Arthroscopic removal of an intramedullary nail in the humerus

Outcomes of Mini-Invasive Arthroscopic Arthrolysis Combined with Locking Screw and/or Intramedullary Nail Extraction after Osteosynthesis of the Proximal Humerus Fracture

Data on the effectiveness of arthroscopic arthrolysis and extraction of osteosynthetic material after osteosynthesis of the proximal humerus in patients with persisting problems are rare and insufficient. In this study, we performed arthroscopic arthrolysis and extraction of fixation screws, and, where protruding, extraction of the nail in 34 patients with problems persisting 12 months after osteosynthesis of the proximal humerus using an intramedullary nail. The effectiveness of the treatment was assessed using the Constant-Murley shoulder score and forward flexion difference between the treated arm and the contralateral one. A median increase of 16 points in CMS score and 30 degrees reduction in the arm forward flexion difference was recorded 12 months after the arthroscopy. The improvement was significantly higher in the patient group with intramedullary nail extraction (however, this group had worse pre-operative values and the screw was only extracted where likely to cause problems). The median time to heal was 11 weeks; no serious peri- or post-procedural complications occurred. Mini-invasive arthroscopic arthrolysis combined with extraction of osteosynthetic material proved to be a safe and effective method for treatment of patients after osteosynthesis of the proximal humerus using an intramedullary nail with persisting pain and/or mobility limitation.

Arthroscopic intramedullary nailing of humeral fractures through the rotator interval

INTRODUCTION

Antegrade nailing of humeral fractures is a proven technique with well-documented results. The standard surgical approach requires incision of the supraspinatus tendon to insert a nail, which comes with the risk of damaging the rotator cuff. The aims of this study were to describe a new surgical technique for arthroscopic humeral nailing that does not require opening the rotator cuff and to report the clinical and radiological outcomes of this technique.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a single center, retrospective study of patients who had a humeral shaft or surgical neck fracture at our hospital in 2017 and underwent antegrade intramedullary nailing by arthroscopy. The nail was introduced through the rotator interval without opening the rotator cuff. All were reviewed at 1-year postoperative: clinical examination (joint range of motion and Constant score) plus AP and lateral radiographs of the shoulder.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients (12 women, 6 men) with a mean age of 65.4 years (37-84) were included retrospectively. One patient died during the follow-up period thus 17 patients were available for analysis. At the 1-year follow-up, the mean forward flexion was 152.1° (90-180), the mean external rotation was 56.1° (30-80), the mean absolute Constant score was 73.9 (54-88) points and the mean adjusted Constant score was 93.5 (67-100) points. Bone union was achieved in 16/17 patients (94%) with 1 patient experiencing a nonunion. There were no complications.

CONCLUSION

Arthroscopic antegrade nailing of humeral shaft and surgical neck fractures through the rotator interval yields good clinical and radiological results in our hands. This new, rotator cuff-sparing technique is a viable option for treating humeral fractures by arthroscopy.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV; retrospective study without control group.

Arthroscopy-assisted versus standard intramedullary nail fixation in diaphyseal fractures of the humerus

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to assess applicability of arthroscopic technique in intramedullary nail fixation of humerus shaft fractures and to compare with conventional nailing in terms of its effects on perioperative and postoperative intra-articular complication rates as well as on clinical and functional outcomes.

METHODS

This prospective randomized controlled clinical trial included 40 patients (12 females and 28 males) indicated for surgery between either undergo arthroscopy-assisted (Arthroscopy-assisted intramedullary nailing [AIMN]; n = 20) or conventional (Intramedullary nailing [IMN]; n = 20) anterograde intramedullary nailing. Two groups were compared in terms of mean number of fluoroscopic shootings until the guide wire was inserted, time for union, length of hospital stay, and complication rates. Shoulder functions were assessed by Constant and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score.

RESULTS

Groups did not significantly differ in terms of age, gender, and mechanism of injury, length of hospital stay, union rate, and mean union time ( p > 0.05). Mean ASES and Constant scores were found to be statistically significantly higher in AIMN group than that in IMN group ( p = 0.000 and p = 0.002, respectively). Mean number of fluoroscopic shootings until the guide wire was inserted was 2.15 in AIMN group, which was significantly lower compared to 4.2 of IMN group ( p = 0.000).

CONCLUSIONS

Arthroscopy-assisted technique may be an applicable and safe method owing to its cosmetic advantages and more satisfactory postoperative shoulder functions subsequent to less injury to deltoid, rotator cuff, and other soft tissue, as compared to conventional anterograde approach.

A novel implant removal technique by endoscopy

BACKGROUND

Routine implant removal after fracture healing remains controversial. However, it has been suggested that implant removal should be performed in cases of joint impingement, painful scar adhesion, and implant malposition. Entrance selection is relatively critical in patients with poor soft tissue conditions or sloughing coverage. We propose an innovative technique using endoscopy.

METHODS

Consecutive surgeries of endoscopic implant removal performed between 2005 and 2016 by a single experienced arthroscopic surgeon were included. Overall, 73 patients were enrolled; 44 were not eligible for inclusion and were excluded from the study.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine patients, including 32 surgical sites, were included. Twenty-four plates and 166 screws were removed using this technique. There were five complications during the follow-up period (range, 0.5 to 104 months; mean, 8.8), including one broken screw, one persistent knee joint contracture, and three wound dehiscence. There were no infections or neurovascular injuries.

CONCLUSION

Implant removal using endoscopy is a minimally invasive surgery that ensures that the screw axis does not strip, and treats the intra-articular pathology concomitantly. This innovative technique may be considered as an alternative to the traditional open method in cases with good surgical indications.

Failure and revision rates of proximal humeral fracture treatment with the use of a standardized treatment algorithm at a level-1 trauma center

BACKGROUND

The aims of this study were to evaluate treatment failure and revision rates of proximal humeral fracture (PHF) treatment with a standardized treatment algorithm within the reality of a level-1 trauma center and to identify predictors of subsequent surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The medical database of a level-1 trauma center was screened for all primary treatments of PHFs between January 2009 and June 2012. Medical records and imaging were analyzed to identify the fracture morphology, pre-existing diseases, revision surgeries and treatment failures (conversion to another treatment). The patients were asked about subsequent surgeries by phone. A functional outcome questionnaire was mailed to participating patients.

RESULTS

Follow-up data were available for 423 of 521 patients (312 females, 111 males). The mean age at the time of primary treatment was 68.3 years; mean follow-up was 24.6 ± 12.3 months. The overall rate of mandatory re-operations was 15.6%, including a failure rate of 8.3%; another 7.6% of patients had additional arthroscopic surgeries. Treatment with anatomic hemi-prostheses was associated with the highest re-operation rates, and lowest outcomes. Involvement of the medial calcar region, complex fracture morphologies, cigarette smoking and alcohol-abuse were predictors for subsequent surgery. Patients without subsequent surgery had significantly higher functional outcome scores than patients with additional surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

With the use of a standardized treatment algorithm no treatment modality was at significantly higher risk for having additional surgery. Complex fracture types, involvement of the medial calcar, cigarette-smoking and alcohol-abuse were associated with subsequent surgeries.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV case series.

Shoulder arthroscopy combined to hardware removal in proximal humeral fractures: a series of 58 cases with a mean follow-up of 2 years

BACKGROUND

Proximal humerus fractures are common injuries. Locking plates and anterograde medullary nails are the two most common fixation devices used when open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) is indicated. Complications related to fracture and to hardware are numerous, especially shoulder stiffness. The goal of this study is to report the clinical outcomes of gleno-humeral arthroscopic arthrolysis combined with hardware removal.

METHODS

A total of 58 patients (25 men, 33 women) with a mean age of 58 years (24-79) were reviewed retrospectively. Forty of them were active workers (5 heavy workers), and 18 were retired. A total of 24 fractures were reported after sport accident, 26 after domestic accident, and 8 after high energy trauma. Thirty-four patients with 3 or 4 part fractures (fracture through the anatomic neck and tuberosities), 20 patients with two part (displaced surgical neck) fracture and 4 cases of fracture of the tuberosities were operated. We combined a gleno-humeral arthrolysis by arthroscopy and a removal of the hardware using the previous incision for the plate or by arthroscopy for the nail.

RESULTS

The average follow-up was 23 months (range 6-60). Pain in Constant Murley score (CS) increased from 7.3 ± 3.8 points preoperatively to 13 ± 2.76 points post-operatively (p < 0.05). CS increased from 36.8 ± 12.25 points to 68.45 ± 15.24 points. Subjective shoulder value (SSV) score increased from 45.8 ± 16.6 to 78.23 ± 14.74. A gain in all active range of motion was reported (forward flexion: 37.6°, abduction: 39.5°, external rotation: 24.3°, internal rotation: from L5-S1 to T12-L1).

CONCLUSIONS

Gleno-humeral arthrolysis by arthroscopy combined with hardware removal after proximal humerus ORIF in one step is safe and beneficial for post-traumatic stiffness of the shoulder. It provides significant pain relief and increase of range of motion and allows to treat associated articular pathology.

Lack of fifth anchoring point and violation of the insertion of the rotator cuff during antegrade humeral nailing: pitfalls in straight antegrade humeral nailing

Antegrade nailing of proximal humeral fractures using a straight nail can damage the bony insertion of the supraspinatus tendon and may lead to varus failure of the construct. In order to establish the ideal anatomical landmarks for insertion of the nail and their clinical relevance we analysed CT scans of bilateral proximal humeri in 200 patients (mean age 45.1 years (sd 19.6; 18 to 97) without humeral fractures. The entry point of the nail was defined by the point of intersection of the anteroposterior and lateral vertical axes with the cortex of the humeral head. The critical point was defined as the intersection of the sagittal axis with the medial limit of the insertion of the supraspinatus tendon on the greater tuberosity. The region of interest, i.e. the biggest entry hole that would not encroach on the insertion of the supraspinatus tendon, was calculated setting a 3 mm minimal distance from the critical point. This identified that 38.5% of the humeral heads were categorised as 'critical types', due to morphology in which the predicted offset of the entry point would encroach on the insertion of the supraspinatus tendon that may damage the tendon and reduce the stability of fixation. We therefore emphasise the need for 'fastidious' pre-operative planning to minimise this risk.

The feasibility and results of an arthroscopic removal of humeral locking plates and glenohumeral arthrolysis after proximal humeral fractures

PURPOSE

This study describes the use of standard shoulder arthroscopy techniques to remove a proximal humerus locking plate following proximal humerus fracture. The goal of this study was to assess the feasibility and results of this technique.

METHODS

This was a retrospective non-comparative study. Inclusion criteria were fracture union when hardware was removed, significant residual glenohumeral stiffness after 6 months of physiotherapy, arthrogenic screw(s) and/or osteonecrosis (partial or complete) of the humeral head resulting in significant pain.

RESULTS

Eleven patients were included in this study. Surgery was successful in all cases, and surgery lasted a mean of 105 ± 10.5 min. Patients' mean age was 54.6 ± 10.6 years and the mean hospital stay 1.6 ± 0.8 days. No patient was lost to follow-up. At the mean last follow-up of 17.7 ± 23.4 months, pain and all functional parameters improved significantly: the Constant score (43.4 ± 8.8 vs 60.5 ± 0.3, p = 0.003), the visual analogue pain score (4.7 ± 1.5 vs 2.8 ± 2.3, p = 0.012), the shoulder abduction (77.7 ± 18.6 vs 104.5 ± 27.3, p = 0.004), the flexion (85.9 ± 30.7 vs 97.7 ± 27.7, p = 0.026) and the external rotation (15 ± 12 vs 31.8 ± 13.6, p = 0.004). Internal rotation improved from L3 to T12. All seven patients who practiced sports before the initial fracture had returned to sports approximately 6 months postoperatively. No infections or wound dehiscence occurred.

CONCLUSION

Shoulder arthroscopy was found to be feasible for removal of hardware following proximal humeral fracture and can be associated with diagnostic and therapeutic arthroscopy and glenohumeral arthrolysis if required.

All-arthroscopic intramedullary nailing of 2- and 3-part proximal humeral fractures: a new arthroscopic technique and preliminary results

PURPOSE

The most criticism of antegrade humeral nailing is the potentially deleterious effect on the shoulder function, which is caused by the trauma to the M. supraspinatus (SSP) at the nail insertion site. We describe a new technique of all-arthroscopical intramedullary nailing, which preserves the rotator cuff, and compare it with the conventional open procedure.

METHODS

From 11/2009 to 12/2010 82 patients with unstable, displaced proximal humeral fractures were treated surgically. Twenty-one of these patients received an intramedullary nailing. Sixteen of 21 met the inclusion criteria. Based on the surgeon's arthroscopic experience, patients were assigned to the arthroscopic (group I, n = 8) or open group (group II, n = 8). Both groups were compared due to the replacement results, complications, time of surgery and fluoroscopy. Concomitant intraarticular pathologies were assessed (group I). First clinical results after a median follow-up of 13 months (group I) and 14 months (group II) were reported.

RESULTS

Between group I and II, no significant differences were seen in patients age [77 years (range 45-90 years) vs. 76 years (range 65-92 years)], gender (6 female/2 male vs. 5 female/3 male) and fracture pattern (six 2-/two 3-part fractures vs. five 2-/three 3-part fractures). The reduction was evaluated by the caput-diaphysis-angle, which was median 137° (range 120-147°) in group I and 132° (range 120-158°) in group II (p = 0.959). Postoperatively, group I showed one varus-, group II two varus- and valgus deformities. Median time of surgery was 75 min (range 45-182 min) versus 70 min (range 40-146 min) (p = 0.442), fluoroscopy time 1.5 min (range, 0.6-3.7 min) versus 1.2 min (range 0.3-2.2 min) in group I and II (p = 0.336). Concomitant pathologies like one traumatic bicipital tendon-lesion and three partial lesions of the SSP were observed and treated in group I. Constant Scores and Visual Analogue Scale did not differ significantly between both groups at the time of follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

All-arthroscopical humeral nailing is possible, preserves the rotator cuff and provides equal replacement and functional results like the open technique. An arthroscopically visualized optimal nail insertion point provides less frequent head deformities. Level of evidence Level III.

[Technique and value of arthroscopic implant removal in the shoulder]

Arthroscopic implant removal involves innovative minimally invasive surgical techniques which offer the advantages of minimally invasive surgery in addition to the possibility of glenohumeral inspection, arthrolysis and treatment of concomitant intraarticular pathologies compared to open surgical procedures. In the following article the surgical techniques and significance of arthroscopic implant removal from the shoulder joint will be described. The first results of a complete arthroscopic plate removal from the humeral head will be described. Compared to the open technique, greater satisfaction of the patients, more rapid pain relief and improvement of the shoulder function in the early postoperative time could be observed. During the follow-up interval the results of the two techniques converge.