Utility of delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI (dGEMRIC) for qualitative evaluation of articular cartilage of patellofemoral joint

Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Had Greater Sensitivity in Diagnosing Chondral Lesions of the Knee: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

To investigate the accuracy and reliability of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in identifying and grading chondral lesions and explore the optimal imaging technique to image cartilage.

METHOD

A comprehensive search was conducted on Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library. Eligible cohort studies published before August 2022 were included. The study reports used MRI to diagnose and grade cartilage lesions, with intraoperative findings as the reference standard. Summary estimates of diagnostic performance were obtained. The reliability of MRI interpretation was summarized. Subgroup analyses were performed based on assessed imaging techniques, field strength, and joint surface.

RESULTS

Forty-three trials and 3,706 patients were included in the systematic review. The overall area under curve for hierarchical summarized receiver operating characteristics was 0.91 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.88-0.93). The pooled sensitivity for quantitative MRI, 3-dimensional MRI, and 2-dimensional MRI was 0.82 (95% CI 0.64-0.92), 0.79 (95% CI 0.74-0.83), and 0.63 (95% CI 0.51-0.73), respectively. The pooled sensitivity of 3 Tesla (3T), 1.5 Tesla (1.5T), and <1.5 Tesla MRI was 0.79 (95% CI 0.72-0.85), 0.67 (95% CI 0.60-0.74), and 0.55 (95% CI 0.39-0.71), respectively. There were differences in interobserver consistency across different studies.

CONCLUSIONS

In general, MRI had high specificity in discriminating normal cartilage, but its sensitivity for identifying chondral lesions is less optimal. Further analysis showed that quantitative MRI, 3D MRI, and 3T MRI demonstrate greater sensitivity compared with 2D MRI, 1.5T MRI, and <1.5 Tesla MRI.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, systematic review of Level II-III studies.

Evaluation of focal cartilage lesions of the knee using MRI T2 mapping and delayed Gadolinium Enhanced MRI of Cartilage (dGEMRIC)

Background

Assessment of degenerative changes of the cartilage is important in knee cartilage repair surgery. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) T2 mapping and delayed Gadolinium Enhanced MRI of Cartilage (dGEMRIC) are able to detect early degenerative changes. The hypothesis of the study was that cartilage surrounding a focal cartilage lesion in the knee does not possess degenerative changes.

Methods

Twenty-eight consecutive patients included in a randomized controlled trial on cartilage repair were evaluated using MRI T2 mapping and dGEMRIC before cartilage treatment was initiated. Inclusion was based on disabling knee problems (Lysholm score of ≤ 75) due to an arthroscopically verified focal femoral condyle cartilage lesion. Furthermore, no major malalignments or knee ligament injuries were accepted. Mean patient age was 33 ± 9.6 years, and the mean duration of knee symptoms was 49 ± 60 months. The MRI T2 mapping and the dGEMRIC measurements were performed at three standardized regions of interest (ROIs) at the medial and lateral femoral condyle, avoiding the cartilage lesion

Results

The MRI T2 mapping of the cartilage did not demonstrate significant differences between condyles with or without cartilage lesions. The dGEMRIC results did not show significantly lower values of the affected condyle compared with the opposite condyle and the contra-lateral knee in any of the ROIs. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of the dGEMRIC readings was 0.882.

Conclusion

The MRI T2 mapping and the dGEMRIC confirmed the arthroscopic findings that normal articular cartilage surrounded the cartilage lesion, reflecting normal variation in articular cartilage quality.

Study identifier

NCT00885729, registered April 17 2009.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12891-016-0941-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Pre- and postcontrast T1 and T2 mapping of patellar cartilage in young adults with recurrent patellar dislocation

PURPOSE

To examine the cartilage quality in young adults with recurrent patellar dislocation in childhood using different magnetic resonance imaging parameters.

METHODS

Sixteen young adults with unilateral recurrent patellar dislocation were investigated ≥5 y (mean, 8.5 y) after the first dislocation. Pre- and postcontrast T1 and precontrast T2 relaxation times were analyzed in four superficial and four deep patellar cartilage regions of both knees. Two hours after intravenous injection of 0.2 mM/kg Gd-DTPA(2-), postcontrast T1 [T1(Gd)] and ΔR1 [1/T1 (precontrast) - 1/T1 (postcontrast)] were analyzed in the regions. Muscle performance and patient-reported outcome were evaluated.

RESULTS

When comparing the injured side with the noninjured side, differences were seen in the superficial half but not the deep half of the cartilage. T1(Gd) was shorter in the central part, whereas T2 was shorter in the periphery of the patellar cartilage (P < 0.05). ΔR1 demonstrated similar differences between healthy and diseased cartilage as T1(Gd) alone. The knee function was not correlated to the degenerative changes.

CONCLUSION

The short T1(Gd) centrally indicates degenerative cartilage changes consistent with loss of glycosaminoglycans. Precontrast and ΔR1 calculations may be excluded in clinical dGEMRIC, which simplifies the procedure. A decrease in T2 may be a very early sign of joint pathology but warrants further investigation.

Chondral Injury in Patellofemoral Instability

OBJECTIVE

Patellofemoral instability is common and affects a predominantly young age group. Chondral injury occurs in up to 95%, and includes osteochondral fractures and loose bodies acutely and secondary degenerative changes in recurrent cases. Biomechanical abnormalities, such as trochlear dysplasia, patella alta, and increased tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove distance, predispose to both recurrent dislocations and patellofemoral arthrosis.

DESIGN

In this article, we review the mechanisms of chondral injury in patellofemoral instability, diagnostic modalities, the distribution of lesions seen in acute and episodic dislocation, and treatments for articular cartilage lesions of the patellofemoral joint.

RESULTS

Little specific evidence exists for cartilage treatments in patellofemoral instability. In general, the results of reparative and restorative procedures in the patellofemoral joint are inferior to those observed in other compartments of the knee.

CONCLUSION

Given the increased severity of chondral lesions and progression to osteoarthritis seen with recurrent dislocations, careful consideration should be given to early stabilisation in patients with predisposing factors.

Using the dGEMRIC technique to evaluate cartilage health in the presence of surgical hardware at 3T: comparison of inversion recovery and saturation recovery approaches

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of metal artifact reduction techniques on dGEMRIC T(1) calculation with surgical hardware present.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We examined the effect of stainless-steel and titanium hardware on dGEMRIC T(1) maps. We tested two strategies to reduce metal artifact in dGEMRIC: (1) saturation recovery (SR) instead of inversion recovery (IR) and (2) applying the metal artifact reduction sequence (MARS), in a gadolinium-doped agarose gel phantom and in vivo with titanium hardware. T(1) maps were obtained using custom curve-fitting software and phantom ROIs were defined to compare conditions (metal, MARS, IR, SR).

RESULTS

A large area of artifact appeared in phantom IR images with metal when T(I) ≤ 700 ms. IR maps with metal had additional artifact both in vivo and in the phantom (shifted null points, increased mean T(1) (+151 % IR ROI(artifact)) and decreased mean inversion efficiency (f; 0.45 ROI(artifact), versus 2 for perfect inversion)) compared to the SR maps (ROI(artifact): +13 % T(1) SR, 0.95 versus 1 for perfect excitation), however, SR produced noisier T(1) maps than IR (phantom SNR: 118 SR, 212 IR). MARS subtly reduced the extent of artifact in the phantom (IR and SR).

CONCLUSIONS

dGEMRIC measurement in the presence of surgical hardware at 3T is possible with appropriately applied strategies. Measurements may work best in the presence of titanium and are severely limited with stainless steel. For regions near hardware where IR produces large artifacts making dGEMRIC analysis impossible, SR-MARS may allow dGEMRIC measurements. The position and size of the IR artifact is variable, and must be assessed for each implant/imaging set-up.

Knee cartilage assessment with MRI (dGEMRIC) and subjective knee function in ACL injured copers: a cohort study with a 20 year follow-up

OBJECTIVE

To assess knee cartilage quality and subjective knee function, 20 years after injury in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injured copers.

METHOD

We examined 32 knees using delayed gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of cartilage (dGEMRIC), 20 years after a complete ACL tear. Only subjects who had coped with the ACL injury without ACL reconstruction (ACLR), and who presented without radiographic signs of osteoarthritis (OA) at an earlier 16-year follow-up, were included in this study. The quality of the central weight-bearing parts of the medial and lateral femoral cartilage was estimated with dGEMRIC (T1Gd). These results were compared with corresponding results in 24 healthy individuals, and with the subjects' self-reported subjective knee function using the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) questionnaire.

RESULTS

The values of T1Gd in the medial and lateral femoral cartilage of the study group (mean (95% CI)), were 404 (385-423) and 427 (399-455) ms, not statistically different from those of the healthy reference group (P = 0.065 and 0.31). The subjective knee function 20 years after the injury, according to the five domains of the KOOS score, was good, with a mean score of 90 ± 11. Values of T1Gd for the medial femoral cartilage were correlated with the KOOS subgroup QOL (P = 0.021, Pearson correlation).

CONCLUSIONS

Subjects who have managed to cope with their ACL injury for 20 years with sustained good subjective knee function also seem to have knee cartilage of good quality, with T1Gd values not very different from a healthy reference group.

Magnetic resonance imaging and histology of ovine hip joint cartilage in two age populations: a sheep model with assumed healthy cartilage

OBJECTIVE

To compare morphologically normal appearing cartilage in two age groups with delayed gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of cartilage (dGEMRIC) and correlate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings with histology.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty femoral head specimens collected from ten lambs (group I) and ten young adult sheep (group II) underwent dGEMRIC and histological assessment. A region of 2 cm(2) with morphologically normal-appearing cartilage was marked with a surgical suture for subsequent matching of MRI and histological sections. The MRI protocol included a three-dimensional (3D) double-echo steady-state sequence for morphological cartilage assessment, a B1 pre-scan with various flip angles for B1 field heterogeneity correction, and 3D volumetric interpolated breathhold examination for T1(Gd) mapping (dGEMRIC). Histological analysis was performed according to the Mankin scoring system.

RESULTS

A total of 303 regions of interest (ROI; 101 MRI reformats matching 101 histological sections) was assessed. Twenty-six ROIs were excluded owing to morphologically apparent cartilage damage or insufficient MR image quality. Therefore, 277 ROIs were analyzed. Histological analyses revealed distinct degenerative changes in various cartilage samples of group II (young adult sheep). Corresponding T1(Gd) values were significantly lower in the group of sheep (mean T1(Gd) = 540.4 ms) compared with the group of lambs (mean T1(Gd) = 623.6 ms; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Although morphologically normal, distinct cartilage degeneration may be present in young adult sheep cartilage. dGEMRIC can reveal these changes and may be a tool for the assessment of early cartilage degeneration.

Probing articular cartilage damage and disease by quantitative magnetic resonance imaging

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a debilitating disease that reflects a complex interplay of biochemical, biomechanical, metabolic and genetic factors, which are often triggered by injury, and mediated by inflammation, catabolic cytokines and enzymes. An unmet clinical need is the lack of reliable methods that are able to probe the pathogenesis of early OA when disease-rectifying therapies may be most effective. Non-invasive quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (qMRI) techniques have shown potential for characterizing the structural, biochemical and mechanical changes that occur with cartilage degeneration. In this paper, we review the background in articular cartilage and OA as it pertains to conventional MRI and qMRI techniques. We then discuss how conventional MRI and qMRI techniques are used in clinical and research environments to evaluate biochemical and mechanical changes associated with degeneration. Some qMRI techniques allow for the use of relaxometry values as indirect biomarkers for cartilage components. Direct characterization of mechanical behaviour of cartilage is possible via other specialized qMRI techniques. The combination of these qMRI techniques has the potential to fully characterize the biochemical and biomechanical states that represent the initial changes associated with cartilage degeneration. Additionally, knowledge of in vivo cartilage biochemistry and mechanical behaviour in healthy subjects and across a spectrum of osteoarthritic patients could lead to improvements in the detection, management and treatment of OA.

In vivo comparison of delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of cartilage and delayed quantitative CT arthrography in imaging of articular cartilage

OBJECTIVE

To compare delayed gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of cartilage (dGEMRIC) and delayed quantitative computed tomography (CT) arthrography (dQCTA) to each other, and their association to arthroscopy. Additionally, the relationship between dGEMRIC with intravenous (dGEMRIC(IV)) and intra-articular contrast agent administration (dGEMRIC(IA)) was determined.

DESIGN

Eleven patients with knee pain were scanned at 3 T MRI and 64-slice CT before arthroscopy. dQCTA was performed at 5 and 45 min after intra-articular injection of ioxaglate. Both dGEMRIC(IV) and dGEMRIC(IA) were performed at 90 min after gadopentetate injection. dGEMRIC indices and change in relaxation rates (ΔR(1)) were separately calculated for dGEMRIC(IV) and dGEMRIC(IA). dGEMRIC and dQCTA parameters were calculated for predetermined sites at the knee joint that were International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) graded in arthroscopy.

RESULTS

dQCTA normalized with the contrast agent concentration in synovial fluid (SF) and dGEMRIC(IV) correlated significantly, whereas dGEMRIC(IA) correlated with the normalized dQCTA only when dGEMRIC(IA) was also normalized with the contrast agent concentration in SF. Correlation was strongest between normalized dQCTA at 45 min and ΔR(1,IV) (r(s) = 0.72 [95% CI 0.56-0.83], n = 49, P < 0.01) and ΔR(1,IA) normalized with ΔR(1) in SF (r(s) = 0.70 [0.53-0.82], n = 52, P < 0.01). Neither dGEMRIC nor dQCTA correlated with arthroscopic grading. dGEMRIC(IV) and non-normalized dGEMRIC(IA) were not related while ΔR(1,IV) correlated with normalized ΔR(1,IA) (r(s) = 0.52 [0.28-0.70], n = 50, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that dQCTA is in best agreement with dGEMRIC(IV) at 45 min after CT contrast agent injection. dQCTA and dGEMRIC were not related to arthroscopy, probably because the remaining cartilage is analysed in dGEMRIC and dQCTA, whereas in arthroscopy the absence of cartilage defines the grading. The findings indicate the importance to take into account the contrast agent concentration in SF in dQCTA and dGEMRIC(IA).

Sensitivity of magnetic resonance imaging for detection of patellofemoral articular cartilage defects

PURPOSE

Chondral defects within the patellofemoral compartment are common and lack the ability to heal on their own. Early detection of these lesions with a noninvasive modality would be beneficial in delaying or preventing their possible progression to osteoarthritis. We hypothesized that magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a sensitive, specific, and accurate imaging modality for the detection of patellofemoral chondral defects with substantial interobserver reliability and that MRI has a higher sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for detecting patellar defects than trochlear defects.

METHODS

A systematic review of multiple medical databases was performed by use of the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) protocol. Analysis of studies that reported diagnostic performance of MRI in the assessment of patellofemoral chondral defects (patella and trochlea), using arthroscopy as the reference gold standard, was performed. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and interobserver reliability were reported. Significant heterogeneity across studies precluded meta-analysis.

RESULTS

MRI was more sensitive in detection of patellar (87%) versus trochlear (72%) defects. MRI was similarly specific for patellar (86%) and trochlear (89%) defects. MRI was similarly accurate for patellar (84%) and trochlear (83%) defects. Interobserver agreement was substantial to almost perfect for both patellar and trochlear defects.

CONCLUSIONS

MRI is a highly sensitive, specific, and accurate noninvasive diagnostic modality for the detection of chondral defects in the patellofemoral compartment of the knee, using arthroscopy as the reference gold standard. Although there was wide variability in the statistical parameters assessed, MRI was more sensitive for detection of patellar versus trochlear defects and similarly specific and accurate for patellar and trochlear defects. Interobserver reliability is substantial to near perfect in the assessment of these lesions, without a significant difference between patellar and trochlear defects.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Use of MRI may allow early detection of chondral defects within the patellofemoral compartment, enabling clinicians to adopt strategies to delay or prevent progression to osteoarthritis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, systematic review of Level I, II, and III studies.

The use of delayed gadolinium enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of cartilage and T2 mapping to evaluate articular cartilage in the normal canine elbow

Commonly used diagnostic tools used to evaluate articular cartilage lack the sensitivity, specificity, and objectivity to measure early changes associated with osteoarthritis. Two techniques using magnetic resonance (MR) imaging have been developed to detect the biology of articular cartilage are delayed gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging of cartilage (dGEMRIC) and T2 mapping. Both techniques have been validated and are used to study the degenerative and adaptive nature of articular cartilage in people. The use of these techniques as a diagnostic tool in dogs has not been well described. We evaluated articular cartilage in the region of the medial coronoid process (MCP) of six healthy dogs free of detectable orthopedic disease using both MR imaging techniques. Histology and proteoglycan (PG) content of the MCP were used to confirm normal articular cartilage. All dogs had ground reaction forces consistent with normal function. Mean dGEMRIC index (T1 value) was 400 +/- 47 ms and mean T2 value was 56 +/- 8 ms. Intra- and interobserver variability was low. dGEMRIC and T2 values for normal cartilage in the elbow of the dog can be generated reproducibly using 3T MR imaging. Using these techniques as objective outcome measures for clinical studies in dogs with OA conditions should help delineate the efficacy of some disease interventions.

MR imaging of articular cartilage physiology

The newer magnetic resonance (MR) imaging methods can give insights into the initiation, progression, and eventual treatment of osteoarthritis. Sodium imaging is specific for changes in proteoglycan (PG) content without the need for an exogenous contrast agent. T1ρ imaging is sensitive to early PG depletion. Delayed gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging has high resolution and sensitivity. T2 mapping is straightforward and is sensitive to changes in collagen and water content. Ultrashort echo time MR imaging examines the osteochondral junction. Magnetization transfer provides improved contrast between cartilage and fluid. Diffusion-weighted imaging may be a valuable tool in postoperative imaging.

Longitudinal assessment of femoral knee cartilage quality using contrast enhanced MRI (dGEMRIC) in patients with anterior cruciate ligament injury--comparison with asymptomatic volunteers

OBJECTIVE

In this observational longitudinal study we estimate knee joint cartilage glycosaminoglycan (GAG) content, in patients with an acute anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury, with or without a concomitant meniscus injury.

METHODS

29 knees (19 men/10 women) were prospectively examined by repeat delayed gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of cartilage (dGEMRIC), approximately 3 weeks and 2.3±1.3 (range 4.5) years after the injury. We estimated the GAG content (T1Gd) in the central weight-bearing parts of the medial and lateral femoral cartilage and compared results with a reference cohort (n=24) with normal knees and no history of injury examined by dGEMRIC at one occasion previously.

RESULTS

The healthy reference group had longer T1Gd values compared with the ACL-injured patients at follow-up both medially: 428±38 vs 363±61ms (P<0.0001) and laterally: 445±41 vs 396±48ms (P=0.0002). At follow-up T1Gd was lower in meniscectomized patients compared to those without a meniscectomy, both medially (-84ms, P=0.002) and laterally (-38ms, P=0.05). In the injured group, the medial femoral cartilage showed similar T1Gd at the two dGEMRIC investigations: 357±50 vs 363±61ms (P=0.57), whereas the lateral femoral cartilage T1Gd increased: 374±48 vs 396±48ms (P=0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

The general decrease in cartilage T1Gd in ACL-injured patients compared with references provide evidence for structural matrix GAG changes that seem more pronounced if a concomitant meniscal injury is present. The fact that post-traumatic OA commonly develops in ACL-injured patients, in particularly those with meniscectomy, suggests that shorter T1Gd may be an early biomarker for OA.

The clinical utility and diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging for identification of early and advanced knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Current diagnostic strategies for detection of structural articular cartilage abnormalities, the earliest structural signs of osteoarthritis, often do not capture the condition until it is too far advanced for the most potential benefit of noninvasive interventions.

PURPOSE

To systematically review the literature relative to the following questions: (1) Is magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) a valid, sensitive, specific, accurate, and reliable instrument to identify knee articular cartilage abnormalities compared with arthroscopy? (2) Is MRI a sensitive tool that can be utilized to identify early cartilage degeneration?

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed in November 2010 using PubMed MEDLINE (from 1966), CINAHL (from 1982), SPORTDiscus (from 1985), SCOPUS (from 1996), and EMBASE (from 1974) databases.

RESULTS

Fourteen level I and 13 level II studies were identified that met inclusion criteria and provided information related to diagnostic performance of MRI compared with arthroscopic evaluation. The diagnostic performance of MRI demonstrated a large range of sensitivities, specificities, and accuracies. The sensitivity for identifying articular cartilage abnormalities in the knee joint was reported between 26% and 96%. Specificity and accuracy were reported between 50% and 100% and between 49% and 94%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for identifying early osteoarthritis were reported between 0% and 86%, 48% and 95%, and 5% and 94%, respectively. As a result of inconsistencies between imaging techniques and methodological shortcomings of many of the studies, a meta-analysis was not performed, and it was difficult to fully synthesize the information to state firm conclusions about the diagnostic performance of MRI.

CONCLUSION

There is evidence in some MRI protocols that MRI is a relatively valid, sensitive, specific, accurate, and reliable clinical tool for identifying articular cartilage degeneration. Because of heterogeneity of MRI sequences, it is not possible to make definitive conclusions regarding its global clinical utility for guiding diagnosis and treatment strategies.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Traumatic sports injuries to the knee may be significant precursor events to early onset of posttraumatic osteoarthritis. Magnetic resonance imaging may aid in early identification of structural injuries to articular cartilage as evidenced by articular cartilage degeneration grading.

Systematic review of the concurrent and predictive validity of MRI biomarkers in OA

OBJECTIVE

To summarize literature on the concurrent and predictive validity of MRI-based measures of osteoarthritis (OA) structural change.

METHODS

An online literature search was conducted of the OVID, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsychInfo and Cochrane databases of articles published up to the time of the search, April 2009. 1338 abstracts obtained with this search were preliminarily screened for relevance by two reviewers. Of these, 243 were selected for data extraction for this analysis on validity as well as separate reviews on discriminate validity and diagnostic performance. Of these 142 manuscripts included data pertinent to concurrent validity and 61 manuscripts for the predictive validity review. For this analysis we extracted data on criterion (concurrent and predictive) validity from both longitudinal and cross-sectional studies for all synovial joint tissues as it relates to MRI measurement in OA.

RESULTS

Concurrent validity of MRI in OA has been examined compared to symptoms, radiography, histology/pathology, arthroscopy, CT, and alignment. The relation of bone marrow lesions, synovitis and effusion to pain was moderate to strong. There was a weak or no relation of cartilage morphology or meniscal tears to pain. The relation of cartilage morphology to radiographic OA and radiographic joint space was inconsistent. There was a higher frequency of meniscal tears, synovitis and other features in persons with radiographic OA. The relation of cartilage to other constructs including histology and arthroscopy was stronger. Predictive validity of MRI in OA has been examined for ability to predict total knee replacement (TKR), change in symptoms, radiographic progression as well as MRI progression. Quantitative cartilage volume change and presence of cartilage defects or bone marrow lesions are potential predictors of TKR.

CONCLUSION

MRI has inherent strengths and unique advantages in its ability to visualize multiple individual tissue pathologies relating to pain and also predict clinical outcome. The complex disease of OA which involves an array of tissue abnormalities is best imaged using this imaging tool.

T1rho MRI quantification of arthroscopically confirmed cartilage degeneration

Nine asymptomatic subjects and six patients underwent T(1)rho MRI to determine whether Outerbridge grade 1 or 2 cartilage degeneration observed during arthroscopy could be detected noninvasively. MRI was performed 2-3 months postarthroscopy, using sagittal T(1)-weighted and axial and coronal T(1)rho MRI, from which spatial T(1)rho relaxation maps were calculated from segmented T(1)-weighted images. Median T(1)rho relaxation times of patients with arthroscopically documented cartilage degeneration and asymptomatic subjects were significantly different (P < 0.001), and median T(1)rho exceeded asymptomatic articular cartilage median T(1)rho by 2.5 to 9.2 ms. In eight observations of mild cartilage degeneration at arthroscopy (Outerbridge grades 1 and 2), mean compartment T(1)rho was elevated in five, but in all observations, large foci of increased T(1)rho were observed. It was determined that T(1)rho could detect some, but not all, Outerbridge grade 1 and 2 cartilage degeneration but that a larger patient population is needed to determine the sensitivity to these changes.

Suitability of T(1Gd) as the dGEMRIC index at 1.5T and 3.0T

Delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC) is based on the theory that Gd-DTPA(2-) will distribute in inverse relation to cartilage glycosaminoglycan (GAG). T(1Gd) (T(1) after penetration of a 0.2 mmol/kg dose of Gd-DTPA(2-)) has been used as the dGEMRIC index, although (1/T(1Gd)-1/T(1o)) should be more representative of Gd-DTPA(2-) concentration (where T(1o) = T(1) before contrast). T(1o) and T(1Gd) were measured in 20 volunteers at both 1.5T and 3T and the correlation between the metrics of T(1Gd) and (1/T(1Gd)-1/T(1o)) was calculated. There was a high correlation coefficient between the two metrics at both field strengths, with R = 0.94, 0.93, and 0.90 for central medial femur, posterior medial femur, and medial tibia, respectively, at 1.5T and 0.87, 0.94, 0.96 at 3T. In all cases P < 0.0001. Therefore, these data suggest that, for native cartilage, the current practice of measuring T(1Gd) (but not also T(1o)) is adequate at both 1.5T and 3T.

Imaging of knee osteoarthritis: data beyond the beauty

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

MRI has revolutionized osteoarthritis research by providing semi-quantitative and quantitative imaging endpoints on most articular tissues. With the first image data of the Osteoarthritis Initiative now becoming publicly available, this article reviews recent developments in quantitative imaging of osteoarthritis.

RECENT FINDINGS

Although radiography remains the standard for regulatory studies on disease modifying osteoarthritis drugs, there is no consensus on the optimal positioning and acquisition protocol. With MRI, semi-quantitative scoring systems for evaluation of multiple articular tissue changes have been developed and are currently investigated in the context of correlation with symptoms and of predicting structural progression of osteoarthritis. Most efforts on quantitative measurement of imaging endpoints have focused on cartilage morphology and composition, with higher field strength (3T), newer sequences, and new measurement endpoints being a driver of current innovation.

SUMMARY

The semi-quantitative and quantitative tools for analysis of articular structure are now available and permit comprehensive analysis of morphological and compositional tissue changes in osteoarthritis. These changes will need to be related to clinical outcomes (e.g. how a patient feels or functions) with current epidemiological studies, such as the Osteoarthritis Initiatives, providing the opportunity for clinical validation of these imaging biomarkers.

Delayed gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the meniscus: an index of meniscal tissue degeneration?

OBJECTIVE

Much attention has been focused recently on the need for a better understanding of the mechanisms and natural progression of knee osteoarthritis (OA), particularly in its early stages. One technique that has been used to investigate early OA is delayed gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of cartilage (dGEMRIC), where T1(Gd) (T1 value after penetration of the MRI contrast agent gadopentate dimeglumine [Gd-DTPA(2-)]) is used as an index of the molecular status of articular cartilage. The goal of this study was to explore T1(Gd) in the meniscus and its relationship with articular cartilage T1(Gd) in knee dGEMRIC image data sets.

METHODS

T1(Gd) maps of the meniscus and articular cartilage were made from knee dGEMRIC images obtained from prior studies of dGEMRIC of the knee in 21 asymptomatic subjects and 9 patients with self-reported OA.

RESULTS

T1(Gd) of the meniscus covered a range of values (247-515 msec) and patterns (homogeneous and focal variations). In addition, T1(Gd) of the meniscus correlated with that of articular cartilage (R = 0.38, P = 0.037; R = 0.57, P = 0.001 for correlations of the medial posterior meniscus with the medial femoral and tibial cartilage, respectively; T1[Gd] of the anterior meniscus and lateral compartments also correlated, with R > 0.38 and P < 0.037), potentially demonstrating parallel degradative processes in the knee.

CONCLUSION

While the biophysical basis for the T1(Gd) results relative to meniscus molecular structure needs investigation, these findings introduce a potential means of examining the time course of meniscal tissue change in the development and progression of arthritis.