CMV infection detected in the upper gastrointestinal tract after liver transplantation

Update on cytomegalovirus infections of the gastrointestinal system in solid organ transplant recipients

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection of the gastrointestinal tract is the most common manifestation of tissue-invasive CMV disease, and is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in the solid organ transplantation (SOT) recipient. In addition to the direct effects of the infection, its indirect effects on allograft function, risk for other opportunistic infections, and mortality are significant in this population. The most common clinical syndromes are esophagitis, colitis, and hepatitis; however, infection can occur anywhere in the gastrointestinal tract. Diagnosis is usually by histopathology or viral culture of tissue specimens; molecular assays also often have a role. Antivirals are the cornerstone of therapy for gastrointestinal tract CMV disease and complications such as recurrent infection and antiviral resistance are not uncommon. Prevention with antiviral prophylaxis or preemptive therapy is important. This review summarizes recent data regarding the clinical manifestations, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of gastrointestinal tract CMV infection in the SOT population.

Endoscopic diagnosis of cytomegalovirus infection of upper gastrointestinal tract in solid organ transplant recipients: Hungarian single-center experience

BACKGROUND

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is considered to be the major cause of upper gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms in organ transplant recipients. In the diagnosis of GI CMV infection the detection of the virus in the mucosa is essential. The aim of the study was to evaluate the significance of CMV, detected in biopsy specimens from stomach and duodenum of solid organ transplant recipients.

METHODS

Data of 227 elective upper endoscopies on symptomatic organ transplant recipients were evaluated for clinical symptoms, endoscopic changes and conventional histologic alterations of mucosal biopsy samples. Qualitative PCR was performed for detection of the presence of CMV-DNA in each biopsy materials.

RESULTS

CMV-DNA was detected in biopsy samples of 91 patients (40.1%) while only in 20 cases (8.8%) the signs of CMV infections were found by conventional histology (p < 0.00001). No considerable differences could be observed in symptomatic, histologic alterations between CMV-PCR positive and negative groups. There were no endoscopic changes in 25.3% of CMV-PCR positive and 5.1% of negative patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Qualitative PCR is an accurate method for the detection of CMV in the mucosa of the GI tract. Further investigations are needed for determination of the exact pathological role of detected CMV.