Clinical and functional results after the rehabilitation period in minimally-invasive unicondylar knee arthroplasty patients

The Length of Incision in Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty Is More Affected by the Patient's Height Than Their Weight

Objective Obesity leads to osteoarthritis due to increased loading forces on joint cartilage and inflammatory agents released from adipose tissue. In patients with a high body mass index (BMI), during hip and total knee arthroplasty, surgical technical challenges such as longer incisions and wider exposure are encountered, resulting in increased postoperative complications (wound healing problems and infection, venous thromboembolism (VTE)- pulmonary embolism (PE), dislocation, early implant failure) and ultimately decreased patient satisfaction and implant survival. This study investigates whether BMI, height, weight, and patient age are associated with longer incisions in patients undergoing unicondylar knee prosthesis (UKP) placement. Method Between January 2017 and December 2018, 30 patients (29 females and 1 male) who underwent UKP surgery due to medial gonarthrosis were included in the study. The UKP used in the procedures was the Oxford Knee Phase III by Biomet Ltd., UK. The study comprised 43 knees, 13 being bilateral cases, 8 on the right, and 9 on the left. Data regarding the patient's height, weight, BMI, age, and the operated side were collected and compiled. The relationships between these variables and the surgical incision length were statistically analyzed. Results The average age of the patients was 66.3 years, with an average weight and height of 77.6 kg (ranging from 62 to 98 kg) and 167 cm (ranging from 150 to 184 cm), respectively. The lengths of the surgical incisions ranged from 70 mm to 160 mm, with an average length of 124.5 mm. When comparing the incision lengths between the right and left sides, it was observed that the incisions on the left side were longer. The average incision length on the right side was 122.09 mm, while on the left, it was 126.86 mm. Moreover, in the 13 patients who underwent bilateral surgery, this difference in incision length was even more pronounced. The average incision length on the right side was 117.15 mm, whereas on the left, it was 124.23 mm. Bivariate correlation analyses were performed to examine the relationship between the length of the incision and BMI and age. However, no significant relationship was found between the incision length and BMI or age. On the other hand, there was a correlation between the patient's weight values and the incision length (p < 0.05, correlation 0.335). Furthermore, a higher correlation was observed between the patient's height and the incision length (p < 0.01, correlation 0.595). Conclusion The latest advances in surgical techniques and instrumentation have enabled surgeons to perform the procedure using a reliable mini-incision approach. Mid-term evaluation of UKP with mini-incision shows faster recovery and lower morbidity. The findings show that in UKP, the length of the surgical incision is more strongly related to the patient's height than their weight.

Early Stage Versus Late Stage Periarticular Injection during Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty for Postoperative Pain Relief: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Controlling postoperative pain after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is essential to improve patient satisfaction and promote early recovery. The purpose of this study was to investigate the difference in clinical efficacy between early and late stage periarticular injection during UKA for postoperative pain relief. Eighty-four patients meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria were randomly divided into the early stage periarticular injection group and late stage periarticular injection group by using a random number tables method. The difference between the two groups was that the early stage periarticular injection group received superficial injection before the joint incision, while the late stage periarticular injection group received superficial injection after implantation of the prosthesis. Deep injection and other perioperative conditions of the two groups were controlled identically. The primary outcome of the study was the recovery room immediate visual analog scale (VAS) at rest. The secondary outcomes were the postoperative VAS (at rest) at 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours, drug dosage of rescue analgesia, range of motion (ROM), and complications. The recovery room immediate VAS (at rest) in the early stage periarticular injection group was significantly lower than that of the late stage periarticular injection group (21 ± 24 vs. 32 ± 34 mm, p = 0.018), the average difference of the VAS reached the minimal clinically important difference. No statistically significant difference in postoperative drug dosage of rescue analgesia, ROM, and complications. Preemptive analgesia combined with the early stage periarticular injection can better alleviate postoperative pain than the late stage periarticular injection.

What is the Level of Evidence Substantiating Commercial Payers' Coverage Policies for Total Joint Arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of total joint arthroplasty (TJA) in the United States has drawn the attention of health care stakeholders. The payers have also used a variety of strategies to regulate the medical necessity of these procedures. The purpose of this study was to examine the level of evidence of the coverage policies being used by commercial payers in the United States.

METHODS

The references of the coverage policies of four commercial insurance companies were reviewed for type of document, level of evidence, applicability to a TJA population, and success of nonoperative treatment in patients with severe degenerative joint disease.

RESULTS

282 documents were reviewed. 45.8% were primary journal articles, 14.2% were level I or II, 41.2% were applicable to patients who were candidates for TJA, and 9.9% discussed the success of nonoperative treatment in patients who would be candidates for TJA.

CONCLUSION

Most of the references cited by commercial payers are of a lower level of scientific evidence and not applicable to patients considered to be candidates for TJA. This is relatively uniform across the reviewed payers. The dearth of high-quality literature cited by commercial payers reflects the lack of evidence and difficulty in conducting high level studies on the outcomes of nonoperative versus operative treatment for patients with severe, symptomatic osteoarthritis. Patients, surgeons, and payers would all benefit from such studies and we encourage professional societies to strive toward that end through multicenter collaboration.

Minimally Invasive Inlay Prosthesis Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty for the Treatment of Unicompartmental Osteoarthritis: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study with Minimum 2-Year Outcomes and up to 14-Year Survival

There are limited medium-term outcome data available for the Repicci II device in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). The purpose of this study was to report the medium-term (minimum 2 years) patient-reported outcomes and long-term (up to 14 years) procedure survival in a consecutive series of patients undergoing an inlay prosthesis UKA (Repicci II) at an independent orthopaedic clinic. Patients presenting with medially localized unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis and meeting the criteria appropriate for UKA were recruited to a clinical patient registry at the time of presentation. A cemented unicompartmental prosthesis (Repicci II) was implanted using minimally invasive techniques with rapid postoperative mobilization. Patients were asked to complete patient-reported outcomes preoperatively and annually postoperatively. A procedure list was cross-matched with the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR), and an analysis of procedure survival was performed with comparison to the national data for UKA. Data from a cohort of 661 primary medial compartment UKA procedures performed in 551 patients over a 15-year period were extracted from the clinical patient registry. Significant improvements were maintained in general health, disease symptoms, pain, and function at an average follow-up of 9 years compared with preoperative data. Threshold analysis revealed that >65% of patients exceeded Patient Acceptable Symptom State at the latest follow-up, with >80% within or exceeding age-matched norms for general health. Cumulative revision rate was significantly lower than that reported for UKA in the AOANJRR at up to 13 years follow-up. This series represents a lower cumulative revision rate than previously reported, with >65% of patients reporting satisfactory functional outcomes at an average of 9 years from surgery. Surgical options for treating unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis could include UKA as a viable alternative; however, clear definitions of procedure success and its overall cost-benefit ratio in the context of ongoing management of knee osteoarthritis remain to be elucidated.

Methylprednisolone reduces pain and decreases knee swelling in the first 24 h after fast-track unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) results in less operative trauma and faster patient recovery than after a conventional total knee arthroplasty. Despite an increased focus on multimodal analgesic strategies, there is still a substantial level of patient-reported pain in the early postsurgical period after UKA. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effect of a single preoperative dose of systemic methylprednisolone on postsurgical pain after fast-track UKA.

METHODS

Seventy-two patients in two consecutive series undergoing unilateral UKA were included in a prospective cohort study. The patients (n = 35) in the treatment group received a single preoperative dose of systemic methylprednisolone 125 mg, whereas the control group (n = 37) did not. Outcome measures were postsurgical pain at rest and during walking, consumption of opioids for pain rescue, knee swelling and knee range of motion, and complications.

RESULTS

In the first 24 h after surgery, the treatment group had less pain at rest (p < 0.001) and during walking (p < 0.001) and less consumption of opioids (p = 0.01) in comparison with the control group. Furthermore, the treatment group had 2.2 cm less knee swelling (p = 0.02) in the first post-operative day, and better knee extension (p = 0.004), whereas knee flexion was similar (n.s.) between groups. No serious complications were associated with the treatment.

CONCLUSION

Addition of a single preoperative dose of 125 mg systemic methylprednisolone to a multimodal analgesic regime significantly reduced postsurgical pain and opioid consumption and decreased knee swelling in the first 24 h after fast-track UKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic study, Level II.

Efficacy of multimodal analgesia injection combined with corticosteroids after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair

INTRODUCTION

Although arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is minimally invasive, there is still considerable postoperative pain, especially during the first 48 hours. The present study assessed the short-term efficacy and safety of multimodal analgesic (MMA) injection associated to corticosteroids in arthroscopic rotator cuff tear surgery.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

A single-center prospective randomized study included 50 patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff tear surgery. The study group received subacromial injection of a mixture of morphine, ropivacaine and methylprednisolone associated to intra-articular injection of morphine plus methylprednisolone; the control group received only isotonic saline. All patients had had 24 hours self-administered morphine associated to standard analgesia. Postoperative data were recorded at 30 minutes and 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, 18 and 24 hours: pain intensity, morphine intake and side effects, and also time to first morphine bolus and additional analgesic intake. Constant, ASES and SST functional scores were recorded at 3 months.

RESULTS

Postoperative pain was significantly less intense in the MMA group than in controls at 30 min, H1, H4, H6, H12, H18 and H24 (P<0.05). A rebound at D10 occurred in both groups. During the first 24 hours, MMA significantly reduced cumulative resort to morphine (P<0.05 at H1/2, P<0.001 at H1-24). Mean time to first bolus was significantly longer in the MMA group (71.6 vs. 33 min; P<0.05). The rate of opioid-related side effects was similar between groups. At last follow-up, functional scores were similar between groups. There were no cases of infection or delayed skin healing.

CONCLUSION

MMA associated to corticosteroids after arthroscopic rotator cuff tear surgery provided immediate benefit in terms of analgesia and morphine sparing, without apparent risk of infection. The practice is presently little known in France and deserves longer-term assessment, especially as regards functional rehabilitation and tendon healing.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2.

Effects of periarticular steroid injection on knee function and the inflammatory response following Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty

There is little information on the values of CRP and ESR as markers for inflammation in Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty. The effect of periarticular steroid injection in post-operative pain relief and clinical recovery has not been well studied. Eighty-three consecutive patients undergoing primary UKAs were randomized to receive either an intra-operative periarticular injection with a local anaesthetic and adrenaline or with the addition of triamcinolone acetonide. CRP and ESR values, pain VAS and other scores, as well as clinical functional parameters, were obtained and analysed. Patients were assessed daily till discharge and up to 6 months post-operatively. Plasma CRP and ESR fluctuate after a UKA, with normalizing values indicating uneventful recovery. Periarticular steroid injections reduce post-operative pain and inflammation, and are clinically relevant as they improve short-term functional recovery and clinical parameters, resulting in better outcomes for patients without having major complications.

A multivariate statistical ranking of clinical and gait measures before and after total knee replacement

The purpose of this study was to assess the use of a multivariate statistical method to rank clinical and gait variables, thus describing a ranking of patient dysfunction prior to and following total knee replacement (TKR) surgery. Twenty end-stage knee osteoarthritis (KOA) subjects scheduled for TKR and 20 healthy controls performed level walking and stair ascent twice: pre- (P1) and 6 months post-surgery (P2). Clinical and gait measures were entered into a principle component analysis (PCA) to determine orthogonal principle components (PCs). The PCs were entered into a discriminant function analysis to determine the best predictors of group membership. The PCA extracted three PCs for both the P1 and P2 data sets. Three orthogonal dimensions were formed: "knee dysfunction", "gait dysfunction", and "stair ascent dysfunction". For P1 the "knee dysfunction" dimension composed of both subjective and objective measures, best discriminated between end-stage knee osteoarthritis patients and controls. For P2, the "stair ascent dysfunction" dimension best discriminated between 6 months post-TKR patients and controls. The results of this study suggest that a multivariate statistical method provides a clinically relevant ranking of patient dysfunction prior to and following TKR. This ranking of dysfunction could serve to identify rehabilitation priorities.

The short-term results of 3 common UKA implants during different periods in Sweden

We studied 13,299 operations of 3 common unicompartmental implants inserted during 1984 to 2004 and compared their cumulative revision rate during different periods, as well as whether minimally invasive surgery (MIS) had been used. In this way, we tried to evaluate how the introduction of implants and approaches affected the short-term results. The oldest implant, the Link, had stable results over time. However, when used with MIS without adequate instruments or training, the results deteriorated. The initial Oxford results were disappointing (phase I and early phase II models). However, with time, the results improved substantially, even when the phase III version using MIS was introduced. For the Miller/Galante, there was significant improvement with time, and MIS was not found to affect the short-term results.

Quantity versus quality of gait and quality of life in patients with osteoarthritis

PURPOSE

This study investigated the relationship between the quality of life, quality of gait and the quantity of gait in patients with impairments in the lower extremities.

METHODS

Twenty-six subjects (age 58.6+/-13.4 years) suffering from knee or hip osteoarthritis were investigated before implantation of an endoprosthesis. Quality of life was assessed using the SF-36 survey. The quality of gait was assessed with a six camera motion analysis system in combination with two force plates. For evaluation of the quantity of gait, two monitors were applied: (a) the accelerometer-based DynaPort activity monitor measured locomotion and posture for 1 day and (b) The Step-Activity-Monitor, a small microprocessor-operated acceleration sensor, measured the number of gait cycles in 1-min intervals for 1 week. Spearman correlation coefficients were calculated between quantity of gait, quality of gait and quality of life.

RESULTS

The patients showed typical gait impairments caused by osteoarthritis. Locomotion accounted for 10.5+/-5% of the daily recorded time, 4782+/-2116 gait cycles were counted per day. The sub-categories of the SF-36 showed limited physical functioning and general health with 38 and 56 out of 100 points, respectively. Computation of Spearman-rho revealed no relevant correlations between quality and quantity of gait but moderate correlations between quality of life and quantity of gait.

CONCLUSION

The findings underline that a patient's level of mobility cannot be reliably estimated from quality of gait or from quality of life. Instead, adequate methods should be chosen to measure the quantity of gait in daily life.

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: technique through a mini-incision

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is a logical procedure when the lesion is limited to one femorotibial compartment. The procedure can now be performed through a mini-incision to provide quicker recovery because the extensor mechanism disruption is minimized. We have found the length of the incision varies according to patient mass and muscle tone. Specific instrumentation limited to the replaced compartment and using either an intra- or extramedullary femoral technique provides femorotibial component alignment and allows slight undercorrection of the deformity. Radiographic assessment demonstrates precise implantation of the components is possible with a mini-incision, which is believed important for the long-term results of the arthroplasty. The functional evaluation of patients implanted with unicompartmental knee arthroplasty performed through a mini-incision suggests appropriate kinematics can be restored after the procedure, enhancing the importance of a functional anterior cruciate ligament.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level V, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Clinical experience using a minimally invasive surgical approach for total knee arthroplasty: early results of a prospective randomized study compared to a standard approach

There has been recent attention concerning minimally invasive techniques for knee arthroplasty. It is not clear whether these complicated techniques can be reproduced across multiple centers and for all surgeons. This prospective, randomized, multicenter study was carried out to assess safety and efficacy of a minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty. The study consisted of 80 knees. There were no differences in blood loss, operative time for completion of surgery, infection, and ultimate wound healing. There were 4 knees with delayed wound healing in the minimally invasive surgical technique group versus 1 in the standard group, which did not affect outcome. Early clinical and radiographic results were also indistinguishable. At 12 weeks follow-up, there was no difference in mean Knee Society objective and functional scores. In summary, in this study, minimal incision total knee arthroplasty demonstrated no improvement over a standard approach.

Minimally invasive revision total knee arthroplasty

Exposure in revision total knee arthroplasty can be difficult. For example, eversion of the patella may require a number of procedures including vastus snips, V-Y turndowns, and tibial tubercle osteotomies. A minimally invasive approach further adds to exposure difficulties. We report a new approach for exposure during difficult revision total knee arthroplasties. A soft tissue envelope technique allows retraction of the patella and avoids eversion. This technique reduces the size of the incision, reduces quadriceps muscle damage, and enhances exposure. It is essential that appropriate instrumentation is used along with down sized femoral and tibial cutting blocks. We report all 17 revision knee arthroplasties using this technique including unicompartmental revisions, tibial component revisions, and femoral component revisions. Followup averaged 29 months (range, 24-39 months). We had one case of posterior retained cement after a full revision with no subsequent complications. One patient required an arthroscopic lateral release for patellar maltracking. Preliminary results are encouraging using improved instrumentation we find essential for enhanced exposure. We believe this a reasonable approach for selected total knee arthroplasty revisions.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic study, level IV (retrospective case series). See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Minimally invasive navigated knee surgery: an American perspective

Minimally invasive total knee replacement surgery may make it possible for patients to undergo the procedure with less pain and recover from the surgery more quickly than has been previously possible. However, minimally invasive techniques have the potential for being associated with a number of complications, including implant and limb malalignment. Computer-assisted technologies used in conjunction with minimally invasive techniques allow the accuracy with which the procedures are performed to be retained.