Intrahepatic biliary lesions after orthotopic liver transplantation

Intensified Endoscopic Evaluation for Biliary Complications After Orthotopic Liver Transplantation

Background

Biliary complications are common causes of morbidity and mortality after liver transplantation.

Material/Methods

From 2013 to 2018, 102 whole-organ liver transplantations were conducted in our department. Patients were closely monitored for biliary complication development. In all suspected cases, patients underwent either endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography or percutaneous transhepatic cholangial drainage. Patients’ demographic characteristics, preexisting conditions, and perioperative characteristics, as well as morbidity and mortality, were analyzed. Risk factors for 1-year survival were calculated.

Results

Of the 102 patients, 43 (42%) experienced biliary complications. In comparison with patients without biliary complications, patients with biliary complications exhibited the following risk factors: underlying liver disease (viral hepatitis; P=0.009), blood group A (P=0.005), and previous abdominal surgery (P=0.037). Neither perioperative characteristics, especially duration of cold ischemia (P=0.86), nor postoperative course differed between patients with and without biliary complications. Risk factors for mortality within 1 year were cirrhosis caused by entities other than viral hepatitis (P=0.017), cardiac comorbidities (P=0.019), re-transplantation (P=0.032), and reduced organ weight (P=0.002). Biliary complications, postoperative hemorrhage, primary nonfunction, and repeated surgery worsened outcome; moreover, serum bilirubin trough in the first 30 days after transplantation might be prognostic for mortality (P=0.043).

Conclusions

Biliary complications adversely affect outcome after liver transplantation. Neither frequency nor outcome of biliary complications was improved by intensified endoscopic evaluation. Patients on the waiting list for liver transplants should also be closely monitored for cardiac comorbidities.

Liver Preservation by Aortic Perfusion Alone Compared With Preservation by Aortic Perfusion and Additional Arterial Ex Situ Back-Table Perfusion With Histidine-Tryptophan-Ketoglutarate Solution: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Multicenter Study

Background

Arterial ex situ back-table perfusion (BP) reportedly reduces ischemic-type biliary lesion after liver transplantation. We aimed to verify these findings in a prospective investigation.

Methods

Our prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter study involved livers retrieved from patients in 2 German regions, and compared the outcomes of standard aortic perfusion to those of aortic perfusion combined with arterial ex situ BP. The primary endpoint was the incidence of ischemic-type biliary lesions over a follow-up of 2 years after liver transplantation, whereas secondary endpoints included 2-year graft survival, initial graft damage as reflected by transaminase levels, and functional biliary parameters at 6 months after transplantation.

Results

A total of 75 livers preserved via standard aortic perfusion and 75 preserved via standard aortic perfusion plus arterial BP were treated using a standardized protocol. The incidence of clinically apparent biliary lesions after liver transplantation (n = 9 for both groups; P = 0.947), the 2-year graft survival rate (standard aortic perfusion, 74%; standard aortic perfusion plus arterial BP, 68%; P = 0.34), and incidence of initial graft injury did not differ between the 2 perfusion modes. Although 33 of the 77 patients with cholangiography workups exhibited injured bile ducts, only 10 had clinical symptoms.

Conclusions

Contrary to previous findings, the present study indicated that additional ex situ BP did not prevent ischemic-type biliary lesions or ischemia-reperfusion injury after liver transplantation. Moreover, there was considerable discrepancy between cholangiography findings regarding bile duct changes and clinically apparent cholangiopathy after transplantation, which should be considered when assessing ischemic-type biliary lesions.

Histological and Clinicopathological Evaluation of Liver Allograft Biopsy: An Initial Experience of Fifty Six Biopsies

INTRODUCTION

Liver biopsy is gold standard for diagnosis of allograft dysfunction.

AIM

The aim of study was to evaluate liver allograft biopsies performed for graft dysfunction, study the pattern of injury and intensity, and timeline of occurrence of graft dysfunction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective study was carried out of 56 liver allograft biopsies and their histological findings with clinical presentation were correlated. Totally 56 needle liver allograft biopsies from January 1210 to July 2014, obtained from 35 patients were studied for histological and clinicopathological evaluation.

RESULTS

The mean age was 53.2±5.48 years. The most common original disease was alcoholic cirrhosis. The most common histological lesion was acute cellular rejection (ACR) in 31 (55.36%) biopsies followed by preservation-reperfusion injury (PRI) in 10 (17.86%) biopsies and drug toxicity in 8 (14.29%) biopsies. Chronic rejection was reported in 2 (3.57%) and recurrence of HCV in 3 (5.36%). Ischemic coagulative necrosis and acute cholangitis were seen in 1 (1.79 %) case each.

CONCLUSION

Alcoholic cirrhosis was the most common etiology for end stage liver disease. ACR and PRI were the major complications in liver allograft biopsies at our centre.

Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury and Ischemic-Type Biliary Lesions following Liver Transplantation

Ischemia-reperfusion (I-R) injury after liver transplantation (LT) induces intra- and/or extrahepatic nonanastomotic ischemic-type biliary lesions (ITBLs). Subsequent bile duct stricture is a significant cause of morbidity and even mortality in patients who underwent LT. Although the pathogenesis of ITBLs is multifactorial, there are three main interconnected mechanisms responsible for their formation: cold and warm I-R injury, injury induced by cytotoxic bile salts, and immunological-mediated injury. Cold and warm ischemic insult can induce direct injury to the cholangiocytes and/or damage to the arterioles of the peribiliary vascular plexus, which in turn leads to apoptosis and necrosis of the cholangiocytes. Liver grafts from suboptimal or extended-criteria donors are more susceptible to cold and warm I-R injury and develop more easily ITBLs than normal livers. This paper, focusing on liver I-R injury, reviews the risk factors and mechanisms leading to ITBLs following LT.

Urokinase perfusion prevents intrahepatic ischemic-type biliary lesion in donor livers

AIM: To evaluate whether urokinase perfusion of non-heart-beating cadaveric donor livers reduces the incidence of intrahepatic ischemic-type biliary lesions (IITBLs).

METHODS: A prospective study was conducted to investigate potential microthrombosis in biliary microcirculation when non-heart-beating cadaveric livers were under warm or cold ischemic conditions. The experimental group included 140 patients who underwent liver transplantation during the period of January 2006 to December 2007, and survived for more than 1 year. The control group included 220 patients who received liver transplantation between July 1999 and December 2005 and survived for more than 1 year. In the experimental group, the arterial system of the donor liver was perfused twice with urokinase during cold perfusion and after trimming of the donor liver. The incidence of IITBLs was compared between the two groups.

RESULTS: In the control group, the incidence of IITBLs was 5.9% (13/220 cases) after 3-11 mo of transplantation. In the experimental group, two recipients (1.4%) developed IITBLs at 3 and 6 mo after transplantation, respectively. The difference in the incidence between the two groups was statistically significant (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION: Double perfusion of cadaveric livers from non-heart-beating donors with urokinase may reduce the incidence of IITBLs.

Arterial reconstruction in rat liver transplantation - development of a new tubing technique of the common hepatic artery

Arterialization of liver transplants in rats results in an improved function compared with grafts without artery. Here we compared techniques of reconstruction, focusing on thrombosis, duration of procedure and severity of pancreas damage after dissecting the gastroduodenal artery (GDA). Group 1: tube was inserted into the proper hepatic artery (PHA) of donor and recipient. Group 2: tube was placed into common hepatic artery (CHA) of donor and recipient. Group 3: cuff was placed over the CHA of the recipient and the graft's artery was slipped over the cuff. Tubing in PHA leads to a thrombosis rate of 40% after 6 months. Arteries remain perfused by using a cuff or tube in CHA. Dissection of the GDA does not influence pancreatic perfusion. Reconstruction took 19 s using the large tube, about 30 s for the tube into PHA and 1 min for the cuff. The method of choice is using a tube for the CHA.