Sirolimus improves the two-year outcome of renal allografts in African-American patients

Sirolimus and mTOR Inhibitors: A Review of Side Effects and Specific Management in Solid Organ Transplantation

Inhibitors of mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR inhibitors) are used as antiproliferative immunosuppressive drugs and have many clinical applications in various drug combinations. Experience in transplantation studies has been gained regarding the side effect profile of these drugs and the potential benefits and limitations compared with other immunosuppressive agents. This article reviews the adverse effects of mTOR inhibitors in solid organ transplantation, with special attention given to mechanisms hypothesized to cause adverse events and their management strategies.

Pharmacist-Led, Technology-Assisted Study to Improve Medication Safety, Cardiovascular Risk Factor Control, and Racial Disparities in Kidney Transplant Recipients

Introduction

Health disparities in African-American (AA) kidney transplant recipients compared with non-AA recipients are well established. Cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk control is a significant mediator of this disparity.

Objective

To assess the efficacy of improved medication safety, CVD risk control, and racial disparities in kidney transplant recipients.

Methods

Prospective, pharmacist-led, technology-aided, 6-month interventional clinical trial. A total of 60 kidney recipients with diabetes and hypertension were enrolled. Patients had to be at least one-year post transplant with stable graft function. Primary outcome measured included hypertension, diabetes, and lipid control using intent-to-treat analyses, with differences assessed between AA and non-AA recipients.

Results

The participants mean age was 59 years, with 42% being female and 68% being AA. Overall, patients demonstrated improvements in blood pressure <140/90 mmHg (baseline 50% vs. end of study 68%, p=0.054) and hemoglobin A1c <7% (baseline 33% vs. end of study 47%, p=0.061). AAs demonstrated a significant reduction from baseline in systolic blood pressure (-0.86 mmHg per month, p=0.026), which was not evident in non-AAs (-0.13 mmHg per month, p=0.865). Mean HgbA1c decreased from baseline in the overall group (-0.12% per month, p=0.003), which was similar within AAs (-0.11% per month, p=0.004) and non-AAs (-0.14% per month, p=0.029). There were no changes in low-density lipoproteins, triglycerides, or high-density lipoproteins over the course of the study. Medication errors were significantly reduced and self-reported medication adherence significantly improved over the course of the study.

Conclusion

These results demonstrate the potential efficacy of a pharmacist-led, technology-aided, educational intervention in improving medication safety, diabetes, and hypertension and reducing racial disparities in AA kidney transplant recipients. (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02763943).

Improving Medication Safety and Cardiovascular Risk Factor Control to Mitigate Disparities in African-American Kidney Transplant Recipients: Design and Methods

There is a lack of data analyzing the influence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factor control on graft survival disparities in African-American kidney transplant recipients. Studies in the general population indicate that CVD risk factor control is poor in African-Americans, leading to higher rates of renal failure and major acute cardiovascular events. However, with the exception of hypertension, there is no data demonstrating similar results within transplant recipients. Recent analyses conducted by our investigator group indicate that CVD risk factors, especially diabetes, are poorly controlled in African-American recipients, which likely impacts graft loss. This study protocol describes a prospective interventional clinical trial with the goal of demonstrating improved medication safety and CVD risk factor control in adult solitary kidney transplant recipients at least one-year post-transplant with a functioning graft. This is a prospective, interventional, 6-month, pharmacist-led and technology enabled study in adult kidney transplant recipients with the goal of improving CVD risk factor outcomes by improving medication safety and patient self-efficacy. This papers describes the issues related to racial disparities in transplant, the details of this intervention and how we expect this intervention to improve CVD risk factor control in kidney transplant recipients, particularly within African-Americans.

Transplant Center Variability in Disparities for African-American Kidney Transplant Recipients

Background

Disparities research has traditionally focused on patient-level variables to ascertain predominant risk factors driving differences in outcomes for African-American (AA) kidney transplant recipients. Our objectives were to determine the magnitude and impact of transplant center variability for graft outcome disparities.

Material/Methods

This was a retrospective cohort study analyzing 25 years of U.S. national transplant registry data at both the patient and center levels using univariate descriptive statistics and multivariable modeling.

Results

A total of 257,024 recipients from 191 centers were analyzed; AAs represented 31.1% of recipients. After adjusting for baseline characteristics, AAs had 42% higher risk of graft loss (aHR 1.42, 95% CI 1.39 to 1.45; p<0.001). Center variability for graft outcome disparities in AAs was significant (race*center interaction term p<0.05), with the aHRs ranging from 0.5 to 4.9; 46% of centers demonstrated a non-statistically significant disparity (aHR p>0.05) and 25% of centers had a large AA disparity (aHR >1.75). In a more recent transplant time period (2000–14), overall racial disparities decreased but center-level disparities increased in variability. Center-level factors significantly associated with increasing disparity included higher acute rejection rates, fewer transplants per year, longer length of stay, lower use of calcineurin inhibitors (CNI), and lower living donor rates.

Conclusions

There is evidence of significant center-level variability in graft outcome disparities for AA kidney recipients. Further, there appears to be a number of center-level factors associated with this variability, including acute rejection rates, CNI use, number of transplants per year, and, in recent years, low living donor rates.

Twenty years of evolving trends in racial disparities for adult kidney transplant recipients

Disparities in outcomes for African American (AA) kidney transplant recipients have persisted for 40 years without a comprehensive analysis of evolving trends in the risks associated with this disparity. Here we analyzed U.S. transplant registry data, which included adult Caucasian or AA solitary kidney recipients undergoing transplantation between 1990 and 2009 comprising 202,085 transplantations. During this 20-year period, the estimated rate of 5-year graft loss decreased from 27.6% to 12.8%. Notable trends in baseline characteristics that significantly differed by race over time included the following: increased prevalence of diabetes from 2001 to 2009 in AAs (5-year slope difference: 3.4%), longer time on the waiting list (76.5 more days per 5 years in AAs), fewer living donors in AAs from 2003 to 2009 (5-year slope difference: -3.36%), more circulatory death donors in AAs from 2000-09 (5-year slope difference: 1.78%), and a slower decline in delayed graft function in AAs (5-year slope difference: 0.85%). The absolute risk difference between AAs and Caucasians for 5-year graft loss significantly declined over time (-0.92% decrease per 5 years), whereas the relative risk difference actually significantly increased (3.4% increase per 5 years). These results provide a mixed picture of both promising and concerning trends in disparities for AA kidney transplant recipients. Thus, although the disparity for graft loss has significantly improved, equity is still far off, and other disparities, including living donation rates and delayed graft function rates, have widened during this time.

Impact of Cardiovascular Risk Factors on Graft Outcome Disparities in Black Kidney Transplant Recipients

Although outcome inequalities for non-Hispanic black (NHB) kidney transplant recipients are well documented, there is paucity in data assessing the impact of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors on this disparity in kidney transplantation. This was a longitudinal study of a national cohort of veteran kidney recipients transplanted between January 2001 and December 2007. Data included baseline characteristics acquired through the United States Renal Data System linked to detailed clinical follow-up information acquired through the Veterans Affairs electronic health records. Analyses were conducted using sequential multivariable modeling (Cox regression), incorporating blocks of variables into iterative nested models; 3139 patients were included (2095 non-Hispanic whites [66.7%] and 1044 NHBs [33.3%]). NHBs had a higher prevalence of hypertension (100% versus 99%; P<0.01) and post-transplant diabetes mellitus (59% versus 53%; P<0.01) with reduced control of hypertension (blood pressure <140/90 60% versus 69%; P<0.01), diabetes mellitus (A1c <7%, 35% versus 47%; P<0.01), and low-density lipoprotein (<100 mg/dL, 55% versus 61%; P<0.01). Adherence to medications used to manage CVD risk was significantly lower in NHBs. In the fully adjusted models, the independent risk of graft loss in NHBs was substantially reduced (unadjusted hazard ratio, 2.00 versus adjusted hazard ratio, 1.49). CVD risk factors and control reduced the influence of NHB race by 9% to 18%. Similar trends were noted for mortality, and estimates were robust across in sensitivity analyses. These results demonstrate that NHB kidney transplant recipients have significantly higher rates of CVD risk factors and reduced CVD risk control. These issues are likely partly related to medication nonadherence and meaningfully contribute to racial disparities for graft outcomes.

Reviewing 15 years of experience with sirolimus

Here, we review 15 years of clinical use of sirolimus in our transplant center, in context with the developing immunosuppressive strategies use worldwide. The majority of studies were conducted in de novo kidney transplant recipients, using sirolimus (SRL) in combination with calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs). We also explored steroid (ST) or CNI-sparing therapies, including CNI minimization, elimination, or conversion strategies in combination with mycophenolate (MMF/MPS). Pooled long-term outcomes were comparable with those obtained with CNI and antimetabolite combination. Surprisingly, there are still several areas that need further investigation to improve the risk/benefit profile of SRL in kidney transplantation, including pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic drug-to-drug interaction with cyclosporine (CsA) or tacrolimus (TAC), mechanisms of SRL-associated adverse reactions and combinations with other drugs such as belatacept and once-daily TAC, possibly leading to improved long-term adherence. These studies, along with others investigating the benefits of SRL associated lower viral infections and malignancies, are essential as we do not expect the introduction of new immunosuppressive drugs in the near future.

Racial comparisons of everolimus pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in adult kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

There is limited data analyzing the pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) properties of everolimus (EVR) between African Americans and Caucasians. The purpose of this study was to determine and compare the EVR PKs and concentration-associated efficacy and toxicity in African American and Caucasian adult kidney transplant recipients.

METHODS

This was a retrospective PK and PD analysis of all patients who received EVR at the Medical University of South Carolina Transplant Center between 2006 and 2012.

RESULTS

Forty-three patients received EVR (22 African Americans, 21 Caucasians). Baseline demographics, immunosuppression, and immunologic risk were similar between races, except for preexisting hypertension, deceased donor type, and cold ischemic time, which were higher in African American patients. PK analysis revealed that African American patients received higher initial EVR doses (2.1 ± 0.8 versus 1.6 ± 0.6 mg/d, P = 0.036), leading to higher early EVR concentrations (EVR >6 ng/mL during the first 60 days: 36% versus 10%, P = 0.037). Efficacy analysis demonstrated similar EVR effects on acute rejection rates (9% versus 10%, P = 0.961), chronic allograft changes (18% versus 14%, P = 0.729), and renal function, with both groups having improved creatinine clearance with EVR therapy (ΔeGFR: 27 versus 12 mL·min·1.73 m). Toxicity analysis demonstrated that African American patients had a trend toward higher rates of EVR discontinuation (46% versus 19%, P = 0.065) and significantly more diarrhea/gastrointestinal intolerance (73% versus 38%, P = 0.022).

CONCLUSIONS

These results demonstrate EVR therapy is effective at preventing rejection and improving graft function in both African American and Caucasian adult renal transplant patients. Conflicting with previous mammalian target of rapamycin PK/PD analyses in African American patients, this study cohort demonstrated higher early EVR levels in the African American patients.

Significant racial differences in the key factors associated with early graft loss in kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

There is continued and significant debate regarding the salient etiologies associated with graft loss and racial disparities in kidney transplant recipients.

METHODS

This was a longitudinal cohort study of all adult kidney transplant recipients, comparing patients with early graft loss (<5 years) to those with graft longevity (surviving graft with at least 5 years of follow-up) across racial cohorts [African-American (AA) and non-AA] to discern risk factors.

RESULTS

524 patients were included, 55% AA, 151 with early graft loss (29%) and 373 with graft longevity (71%). Consistent within both races, early graft loss was significantly associated with disability income [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 2.2, 95% CI 1.1-4.5], Kidney Donor Risk Index (AOR 3.2, 1.4-7.5), rehospitalization (AOR 2.1, 1.0-4.4) and acute rejection (AOR 4.4, 1.7-11.6). Unique risk factors in AAs included Medicare-only insurance (AOR 8.0, 2.3-28) and BK infection (AOR 5.6, 1.3-25). Unique protective factors in AAs included cardiovascular risk factor control: AAs with a mean systolic blood pressure <150 mm Hg had 80% lower risk of early graft loss (AOR 0.2, 0.1-0.7), while low-density lipoprotein <100 mg/dl (AOR 0.4, 0.2-0.8), triglycerides <150 mg/dl (AOR 0.4, 0.2-1.0) and hemoglobin A1C <7% (AOR 0.2, 0.1-0.6) were also protective against early graft loss in AA, but not in non-AA recipients.

CONCLUSIONS

AA recipients have a number of unique risk factors for early graft loss, suggesting that controlling cardiovascular comorbidities may be an important mechanism to reduce racial disparities in kidney transplantation.

African American kidney transplantation survival: the ability of immunosuppression to balance the inherent pre- and post-transplant risk factors

Among organ transplant recipients, the African American population historically has received special attention. This is because secondary to their disposition to certain disease states, for example hypertension, an African American patient has a propensity to reach end-stage renal disease and require renal replacement earlier than a Caucasian patient. Regardless of the initiative to replace dialysis therapy with organ transplantation, the African American patient has many barriers to kidney transplantation, thus extending their time on dialysis and waiting time on the organ transplant list. These factors are among the many negative causes of decreased kidney graft survival, realized before kidney transplantation. Unfortunately, once the African American recipient receives a kidney graft, the literature documents that many post-transplant barriers exist which limit successful outcomes. The primary post-transplant barrier relates to designing proper immunosuppression protocols. The difficulty in designing protocols revolves around (i) altered genetic metabolism/lower absorption, (ii) increased immuno-active cytokines and (iii) detrimental effects of noncompliance. Based on the literature, dosing of immunosuppression must be aggressive and requires a diligent practitioner. Research has indicated that, despite some success with proven levels of immunosuppression, the African American recipient usually requires a higher 'dose per weight' regimen. However, even with aggressive immunosuppressant dosing, African Americans still have worse outcomes than Caucasian recipients. Additionally, many of the targeted sites of action that immunosuppression exerts its effects on have been found to be amplified in the African American population. Finally, noncompliance is the most discouraging inhibitor of long-term success in organ transplantation. The consequences of noncompliance are biased by ethnicity and affect the African American population more severely. All of these factors are discussed further in this review in the hope of identifying an ideal healthcare model for caring for the African American transplant recipient, from diagnosing chronic kidney disease through to successful kidney graft outcomes. An indepth review of the literature is described and organized in a fashion that highlights all of the issues affecting success in African Americans. The compilation of the literature in this review will enable the reader to get closer to understanding the caveats of kidney transplantation in the African American patient, but falls short of delivering an actual 'equation' for post-transplant care in an African American kidney recipient.

Use of sirolimus in solid organ transplantation

Sirolimus is a mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor that inhibits cell cycle progression and has proven to be a potent immunosuppressive agent for use in solid organ transplant recipients. The drug was initially studied as an adjunct to ciclosporin (cyclosporine) to prevent acute rejection in kidney transplant recipients. Subsequent studies have shown efficacy when combined with a variety of other immunosuppressive agents. The most common adverse effects of sirolimus are hyperlipidaemia and myelosuppression. The drug has unique antiatherogenic and antineoplastic properties, and may promote immunological tolerance and reduce the incidence of chronic allograft nephropathy. Although sirolimus is relatively non-nephrotoxic when administered as monotherapy, it pharmacodynamically enhances the toxicity of calcineurin inhibitors. Ironically, the drug has been used to facilitate calcineurin inhibitor-free protocols designed to preserve renal function after solid organ transplantation. Whether sirolimus can be used safely over the long term with low doses of calcineurin inhibitors requires further study. The use of sirolimus as a corticosteroid-sparing agent also remains to be proven in controlled trials. Postmarketing studies have revealed a number of unforeseen adverse effects including impaired wound healing and possibly proteinuria, oedema, pneumonitis and thrombotic microangiopathy. Overall, sirolimus is a powerful agent when used judiciously with other available immunosuppressants. As is true for all immunosuppressive drugs available for treatment of solid organ transplant recipients, the efficacy of the drug must be balanced against its considerable adverse effects.

Clinical application of sirolimus in renal transplantation: an update

In addition to an analysis of the final results of phase I/II and phase III clinical trials of sirolimus (SRL), this review focuses on the recent results of several studies in renal transplantation, which include diverse combinations of SRL with other immunosuppressive agents. While SRL was initially introduced as an adjunctive agent to calcineurin inhibitors, it is now serving as the base for therapies that spare or avoid these nephrotoxic drugs. However, to optimize the use of SRL as base therapy, further work is necessary to determine target concentrations, requirement for concomitant steroids and/or nucleoside synthesis blockers, and countermeasure therapy to overcome the drug's adverse effects.

African-American renal transplant recipients benefit from early corticosteroid withdrawal under modern immunosuppression

African-Americans (AAs) have historically been considered high-risk renal transplant recipients due to increased rejection rates and reduced long-term graft survival. As a result, AAs are often excluded from corticosteroid withdrawal (CSWD) protocols. Modern immunosuppression has reduced rejections and improved graft survival in AAs and may allow successful CSWD. Outcomes in 56 AAs were compared to 56 non-AAs. All patients were enrolled in one of four early CSWD protocols. Results are reported as AA versus non-AA. Acute rejection at 1-year was 23% and 18%; (p = NS); creatinine clearance at 1-year was 75 versus 80 mL/min (p = NS); patient and graft survival was 96% versus 98% and 91% versus 91%; (p = NS). AAs benefit from early CSWD with significantly improved blood pressure, LDL < 130 mg/dL and HDL > 45 mg/dL at 1-year, post-transplant diabetes of 8.7%, and mean weight change at 1-year of 4.8 +/- 7.2 kg. In conclusion, early CSWD in AAs is associated with acceptable rejection rates, excellent patient and graft survival, and improved cardiovascular risk, indicating that the risks and benefits of early CSWD are similar between AAs and non-AAs. Additional follow-up is needed to determine long-term renal function, graft survival, and cardiovascular risk in AAs with early CSWD.

Long-term renal allograft survival: have we made significant progress or is it time to rethink our analytic and therapeutic strategies?

Impressive renal allograft survival improvement between 1988 and 1995 has been described using projections of half-lives based on limited actual follow up. We aimed, now with sufficient follow up available to calculate real half-lives. Real half-lives calculated from Kaplan-Meier curves for the overall population as well as subsets of repeat transplants and African Americans recipients were examined. Real half-lives were substantially shorter than projected half-lives. As a whole, half-lives have improved by about 2 years between 1988 and 1995 as compared to the earlier projected 6 years of improvement. The improvement seems to be driven primarily by the improvement in graft survival of re-transplants. First transplants showed a cumulative increase in graft survival of less than 6 months. Projected half-lives are a risky estimation of long-term survival especially when based on short actual follow up. First transplant survival has only marginally improved during the early years of post transplant follow up while no significant improvement in long-term survival could be detected between 1988 and 1995. Redirection of attention from early endpoints towards the process of long-term graft loss may be necessary to sustain early gains in the long term.