathogenesis could reveal prognostic markers and aid the development of immunomodulating ALF therapies.

The therapeutical efficiency of the newest extracorporal elimination procedure (Prometheus® treatment) in acute liver failure caused by intoxication

Az akut májelégtelenség mortalitása az intenzív terápia ellenére májtranszplantáció nélkül 60–90%. Az átültethető szervek korlátozott száma miatt azonban a betegek jelentős része a várólistán exitál. A mortalitás csökkentése érdekében számos próbálkozás történt a májelégtelenségben felhalmozódó albuminhoz kötött és vízoldékony méreganyagok eltávolítására, elősegítve ezzel a máj spontán regenerációját, illetve a beteg életben tartását a májtranszplantációig. A Prometheus®-kezelés egy viszonylag új technika, a frakcionált plazmaszeparáció és -adszorpció (FPSA) és egy high-flux dialízis kombinációja. Az eljárás során a beteg saját, szeparált, albuminban gazdag plazmája speciális adszorbereken halad keresztül, lehetővé téve az albuminhoz kötött toxinok eliminációját, miközben a vízoldékony toxinok eltávolítása hemodialízissel történik. Célkitűzés: A szerzők szándéka az volt, hogy a Prometheus®-kezelés hatékonyságát igazolják mérgezés okozta akut májelégtelenségben. Betegek és módszer: A Prometheus®-kezelést három, konzervatív kezeléssel nem uralható akut májelégtelenségben szenvedő, súlyos, paracetamol-, káliumpermanganát- és Amanita phalloides-mérgezett beteg esetében alkalmazták. Eredmények: A három nőbetegnél 10 kezelés történt. Súlyos szövődményt nem észleltek. A kezelések során az albuminhoz kötött (indirekt bilirubin p = 0,048; epesav p = 0,001) és a vízoldékony (direkt bilirubin p = 0,002; kreatinin p = 0,007) toxinok szignifikáns csökkenését tapasztalták. Az ammónia, a karbamid, a fibrinogén és az antitrombin III szint szignifikánsan nem változott. Mindhárom beteg májtranszplantáció nélkül meggyógyult. Következtetés: A Prometheus®-kezelés hatékonyan távolítja el az akut májelégtelenségben akkumulálódó toxinokat. Biztonságos eljárás. Konzervatív terápiával nem uralható esetekben lehetővé teszi a beteg életben tartását a máj spontán regenerációjáig vagy a májtranszplantációig.

Modern management of acute liver failure

Liver transplantation has revolutionized the management of acute or fulminant liver failure. Overall success rates of liver transplantation are satisfactory, although not as high as for elective transplantation. Although the bulk of liver transplants use standard whole grafts, interesting data are emerging on auxiliary liver grafts and donations from living donors. Liver transplantation is an integral part of management protocols complementing the sophisticated critical care protocols that have contributed significantly to the overall improved outcomes seen in acute liver failure. The potential for liver support devices to have an impact on the need for liver transplantation and outcomes after transplantation remains exciting.

Albumin dialysis has no clear effect on cytokine levels in patients with life-threatening liver insufficiency

Cytokines play a important role in life-threatening liver insufficiency. They are released within the liver in response to hepatic injury and inflammation. To study cytokine clearance during albumin dialysis treatment (Molecular Adsorbent Recirculating System [MARS]), we monitored proinflammatory (tumor necrosis factor alpha [TNF-alpha] and interleukin-8 [IL-8]) and anti-inflammatory (IL-10 and IL-6) cytokines and the lymphocyte activation marker IL-2sRalpha in 81 consecutive ICU patients displaying serious hepatic decompensation. Cytokine levels were measured before treatment and after the last MARS treatment in 49 acute liver failure (ALF) and 32 acute decompensation of chronic liver disease (AcOChr) patients who were mainly considered for liver transplantation. No significant change in cytokines was observed before versus after the last MARS treatment in the AcOChr group, and only IL-10 decreased significantly in the ALF group. Baseline levels of IL-8 and IL-6 were significantly lower and IL-10 was higher in the ALF group compared with those in the AcOChr group. TNF-alpha and IL-2sRalpha levels did not differ between the groups. After treatment, IL-8 was also significantly lower in ALF patients compared with the levels in AcOChr patients. In this study, MARS therapy did not show a clearly identifiable efficacy at removing circulating cytokines. However, the results revealed that ALF and AcOChr patients displayed different profiles of circulating cytokines.

MARS in the treatment of liver failure: controversies and evidence

Molecular Adsorbent Recirculation System (MARS) is a form of extracorporeal detoxification system used as an artificial liver support system. Numerous studies have been published on the topic, with the majority of them describing the capability of MARS in removing albumin-bound toxins and improving systemic hemodynamics. Whether such improvement could be translated into survival benefit is still uncertain, given the paucity of randomized controlled trials available. The outcome of patients receiving MARS treatment is difficult to analyze because liver failure patients constitute a heterogeneous population and different subgroups carry different prognoses. An evidence-based recommendation on the timing of MARS initiation is not available and currently MARS is usually commenced for hyperbilirubinemia or presence of complications of liver failure. MARS is in general a safe procedure, but there are still potential complications that need to be cautioned, along with various operative issues that are worth attention. The future prospects of MARS would rely on the completion of adequately powered randomized controlled trials.

Molecular adsorbent recirculating system dialysis in patients with acute liver failure who are assessed for liver transplantation

OBJECTIVE

To assess the usefulness of dialysis with the molecular adsorbent recirculating system (MARS) in patients with acute liver failure who fulfil criteria for liver transplantation.

DESIGN

Observational cohort study.

SETTING

ICU at a liver transplantation centre.

PATIENTS

Twenty-two patients (23 episodes) received MARS dialysis. They were either listed for LT (n=14), delayed (n=1), or not listed (contra-indication, n=7).

INTERVENTIONS

A total of 56 MARS treatments (median per patient 2; mean duration 7.6+/-2.6h) were performed on haemodialysis.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Clinical and biological variables were assessed before and 24[Symbol: see text]h after MARS therapy. The rate of recovery of liver function without transplantation was compared with an expected rate and survival was analysed. Following MARS dialysis, we observed an improvement in the grade of hepatic encephalopathy (P=0.02) and the Glasgow coma score (P=0.02), a decrease in conjugated bilirubin (P=0.05) and INR (P=0.006), and an increase in prothrombin index (P=0.005). Overall, liver function improved in seven patients (32%): four listed patients in whom transplantation could be avoided and three patients among those not listed due to contra-indications. The transplant-free recovery rate in listed patients was 29% (vs. expected 9%, P=0.036). Listed patients (n=14) had a higher 30-day survival rate [86% (12/14) vs 38% (3/8), P=0.05] and a higher long-term survival rate (P=0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

A statistically significant improvement of liver function was observed after MARS therapy. Transplant-free recovery was more frequent than expected. The apparent benefit of MARS dialysis to treat acute liver failure needs to be confirmed by a controlled study.

Molecular adsorbent recirculating system (MARS) application in liver failure: clinical and hemodepurative results in 22 patients

PURPOSE

Acute liver failure (ALF) and acute on chronic liver failure (ACLF) still show a poor prognosis. MARS was used in 22 patients with ALF or ACLF to prolong patient survival for liver function recovery or as a bridge to transplantation.

DESIGN

Evaluation of depurative efficiency, biocompatibility, hemodynamics, encephalopathy (HE) and clinical outcome.

PROCEDURES

During 71 five-hour sessions we evaluated (0', 60', 120', 180', 240', 300'): bilirubin, ammonia, cholic acid (CCA), chenodeoxycholic acid (CCDCA), leukocytes, platelets, hemoglobin and mean arterial pressure (MAP). Serum creatinine, electrolytes, cardiac output, cardiac index (bioimpedence) and HE (West Haven Criteria score) were evaluated at 0' and 300'. STATISTICAL METHODS AND OUTCOME MEASURES: Student's t-test for pre- vs. end-session values was used. For bilirubin and ammonia the correlation test was made between pre- and end-session values and between pre-session values and removal rates (RRS).

MAIN FINDINGS

Survival was 90.9% at 7 days, 40.9% at 30 days. Pre- vs. end-session: bilirubin from 37.2 +/- 12.5 mg/dL to 24.9 +/- 8.9 mg/dL (p < 0.01), ammonia from 88.0 +/- 60.4 micromol/L to 43.6 +/- 32.9 micromol/L (p < 0.01), CCA from 42.8 +/- 21.0 micromol/L 18.2 +/- 9.8 micromol/L (p < 0.01), CCDCA from 26.3 +/- 6.3 micromol/L to 15.7+/-7.6 micromol/L (p<0.01). The correlation test between pre-session values of bilirubin and ammonia vs. RR S was respectively 0.32 (p = 0.01) and 0.30 (p = 0.04). Leukocytes, platelets and hemoglobin remained stable. MAP increased from 82.0 +/- 12.0 mmHg to 87.0 +/- 13.0 mmHg (p < 0.05), West Haven Criteria score decreased from 2.7 +/- 0.7 to 0.7 +/- 0.7 (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

MARS treatment led in all patients to an improvement of clinical, hemodynamic and neurological conditions, with significant reduction in the hepatic toxins blood level. Treatment biocompatibility and tolerance were satisfactory.

Molecular adsorbent recirculating system treatment for patients with liver failure: the Hong Kong experience

BACKGROUND

The molecular adsorbent recirculating system (MARS) is an extracorporeal liver dialysis system that allows selective removal of bilirubin and other albumin-bound toxins. We reported here our experience with the use of this technique for management of liver failure at Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong.

METHODS

From December 2002 to 2004, a total of 74 MARS sessions were performed on 22 patients. The cause of liver failure included acute liver failure (n = 2), acute on chronic liver failure (n = 12), posthepatectomy liver failure (n = 4), and posttransplantation allograft failure (n = 4).

RESULTS

MARS treatment showed significant reduction in total bilirubin level, serum ammonia level and blood urea, and nitrogen (P < 0.001 for all three parameters). Five patients (22.7%) were able to bridge to transplantation and one patient (4.5%) made a spontaneous recovery. The 30-day mortality rate was 72.7%.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicated that MARS can effectively improve serum biochemistry and is suitable for temporarily supporting patients with liver failure where transplantation is not immediately available. There is, however, no clear evidence showing that MARS can increase survival, improve the chance of transplantation or assist liver regeneration. Future studies in the form of randomized-controlled trials are crucial to characterize the true potential of this treatment.

Personal view: current role of artificial liver support devices

Enthusiasm for liver support devices, particularly cell-based biological systems and albumin dialysis, increased over the last decade and there has been considerable clinical activity both within and without the construct of clinical trials. Most data have been generated on patients with acute liver failure or in patients with decompensation of chronic liver disease, often referred to as acute-on-chronic liver failure. In acute liver failure liver, liver support devices are more realistically being used as a 'bridge' to liver transplantation rather than to transplant-free survival. In acute-on-chronic liver failure the clinical objective of attaining clinical stability with treatment appears more achievable. The so-called bioartificial liver device, based on porcine hepatocytes, is the most extensively evaluated biological device. A sizeable clinical trial failed to demonstrate efficacy, but secondary analyses suggest it would be unwise to assume futility had been established with this device. Molecular adsorbent recirculating system leads the way in the non-biological category in terms of the number of patients treated, but data from large clinical trials are not yet available. One of the strongest conclusions of this review is that the amount of high-quality data available on liver support devices dramatically understates the effort and money that have been expended in their assessment. It is very clear that randomized controlled trials are mandatory to establish clinical efficacy, but it is less clear how the ideal trial should be constructed.