Functional outcome following reconstruction in chronic multiple ligament deficient knees

Diagnosis and treatment strategies of the multiligament injured knee: a scoping review

OBJECTIVE

To map the current literature evaluating the diagnosis and treatment of multiligament knee injuries (MLKIs).

DESIGN

Scoping review.

DATA SOURCES

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews and Arksey and O'Malley frameworks were followed. A three-step search strategy identified relevant published literature comprising studies reporting on at least one aspect in the diagnosis or treatment of MLKI in adults. Data were synthesised to form a descriptive analysis and thematic summary.

RESULTS

Overall, 417 studies were included. There was a substantial chronological increase in the number of studies published per year, with 70% published in the last 12 years. Of included studies, 128 (31%) were narrative reviews, editorials or technical notes with no original data. The majority of studies (n=239, 57%) originated from the USA; only 4 studies (1%) were of level I evidence. Consistent themes of contention included clinical assessment, imaging, operative strategy, timing of surgery and rehabilitation. There was a lack of gender and ethnic diversity reported within patient groups.

CONCLUSIONS

There remains insufficient high-level evidence to support definitive management strategies for MLKI. There is considerable heterogeneity in outcome reporting in current MLKI literature, precluding robust comparison, interpretation and pooling of data. Further research priorities include the development of expert consensus relating to the investigation, surgical management and rehabilitation of MLKI. There is a need for minimum reporting standards for clinical studies evaluating MLKI.

The Functional Outcomes of Delayed Surgical Reconstruction in Nonsport-Induced Multiligament Knee Injuries: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Multiligament knee injuries (MLKIs) are among the most detrimental injuries, which can cause significant compromise of joint stability and function. Our aim was to investigate the functional outcomes of nonsport-induced MLKIs who presented late after injury and underwent delayed arthroscopic reconstruction. In a retrospective cohort of 18 MLKI patients (19 knees, January 2012-2018) who had undergone arthroscopic reconstruction, we assessed the knee range of motion, return to work/sport, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index, Lysholm, and Tegner scores. The preoperative scores were retrieved from the patients' registry database. We reviewed their surgical notes and extracted the operation data, including the damaged ligaments, stages of the surgery, and associated meniscal injury. There were 14 males and 4 females with a mean age of 30.57 ± 10.31 years. The mean time from injury to surgery was 17.31 ± 11.98 months. The most common injury was anterior cruciate ligament/posterior cruciate ligament (31.6%). The mechanisms of injury were motor vehicle accidents (72.2%), falls (22.2%), and sports (5.6%). The reconstruction was either single (61.2%) or multiple stage (38.8%). The pre- and postoperative scores were 45.31 ± 7.30 versus 79.16 ± 11.86 IKDC, 3.84 ± 1.26 versus 8.37 ± 1.16 Tegner, and 60.42 ± 7.68 versus 89.42 ± 8.81 Lysholm, respectively. All the scores showed significant improvement at mean follow-up of 24.05 ± 9.55 months (p < 0.001). In conclusion, delayed arthroscopic reconstruction of MLKIs significantly improved the functional outcomes and return to work in patients presenting late to the orthopaedic clinic. There was no relationship between the demographic variables, mechanism of injury, number of injured ligaments, and the stages of surgery and the functional outcomes in this group of patients.

Postoperative Rehabilitation and Return to Sport Following Multiligament Knee Reconstruction

Multiligament knee injuries (MLKIs) are debilitating injuries that increasingly occur in young athletes. Return to sport (RTS) has historically been considered unlikely due to the severity of these injuries. Reporting in the literature regarding objective outcomes following MLKI, including RTS, is lacking, as are clear protocols for both rehabilitation progressions and RTS testing. RTS following MLKI is a complex process that requires an extended recovery duration compared to other surgery types. Progressions through postoperative rehabilitation and RTS should be thoughtful, gradual, and criterion based. After effective anatomic reconstruction to restore joint stability, objective measures of recovery including range of motion, strength, movement quality, power, and overall conditioning guide decision-making throughout the recovery process. It is important to frame the recovery process of the athlete in the context of the severity of their injury, as it is typically slower and less linear. Improved reporting on objective outcomes will enhance our understanding of recovery expectations within this population by highlighting persistent deficits that may interfere with a full recovery, including RTS.

Acute Versus Delayed Surgical Intervention in Multiligament Knee Injuries: A Systematic Review

Background:

The optimal timing of surgical intervention for multiligament knee injuries remains controversial.

Purpose:

To review the clinical and functional outcomes after acute and delayed surgical intervention for multiligament knee injuries.

Study Design:

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods:

We performed a search of the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases from inception to September 2020. Eligible studies reported on knee dislocations, multiligament knee injuries, or bicruciate ligament injuries in adult patients (age, ≥18 years). In addition to comparing outcomes between acute and delayed surgical intervention groups, we conducted 3 subgroup analyses for outcomes within isolated knee injuries, knee injuries with concomitant polytrauma/fractures, and high-level (level 2) studies.

Results:

Included in the analysis were 31 studies, designated as evidence level 2 (n = 3), level 3 (n = 8), and level 4 (n = 20). These studies reported on 2594 multiligament knee injuries sustained by 2585 patients (mean age, 25.1-65.3 years; mean follow-up, 12-157.2 months). At the latest follow-up timepoint, the mean Lysholm (n = 375), International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) (n = 286), and Tegner (n = 129) scores for the acute surgical intervention group were 73.60, 67.61, and 5.06, respectively. For the delayed surgical intervention group, the mean Lysholm (n = 196), IKDC (n = 172), and Tegner (n = 74) scores were 85.23, 72.32, and 4.85, respectively. The mean Lysholm (n = 323), IKDC (n = 236), and Tegner (n = 143) scores for our isolated subgroup were 83.7, 74.8, and 5.0, respectively. By comparison, the mean Lysholm (n = 270), IKDC (n = 236), and Tegner (n = 206) scores for the polytrauma/fractures subgroup were 83.3, 64.5, and 5.0, respectively.

Conclusion:

The results of our systematic review did not elucidate whether acute or delayed surgical intervention produced superior clinical and functional outcomes. Although previous evidence has supported acute surgical intervention, future prospective randomized controlled trials and matched cohort studies must be completed to confirm these findings.

MRI of Traumatic Knee Dislocation: A Study to Evaluate Safety and Image Quality for Patients with Knee-Spanning Stabilization Devices

This study evaluated safety and image quality of MRI exams performed for patients with traumatic knee dislocations in knee-spanning stabilization devices. It is an IRB-approved retrospective design with waived informed consent that included 63 patients with traumatic knee dislocation. 56 patients had metallic external fixators, and 7 patients had non-metallic knee immobilizers. 7 patients had bilateral dislocations yielding a total of 70 knee MRIs. 1.5 Tesla MRI exams were performed for all patients who were awake and alert at the time of imaging. All knee-spanning external fixators were considered "MR conditional" by the FDA. The electronic medical record was reviewed for notes from the technologist and nursing staff documenting any patient complaints or adverse events during the MRI exam as required by departmental protocol. Qualitative analysis of the six most frequently performed sequences were independently conducted by 2 musculoskeletal radiologists using a 5-point Likert scale. Overall image quality and select time intervals between the two groups were compared using an independent sample t test and the Mann-Whitney U test, respectively. No adverse events were reported for a 40-minute average estimated patient scan time with the stabilization devices in the MR gantry. Mean values of Likert scale scores were generated from two readers' data for comparison between the external fixation and the immobilizer groups. Most knee MRI exams with external fixators were within diagnostic quality despite artifacts (grade 3). MRI exams generally were of higher diagnostic quality in the immobilizer group than the external fixator group (p < 0.05). The external fixator models included DePuy Synthes, Smith and Nephew, Stryker Hoffman III, Zimmer FastFrame, and Zimmer XtraFix. MRI examinations in patients with external fixators for traumatic knee dislocations can be safely performed under certain conditions and provide diagnostic quality images.

Clinical outcome after knee ligament reconstruction with tendon allografts

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to investigate the clinical outcome for patients after knee ligament reconstructions with allografts at a university hospital.

METHODS

A total of 33 patients received allografts for reconstructive knee surgery between 2007 and 2017. The follow up evaluation consisted of a clinical knee examination including evaluation of range of motion (ROM), lateral and medial laxity, the Lachman test, the Pivot shift test, the sag test, the posterior drawer test and checking for patellofemoral pain. The following patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were used; the Lysholm Function Score, the Tegner activity score, and the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS).

RESULTS

Twenty-one (64%) patients were available for the follow-up evaluation and the mean follow-up time was 4.8 years. A total of 16 out of 21 patients had multiligament injuries of which the ACL was the ligament most frequently ruptured. At the time of follow-up, 14 out of 16 patients (87%) with ACL injury had Lachman test grade 0 or grade 1 + , and 12 out of 13 (92%) had a pivot shift grade 0 or 1 + . The mean Lysholm Score was 74. All mean KOOS subscale values were ≥ 59 at the follow-up. The preoperative Tegner activity score was 3 (range, 1-6) and 4 (range, 2-6) at follow up. There were no deep postoperative infections. A total of 19 out of 21 patients (90%) reported that they would have undergone surgery again had they known the clinical outcome in advance.

CONCLUSIONS

The patients improved from the preoperative score to the follow-up score in the knee-related Quality of Life (QoL) KOOS subscale. None of the patients were diagnosed with deep postoperative infections.

A systematic review comparing the results of early vs delayed ligament surgeries in single anterior cruciate ligament and multiligament knee injuries

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcomes and incidence of concomitant injuries in patients undergoing early vs delayed surgical treatment of single anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury and multiligament knee injury (MLKI).

METHODS

A literature search using PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health, and Scopus from their inception to April 30, 2020 was conducted. Studies with levels I to IV evidence reporting the incidence of meniscus or cartilage injury according to early vs delayed surgery in single ACL injuries and MLKIs were included. In the meta-analysis, data based on the number of meniscus and cartilage injuries were extracted and pooled. Lysholm and Tegner scores were analyzed using two-sample Z-tests to calculate the non-weighted mean difference (NMD). A meta-regression analysis was also performed to determine the effect of single ACL injury and MLKI/study design.

RESULTS

Sixteen studies on single ACL injury and 14 studies on MLKI were included in this analysis. In the analysis, there were significant decreases in Lysholm score (NMD - 5.3 [95% confidence interval (CI) - 7.37 to - 3.23]) and Tegner score (NMD - 0.25 [95% CI - 0.45 to - 0.05]) and increases in risk of meniscus tear (odds ratio [OR] 1.73 [95% CI 1.1-2.73], p = 0.01) and cartilage injury (OR 2.48 [95% CI 1.46-4.2], p = 0.0007) in the delayed surgery group regardless of single ACL injury or MLKI. The result of the meta-regression analysis indicated that single ACL injury and MLKI/study design were not significant moderators of overall heterogeneity (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that delayed ACL surgery significantly resulted in a higher risk of meniscus tear and cartilage injury and decreased Lysholm and Tegner scores compared to early ACL surgery. The Lysholm scores in the delayed MLKI surgery group were significantly decreased, but the risks of meniscus tear and cartilage injury in the delayed MLKI surgery group remained unclear.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, meta-analysis.

Outcomes of one-stage reconstruction for chronic multiligament injuries of knee

PURPOSE

This article aims to evaluate patterns of chronic multiligament injuries and outcomes of treatment with single-stage reconstruction using autografts.

METHODS

All patients with clinicoradiologically diagnosed multiligament knee injury (MKI) were included in this prospective observational study. As the time since injury was more than 6 weeks in all of the patients, they were categorized as having chronic MKI. Patients were assessed clinically for laxity, and the diagnosis was confirmed radiologically. Ipsilateral hamstring tendons were used for medial collateral ligament (MCL) or posterolateral corner reconstruction in a patient with Schenck knee dislocation (KD) type III. In these cases, the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) were reconstructed by using the peroneus longus and contralateral hamstring tendons respectively. Ipsilateral hamstring tendons were used for ACL reconstruction and an ipsilateral peroneus longus tendon graft was used for reconstruction of the PCL in a KD type II injury. In two cases of KD type IV injury, the lateral laxity was only grade II and was managed conservatively; the rest of the ligaments were addressed like a KD type III injury. Outcome evaluation was done using a visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Lysholm score, and Tegner activity level, preoperatively and postoperatively at 2 years' follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 27 patients of mean age 33.48 ± 9.9 years with MKI were included in the study. The patients were classified as eight KD type II, 17 KD type III, and two KD type IV. The majority of the patients had associated meniscal (59.2%) or chondral (40.7%) injuries. At the 2 years' follow-up visit, there were significant improvements in VAS score (p = 0.0001) IKDC score (p = 0.0001), Lysholm score (p = 0.0001), and range of motion (p = 0.001). None of the patients had residual laxity on clinical examination of the knee joint at the 2 years' follow-up. All but two of the patients went back to their previous activity level. These two patients had progressive knee arthritis and needed knee arthroplasty.

CONCLUSION

Single-stage surgical reconstruction for chronic MKI has favourable functional outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, case series.

Pattern of multiligament knee injuries and their outcomes in a single stage reconstruction: Experience at a tertiary orthopedic care centre

INTRODUCTION

Multi-ligamentous knee injuries (MLKI) are rare orthopedic injuries with diverse approaches to its management protocol. The purpose of this study was to determine the epidemiology of MLKI in our centre and its outcome in single stage reconstruction.

METHODS

60 patients who were surgically treated for MLKI between 2014 and 2018 were included in this study, data was collected pre and postoperatively and their Lysholm and IKDC scores were used to evaluate the outcomes.

RESULTS

A male predominance was noted in the present study. Road traffic accidents (RTA) were the most common mode of injury (66.7%). ACL & MCL combination constituted the most common injury pattern (36.7%). 41.7% of our patients were treated within 3 weeks from injury and 58.3% were treated 3 weeks after injury and there was no statistically significant difference in their outcomes with a p value > 0.05 for their post op Lysholm scores and post op IKDC scores. Overall, there was a statistically significant difference in outcomes post surgery with regards to pre-operative and post-operative Lysholm and IKDC scores in our patients with a p value < 0.0001, substantiating the need for surgical management of MLKI. With a mean post-operative Lysholm score of 89.11 and mean post operative IKDC score of 85.25, this study showed functionally good results in the patients treated in a single sitting. 28 of 60 patients could get back to their sports activities after atleast 6 months of rehabilitation.

CONCLUSION

MLKI are relatively uncommon injuries eluding a large scale prospective clinical studies and consensus regarding its management. In the present study, a male predominance was noted, high velocity injuries like RTA was the most common mechanism of injury. A combination of ACL & MCL accounted for the most common pattern of injury. We could also conclude that surgical management yields good results irrespective of the time since injury i.e. either early (<3 weeks) or delayed (>3 weeks) surgery. Single stage surgical management of MLKI produce considerably better outcomes compared to staged management. It was also found that surgical management of MLKI with reconstruction could help patients to return to their pre operative level of sports activities with a proper rehabilitation protocol.

Long-term clinical and radiological outcomes after multiligament knee injury using a delayed ligament reconstruction approach: A single-center experience

PURPOSE

To present long-term clinical and radiological results of patients treated with delayed reconstruction of multiligament knee injuries.

METHODS

Clinical data from 26 patients (21 men, five women, mean age 27.44 years) were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were evaluated at final follow-up with the use of: The International Knee Documentation Committee score (IKDC), Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Tegner Activity level, Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale, EuroQol subjective knee evaluation form, and KT-2000 arthrometer. Mean follow-up time was 105.38 months. Both knees were radiographically evaluated for osteoarthritis according to the Kellgren-Lawrence classification.

RESULTS

No patient required mobilization under anesthesia for adhesion lysis at the immediate or later postoperative duration. There was no statistically significant difference in range of motion between the healthy and operated sides (P = 0.713). Mean time to final range of motion regain was 2.1 ± 0.4 months. Average KT-2000 side-to-side (operated vs. normal) difference was 2.03 ± 1.1 mm, and the difference was statistically significant (P = 0.007). The mean IKDC, KOOS, Lysholm, Tegner, and Euroqol-5D postoperative scores were 82.13 ± 17.5, 84.59 ± 16.8, 90.6 ± 6.4, 4.3 ± 1.3, and 80 ± 11.74, respectively. Multiple regression analysis showed that age and follow-up time had significant effects on each clinical score, except for the Lysholm and Tegner scores. Progression of osteoarthritic changes of the reconstructed knee and its contralateral side was significantly different (P = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

Excellent clinical results were reported from this center's long-term experience with delayed ligament reconstruction, and osteoarthritic changes of reconstructed knees were recorded.

Multiligamentous Knee Injuries in the Military Tactical Athlete

Multiligament knee injuries pose a significant challenge to military service members looking to return to active duty service. They represent a diverse injury pattern and recovery is often complicated by other ipsilateral extremity trauma and systemic injuries. There is a paucity of high-quality evidence guiding the treatment of these injuries. Despite this, orthopedic surgeons are tasked with a young, active, high demand population looking to maximize their recovery after these complex injuries. We present a synthesis of the available civilian and military literature and provide an evidence-based review with considerations specific to a military population.

Factors predictive of poorer outcomes in the surgical repair of multiligament knee injuries

PURPOSE

To investigate the influence of injury and treatment factors on clinical/functional outcomes in multiligament knee injuries (MLKI).

METHODS

Thirty-nine consecutive patients with confirmed and surgically treated MLKI who met inclusion criteria were scheduled for a follow-up visit to obtain: SF-12 and subjective feeling of normalcy between the operated and healthy knee, and IKDC, active range of motion (ROM), and stability exam (Lachman test, posterior drawer, and dial test at 30°). A chart review was used to obtain data on injury and treatment factors.

RESULTS

The postoperative mean (SD) outcomes were: IKDC score 62.7 (25.9), flexion-extension ROM 125° (29°), and percentage of normalcy 74% (20%). The postoperative normal/nearly normal stability exam was: Lachman test 36 (95%) patients, posterior drawer at 90° 38 (97%) patients, and dial test of 39 (100%) patients. There were 24 (61.5%) and 23 (59%) patients with complications and reoperations, respectively. The presence of bicruciate injuries was associated with worse Lachman (p = 0.03) and posterior drawer tests (p = 0.03). Presence of injury to meniscal structures was associated with worse Lachman test (p = 0.03), lower percentage of normalcy (p = 0.02) and extension lag (p = 0.04). Injury to cartilage structures was associated with worse IKDC scores (p = 0.04). IKDC was lower in cases of posterolateral corner reconstruction (p = 0.03) and use of allograft tendons for reconstruction (p = 0.02); ROM was lower in allograft reconstruction (p = 0.02) and need for meniscal repair (p = 0.01). Bicruciate reconstruction led to worst posterior drawer test (p = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

The outcomes of MLKI might be negatively influenced by bicruciate ligament, meniscal, and cartilage injuries; with regards to treatment characteristics, need for posterolateral corner or bicruciate ligament reconstruction, use of allografts, or need for meniscal repair may similarly diminish outcomes. While surgical treatment provides good overall function, ROM and stability, it rarely results in a "normal" knee and the chances of complications and reoperations are high.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Cross-sectional comparative study, Level III.

Early surgery of multiligament knee injuries may yield better results than delayed surgery: a systematic review

Importance

Multiligament knee injuries are rare, but can lead to significant functional limitations. Surgery has been shown to improve outcomes, however, there remains considerable debate regarding the optimal timing of surgery.

Objective

We aimed to determine whether early surgery in the setting of a multiligamentous knee injury was associated with superior functional outcomes when compared with surgery on a delayed basis.

Evidence review

A comprehensive literature search of the MEDLINE, EMBASE and PubMed databases was conducted up to March 2018. We identified studies with a sample size greater than 10 that included subjects with an injury to at least two of the four major knee ligaments and compared outcomes between early and delayed surgery. We assessed the methodological quality of each included study using the Newstead-Ottawa Scale.

Findings

We identified 11 eligible studies, including a total of 320 patients (195 early and 125 delayed). The mean time to surgery among patients treated early was 11.2 days in comparison to 294.8 days for the delayed group. Early surgery was found to have a statistically significantly higher Lysholm score (p<0.0001) and Meyers rating (p=0.02) when compared with delayed surgery. No statistically significant differences in International Knee Documentation Committee, Tegner Activity Scale, total arc of motion, loss of extension or loss of flexion were demonstrated between early and delayed surgery. Early surgery was noted to have a statistically significantly higher odds of requiring a manipulation under anaesthesia or arthrolysis (p=0.04), however, subsequent subgroup analysis showed no difference between early and delayed surgery when only studies employing an early range of motion protocol were pooled.

Conclusions and relevance

Based on the current body of literature, which primarily consists of level IV evidence, early surgery in the setting of multiligament knee injury may provide better functional outcomes without compromising range of motion when using early postoperative mobilisation protocols. Further studies of higher quality are required to corroborate these findings.

Level of evidence

Level IV, systematic review.

Practice Guidelines for the Management of Multiligamentous Injuries of the Knee

BACKGROUND

Multiligamentous injuries of knee remain a gray area as far as guidelines for management are concerned due to absence of large-scale, prospective controlled trials. This article reviews the recent evidence-based literature and trends in treatment of multiligamentous injuries and establishes the needful protocol, keeping in view the current concepts.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two reviewers individually assessed the available data indexed on PubMed and Medline and compiled data on incidence, surgical versus nonsurgical treatment, timing of surgery, and repair versus reconstruction of multiligamentous injury.

RESULTS

Evolving trends do not clearly describe treatment, but most studies have shown increasing inclination toward an early, staged/single surgical procedure for multiligamentous injuries involving cruciate and collateral ligaments. Medial complex injuries have shown better results with conservative treatment with surgical reconstruction of concomitant injuries.

CONCLUSION

Multiligamentous injury still remains a gray area due to unavailability of a formal guideline to treatment in the absence of large-scale, blinded prospective controlled trials. Any in multiligamentous injuries any intervention needs to be individualized by the presence of any life- or limb-threatening complication. The risks and guarded prognosis with both surgical and non-surgical modalities of treatment should be explained to patient and relations.

The timing of surgical treatment of knee dislocations: a systematic review

PURPOSE

Traumatic knee dislocations (KDs) are unusual yet limb-threatening injuries; the timing of surgical intervention is still debated. A systematic review was performed to determine the optimal timing of surgery with respect to injury pattern.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was performed for studies published between 1 January 1974 and 20 April 2014 on the surgical management of "knee dislocation" and "multiligament knee injuries". Surgical timing was classified as acute, chronic, or staged. A systematic review was performed for patients with KD-III according to Schenck's classification using individual patient data.

RESULTS

Twelve studies including 150 patients (153 knees) with KDs fulfilled the study requirements. Sixty-nine cases with KD-IIIM and 84 cases with KD-IIIL were identified. Excellent or good results were demonstrated in 79.1 % (34 cases) of cases managed with staged treatment versus 58.4 % (45 cases) of cases undergoing acute surgery (p = 0.02), and versus 45.5 % (15 cases) of cases undergoing chronic surgery (p = 0.002). No statistically significant difference was found in the percentage of excellent or good results between the acute and chronic surgery groups (n.s.), or between the KD-IIIM and KD-IIIL groups (n.s.).

CONCLUSION

Staged treatment yields the best clinical results for patients with KD-III. No statistically significant difference was shown in the clinical results between acute surgery and chronic surgery groups.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Tendon Graft Healing in Multiligament Reconstructed Knee Detected by FDG-PET/CT: A Pilot Study

Background and Aims:

The detection of graft viability is challenging in the multiligament reconstructed knee. Magnetic resonance imaging gives structural information but lacks the capability to assess biological activity of the grafts. 18F-labeled fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography combined with computer tomography is shown to be a sensitive method for imaging tissue metabolism and viability. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the feasibility of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography combined with computer tomography imaging in the detection of the replacement graft metabolism in multiligament reconstructed knees.

Materials and Methods:

Seven patients (17–44 years) with multiligament reconstructed knee underwent fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography combined with computer tomography to evaluate the biological activity of replacement grafts. The degree of fluorodeoxyglucose uptake reported as standard uptake values from the region of interest was analyzed 3–24 months postoperatively.

Results:

In all patients, the fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography combined with computer tomography showed increased fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in all replacement grafts at different follow-up time points. Furthermore, fluorodeoxyglucose was higher at femoral condyles of operated knees compared to contralateral reference values.

Conclusion:

This pilot study shows a significant increase in tendon graft metabolism during two first years of postoperative healing. The fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography combined with computer tomography imaging seems to be adequate method of assessment of graft metabolism and viability during postoperative healing. The clinical value of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography combined with computer tomography imaging, however, warrants further evaluation with longitudinal studies with a larger patient population.

Surgical management of combined anterior or posterior cruciate ligament and posterolateral corner tears: for what functional results?

INTRODUCTION

Management of combined anterior or posterior cruciate ligament and posterolateral corner tears is still poorly codified. The aim of this study was to evaluate functional outcome after complete surgical treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective multicenter study included 53 patients. Mean age was 29.8 yrs. (15-49). The anterior and posterior cruciate ligaments were involved in respectively 48 and 5 cases. Mean time to surgery was 25.6 months (0-184), and in 10 cases less than 21 days. Nine patients were sedentary workers and 29 non-sedentary (13 laborers). All ligament injuries were treated surgically. Mean follow-up was 49 months (12-146). Last follow-up assessment used IKDC, Lysholm and KOOS scores.

RESULTS

At last follow-up, IKDC score graded 14 patients A, 25 B, 8 C and 6 D, versus 0 A, 4 B, 25 C, 22 D and 2 ungraded preoperatively. Mean subjective IKDC and Lysholm scores were respectively 72.8 (11.5-100) and 77.5 (37-100). Mean KOOS scores (pain, symptoms, daily life, sports, quality of life) were respectively 78 (3-100), 70 (25-100), 88 (47-100), 53 (0-100) and 50 (0-100). Posterolateral laxity was corrected in all but two cases. All sedentary workers and 86.7% of non-sedentary workers could return to work. The job had to be changed in 10% of cases overall, but in 25% of cases for laborers.

DISCUSSION

The present results are comparable with those of the literature. The strategy of combined surgical treatment showed functional efficacy, usually associated with return to work except for some laborers. There was a non-significant trend in favor of acute-phase ligament reconstruction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV (retrospective series).

Primary ligament sutures as a treatment option of knee dislocations: a meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Treatment of knee dislocation is still controversial. There is no evidence to favour ligament suture or reconstruction. Until now, no meta-analyses have examined suture versus reconstruction of cruciate ligaments in knee dislocations with respect to injury pattern and rupture classification.

METHODS

We searched Medline, the Cochrane Controlled Trial Database, and EMBASE for studies on surgical treatment for 'knee dislocation' and 'multiple ligament injured knee'. A meta-analysis was performed using individual patient data.

RESULTS

Nine studies including 195 patients (200 knees) with a mean age of 31.4 (±13) years fulfilled the study requirements. Thirteen cases of type II dislocations, 63 cases of type III medial, 84 cases of type III lateral, and 40 cases of type IV dislocations, according to Schenck's classification, were found. Poor or moderate results were found in 70 % of patients without surgical treatment of ACL or PCL (n = 27). Patients (n = 40) treated by sutures of the ACL and PCL demonstrated a significantly greater proportion of excellent or good results (40 and 37.5 %, respectively) (p < 0.001). Patients who underwent reconstruction of the ACL and PCL (n = 75) showed excellent or good results (28 and 45 %, respectively). No significant difference was found when comparing suture versus reconstruction of the ACL and PCL (n.s.). The outcome depends considerably on Schenck's injury pattern classification.

CONCLUSION

Conservative treatment after knee dislocation yields poor clinical results. Suture repair of cruciate ligaments can still serve as an alternative option for multiligament injuries of the knee and achieve good clinical results, which are comparable to those of ligament reconstruction. The data provided by this meta-analysis should be reinforced by a prospective study, in which suture repair and ligament reconstruction are compared.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Diagnosis and management of the multiligament-injured knee

Knee injuries involving multiple ligaments, which are often associated with tibiofemoral joint dislocations, are complex injuries that are challenging to evaluate and treat. The clinician must have a thorough understanding of knee anatomy and be capable of a detailed physical examination to determine the extent and pattern of injury. Accurate interpretation of imaging studies is crucial but cannot replace the physical examination. The magnitude of deforming forces and amount of translation and rotation of the tibia in relation to the femur determine the risk for neurovascular injury. Most patients with multiligament knee injuries undergo surgical management; however, some patients may be best served by a nonoperative approach. Successful rehabilitation consists of achieving good range of motion and strength, as well as normal gait mechanics, while respecting the stages of healing.

Outcome of surgical treatment of arthrofibrosis following ligament reconstruction

PURPOSE

Clinical outcome following surgical treatment and intensive physiotherapy was evaluated in patients with arthrofibrosis as a complication to varying knee-ligament reconstructions.

METHODS

From 2003 to 2007, 31 patients underwent surgery for arthrofibrosis as a postoperative complication following knee-ligament reconstruction. Treatment for reduced range of motion consisted of forced manipulation or arthroscopic arthrolysis followed by intensive physiotherapy. Twenty-seven patients (12 men and 15 women; median age 35(12-70) years) were followed up. Objective examination, Pain, KOOS and Tegner scores were used to evaluate the clinical outcome at follow-up.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients were treated with forced manipulation alone, and the remaining thirteen were treated with forced manipulation and arthroscopic arthrolysis. The patients' median follow-up was 51 months (19-73 months). Median interval between primary surgery and surgical release was 4 (1-32) months. Median range of motion (ROM) improved from -0°(0 to 20) to 0°(+2-9) in extension deficit and from 90°(40-145) to 130°(90-155) in flexion. Mean KOOS score were symptoms 63, pain 72, ADL 77, sport 42, QOL 45. Median Tegner score was 4 (2-9).

CONCLUSION

Surgical arthrolysis combined with intensive physiotherapy improved range of motion to nearly normal values. Subjective outcome scores revealed relatively poor outcome levels compared to uncomplicated knee-ligament reconstruction. Predictors of poor outcome were global arthrofibrosis and greater than 6-month time interval from primary reconstruction and surgical release.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Retrospective clinical case series, Level IV.

Decision making in the multiligament-injured knee: an evidence-based systematic review

PURPOSE

The purpose of this systematic review was to address the treatment of multiligament knee injuries, specifically (1) surgical versus nonoperative treatment, (2) repair versus reconstruction of injured ligamentous structures, and (3) early versus late surgery of damaged ligaments.

METHODS

Two independent reviewers performed a search on PubMed from 1966 to August 2007 using the terms "knee dislocation," "multiple ligament-injured knee," and "multiligament knee reconstruction." Study inclusion criteria were (1) levels I to IV evidence, (2) "multiligament" defined as disruption of at least 2 of the 4 major knee ligaments, (3) measures of functional and clinical outcome, and (4) minimum of 12 months' follow-up, with a mean of at least 24 months.

RESULTS

Four studies compared surgical treatment with nonoperative treatment. There was a higher percentage of excellent/good International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores (58% v 20%) in surgically treated patients, as well as higher rates for return to work (72% v 52%) and return to full sport (29% v 10%). Two studies compared repair with reconstruction of damaged structures, with similar mean Lysholm scores (88 v 87) and excellent/good IKDC scores (51% v 48%). However, repair of the posterolateral corner had a higher failure rate (37% v 9%). Similarly, repair of the cruciates yielded decreased stability and range of motion and a lower return to preinjury activity levels (0% v 33%). There were 5 studies comparing early surgery (<or=3 weeks) with late surgery. Early treatment resulted in higher mean Lysholm scores (90 v 82) and a higher percentage of excellent/good IKDC scores (47% v 31%), as well as higher sports activity scores (89 v 69) on the Knee Outcome Survey.

CONCLUSIONS

Our review suggests that early operative treatment of the multiligament-injured knee yields improved functional and clinical outcomes compared with nonoperative management or delayed surgery. Repair of the posterolateral corner may yield higher revision rates compared with reconstruction.

Self-reported activity level and knee function in amateur football players: the influence of age, gender, history of knee injury and level of competition

The aim of this study is to investigate if self-reported activity level or knee functions are influenced by subject characteristics, level of competition and history of knee injury. Cross-Sectional study using questionnaires distributed at a personal visit. One hundred and eighty-eight (65 women) amateur football players in 10 football clubs from each division below national level participated in the study. Self-reported Tegner Activity Scale, and the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) are the main outcome measures. Older age, female gender and lower level of competition (football division) were independently associated with lower self-reported Tegner Activity Scale (P < 0.001). Subjects reporting history of knee injury had significantly worse KOOS scores (P < 0.001 for all subscales). In future studies, a clear description of how the Tegner Activity Scale was administered is recommended. We suggest that self-reported Tegner Activity Scale scores should be adjusted for age, gender and level of competition. In amateur football players, KOOS scores do not need adjustment for age and gender.

Análise da capacidade funcional de indivíduos submetidos a tratamento cirúrgico após fratura do planalto tibial

As fraturas articulares são consideradas graves e ocasionam incapacidade, principalmente quando atingem uma articulação de carga, como o joelho. É necessário tratamento imediato a fim de obter estabilização dos fragmentos, evitando complicações secundárias. O objetivo do presente estudo foi analisar a capacidade funcional, durante as atividades de vida diária, de indivíduos que sofreram fraturas do planalto tibial e foram submetidos a tratamento cirúrgico entre os anos de 2002 a 2005. Foram analisados 20 pacientes com a aplicação do questionário ADLS (Activities of Daily Living Scale). Concluímos que 85% dos indivíduos apresentaram capacidade funcional próximo ao normal, de acordo com a pontuação estabelecida pela escala utilizada.