Clinical and functional comparison of uni- and bicondylar sledge prostheses

Optimal intersurface stability for unicompartmental femoral component design with two pegs placed on the distal resection surface: 5 mm peg length increment and 10° peg inclination

PURPOSE

The present study aimed to identify the optimal design of the unicompartmental femoral component through parameter analysis and stability evaluation.

METHODS

A finite element (FE) analysis was applied to analyse and adjust the parameter combinations of the anterior tilt angle of the posterior condyle resection surface, the position of the peg, the length of the peg and the inclination angle of the peg, resulting in 10 different FE models. Setting three knee flexion angles of 8.4° (maximum load state during walking), 40° (maximum load state during stair climbing) and 90° (maximum load state during squatting exercise), quantitatively analysing the micromotion values of the bone-prosthesis interface and defining a weighted scoring formula to evaluate the stability of different FE models. The validity of the FE analysis was verified using the Digital Image Correlation (DIC) device.

RESULTS

The errors between the FE analysis and the DIC test at three flexion angles were 5.6%, 1.7% and 11.1%. The 10 different femoral component design models were measured separately. The FE analysis demonstrated that the design with a 0° anterior tilt angle of the posterior condyle resection surface, both pegs placed on the distal resection surface, lengthened 5 mm pegs and a 10° peg inclination angle provided the best stability.

CONCLUSION

The current study proposed a method for evaluating the stability of the femoral component design. The optimal intersurface stability design of the unicompartmental femoral component was achieved with two pegs placed on the distal resection surface, a 5-mm peg length increment and a 10° peg inclination. These results might provide a reference for the selection of unicompartmental femoral components in clinical practice and therefore improve the survival rate of future unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Partial and Combined Partial Knee Arthroplasty: Greater Anterior-Posterior Stability Than Posterior Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Little is known regarding anterior-posterior stability after anterior cruciate ligament-preserving partial (PKA) and combined partial knee arthroplasty (CPKA) compared to standard posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

The anterior-posterior tibial translation of twenty-four cadaveric knees was measured, with optical tracking, while under 90N drawer with the knee flexed 0-90°. Knees were tested before and after PKA, CPKA (medial and lateral bicompartmental and bi-unicondylar), and then posterior cruciate-retaining TKA. The anterior-posterior tibial translations of the arthroplasty states, at each flexion angle, were compared to the native knee and each other with repeated measures analyses of variance and post-hoc t-tests.

RESULTS

Unicompartmental and bicompartmental arthroplasty states had similar laxities to the native knee and to each other, with ≤1-mm differences throughout the flexion range (P ≥ .199). Bi-unicondylar arthroplasty resulted in 6- to 8-mm increase of anterior tibial translation at high flexion angles compared to the native knee (P ≤ .023 at 80-90°). Meanwhile, TKA exhibited increased laxity across all flexion angles, with increased anterior tibial translation of up to 18 ± 6 mm (P < .001) and increased posterior translation of up to 4 ± 2 mm (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

In a cadaveric study, anterior-posterior tibial translation did not differ from native laxity after PKA and CPKA. Posterior cruciate ligament-preserving TKA demonstrated increased laxity, particularly in anterior tibial translation.

Does bicompartmental knee arthroplasty hold an advantage over total knee arthroplasty? Systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

The role of bicompartmental knee arthroplasty (BKA) in the treatment of medial patellofemoral osteoarthritis (MPFOA) has been debated by orthopaedic surgeons for years. The BKA is a cruciate ligament retaining prosthesis designed to mimic the kinematics of the native knee that requires resurfacing of only two knee compartments. In this study, we aim to assess the patient recorded outcome measures (PROMs), range of motion (ROM), perioperative morbidity, and implant revision rate in patients undergoing BKA and compare them to those undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for bicompartmental knee osteoarthritis (OA).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses Statement (PRISMA). Articles from any country and written in any language were considered. We included all randomized control trials and retrospective cohort studies examining BKA versus TKA for bicompartmental knee OA. The primary outcome measure was knee society score (KSS) at one year and the secondary outcome measures were Oxford knee score (OKS) and short-form survey (SF-)12 at six and twelve months.

RESULTS

We included five studies in our meta-analysis. In terms of OKS, KSS, and SF-12, our meta-analysis suggests better short-term results for the TKA compared with the BKA. TKA was also associated with a shorter operative time and a lower revision rate. The BKA implant did however result in marginally less intraoperative blood loss and slightly better post-operative ROM.

CONCLUSIONS

BKA did not prove to be an equivalent alternative to TKA in bicompartmental knee OA. It was associated with inferior KSS, OKS, and SF-12 at short-term follow-up and a higher revision rate.

Clinical outcome of bi-unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for both medial and lateral femorotibial arthritis: a systematic review-is there proof of concept?

INTRODUCTION

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is a well-accepted treatment for isolated unicompartmental osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee. In previous literature, it has been suggested that bi-unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (bi-UKA) which uses two UKA implants in both the medial and lateral compartments of the same knee is a feasible and viable option for the treatment of knee OA. Given the advantages of UKA treatment, it is warranted to review the literature of bi-UKA and discuss the evidence in terms of implant selection, indications, surgical techniques, and outcomes, respectively.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Following the PRISMA guidelines, PubMed, Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched for studies presenting outcome of bi-UKA. Studies were included if they reported clinical outcomes using two unicompartmental prostheses for both medial and lateral femorotibial arthritis. Studies with the addition of patellofemoral arthroplasty or concomitant soft-tissue reconstruction and those not published in English were excluded.

RESULTS

In the early literature, the procedure of bi-UKA were performed for very severe OA and rheumatoid arthritis, but indications have evolved to reflect a more contemporary case-mix of knee OA patients. Both mobile and fixed bearing implants have been used, with the latter being the most frequent choice. A medial parapatellar approach for incision and arthrotomy has been the most frequently used technique. The present review found a promising clinical outcome of both simultaneous and staged bi-UKA although the number of long-term follow-up studies was limited.

CONCLUSIONS

Both simultaneous and staged bi-UKA has demonstrated good functional outcomes. However, the volume and level of evidence in general is low for studies captured in this review, and the data on long-term outcomes remain limited. The present review indicates that bi-UKA is a feasible and viable surgical option for bicompartmental femorotibial OA in carefully selected patients.

Lower limb kinematics of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty individuals during stair ascent

Objective

Purpose of the study was to compare lower-limb kinematics and interlimb asymmetry during stair ascent in individuals post-medial or lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA).

Methods

60 patients (20 medial; 10 lateral) post-UKA and 30 matched healthy controls performed stair ascent. Spatio-temporal, lower-limb kinematics and interlimb asymmetries during stair ascent were compared.

Results

Medial-UKA group displayed 5° less knee extension of the UKA limb than controls (p = 0.005) and 2° less than the contralateral limb during stance phase. No interlimb asymmetries were found for lateral-UKA.

Conclusion

Patients post-UKA demonstrate satisfactory lower-limb kinematics and minimal interlimb asymmetry during stair ascent compared to healthy individuals.

Bicompartmental (uni plus patellofemoral) versus total knee arthroplasty: a match-paired study

BACKGROUND

Osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee, whether primary or post-traumatic, does not always involve all three compartments (tibiofemoral medial and lateral and the patellofemoral ones). Bicompartmental knee arthroplasty (BKA) was proposed as a good alternative to total knee arthroplasty when two of the three knee compartments were affected.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective comparative study collecting all BKAs performed between March 2010 and January 2016. During this period, we treated 27 patients with BKA for medial or lateral and patellofemoral OA. Seven of them were lost to follow-up and were not included in the study. Group A (BKA group) was compared to a homogeneous group of 20 patients who underwent TKA during the same period (group B).

RESULTS

Patients treated with TKA were younger than those treated with BKA (mean age 65 vs. 67.2; p = 0.2149). BKA resulted in longer mean operating time (87 vs. 82.4 min; p = 0.2983), less blood loss (413 vs. 458 ml; p = 0.0052) but higher blood transfusion rate (12 vs. 10%). Medium follow-up was 34 months for BKA group and 38 months for TKA group. No statistically significant differences were found in KSS score between the two groups (KSS score 92.3 for BKA, 94.5 for TKA; p = 0.5221; KSS function was 87.2 for BKA and 89.2 for TKA; p = 0.4985).

CONCLUSION

The most important finding of the present study was that although BKA seemed to be theoretically more favorable in terms of functional recovery and blood loss, patients of group A had lower KSS score and higher transfusion rate than those of group B. Our data confirm that BKA could be proposed as an alternative to TKA, especially in young and high-demanding patients.

Reduced joint-awareness in bicruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty compared to cruciate-sacrificing total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

There is rising impact of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measurement in joint arthroplasty over the past years. Bicruciate-retaining implants have shown more physiologic knee kinematics and provide superior proprioceptive capacities. The aim of this study was to evaluate if the functional properties of this new implant design lead to improved PRO results after total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

This prospective, controlled trial compares PRO of bicruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty (BCR-TKA) to unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA) and standard posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty (PS-TKA). We evaluated 102 patients (34 patients in each group) 18 months postoperatively after knee arthroplasty. Primary outcome measure was the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS).

RESULTS

The BCR-group showed the same level of joint awareness as the UKA-group (p = 0.999). The second control group of PS-TKA patients had a lower mean score value in the FJS compared to the BCR-group (p = 0.035) and UKA-group (p = 0.031). There was no correlation of age, gender, body mass index (BMI) and the FJS. No relevant floor- or ceiling effects occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

This study found reduced joint awareness for BCR-TKA compared to a standard total knee arthroplasty. The score values of the BCR-group were equal to the UKA-group. Further prospective, randomized studies to investigate long-term survivorship of bicruciate-retaining implants are needed.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

Postural Stability after Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty and Patient-Specific Interpositional Knee Spacer

Purpose and Hypothesis. Knee osteoarthritis results, inter alia, in decreased postural stability. After arthroplasty, postural stability recovers, but it is unclear whether this can be ascribed to a reduction of pain or to the preserving of receptor-rich intraarticular soft tissue and natural knee kinematics. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether an unicondylar knee arthroplasty provides better results regarding postural stability or a patient-specific knee spacer. Methods. In this comparative study, we assessed functional results and postural stability 16 months after 20 unicondylar knee arthroplasties (group A) and 20 patient-specific interpositional knee device implantations (group B). Patients were evaluated using the KSS and WOMAC score. Postural stability was analysed during single leg stance on a force platform (Biodex Balance System). Results. Concerning postural stability, range of motion (ROM), and KSS 16 months after the procedure, there were no significant differences between both groups. Conclusion. Successful treatment of knee osteoarthritis restores postural stability to the level of the contralateral side, regardless of the implant device.

Proprioception after bicruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty is comparable to unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

Rising expectations in functional performance of total knee joints are inciting further improvement of knee arthroplasty implants. From a patient-centred view, bicruciate-retaining models provide a more natural feeling knee. However, there is no evidence of functional advantage for these implants. The aim of this study was to evaluate balance ability as a measure of proprioception in patients with a bicruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty.

METHODS

A prospective, controlled trial was conducted to compare balance ability in 60 patients after arthroplasty of the knee for osteoarthritis. We compared patients with a bicruciate-retaining knee arthroplasty (BCR group) to a control group of patients with a medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA group) and another control group of patients with a posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty (PS group). The patient population comprised 30 women (50.0 %) and 30 men in three cohorts of 20 each. The mean age was 62.1 ± 8.0 years (range 43-78). Patients were evaluated preoperatively and 9 months post-operatively. The evaluation included clinical, radiological, and balance testing-a single-leg stance with eyes closed compared to eyes open. The difference in area of sway between eyes closed and eyes open represents static balance ability after knee arthroplasty.

RESULTS

Perioperative data showed that there was no intra-operative fracture of the intercondylar eminence. There was a decreased post-operative knee extension 9 months post-operative in the BCR group, which was not clinically relevant in any case. We recorded a lower difference in the area of sway between eyes closed and eyes open (ΔA _(ec-eo)) for the BCR group (p = 0.01) and the UKA group (p = 0.04) compared to the PS group.

CONCLUSIONS

This study found superior static balance ability after preservation of both cruciate ligaments in arthroplasty of the knee, indicating superior proprioceptive function. Hence, BCR implants could provide improved functional properties. Superior proprioceptive function of bicruciate-retaining implants can be an important factor in implant selection. Further prospective, randomized studies to investigate kinematics and long-term survivorship of bicruciate-retaining implants are needed.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Knee Extensor Strength and Gait Characteristics After Minimally Invasive Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty vs Minimally Invasive Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

In light of the existing lack of evidence, it was the aim of this study to compare gait characteristics and knee extensor strength after medial unicondylar knee arthroplasty (MUKA) with those after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), given the same standardized minimally invasive surgery (MIS) approach in both groups.

METHODS

Patients scheduled for MIS-MUKA or MIS-TKA as part of clinical routine were invited to participate. A posterior cruciate ligament-retaining total knee design was used for all MIS-TKA. A 3-dimensional gait analysis was performed preoperatively with a VICON system and at 8 weeks postoperative to determine temporospatial parameters, ground reaction forces, joint angles, and joint moments. At the same 2 times, isokinetic tests were performed to obtain peak values of knee extensor torque. A multivariate analysis of variance was conducted and included the main effects time (before and after surgery) and surgical group and the group-by-time interaction effect.

RESULTS

Fifteen MIS-MUKA patients and 17 MIS-TKA patients were eligible for the final analysis. The groups showed no differences regarding age, body mass index, sex, side treated, or stage of osteoarthritis. We determined neither intergroup differences nor time × group interactions for peak knee extensor torque or any gait parameters (temporospatial, ground reaction forces, joint angles, and joint moments).

CONCLUSION

It is concluded that MUKA is not superior to TKA with regard to knee extensor strength or 3-dimensional gait characteristics at 8 weeks after operation. As gait characteristics and knee extensor strength are only 2 of the various potential outcome parameters (knee scores, activity scores…) and quadriceps strength might take a longer time to recover, our findings should be interpreted with caution.

Bicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is the most worldwide practiced surgery for knee osteoarthritis and its efficacy is mightily described by literature. Concerns about the invasiveness of TKA let the introduction of segmental resurfacing of the joint for younger patients with localized osteoarthritis. Bone stock sparing and ligaments preservation are the essence of both unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and bicompartmental knee arthroplasty (BKA). Advantages related to BKA are the respect of knee biomechanics, lower complications rates, shorter hospital stay, faster rehabilitation. Moreover, in case of failure of the first implant the conversion to TKA is undemanding and can be compared to a standard prosthesis. Our experience suggest that BKA is a reliable technique in selected cases and especially younger people with higher functional requests can favourably profit from it. Although those results are encouraging, we still need further prospective, randomized, long-term studies to finally assess BKA indications and outcomes.

Fracture of the Tibial Baseplate in Bicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

Introduction. Bicompartmental knee arthroplasty (BKA) addresses combined medial and patellofemoral compartment osteoarthritis, which is relatively common, and has been proposed as a bridge between unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Case Presentation. We present the case report of a young active man treated with BKA after unsuccessful conservative therapy. Four years later, loosening with fracture of the tibial baseplate was identified and the patient was revised to TKA. Discussion. Although our case is only the second fractured tibial baseplate to be reported, we believe that the modular titanium design, with two fixation pegs, is too thin to withstand daily cyclic loading powers. Light daily routine use, rather than high-impact sports, is therefore advised. Failures may also be related to the implant being an early generation and known to be technically complex, with too few implant sizes. We currently use TKA for the treatment of medial and patellofemoral compartment osteoarthritis.

Motion analysis of patients after knee arthroplasty during activities of daily living--a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Motion analysis with optoelectronic systems is a frequently used method to analyze the patient's gait as well as further relevant activities of daily living before and after knee arthroplasty. The aim of this systematic review was to identify the investigated activities of daily living and to show an extensive presentation of gait analysis studies with patients after knee arthroplasty surgery.

METHODS

The articles were searched in electronic databases: MEDPILOT, EMBASE. To identify articles that potentially met the inclusion criteria the titles and abstracts were screened. The level of evidence was analyzed for the included articles.

RESULTS

Overall 3989 abstracts were reviewed and 87 full text articles were included. Ten activities of daily living were identified. Level walking was the most frequently investigated activity (78.2%). In 94.6% the sagittal plane kinematics were analyzed and 5.3% presented the results in all three planes. Knee adduction moments were determined in 33.3% of the included articles. At least two joints were investigated in 40.2%, including the impaired knee and further body parts (ankle, hip, pelvis, trunk). Unicondylar knee arthroplasty was addressed in 14.1%.

CONCLUSIONS

Besides level walking, it is necessary to examine physical more demanding activities of daily living to detect potential kinematic and kinetic abnormalities. Further research should imply the evaluation of sagittal, frontal and transverse plane joint and muscle function based on accurate inverse-dynamic techniques. More motion analysis studies are necessary that address unicondylar knee arthroplasty in comparison to total knee arthroplasty and healthy controls.

A flat all-polyethylene tibial component in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a long-term study

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to present the clinical and radiological results of a cemented unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) using a flat all-polyethylene tibial component at long-term follow-up, in a homogeneous group of patients with medial femoro-tibial knee arthritis.

METHODS

The study group included 53 knees in 51 patients who were treated between January 1998 and November 1999 using a flat all-polyethylene tibial component. The same surgical technique was used for all patients. Inclusion criteria included a diagnosis of atraumatic arthritis, pre-operative flexion greater than 100° with no flexion deformity, a varus deformity of less than 10°, and a body mass index (BMI) less than 35. A neutral mechanical axis was considered the end-point in all interventions. The patients were assessed clinically using the International Knee Society (IKS) and the functional scores at follow-up. Plain radiographs were used to determine the alignment of the mechanical axis at 5, 10 and 14.7-year follow-up. A radiographic analysis of loosening, based on the method described by the IKS, was performed and the degree of arthritic progression in the non-resurfaced compartment was also assessed.

RESULTS

At latest follow-up five patients had died and the data for three patients had not been collected. At final review four knees had undergone revision surgery and a further patient had declined a recommended revision TKA. The main indication for revision surgery was progressive aseptic loosening of the tibial component in female patients. No revisions were required because of arthritic progression in the lateral compartment. Over time the clinical outcomes did not show statistically significant differences. There was a significant worsening of the mechanical axis at the last follow-up compared with the results at five and ten year review.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that, in primary arthritis involving the medial femoro-tibial compartment, UKA using a flat all-polyethylene component could be considered an effective surgical option. Attention should be paid to progressive worsening of the mechanical axis over time associated with progressive radiolucency especially in female patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Partial knee arthroplasty: patellofemoral arthroplasty and combined unicompartmental and patellofemoral arthroplasty implants--general considerations and indications, technique and clinical experience

BACKGROUND

Unicompartmental and patellofemoral arthroplasty (PFA) are not new concepts as shown by different authors, and nowadays surgical solutions other than total knee arthroplasty (TKA) must be considered, exploiting the technical possibilities offered by the new designs of prostheses which have improved the results of already used, old fashioned implants. The aim of our study was to present our experience with PFA and its combination with unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA).

METHODS

From March 2007 to May 2012 we have treated 55 patients with a patellofemoral joint arthroplasty; in 25 cases we have performed an isolated PFA and in 30 cases a combined UKA and PFA. The mean follow-up in the group of isolated patellofemoral joint arthroplasty was 56.5 months; in the combined implant the mean follow-up was 59 months.

RESULTS

In both group we found an significant improvement of HSS, KSS and OKS scores with results at final follow-up ranging from good to excellent.

CONCLUSIONS

Partial knee arthroplasty shows promising results at mid-term follow-up.

[The bicompartmental knee joint prosthesis Journey Deuce: failure analysis and optimization strategies]

BACKGROUND

The Journey Deuce bicompartmental knee system is intended for patients with medial and patellofemoral arthritis of the knee and is aimed at diversifying the treatment options for knee arthritis. The prosthesis consists of a combined femoral shield with a medial condylar resurfacing component and a fixed bearing unicondylar tibial knee prosthesis. The advantages of the Journey Deuce system compared to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are the bone sparing and cruciate retaining implantation. Outcome studies and investigation with respect to success and revision rates are rare. Thus the aim of this study was to investigate the early functional outcome as well as the revision and complication rates in patients with a Journey Deuce prosthesis within the first 2 years.

METHODS

In this study 43 patients (25 female/18 male, average age 62.4 ± 8 years and mean body mass index27.3 ± 4.5 kg/m(2)) underwent bicompartmental knee arthroplasty using the Journey Deuce prosthesis between March 2008 and March 2009. Inclusion criteria were clinically and radiographically confirmed patellofemoral arthritis, ligament stability and flexion > 90°. Exclusion criteria were extension deficits > 5°, axis deviation > 10° and patellofemoral malalignment. Patients were followed up for 6, 12 and 24 months postoperatively. Follow-up consisted of clinical and radiographical examination as well as a survey of the Knee Society score (KSS), a pain score (visual analog scale VAS, range 0-10) and a satisfaction score.

RESULTS

Of the patients 35 (82%) patients reached the 2-year follow-up and of these 35 patients 26 (75%) had a good to very good satisfaction, a mean KSS of 93 (range 65-100) and a minimal pain score of 1.2 (range 0-4). After 12 months all patients had a knee flexion of more than 90° (mean 116°, range 95°-140°). Loosening was not detected but 8 (18%) patients had to undergo revision within the first year due to persistent knee pain and instability.

CONCLUSIONS

Under clear indications and exact anatomical positioning the Journey Deuce prosthesis enables a good functional outcome; however, a high revision rate occurred in this study caused by technical complexity and insufficient variety of implant sizes which led to malalignment and instability. Additional positional guidance and a higher variability in implant sizes are required to enable an adequate treatment with anatomically correct positioning. The Journey Deuce prosthesis would then be a reasonable diversification of the endoprosthesis spectrum in knee arthroplasty and would allow a more individual and selective treatment of patients with knee arthritis.

Investigating the primary stability of the transversal support tibial plateau concept to retain both cruciate ligaments during total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

The important roles of the anterior cruciate ligament regarding knee stability, physiologic kinematics, and proprioception are unquestioned. Thus, various efforts have been made to retain the ACL during total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Neither of the existing solutions to this problem, i.e. bicruciate retaining prostheses and implantation of two unicondylar prostheses, has been successful because of concept-specific problems as well as general difficulties with implant fixation. The new transversal support tibial plateau concept is a prosthesis of two individual joint surfaces reinforced beneath the articular line by joint surface supports and buttressed by a single transversal support. This configuration, which enables retention of both cruciate ligaments, should provide good bone fixation and ensure long-term alignment of the individual joint surfaces.

METHODS

In the current study, four prototypes based on this novel concept were developed and the resulting primary stability was analyzed using adapted load testing. The test set-up, with the model-loading of specially prepared Sawbones® and a sinusoidal oscillating load transmission with 25 000 cycles over 10 increasing load levels, achieved subsidence, which enabled comparison of the four different model variants regarding primary stability in view of bone anchoring.

RESULTS

The model variant (TSmobile) that allowed transverse glide of the joint surface supports along the transversal support revealed the largest subsidence.

CONCLUSIONS

A rigid attachment of the joint surface supports of the transversal support tibial plateau thus appears to offer increased primary stability regarding bone anchoring.

Evaluation of postoperative range of motion and functional outcomes after cruciate-retaining and posterior-stabilized high-flexion total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare postoperative range of motion and functional outcomes among patients who received high-flexion total knee arthroplasty using cruciate-retaining (CR-Flex) and posterior-stabilized (PS-Flex) type prostheses.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Among 127 patients (186 knees) who underwent high-flexion total knee arthroplasty between 2005 and 2007, 92 knees were placed in the CR-Flex group, and 94 knees were placed in the PS-Flex group. After two years of postoperative follow-up, clinical and radiographic data were reviewed. Postoperative non-weight-bearing range of knee motion, angle of flexion contracture and functional outcomes based on the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) functional sub-scale were assessed and compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

After the 2-year postoperative period, the mean range of motion was 131° in the CR-Flex group and 133° in the PS-Flex group. There were no significant differences in postoperative range of motion between the two groups. Only age at operation and preoperative range of motion were significantly associated with postoperative range of motion after high-flexion total knee arthroplasty. Postoperative functional outcomes based on the WOMAC functional sub-scale were slightly better in the CR-Flex group (9.2±9.1 points) than in the PS-Flex group (11.9±9.6 points); however, this difference was not statistically significant (p=non-significant).

CONCLUSION

The retention or substitution of the posterior cruciate ligament does not affect postoperative range of motion (ROM) or functional outcomes, according to 2 years of postoperative follow-up of high-flexion total knee arthroplasty.

Muscle activity around the knee and gait performance in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty patients: a comparative study on fixed- and mobile-bearing designs

PURPOSE

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) offers clinical and functional advantages over total knee arthroplasty. The aim of this study was to compare the functional recovery of patients with mobile UKA versus fixed-bearing designs by state-of-the-art gait analysis and, in particular, by assessing muscular activity.

METHODS

Ten patients with the Oxford (mobile bearing) and ten patients with Optetrak (fixed bearing) UKA were evaluated at a minimum follow-up of 1 year post-operatively by gait analysis, which includes the main time-distance parameters, kinematics and kinetics of the replaced knee, and muscular activity of the main relevant muscles. Twenty healthy young subjects were used as controls.

RESULTS

The mean International Knee Society score was 92.7 ± 11.2 for all 20 UKA knees; for the Oxford UKA, it was 94.1 ± 9.5; and for the Optetrak UKA, it was 91.5 ± 12.9, although follow-up was significantly lower for the latter. Time-distance parameters showed a slower gait in both groups compared with that of controls, and the Oxford group had values closer to the controls. Knee joint flexion was similar to that of controls at initial contact and loading response with no differences between groups. In all patients, the joint moments were smaller to that of controls. Residual abnormalities such as the prolonged rectus femoris activity were present in both designs, and the only difference distinguishing the Optetrak group from the others was the combined co-contraction of the hamstrings.

CONCLUSIONS

A good restoration of gait was achieved by most unicompartmental knee patients independently of the UKA design, although some abnormalities persisted in muscle activity around the knee.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Retrospective comparative study, Level III.

Innovations in total knee replacement: new trends in operative treatment and changes in peri-operative management

The human knee joint can sustain damage due to injury, or more usually osteoarthritis, to one, two or all three of the knee compartments: the medial femorotibial, the lateral femorotibial and the patellofemoral compartments. When pain associated with this damage is unmanageable using nonsurgical techniques, knee replacement surgery might be the most appropriate course of action. This procedure aims to restore a pain-free, fully functional and durable knee joint. Total knee replacement is a well-established treatment modality, and more recently, partial knee replacement-more commonly known as bi- or unicompartmental knee replacement-has seen resurgence in interest and popularity. Combined with the use of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) techniques, gender-specific prosthetics and computer-assisted navigation systems, orthopaedic surgeons are now able to offer patients knee replacement procedures that are associated with (1) minimal risks during and after surgery by avoiding fat embolism, reducing blood loss and minimising soft tissue disruption; (2) smaller incisions; (3) faster and less painful rehabilitation; (4) reduced hospital stay and faster return to normal activities of daily living; (5) an improved range of motion; (6) less requirement for analgesics; and (7) a durable, well-aligned, highly functional knee. With the ongoing advancements in surgical technique, medical technology and prosthesis design, knee replacement surgery is constantly evolving. This review provides a personal account of the recent innovations that have been made, with a particular emphasis on the potential use of MIS techniques combined with computer-assisted navigation systems to treat younger, more physically active patients with resurfacing partial/total implant knee arthroplasty.

ICRS Recommendation Document: Patient-Reported Outcome Instruments for Use in Patients with Articular Cartilage Defects

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this article is to describe and recommend patient-reported outcome instruments for use in patients with articular cartilage lesions undergoing cartilage repair interventions.

METHODS

Nonsystematic literature search identifying measures addressing pain and function evaluated for validity and psychometric properties in patients with articular cartilage lesions.

RESULTS

The knee-specific instruments, titled the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form and the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis and Outcome Score, both fulfill the basic requirements for reliability, validity, and responsiveness in cartilage repair patients. A major difference between them is that the former results in a single score and the latter results in 5 subscores. A single score is preferred for simplicity's sake, whereas subscores allow for evaluation of separate constructs at all levels according to the International Classification of Functioning.

CONCLUSIONS

Because there is no obvious superiority of either instrument at this time, both outcome measures are recommended for use in cartilage repair. Rescaling of the Lysholm Scoring Scale has been suggested, and confirmatory longitudinal studies are needed prior to recommending this scale for use in cartilage repair. Inclusion of a generic measure is feasible in cartilage repair studies and allows analysis of health-related quality of life and health economic outcomes. The Marx or Tegner Activity Rating Scales are feasible and have been evaluated in patients with knee injuries. However, activity measures require age and sex adjustment, and data are lacking in people with cartilage repair.

Bi-unicondylar knee prosthesis functional assessment utilizing force-control wear testing

Recent in vivo studies have identified variations in knee prosthesis function depending on prosthesis geometry, kinematic conditions, and the absence/presence of soft-tissue constraints after knee replacement surgery. In particular, unicondylar knee replacements (UKR) are highly sensitive to such variations. However, rigorous descriptions of UKR function through experimental simulation studies, performed under physiological force-controlled conditions, are lacking. The current study evaluated the long-term functional performance of a widely used fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee replacement, mounted in a bi-unicondylar configuration (Bi-UKR), utilizing a force-controlled knee simulator during a simulated (ISO 14243) walking cycle. The wear behaviour, the femoral-tibial kinematics, and the incurred damage scars were analysed. The wear rates for the medial and the lateral compartments were 10.27 +/- 1.83 mg/million cycles and 4.49 +/- 0.53 mg/million cycles, respectively. Although constant-input force-controlled loading conditions were maintained throughout the simulation, femoral-tibial contact point kinematics decreased by 65 to 68 per cent for average anterior/posterior travel and by 58 to 74 per cent for average medial/lateral travel with increasing cycling time up to 2 million cycles. There were no significant differences in damage area or damage extent between the medial and the lateral compartments. Focal damage scars representing the working region of the femoral component on the articular surface extended over a range of 16-21 mm in the anterior-posterior direction. Kinematics on the shear plane showed slight variations with increasing cycling time, and the platform exhibited medial pivoting over the entire test. These measures provide valuable experimental insight into the effect of the prosthesis design on wear, kinematics, and working area. These functional assessments of Bi-UKR under force-controlled knee joint wear simulation show that accumulated changes in the UKR articular conformity manifested as altered kinematics both for anterior/posterior translations and internal/external rotations.

Survival of bicompartmental knee arthroplasty at 5 to 23 years

Recent literature suggests patients achieve substantial short-term functional improvement after combined bicompartmental implants but longer-term durability has not been documented. We therefore asked whether (1) bicompartmental arthroplasty (either combined medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and femoropatellar arthroplasty (PFA) or medial UKA/PFA, or combined medial and lateral UKA or bicompartmental UKA) reliably improved Knee Society pain and function scores; (2) bicompartmental arthroplasty was durable (survivorship, radiographic loosening, or symptomatic disease progression); (3) we could achieve durable alignment; and (4) the arthritis would progress in the unresurfaced compartment. We retrospectively reviewed 84 patients (100 knees) with bicompartmental UKA and 71 patients (77 knees) with medial UKA/PFA. Clinical and radiographic evaluations were performed at a minimum followup of 5 years (mean, 12 years; range, 5-23 years). Bicompartmental arthroplasty reliably alleviated pain and improved function. Prosthesis survivorship at 17 years was 78% in the bicompartmental UKA group and 54% in the medial UKA/PFA group. The high revision rate, compared with total knee arthroplasty, may be related to several factors such as implant design, patient selection, crude or absent instrumentation, or component malalignment, which can all contribute to the relatively high failure rate in this series.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Gait analysis after bi-compartmental knee replacement

BACKGROUND

It is reported that a majority of the patients with knee osteoarthritis have cartilage degeneration in medial and patellofemoral compartments. A bi-compartmental knee replacement system was designed to treat osteoarthritis at medial and patellofemoral compartments. To date, there is very little information regarding the knee mechanics during gait after bi-compartmental knee replacement. The purpose of the study was to evaluate knee strength and mechanics during level walking after knee replacement.

METHODS

Ten healthy control subjects and eight patients with unilateral bi-compartmental knee replacement participated in the study. Maximal isokinetic concentric knee extension strength was evaluated. 3D kinematic and kinetic analyses were conducted for level walking. Paired Student t-test was used to determine difference between surgical and non-involved limbs. One way MANOVA was used to determine difference between surgical and control groups.

FINDINGS

The surgical knee exhibited less peak torque and initial abduction moment than both the non-involved and control limbs (P<0.05). The non-involved limb had less knee extension at stance and greater knee extensor moment during push-off than both the surgical and control limbs (P<0.05). No differences were found for other typical knee mechanics among the surgical, non-involved, and control limbs during walking (P>0.05).

INTERPRETATIONS

Patients with bi-compartmental knee replacement exhibited good frontal plane knee mechanics and were able to produce the same level of knee extensor moment as healthy control limbs during walking. While showing some compensatory patterns during walking, patients with bi-compartmental knee replacement largely exhibited normal gait patterns and knee mechanics.

Bi-unicompartmental versus total knee arthroplasty: a matched paired study with early clinical results

INTRODUCTION

The authors performed a matched paired study between two groups: bi-unicompartmental (Bi-UKR) versus total knee replacements (TKR) for the treatment of isolated bicompartmental tibio-femoral knee arthritis with an asymptomatic patello-femoral joint. The Authors believe that Bi-UKR could achieve comparable outcomes than TKR, but with a real less invasive surgery and maintaining a higher joint function.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 22 patients with bicompartmental tibio-femoral knee arthritis, who underwent Bi-UKR between January 1999 and March 2003, were included in the study (group A). In all the knees the arthritic changes were graded according to the classification of Alback. All patients had an asymptomatic patello-femoral joint. All patients had a varus deformity lower than 8 degrees , a body-mass index lower than 34, no clinical evidence of ACL laxity or flexion deformity and a preoperative range of motion of a least 110 degrees . At a minimum follow-up of 48 months, every single patient in group A was matched with a patient who had undergone a computer assisted TKR between August 1999 and September 2002 (group B). In the Bi-UKR group, in two cases we registered intraoperatively the avulsion of the treated tibial spines, requiring intra-operative internal fixation and without adverse effects on the final outcome. Statistical analysis of the results was performed.

RESULTS

At a minimum follow-up of 48 months there were no statistical significant differences in the surgical time while the hospital stay was statistically longer in TKR group. No statistically significant difference was seen for the Knee Society, Functional and GIUM scores between the two groups. Statistically significant better WOMAC Function and Stiffness indexes were registered for the Bi-UKR group. TKR implants were statistically better aligned with all the implants positioned within 4 degrees of an ideal hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle of 180 degrees .

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this 48 months follow-up study suggest that Bi-UKR is a viable option for bicompartmental tibio-femoral arthritis at least as well as TKR but maintaining a higher level of function.

Tissue sparing surgery in knee reconstruction: unicompartmental (UKA), patellofemoral (PFA), UKA + PFA, bi-unicompartmental (Bi-UKA) arthroplasties

Recently mini-invasive joint replacement has become one of the hottest topics in the orthopaedic world. However, these terms have been improperly misunderstood as a "key-hole" surgery where traditional components are implanted with shorter surgical approaches, with few benefits and several possible dangers. Small implants as unicompartmental knee prostheses, patellofemoral prostheses and bi-unicompartmental knee prostheses might represent real less invasive procedures: Tissue sparing surgery, the Italian way to minimally invasive surgery (MIS). According to their experience the authors go through this real tissue sparing surgery not limited only to a small incision, but where the surgeons can respect the physiological joint biomechanics.

Navigated shorter incision or smaller implant in knee arthritis?

Minimally invasive approaches for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty are well-accepted for treating knee arthritis because of the smaller implant size, shorter operative time, and tissue-sparing nature of the procedure. With the introduction of computer alignment systems, a well-aligned and balanced total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can be achieved even with smaller surgical exposures. We hypothesized a unicompartmental knee arthroplasty would provide better midterm outcomes than a computer-assisted minimally invasive TKA in patients with isolated medial compartment knee arthritis. We matched (preoperative arthritis severity, age, gender, and preoperative range of motion) 64 knees that had a medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty or a mini-incision computer-assisted TKA. All patients had a varus deformity no greater than 8 degrees and a body mass index lower than 30 kg/m. Patients were followed a minimum of 48 months. In the mini-incision computer-assisted TKA group, all the implants were positioned within 4 degrees of ideal alignment. The surgical time and hospital stay were longer in the computer-assisted TKA group. A unicompartmental knee arthroplasty was estimated to cost at least 3100 euros (approximately US $4100) less. The clinical assessment showed higher functional and Italian Orthopaedic UKA Users Group scores for the unicompartmental knee arthroplasty group.

[Reconstruction of the ligamentum cruciatum anterius during the performance of unicondylar knee arthroplasty by minimally invasive surgery. A salvage procedure for monocondylar arthrosis and downfall of the anterior cruciate ligament]

Opinions differ on unicompartmental knee replacement for treatment of unicompartmental ostearthritis of the knee. There is general agreement that well-functioning cruciate ligaments are necessary if use of this prosthesis is to be successful. Especially for younger people who are still working and who have advanced medial arthritis and lacking or inadequate anterior cruciate ligament, this therapy has its limitations. To exploit the advantages of unicondylar replacement in such patients, we combined this joint replacement operation with reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament using the semitendinosus/gracilis tendon and applying a transfix technique in 7 cases. The mean Knee Society Score was recorded preoperatively and after 12 and 28 months of follow-up. Long-term results are not yet available, but after this operation method average Knee Society Scores of 164.1 were recorded at 28 months, and all these patients were able to return to work after their rehabilitation. Thus, the short-term follow-up documents the efficacity of the treatment and benefit to the patients.

Does arthroplasty type influence knee joint proprioception? A longitudinal prospective study comparing total and unicompartmental arthroplasty

Proprioception was assessed after knee replacement to compare total (TKA) to unicompartmental (UKA) knee arthroplasty. Thirty-four patients were recruited; seventeen patients underwent TKA and seventeen patients underwent UKA. The patient's age was similar in both groups. Two measures of proprioception, joint position sense (JPS) and postural sway (PS) were measured. Function was assessed using the Oxford Knee Score (OKS). Measurements were taken pre-operatively and 6 months post-operatively on both the operated and contralateral leg. Pre-operatively, no differences in JPS or PS were found between groups or between limbs in either group. Post-operatively, both groups had significant improvement of JPS in the operated limb only (20% increase). The improvement in JPS was similar in both groups. PS also improved significantly in both groups although the improvement of PS in the UKA group was twice that for the TKA group. The OKS improved by a similar amount in both groups. Both UKA and TKA result in a significant improvement in proprioception. Dynamic aspects of proprioception improve more after UKA than TKA, which may explain, in part, why UKA patients have superior functional outcome to that of TKA patients.

Unicompartmental versus computer-assisted total knee replacement for medial compartment knee arthritis: a matched paired study

Patients older than 60 with unicompartmental knee arthritis can be treated with total or unicompartmental knee replacement. The aim of this study was to compare the results of matched paired groups of patients with isolated medial compartment knee arthritis replaced with either UKR (group A) or computer-assisted TKR (group B). The results included 68 knees at a minimum follow-up of 3 years. All patients had a varus deformity no greater than 8 masculine and a BMI lower than 30. Patients were matched in terms of preoperative arthritis severity, age, gender and preoperative range of motion. In the computer-assisted TKR group, all the implants were positioned within 4 masculine of the correct hip-knee-ankle angle and frontal tibial component angle. The surgical time and hospital stay were statistically longer in the CA TKR group. During the study no implant required revision. The results showed higher scores for a UKR in the treatment of isolated primary unicompartmental knee arthritis in patients older than 60 compared to a computer-assisted TKR. In this study a computer-assisted alignment system for TKR with optimal implant positioning did not produce equivalent clinical results compared to a UKR, but did increase the financial costs.